松嫩平原沙丘-草甸复合生态系统土壤水分和盐碱时空变化特征

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0518

中国农学通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (20): 49-58.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0518

所属专题：资源与环境；农业生态

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

松嫩平原沙丘-草甸复合生态系统土壤水分和盐碱时空变化特征

张琦林¹(), 胡娟², 高英志¹(), 周道玮¹()

¹东北师范大学草地研究所植被生态科学教育部重点实验室,长春 130024
²中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,长春 130102

收稿日期:2020-09-28 修回日期:2020-12-05 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2021-08-06
通讯作者: 高英志,周道玮
作者简介:张琦林,女,1995年出生,山东潍坊人,在读硕士,研究方向：植物生理生态学研究。通信地址：130024 吉林省长春市宽城区高新北区盛北大街与地理路交叉口成果转化楼308室,Tel：4318-5684088,E-mail：zhangql086@nenu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
吉林省科技厅重点科技研发项目“优质饲草品种选育及其配套种植技术研究与示范”(20180201073NY);吉林省科技厅自然科学基金“紫花苜蓿根系氮素固定及其转移给玉米能力与间作系统增产相关关系研究”(20190201121JC)

Spatiotemporal Variations of Soil Water and Saline-alkali in Compound Ecosystem of Sand and Meadow in the Songnen Plain

Zhang Qilin¹(), Hu Juan², Gao Yingzhi¹(), Zhou Daowei¹()

¹Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology, Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024
²Jilin Provincial Laboratory of Grassland Farming, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130102

Received:2020-09-28 Revised:2020-12-05 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2021-08-06
Contact: Gao Yingzhi,Zhou Daowei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在时间和空间尺度上,利用烘干法(105℃)、pH计和电导仪测定沙丘、草甸、沙丘和草甸结合部位,5—9月的0~300 cm土层土壤垂直剖面的土壤水分含量(SWC)、电导率(EC)和pH,来探究松嫩平原典型的沙丘-草甸复合生态系统中土壤水分和盐碱的时空分布特征。结果表明：不同部位平均土壤含水量存在极显著差异,草甸平均土壤含水量比结合部和沙丘分别高20.5%和52.7%。9月份结合部0~20 cm土层土壤含水量较高,而30~150 cm土层的土壤含水量较低。7月份草甸0~10 cm土层的平均土壤含水量较低,10~150 cm土层中平均土壤含水量随土壤深度增加而降低。不同部位的EC和pH也存在极显著差异,草甸区和结合部极显著高于沙丘,草甸的EC值比结合部高39.8%。7月份草甸0~10 cm土层和9月份30~70 cm土层有较高的EC和pH,9月结合部0~10 cm土层中有较高的EC和pH。土壤表面的盐碱化主要出现在7月和9月的草甸和结合部,而且两者盐碱化程度的不同主要是由物种、土壤和地下水位差异决定。

关键词: 土壤含水量, pH, 土壤电导率, 沙丘, 草甸, 结合部, 松嫩平原

Abstract:

To explore the spatiotemporal variations of soil water and saline-alkali in compound ecosystem of sand and meadow in the Songnen Plain, the soil water content (SWC), electrical conductivity (EC), and pH in 0-300 cm soil profile in sand, meadow and middle area (between sand and meadow) regions from May to September were analyzed. The results showed that the mean SWC in meadow region was 20.5% and 52.7% higher (P<0.01) than that of middle area region and sand region, respectively. In middle area region, higher SWC in 0-20 cm soil and lower SWC in 30-150 cm soil were observed in September. In meadow region, SWC was lower in 0-10 cm soil in July and it gradually declined with the increase of soil depth from 10 to 150 cm. The mean EC and mean pH in meadow and middle area regions were higher (P<0.01) than that of sand region. The mean EC in meadow region was 39.8% higher (P<0.01) than that of middle area region. In meadow region, higher EC and pH were observed in 0-10 cm soil in July and in 30-70 cm soil in September. In middle area region, higher EC and pH were observed in 0-10 cm soil in September. The surface soil saline-alkali mainly occurred in meadow region and middle area region in July and September, respectively, and the different saline-alkali degree of the two kinds of regions was determined by species, soil texture and soil water table level.

