Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (18): 40-46.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0406
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Yanlan1(), LI Chengchun2, JIANG Xintong3, ZHANG Na4, HU Xinzhou1, GAO Yuxi2, LIU Jianjian1, LUO Bin3, LI Xiang1, FANG Xiaodong5, YANG Jincheng1(
)
Received:
2024-06-27
Revised:
2024-09-15
Online:
2025-06-25
Published:
2025-07-06
LI Yanlan, LI Chengchun, JIANG Xintong, ZHANG Na, HU Xinzhou, GAO Yuxi, LIU Jianjian, LUO Bin, LI Xiang, FANG Xiaodong, YANG Jincheng. Analysis on Yield and Stability of New Fresh Broad Bean Varieties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 40-46.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0406
地点 | 品种 | 株高/cm | 单株实荚数/荚 | 单荚粒数/粒 | 百荚鲜重/kg | 百粒鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | V1 | 88.40 | 11.82 | 2.92 | 0.71 | 251 |
V2 | 92.90 | 8.23 | 2.49 | 0.63 | 243 | |
V3 | 91.70 | 8.93 | 2.32 | 0.53 | 237 | |
V4 | 83.40 | 11.58 | 2.78 | 0.64 | 243 | |
V5 | 76.10 | 9.30 | 2.81 | 0.65 | 240 | |
V6 | 93.40 | 9.67 | 2.54 | 0.54 | 223 | |
V7 | 88.60 | 11.07 | 2.63 | 0.63 | 250 | |
V8 | 73.80 | 7.58 | 2.35 | 0.57 | 253 | |
E2 | V1 | 69.70 | 25.00 | 1.78 | 0.93 | 230 |
V2 | 82.60 | 26.70 | 1.90 | 0.87 | 246 | |
V3 | 100.60 | 21.35 | 1.87 | 0.73 | 187.5 | |
V4 | 83.50 | 24.80 | 1.98 | 0.88 | 206 | |
V5 | 84.80 | 11.50 | 2.62 | 1.26 | 207 | |
V6 | 86.90 | 21.00 | 2.15 | 0.94 | 187 | |
V7 | 89.50 | 24.85 | 1.89 | 0.83 | 254 | |
V8 | 85.10 | 16.30 | 1.76 | 0.85 | 246 | |
E3 | V1 | 105.67 | 60.67 | 1.91 | 1.15 | 280 |
V2 | 144.67 | 33.33 | 2.23 | 1.05 | 225 | |
V3 | 159.33 | 59.67 | 2.27 | 1.09 | 220 | |
V4 | 144.33 | 73.67 | 2.41 | 1.10 | 210 | |
V5 | 154.00 | 27.33 | 3.14 | 1.74 | 255 | |
V6 | 158.67 | 56.67 | 2.41 | 1.21 | 225 | |
V7 | 145.00 | 31.33 | 2.24 | 1.27 | 240 | |
V8 | 144.00 | 45.67 | 2.30 | 1.28 | 250 |
地点 | 品种 | 株高/cm | 单株实荚数/荚 | 单荚粒数/粒 | 百荚鲜重/kg | 百粒鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | V1 | 88.40 | 11.82 | 2.92 | 0.71 | 251 |
V2 | 92.90 | 8.23 | 2.49 | 0.63 | 243 | |
V3 | 91.70 | 8.93 | 2.32 | 0.53 | 237 | |
V4 | 83.40 | 11.58 | 2.78 | 0.64 | 243 | |
V5 | 76.10 | 9.30 | 2.81 | 0.65 | 240 | |
V6 | 93.40 | 9.67 | 2.54 | 0.54 | 223 | |
V7 | 88.60 | 11.07 | 2.63 | 0.63 | 250 | |
V8 | 73.80 | 7.58 | 2.35 | 0.57 | 253 | |
E2 | V1 | 69.70 | 25.00 | 1.78 | 0.93 | 230 |
