温带森林叶部生态化学计量学特征研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17030147

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 95-100.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17030147

所属专题：资源与环境；农业生态

• 资源环境生态土壤气象 • 上一篇下一篇

温带森林叶部生态化学计量学特征研究进展

刘瑜,王庆贵,邢亚娟

黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院,黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院,黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院;黑龙江省林业科学研究所

收稿日期:2017-03-22 修回日期:2017-03-29 接受日期:2017-04-18 出版日期:2018-04-10 发布日期:2018-04-10
通讯作者: 邢亚娟
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“大兴安岭北方森林细根动态和形态特征对氮沉降的响应”(41575137)，“大兴安岭北方森林生态系统对N沉降增加的响应”(31370494)，“小兴安岭阔叶红松林生态系统对N沉降增加的响应”(31170421)，“气候变化背景下小兴安岭阔叶红松林土壤碳汇变化机理” (31070406)；黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目“黑龙江省寒温带针叶林生态系统碳循环对模拟N沉降的响应”(ZD201406)；长白山科学研究院开放基金项目“长白山阔叶红松林生态系统细根动态和形态特征对氮沉降的响应”(2016001)；黑龙江省科研机构创新能力提升专项计划“抗寒速生用材树种新种质创制及培育技术研究”(YC2014D005)。

Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Temperate Forest Leaves: A Review

Received:2017-03-22 Revised:2017-03-29 Accepted:2017-04-18 Online:2018-04-10 Published:2018-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态化学计量学中碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)等元素的比例与分配已经成为全球气候变化研究的热点，因C、N、P 是植物生长的必需元素，它们的供应限制着植物生长及微生物的功能。然而，目前人类活动已经大大改变了C、N、P循环，从而改变了养分运输的模式、数量和养分限制的程度，导致温带森林养分不足的状况发生了改变。笔者分析了国内外温带森林叶片及凋落物的C、N、P 含量、化学计量比特征、限制性元素及其与土壤养分之间的关系，并与热带及亚热带森林进行了对比，同时，将全球森林的叶部生态化学计量学特征进行了总结。此外，笔者还综述了部分影响植物叶片生态化学计量比的因素，为未来生态化学计量学研究提供参照。由文献数据得出建议，将植物新鲜叶片、离体叶片、土壤及微生物共同联系起来进行研究，并针对不同的树种，加强其生态因子各种不同参数（如凸度、垂直结构、演替、温度及降水量等）对生态化学计量学特征的影响研究。

关键词: 转基因食品, 转基因食品, 消费者, 认知, 购买意愿

Abstract: The ratio and allocation of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) in ecological stoichiometry have become hot topics of global climate change research, because C, N, P are necessary elements of plant growth, their supply restrict the plants growth and the microorganisms function. However, at present, human activities have greatly changed the C, N and P cycle, which changes the nutrient transport model, quantity and the degree of nutrient limitation, resulting in the current situation of widespread nutrient deficiency of temperate forests has been changed. The authors analyzed the contents of C, N and P, ecological stoichiometric ratio, limiting elements and their relationships with soil nutrient, and compared with those of tropical and subtropical forests, meanwhile, the ecological chemometrics characteristics of the forest leaf were summarized. In addition, the authors also reviewed some factors affecting the stoichiometric ratio of plant leaves, which would provide reference for the future study of ecological stoichiometry. The advice by the literature data as follows: the relationship of plant fresh leaves, exotic leaves, soil and microbes must be studied together, and for the different trees species, strengthen the effects of different parameters of the ecological factors such as crown, vertical structure and succession, temperature and precipitation on the ecological chemometrics characteristics.

中图分类号:

X171.1

刘瑜,王庆贵,邢亚娟. 温带森林叶部生态化学计量学特征研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(10): 95-100.