Key words: soil water content, pH, soil electrical conductivity, sand, meadow, middle area, Songnen plain

中图分类号:

Q149

张琦林, 胡娟, 高英志, 周道玮. 松嫩平原沙丘-草甸复合生态系统土壤水分和盐碱时空变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(20): 49-58.

Zhang Qilin, Hu Juan, Gao Yingzhi, Zhou Daowei. Spatiotemporal Variations of Soil Water and Saline-alkali in Compound Ecosystem of Sand and Meadow in the Songnen Plain[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(20): 49-58.

图/表 10

参考文献 41

[1]	Wang L,Seki Katsutoshi Miyazaki T,Ishihama Y.The causes of soil alkalinization in the Songnen Plain of Northeast China[J].Paddy Water Environ,2009,7:259-270. doi: 10.1007/s10333-009-0166-x URL
[2]	Yang F,An F H,Ma H Y,et al.Variations on soil salinity and sodicity and its driving factors analysis under microtopography in different hydrological conditions[J].Water,2016,8:22. doi: 10.3390/w8010022 URL
[3]	Yin HN,Tang Z,Lu F.Analysis of ecoenvironment degradation mechanism in the west of Northeast Plain in China during the last 100 years[J].Res Soil Water Conserv,2003,10(4):190-192.
[4]	Li X J.The alkili-saline land and agricultural sustainable development of the Western Songnen Plain in China[J].Sci Geogr Sin,2000,20(1):51-55.
[5]	Liu X T.Management on degraded land and agricultural development in the Songnen Plain[M].Beijing:Science Press,2001.
[6]	Li B,Wang Z C,Liang Z W,et al.Interrelationship between the salinization and salinization of Sodic Soil in the Da'an City, Jilin Province, China[J].J Arid Land Resour Environ,2007,25(2):151-155.
[7]	Qiu S W,Zhang B,Wang Z C.Analyses on current situation, causes of formation, and way of management of desertification in western northeast plain of China[J].Quaternary Science,2005,25(1):63-73.
[8]	Lin N F,Bounlom V,Tang J,et al.Study on the relation between the formation of saline-alkali soil and the neotectonic movement[J].Global Geol,2005,24(3):282-288,311.
[9]	Xu Y,Ge Z,Wang J,et al.Study on relationship between soil salinization and groundwater table depth based on indicator Kriging[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2019,35(1):123-130.
[10]	Gu H B,Song Y,Pan J.Research progress of influencing factors on salinization of Songnen Plain[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2010,38(30):16895-16898.
[11]	Wang L,Seki Katsutoshi Miyazaki T,Ishihama Y.he causes of soil alkalinization in the Songnen Plain of Northeast China[J].Paddy Water Environ,2009,7:259-270. doi: 10.1007/s10333-009-0166-x URL
[12]	Li B,Wang Z C.The alkalization parameters and their influential factors of saline-sodic soil in the Songnen Plain[J].J Arid Land Resour Environ,2006,20(6):183-191.
[13]	Lan Z L,Pan X L,Zhao Y,et al.Effects of land use types on deep soil water content in the loess hilly area of the north Shanxi Province, China[J].Chin J Appl Ecol,2017,28(3):847-855.
[14]	Zhu H,Hu S J,Chen Y B.Spatio-temporal variation of soil moisture in fixed dunes at the southern edge of gurbantunggut desert[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2016,53(1):117-126.
[15]	Jacobs J M,Mohanty B P,Hsu E C,et al.SMEX02: field scale variability, time stability and similarity of soil water[J].Remote Sens. Environ,2004,92:436-446. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.017 URL
[16]	Zhu H D,Shi Z H,Fang N F,et al.Soil moisture response to environmental factors following precipitation events in a small catchment[J].Catena,2014,120:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.003 URL
[17]	Gao X D,Wu P T,Zhao X N.Soil moisture variability along transects over a well-developed gully in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Catena,2011,87(3):357-367. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2011.07.004 URL
[18]	Shi Y G,Wu P T,Zhao X N.Statistical analyses and controls of root-zone soil moisture in a large gully of the Loess Plateau[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2014,71(11):4801-4809. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2870-5 URL
[19]	Zhu H,Hu S J,Chen Y B.Spatio-temporal variation of soil moisture in fixed dunes at the southern edge of gurbantunggut desert[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2016,53(1):117-126.