V2 | 82.60 | 26.70 | 1.90 | 0.87 | 246 | |
V3 | 100.60 | 21.35 | 1.87 | 0.73 | 187.5 | |
V4 | 83.50 | 24.80 | 1.98 | 0.88 | 206 | |
V5 | 84.80 | 11.50 | 2.62 | 1.26 | 207 | |
V6 | 86.90 | 21.00 | 2.15 | 0.94 | 187 | |
V7 | 89.50 | 24.85 | 1.89 | 0.83 | 254 | |
V8 | 85.10 | 16.30 | 1.76 | 0.85 | 246 | |
E3 | V1 | 105.67 | 60.67 | 1.91 | 1.15 | 280 |
V2 | 144.67 | 33.33 | 2.23 | 1.05 | 225 | |
V3 | 159.33 | 59.67 | 2.27 | 1.09 | 220 | |
V4 | 144.33 | 73.67 | 2.41 | 1.10 | 210 | |
V5 | 154.00 | 27.33 | 3.14 | 1.74 | 255 | |
V6 | 158.67 | 56.67 | 2.41 | 1.21 | 225 | |
V7 | 145.00 | 31.33 | 2.24 | 1.27 | 240 | |
V8 | 144.00 | 45.67 | 2.30 | 1.28 | 250 |
地点 | 各品种鲜荚小区产量(小区面积20 m2)/kg | 单产/(t/hm2) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
区组 | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | V7 | V8 | Te | Xe1 | ||
E1 | Ⅰ | 24.58 | 15.03 | 14.29 | 23.97 | 18.2 | 16.89 | 22.34 | 13.23 | 148.53 | 18.71 | 9.36 b B |
Ⅱ | 25.77 | 17.63 | 15.22 | 24.57 | 20.45 | 15.95 | 22.63 | 12.13 | 154.35 | |||
Ⅲ | 26.56 | 16.29 | 14.36 | 23.32 | 17.2 | 13.82 | 22.98 | 11.68 | 146.21 | |||
E2 | Ⅰ | 32.88 | 33.23 | 22.97 | 29.72 | 23.82 | 28.24 | 31.98 | 28.14 | 230.98 | 24.11 | 12.06 b B |
Ⅱ | 20.5 | 19.16 | 17.47 | 24.32 | 23.62 | 24.7 | 27.18 | 18.38 | 175.33 | |||
Ⅲ | 23.62 | 25.18 | 12.54 | 24.03 | 15.18 | 15.42 | 26.51 | 29.87 | 172.35 | |||
E3 | Ⅰ | 111.26 | 71.07 | 132.26 | 116.07 | 116.75 | 116.31 | 157.98 | 85.83 | 907.53 | 104.32 | 52.16 a A |
Ⅱ | 98.98 | 81.31 | 119.4 | 122.65 | 101.38 | 74.29 | 136.43 | 89.17 | 823.61 | |||
Ⅲ | 91.94 | 116.71 | 88.79 | 91.62 | 107.36 | 108.21 | 93.98 | 73.98 | 772.59 | |||
x | 25.34 abc AB | 21.98 bc B | 24.30 abc AB | 26.68 ab AB | 24.67 abc AB | 22.99 bc AB | 30.11 a A | 20.13 c B |
地点 | 各品种鲜荚小区产量(小区面积20 m2)/kg | 单产/(t/hm2) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
区组 | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | V7 | V8 | Te | Xe1 | ||
E1 | Ⅰ | 24.58 | 15.03 | 14.29 | 23.97 | 18.2 | 16.89 | 22.34 | 13.23 | 148.53 | 18.71 | 9.36 b B |
Ⅱ | 25.77 | 17.63 | 15.22 | 24.57 | 20.45 | 15.95 | 22.63 | 12.13 | 154.35 | |||
Ⅲ | 26.56 | 16.29 | 14.36 | 23.32 | 17.2 | 13.82 | 22.98 | 11.68 | 146.21 | |||
E2 | Ⅰ | 32.88 | 33.23 | 22.97 | 29.72 | 23.82 | 28.24 | 31.98 | 28.14 | 230.98 | 24.11 | 12.06 b B |