参考文献

[1] Agren G I. Stoichiometry and Nutrition of Plant Growth in Natural Communities[J]. Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2008, 39(39):153-170.
[2] Redfield A C. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment.[J]. Science Progress, 1960, 11(11):150-170.
[3] Elser J J, Sterner R W, Gorokhova E, et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3: 540-550.
[4] Elser J J, Bracken M E, Cleland E E, et al. Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems.[J]. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10(12): 1135-1142.
[5] Koerselman W. The Vegetation N:P Ratio: a New Tool to Detect the Nature of Nutrient Limitation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33(6):1441-1450.
[6] Vitousek P M, Porder S, Houlton B Z, et al. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions.[J]. Ecological Applications A Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2010, 20(1):5-15.
[7] Sardans J, Rivas-Ubach A, Pe?uelas J. The C: N: P stoichiometry of organisms and ecosystems in a changing world: a review and perspectives[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2012, 14(1): 33-47.
[8] 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8):3937-3947.
[9] 谢锦, 常顺利, 张毓涛,等. 天山北坡植物土壤生态化学计量特征的垂直地带性[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(14):4363-4372.
[10] 刘超, 王洋, 王楠,等. 陆地生态系统植被氮磷化学计量研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(11):1205-1216.
[11] Yuan Z, Chen H Y H. Global trends in senesced-leaf nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Global Ecology, 2009, 18(5):532-542.
[12] 赵亚芳. 华北落叶松人工林碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征研究[D]. 中国科学院大学, 2015.
[13] 王晶苑, 王绍强, 李纫兰,等. 中国四种森林类型主要优势植物的C∶N∶P化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6):587-595.
[14] Campo J, Gallardo J F, Hernández G. Leaf and litter nitrogen and phosphorus in three forests with low P supply[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 133(1):121-129.
[15] 唐仕姗, 杨万勤, 王海鹏,等. 中国森林凋落叶氮、磷化学计量特征及控制因素[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015(2):316-322.
[16] Mcgroddy M E, Daufresne T, Hedin L O. Scaling of C:N:P stoichiometry in forest worldwide: implications of terrestrial Redfield-type ratios[J]. Ecology, 2004, 85(9):2390-2401.
[17] 程滨, 赵永军, 张文广,等. 生态化学计量学研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(6):1628-1637.
[18] Reich P B, Oleksyn J, Tilman G D. Global Patterns of Plant Leaf N and P in Relation to Temperature and Latitude[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(30):11001-11006.
[19] Townsend A R, Cleveland C C, Asner G P, et al. CONTROLS OVER FOLIAR N:P RATIOS IN TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88(1):107-118.
[20] Chiwa M, Ikezaki S, Katayama A, et al. Topographic Influence on Plant Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometry in a Temperate Forested Watershed[J]. Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 2016, 227(1):1-7.
[21] Casson N J, Eimers M C, Watmough S A. An assessment of the nutrient status of sugar maple in Ontario: indications of phosphorus limitation[J]. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 2012, 184(184):5917-27.
[22] Kang H, Zhuang H, Wu L, et al. Variation in leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Picea abies across Europe: An analysis based on local observations[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2011, 261(2):195-202.
[23] Liu C, Liu Y, Guo K, et al. Mixing litter from deciduous and evergreen trees enhances decomposition in a subtropical karst forest in southwestern China[J]. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 2016, 101:44-54.
[24] 刘万德, 苏建荣, 李帅锋,等. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林演替系列植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23):6581-6590.
[25] Gress S E, Nichols T D, Northcraft C C, et al. Nutrient limitation in soils exhibiting differing nitrogen availabilities: what lies beyond nitrogen saturation?[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88(1):119-30.
[26] Long M, Wu H H, Smith M D, et al. Nitrogen deposition promotes phosphorus uptake of plants in a semi-arid temperate grassland[J]. Plant Soil, 2016, 408(1-2):475-484.
[27] Liu D, Keiblinger K M, Leitner S, et al. Is there a convergence of deciduous leaf litter stoichiometry, biochemistry and microbial population during decay?[J]. Geoderma, 2016, 272:93-100.
[28] Houlton B Z, Wang Y P, Vitousek P M, et al. A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terrestrial biosphere[J]. Nature, 2008, 454(7202):327-30.
[29] Dise N B, Wright R F. Nitrogen leaching from European forests in relation to nitrogen deposition[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 1995, 71(1–2):153-161.
[30] Gundersen P, Schmidt I K, Raulund-Rasmussen K. Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests - effects of air pollution and forest management[J]. Environmental Review, 2006, 14: 1–57.
[31] Braun S, Thomas V F D, Quiring R, et al. Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(158):2043-2052.
[32] Chiwa M, Maruno R, Ide J, et al. Role of stormflow in reducing N retention in a suburban forested watershed, western Japan[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2010, 115(G2):61-61.
[33] Chiwa M, Onikura N, Ide J, et al. Impact of N-Saturated Upland Forests on Downstream N Pollution in the Tatara River Basin, Japan[J]. Ecosystems, 2012, 15(2):230-241.
[34] Zhang Z, Fukushima T, Onda Y, et al. Characterisation of diffuse pollutions from forested watersheds in Japan during storm events — Its association with rainfall and watershed features[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 390(1):215-26.
[35] Gradowski T, Thomas S C. Phosphorus limitation of sugar maple growth in central Ontario[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2006, 226(1–3):104-109.
[36] Blanes M C, Vi?egla B, Merino J, et al. Nutritional status of Abies pinsapo forests along a nitrogen deposition gradient: do C/N/P stoichiometric shifts modify photosynthetic nutrient use efficiency?[J]. Oecologia, 2013, 171(4):797-808.
[37] Marklein A R, Houlton B Z. Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems[J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 193(3):696–704.
[38] Finzi A C. Decades of atmospheric deposition have not resulted in widespread phosphorus limitation or saturation of tree demand for nitrogen in southern New England[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2009, 92(3):217-229.
[39] Fisk M C, Fahey T J. Microbial biomass and nitrogen cycling responses to fertilization and litter removal in young northern hardwood forests[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2001, 53(2):201-223(23).
[40] Xu S, Liu L, Sayer E J. Variability of aboveground litter inputs alters soil physicochemical and biological processes: a meta-analysis of litterfall-manipulation experiments[J]. Biogeosciences Discussions, 2013, 10(3):7423-7433.
[41] Braun S, Thomas V F, Quiring R, et al. Does nitrogen deposition increase forest production? The role of phosphorus[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(6):2043-52.
[42] Cleveland C C, Townsend A R, Taylor P, et al. Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan-tropical analysis[J]. Ecology Letters, 2011, 14(9):939-47.
[43] Suo Y, Yuan Z, Lin F, et al. Local-scale determinants of elemental stoichiometry of soil in an old-growth temperate forest[J]. Plant Soil, 2016, 408(1):1-14.
[44] Uriarte M, Turner B L, Thompson J, et al. Linking spatial patterns of leaf litterfall and soil nutrients in a tropical forest: a neighborhood approach[J]. Ecological Applications, 2015, 25(7):2022.
[45] Poorter H, Niklas K J, Reich P B, et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control[J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 193(1):30-50.
[46] Vogt K A, Grier C C, Vogt D J. Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1986, 15(15):303-377.
[47] Finér L, Helmisaari H S, L?hmus K, et al. Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)[J]. Plant Biosystems, 2007, 141(3): 394-405.
[48] Wang C, Han S, Zhou Y, et al. Fine root growth and contribution to soil carbon in a mixed mature Pinus koraiensis forest[J]. Plant and Soil, 2016, 400(1):275-284.
[49] Schmidt M W I, Torn M S, Abiven S, et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property[J]. Nature, 2011, 478(7367): 49-56.
[50] Townsend A R, Asner G P, Cleveland C C. The biogeochemical heterogeneity of tropical forests[J]. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 2008, 23(8):424-31.
[51] Fitzhugh R D, Driscoll C T, Groffman P M, et al. Effects of soil freezing on soil solution nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon chemistry in a northern hardwood ecosystem[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2001, 56(2):215-238.
[52] Zhou W, Chen H, Zhou L, et al. Effect of freezing-thawing on nitrogen mineralization in vegetation soils of four landscape zones of Changbai Mountain[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2011, 68(5):943-951.
[53] Sayer E J, Heard M S, Grant H K, et al. Soil carbon release enhanced by increased tropical forest litterfall[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2011, 1(6):304-307.
[54] Cheng W, Parton W J, Gonzalez-Meler M A, et al. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming[J]. New Phytologist, 2014, 201(1):31-44.

