欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 51-55.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-2303

所属专题: 水稻

• 农学 农业基础科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

成都平原水稻直播方式对出苗状况及产量形成的影响

李旭毅,池忠志,姜心禄,郭翔,郑家国,付书明   

  1. 四川省农业科学院作物研究所,四川省农业科学院作物研究所,四川省农业科学院作物研究所,四川省农业气象中心,四川省农业科学院作物所,四川省绵竹市农业局
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-22 修回日期:2014-08-22 接受日期:2014-09-30 出版日期:2015-04-07 发布日期:2015-04-07
  • 通讯作者: 郑家国
  • 基金资助:
    “十二五”国家科技支撑计划“四川盆地杂交中稻持续丰产高效技术集成创新与示范”(2011BAD16B05);“十二五”国家科技支撑计划“四川玉米单季稻大面积均衡增产技术集成研究与示范”(2012BAD04B13);“十二五”国家科技支撑计划“四川盆地水稻丰产节水节肥技术集成与示范”(2013BAD07B13);公益性行业(农业)科研专项西南水旱轮作区规模化周年高效生产技术研究(201303129);农业部重大研究专项“超级稻配套栽培技术开发与集成”。

Effects of Rice Direct Seeding Models on Seedling Emergence and Yield Formation in Chengdu Basin

  • Received:2014-08-22 Revised:2014-08-22 Accepted:2014-09-30 Online:2015-04-07 Published:2015-04-07

摘要: 为研究水稻不同直播方式在成都平原的适应性,确定最佳的直播方式,以杂交稻‘川优6203’和常规稻‘金农丝苗’为材料开展了田间试验,研究了成都平原生态条件下翻耕旱直播、免耕旱直播及翻耕水直播3种直播方式对直播稻出苗状况、生长发育、水分利用及产量形成的影响。结果表明:不同类型品种直播方式间产量的差异主要取决于有效穗数的多寡。翻耕旱直播处理前期出苗状况好、有效穗多,产量潜力最高;翻耕水直播处理前期出苗状况和产量虽不及翻耕旱直播处理,但有利于减少杂草和落田谷发生,播种后所需灌水量也最少;免耕旱直播处理存在着杂草和落田谷滋生严重、出苗差及播种后田间耗水量大等问题,产量最低。这表明翻耕条件下旱直播和水直播在成都平原各有优点,但从生产实用的角度考虑水直播更为适合。

关键词: 生物质炭基肥, 生物质炭基肥, 水稻产量, 氮素利用率, 茎蘖成穗率, 生物炭

Abstract: In order to study adaptability of different rice direct seeding models in Chengdu basin and determine optimal models, the effects of seedling emergence, growth and development, water use and yield formation for different direct seeding methods were studied with hybrid rice Chuanyou6203 and conventional rice Jinnongsimiao in Chengdu basin. The rice direct seeding methods included dry direct seeding with plowing, dry direct seeding with no-till and water direct seeding with plowing. The result indicated that: the difference of yield among different direct seeding methods mainly depended on numbers of productive tillers. With better seedling emergence and more panicles, the yield potential of dry direct seeding with plowing was highest than other methods. Although seedling emergence and yield of water direct seeding with plowing were lower than that of dry direct seeding with plowing, this treatment was beneficial for decreasing weeds, paddydropped seedlings and water consumption after seeding in field. With more weeds and paddy- dropped seedlings, poor seedling emergence and huge water consumption after seeding, the yield of dry direct seeding with no-till was the lowest. With plowing, dry direct seeding and water direct seeding have both advantages. But for practical production, water direct seeding was the best.