Ⅱ | 20.5 | 19.16 | 17.47 | 24.32 | 23.62 | 24.7 | 27.18 | 18.38 | 175.33 | |||
Ⅲ | 23.62 | 25.18 | 12.54 | 24.03 | 15.18 | 15.42 | 26.51 | 29.87 | 172.35 | |||
E3 | Ⅰ | 111.26 | 71.07 | 132.26 | 116.07 | 116.75 | 116.31 | 157.98 | 85.83 | 907.53 | 104.32 | 52.16 a A |
Ⅱ | 98.98 | 81.31 | 119.4 | 122.65 | 101.38 | 74.29 | 136.43 | 89.17 | 823.61 | |||
Ⅲ | 91.94 | 116.71 | 88.79 | 91.62 | 107.36 | 108.21 | 93.98 | 73.98 | 772.59 | |||
x | 25.34 abc AB | 21.98 bc B | 24.30 abc AB | 26.68 ab AB | 24.67 abc AB | 22.99 bc AB | 30.11 a A | 20.13 c B |
分析方法 | 变异来源 | df | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方差分析 | 地点内区组 | 6 | 1437.63 | 239.61 | 1.90 | 2.32 | 3.27 |
地点 | 2 | 110336.51 | 55168.25 | 437.02** | 3.22 | 5.15 | |
品种 | 7 | 2329.85 | 332.84 | 2.64* | 2.24 | 3.1 | |
品种×地点 | 14 | 3958.76 | 249.96 | 1.96* | 1.94 | 2.54 | |
试验误差 | 42 | 5301.91 | 126.24 | ||||
总的 | 71 | 122234.39 | |||||
AMMI分析 | IPCA1 | 8 | 2681.50 | 335.19 | 2.39* | 2.17 | 2.97 |
残差 | 6 | 146.99 | 24.50 |
分析方法 | 变异来源 | df | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
方差分析 | 地点内区组 | 6 | 1437.63 | 239.61 | 1.90 | 2.32 | 3.27 |
地点 | 2 | 110336.51 | 55168.25 | 437.02** | 3.22 | 5.15 | |
品种 | 7 | 2329.85 | 332.84 | 2.64* | 2.24 | 3.1 | |
品种×地点 | 14 | 3958.76 | 249.96 | 1.96* | 1.94 | 2.54 | |
试验误差 | 42 | 5301.91 | 126.24 | ||||
总的 | 71 | 122234.39 | |||||
AMMI分析 | IPCA1 | 8 | 2681.50 | 335.19 | 2.39* | 2.17 | 2.97 |
残差 | 6 | 146.99 | 24.50 |
品种×地点平均产量两向列表 | 品种×地点互作效应两向列表 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 | E1 | E2 | E3 | E. | E1 | E2 | E3 | E. | |
V1 | 25.64 | 25.67 | 100.73 | 50.68 | 5.30 | -0.07 | -5.22 | 1.63 | |
V2 | 16.32 | 25.86 | 89.70 | 43.96 | 2.70 | 6.84 | -9.53 | -5.09 | |
V3 | 14.62 | 17.66 | 113.48 | 48.59 | -3.63 | -5.99 | 9.62 | -0.46 | |
V4 | 23.95 | 26.02 | 110.11 | 53.36 | 0.93 | -2.40 | 1.48 | 4.32 | |
V5 | 18.62 | 20.87 | 108.50 | 49.33 | -0.38 | -3.52 | 3.89 | 0.28 | |
V6 | 15.55 | 22.79 | 99.60 | 45.98 | -0.09 | 1.74 | -1.65 | -3.07 | |
V7 | 22.65 | 28.56 | 129.46 | 60.22 | -7.24 | -6.73 | 13.97 | 11.17 | |
V8 | 12.35 | 25.46 | 82.99 | 40.27 | 2.42 | 10.13 | -12.55 | -8.78 | |
V. | 18.71 | 24.11 | 104.32 | 49.05 | -30.34 | -24.94 | 55.27 |
品种×地点平均产量两向列表 | 品种×地点互作效应两向列表 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
品种 | E1 | E2 | E3 | E. | E1 | E2 | E3 | E. | |