温带森林叶部生态化学计量学特征研究进展

Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Temperate Forest Leaves: A Review

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	张羽丰, 孙江涛, 李青松, 范利瑶, 文倩. 豫东农区农户宅基地退出意愿及影响因素分析——以扶沟县为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(2): 150-156.
[2]	殷鉴, 邓丹, 黄春丽, 罗佳, 陈玉, 王弢. 洱海保护治理政策下的农业社会生态响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(10): 158-164.
[3]	张志, 安强. 三权分置下农地经营权流转中的农户法律认知实证研究——以河北省张北县为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(36): 152-157.
[4]	孟晓芳, 刘增金, 范婷婷. 消费者对可追溯猪肉的支付意愿及其影响因素研究——以上海、济南消费者为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(17): 144-150.
[5]	吴天强, 马佳, 王慧, 杨德利. 消费者对本地品牌鲜食玉米的购买意愿及其影响因素分析——基于上海929份消费者调查问卷[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(11): 157-164.
[6]	刘艳婷, 陈美球, 邝佛缘, 张淑娴, 周丹. 家庭经济禀赋、政策认知与农户宅基地流转意愿——基于江西省456份问卷调查[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(1): 160-164.
[7]	易湘生,裴志远,赵虎,郭琳. 农村土地承包经营权确权登记颁证技术标准认知和执行情况评估——基于农村经营管理部门视角[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(36): 155-164.
[8]	王秀丽,马云倩,孙君茂. 北京市居民对马铃薯主食营养认知与消费行为[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
[9]	赵雪阳,胡宝贵,刘超. 基于消费者行为的西瓜市场营销策略研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(14): 160-164.
[10]	张驰,张晓东,王登位. 消费者参与模式下的农产品透明供应链系统研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(7): 158-164.
[11]	娄博杰,张惠娜,宋敏,娄博昊. 农户农产品质量安全认知水平影响因素实证分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(8): 159-163.
[12]	蒋哲,朱波,田媛,梁超,刘章勇,陈阜. 基于CVM 的有机农业认知程度和消费意愿研究——以江西省居民为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(5): 200-204.
[13]	刘增金,乔娟,徐琳君. “三品”认证食品标签信任对消费者行为的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(36): 283-290.
[14]	李倩如,王祺,刘悦悦,马林,马梅,杭华. 安徽消费者对转基因食品的认知与购买分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(35): 116-121.
[15]	洪名勇,尚名扬. 地权认知、资源禀赋、信任与农地流转的实证研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(26): 274-278.