V1 | 25.64 | 25.67 | 100.73 | 50.68 | 5.30 | -0.07 | -5.22 | 1.63 | |
V2 | 16.32 | 25.86 | 89.70 | 43.96 | 2.70 | 6.84 | -9.53 | -5.09 | |
V3 | 14.62 | 17.66 | 113.48 | 48.59 | -3.63 | -5.99 | 9.62 | -0.46 | |
V4 | 23.95 | 26.02 | 110.11 | 53.36 | 0.93 | -2.40 | 1.48 | 4.32 | |
V5 | 18.62 | 20.87 | 108.50 | 49.33 | -0.38 | -3.52 | 3.89 | 0.28 | |
V6 | 15.55 | 22.79 | 99.60 | 45.98 | -0.09 | 1.74 | -1.65 | -3.07 | |
V7 | 22.65 | 28.56 | 129.46 | 60.22 | -7.24 | -6.73 | 13.97 | 11.17 | |
V8 | 12.35 | 25.46 | 82.99 | 40.27 | 2.42 | 10.13 | -12.55 | -8.78 | |
V. | 18.71 | 24.11 | 104.32 | 49.05 | -30.34 | -24.94 | 55.27 |
品种 | 品种名称 | 丰产性参数 | 稳定性参数 | 回归系数b | 回归方程 | 适应地区 | 综合评价 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 | 效应 | 方差 | 变异度 | |||||||
V7 | 玉豆3号 | 60.22 | 11.17 | 146.36 | 20.09 | 1.25 | y7=-1.1936+1.25217x | E3 | 好 | |
V4 | 云豆早16 | 53.36 | 4.32 | 4.41 | 3.93 | 1.02 | y4= 3.1050 +1.02467x | E1-E3 | 好 | |
V1 | 云豆早6 | 50.68 | 1.63 | 27.67 | 10.38 | 0.90 | y1= 6.4037 +0.90264x | E1-E3 | 较好 | |
V5 | 云豆2883 | 49.33 | 0.28 | 13.84 | 7.54 | 1.07 | y5=-3.0734+1.06838x | E1-E3 | 较好 | |
V3 | 云豆早8 | 48.59 | -0.46 | 70.81 | 17.32 | 1.17 | y3=-8.9015+1.17212x | E3 | 较差 | |
V6 | 云豆663 | 45.98 | -3.07 | 2.89 | 3.70 | 0.97 | y6=-1.6592+0.97129x | E1-E3 | 一般 | |
V2 | 云豆早7 | 43.96 | -5.09 | 72.46 | 19.36 | 0.83 | y2= 3.2222 +0.83050x | E2 | 较差 | |
V8 | 云豆147 | 40.27 | -8.78 | 132.98 | 28.64 | 0.78 | y8=2.0968 +0.77823x | E2 | 不好 |
品种 | 品种名称 | 丰产性参数 | 稳定性参数 | 回归系数b | 回归方程 | 适应地区 | 综合评价 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量 | 效应 | 方差 | 变异度 | |||||||
V7 | 玉豆3号 | 60.22 | 11.17 | 146.36 | 20.09 | 1.25 | y7=-1.1936+1.25217x | E3 | 好 | |
V4 | 云豆早16 | 53.36 | 4.32 | 4.41 | 3.93 | 1.02 | y4= 3.1050 +1.02467x | E1-E3 | 好 | |
V1 | 云豆早6 | 50.68 | 1.63 | 27.67 | 10.38 | 0.90 | y1= 6.4037 +0.90264x | E1-E3 | 较好 | |
V5 | 云豆2883 | 49.33 | 0.28 | 13.84 | 7.54 | 1.07 | y5=-3.0734+1.06838x | E1-E3 | 较好 | |
V3 | 云豆早8 | 48.59 | -0.46 | 70.81 | 17.32 | 1.17 | y3=-8.9015+1.17212x | E3 | 较差 | |
V6 | 云豆663 | 45.98 | -3.07 | 2.89 | 3.70 | 0.97 | y6=-1.6592+0.97129x | E1-E3 | 一般 | |
V2 | 云豆早7 | 43.96 | -5.09 | 72.46 | 19.36 | 0.83 | y2= 3.2222 +0.83050x | E2 | 较差 | |
V8 | 云豆147 | 40.27 | -8.78 | 132.98 | 28.64 | 0.78 | y8=2.0968 +0.77823x | E2 | 不好 |
[1] |
郑卓杰. 中国食用豆类学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版, 1997:141-166.
|
[2] |
吕春雨, 廖芳丽, 陈宏伟, 等. 41份非洲地区和我国湖北蚕豆种质资源产量性状的鉴定与评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(12):2356-2363.
|
[3] |
马钰. 蚕豆SSR标记的开发及遗传连锁图谱的构建[D]. 北京: 北京农业科学院, 2012.
|
[4] |
缪士毅. 立夏时节蚕豆鲜[J]. 养生月刊, 2020, 41(6):74-75.
|
[5] |
刘玉佼, 郭兴莲, 袁名宜, 等. 青海省蚕豆产业持续高效发展的问题探讨[J]. 青海农业科技, 2002(2):18-20.
|
[6] |
何海琼. 蚕豆高产种植技术及管理[J]. 南方农机, 2017, 48(10):128.
|
[7] |
于海天, 王丽萍, 吕梅媛, 等. 早熟鲜食秋蚕豆主要农艺性状与鲜食产量相关及通径分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(4):711-717.
|
[8] |
庄应强, 屠娟丽, 费伟英, 等. 不同鲜食蚕豆品种产量性状及营养成分比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(32):52-54.
|
[9] |
缪亚梅, 王学军, 陈满峰, 等. 鲜食蚕豆主要农艺性状的遗传变异相关性和主成分分析[J]. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(10):95-97.
|
[10] |
朱正梅, 吕学高, 石丽敏, 等. 我国鲜食蚕豆育种概况[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2020, 7:14-16.
|
[11] |
刘彩琴, 漆文选. 青豆(菜用鲜食春蚕豆)优质生产——主要病虫害症状识别及绿色防控技术[J]. 蔬菜, 2022, 1:46-49.
|
[12] |
陆陈红, 吴树娟, 谢松花, 等. 鲜食蚕豆病虫草发生规律与防治技术探讨[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2022, 43(2):18-22.
|
[13] |
李波, 石晓旭, 刘建, 等. 不同种植方式对鲜食蚕豆产量及生长的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(12):73-77.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2020-0113 |
[14] |
杨翔平. 品种“丰产性”概念及其在区域试验中的分析[J]. 种子, 1983(3):46-49.
|
[15] |
杨久, 卢义宣, 辜琼瑶, 等. 云南两系杂交稻产量稳定性及适应性AMMI分析[A].第一届中国杂交水稻大会论文集[C]. 2010:139-143.
|
[16] |
滕志英, 李明星, 解小林, 等. 国审小麦新品种华麦1028的丰产稳定性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(24):48-50,53.
|
[17] |
聂迎彬, 穆培源, 桑伟, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图法在新疆冬小麦区域试验产量分析上的应用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2012, 49(9):1569-1575.
|
[18] |
李艳艳, 丰震, 赵兰勇. 用AMMI模型分析玫瑰品种产量的稳定性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(6):1761-1766.
|
[19] |
刘坚坚, 周荣保, 杨进成, 等. AMMI模型分析低纬高原山区油菜品种的农艺性状[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(11):2412-2416.
|
[20] |
陈志雄, 胡润芳, 林国强. 菜用大豆新品种区域试验的AMMI模型分析[J]. 大豆通报, 2007, 1:32-33.
|
[21] |
李诚, 艾尼瓦尔, 李兰珍, 等. AMMI模型对啤酒大麦品种稳定性的分析[J]. 种子, 2005, 24(10):73-74,86.
|
[22] |
范士杰, 王蒂, 张俊莲, 等. 应用AMMI模型分析评判贵州省马铃薯区试品种的稳定性和适应性[J]. 种子, 2012, 31(7):106-109.
|
[23] |
姜心禄, 李旭毅, 池忠志, 等. 10个品种的生态适应性与产量稳定性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(12):2792-2795.
|
[24] |
强爱玲, 安永平, 杨生生, 等. 水稻区域试验品种的丰产性和稳定性分析[J]. 垦殖与稻作, 2006(6):15-18.
|
[1] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
[2] | ZHAO Guozhen, LIU Weihua, LIU Siyu, DONG Linbo, LI Lindong, CHEN Yumin. Stability Analysis of A New Japonica rice ‘Yunjing 37’ with Good Eating Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 1-6. |
[3] | YU Liping, WANG Lijun, LIANG Mengju, WANG Lu, SUN Jinyang, ZHANG Junpeng, HOU Xianghao. Effects of Base Application of Organic Fertilizer on Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Physical-chemical Properties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 8-16. |
[4] | SONG Jiming, DUAN Chunfang, LI Yuexian, XIAO Mingkun, LIU Qian, ZHANG Linhui, YAN Wei, LIU Guanghua. Breeding of A New Cassva Cultivar ‘Yunreshu No.1’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(14): 25-31. |
[5] | ZHANG Zhouna, ZHOU Huaping, ZHANG Mingkui. Effects of Different Conditioning Agents on the Stabilization of Soil Phosphorus in Phosphorus-rich Vegetable Fields [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 61-66. |
[6] | HUANG Shuilong. Screening of New Potato Varieties for Cultivation in Winter in Longhai District of Zhangzhou City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 25-31. |
[7] | GUO Yuhao, LIU Shaobo, GE Jingping, PING Wenxiang. Identification of Actinomyces 4-1 and Study on Bacteriostasis and Stability of Its Fermentation Broth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 117-123. |
[8] | YAO Jinbao, YANG Xueming, ZHANG Peng, FAN Xiangyun, YU Guihong, HE Yi, WANG Huadun. Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of New Weak-Gluten Wheat Cultivar ‘Ningmai 36’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 20-24. |
[9] | JIANG Bo, LI Hui, LIU Zhiru, AO Xiang, QIU Ping, WANG Xiaoli, YU Xiaogang, TANG Cunshan. Starch Yield of Potato Varieties: Performance and Stability [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(36): 24-30. |
[10] | LI Yanlan, LONG Shuiying, HU Xinzhou, LI Xiaoliang, LI Chengchun, LI Yihua, ZHANG Yurong, GAO Yuxi, YE Rong, LI Xiang, LIU Jianjian, YANG Jincheng. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Amount on Yield and Main Characters of Fresh Broad Bean After Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(36): 31-36. |
[11] | LI Tingyu, SHEN Yi, TONG Junfei, LU Shunfeng, LI Qin, GUO Song, YANG Weijun. Effects of Biochar Application and Reducing Irrigation Amount on Soil Agglomeration Structure and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(36): 110-116. |
[12] | MAO Xue, YIN Bo, ZHANG Xin, LIU Yu, XIN Lixin, KONG Xianghui, WANG Jialong. Antioxidant Activity and Stability of Polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum Spore Powder [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(35): 130-137. |
[13] | SHANG Na, LI Qing’en, LI Xiaoyu, WEN Xiaoxia, LI Haitao, YU Fagang, LI Qiuzhi, YANG Zhongxu, YIN Huihui. Newly State-approved Cotton Variety ‘Liaomian 15’: Analysis of High Yield, Stable Yield, Adaptability and Yield Composition Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(33): 48-52. |
[14] | ZHAO Kaili, GUO Ning, LI Quanhui, LI Ping, WANG Yanping, CHEN Juan, YAN Fang, WANG Weirui. Technology and Application of Fast Fertilizing and High Yield Fertilization in Low Fertility Grain Fields in Suburbs of Beijing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(30): 61-65. |
[15] | GAO Jing, QIN Mengfan, LI Kun, LI Wu. Research Progress on Genetic Mechanism of Twin-embryo in Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(29): 1-7. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||