[20]	Aa Y L,Wang G Q,Liu T X.Vertical variations of soil water and its controlling factors based on the structural equation model in a semi-arid grassland[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,691:1016-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.181 URL
[21]	Geris J,Tetzlaff D,McDonnell J J.Spatial and temporal patterns of soil water storage and vegetation water use in humid northern catchments[J].Science of the Total Environment,2017,595:486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.275 URL
[22]	Biswas A,Chau H W,Bedard-Haughn A.Factors controlling soil water storage in the Hummocky landscape of the Prairie Pothole region of North America[J].Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2012,92(4):649-663. doi: 10.4141/cjss2011-045 URL
[23]	Wang Y,Hu W,Zhu Y.Vertical distribution and temporal stability of soil water in 21-m profiles under different land uses on the Loess Plateau in China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2015,527:543-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.010 URL
[24]	Wang Y Q,Shao M A,Liu Z P.Vertical distribution and influencing factors of soil water content within 21-m profile on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J].Geoderma,2013,193:300-310.
[25]	Fan J,Shao M A,Wang Q J.Toward sustainable soil and water resources use in China’s highly erodible semi-arid loess plateau[J].Geoderma,2010,155(1-2):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.11.027 URL
[26]	Hu W,Shao M A,Han F P.Watershed scale temporal stability of soil water content[J].Geoderma,2010,158(3-4):181-198. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.030 URL
[27]	Markewitz D,Devine S,Davidson E A.Soil moisture depletion under simulated drought in the Amazon: impacts on deep root uptake[J].New Phytologist,2010,187(3):592-607. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03391.x pmid: 20659251
[28]	Yang L,Wei W,Chen L.Response of deep soil moisture to land use and afforestation in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2012,475,111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.041 URL
[29]	Baudena M,von Hardenberg J,Provenzale A.Vegetation patterns and soil-atmosphere water fluxes in drylands[J].Advances in Water Resources,2013,53(Mar):131-138. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.10.013 URL
[30]	Cardenas M B,Kanarek M R.Soil moisture variation and dynamics across a wild-fire burn boundary in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forest[J].Journal of Hydrology,2014,519:490-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.016 URL
[31]	Wang Y Q,Shao M A,Liu Z P.Regional spatial pattern of deep soil water content and its influencing factors[J].Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques,2012,57(2):265-281. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2011.644243 URL
[32]	Li Q S,Li X J,Wang Z,et al.Sodium bicarbonate soil management and utilization in Songnen Plain[J].Resour Sci,2003,25(1):15-20.
[33]	Wu L,Li Q S.Research of mechanism of saline desertification in Western Songnen Plain[J].J Soil Water Conserv,2003,17(4):79-81, 93.
[34]	Wang L,Miyazaki T,Ishihama Y,et al.The variation of soil physical properties on alkali grasslands in Anda City of Heilongjiang Province[J].Pratacult Sci,2007,24(10):19-25.
[35]	Luo J M,Yang F,Wang Y J,et al.Mechanism of soil sodification at the local scale in Songnen Plain, northeast China, as affected by shallow groundwater table[J].Arid Land Res,2011,Manag 25:234-256.
[36]	Abdel-Kawy W A M,Belal A.Use of satellite data and GIS for soil mapping and monitoring soil productivity of the cultivated land in El-Fayoum depression Egypt[J].Arab J Geosci,2013,6:723-732. doi: 10.1007/s12517-011-0371-y URL
[37]	Wang J Z,Wu J L,Jia H J.Analysis of spatial variation of soil salinization using a hydrochemical and stable isotopic method in a semiarid irrigated basin, Hetao plain, Inner Mongolia, North China[J].Environ. Process,2016,3:723-733. doi: 10.1007/s40710-016-0179-6 URL
[38]	Ibrahimi M K,Tsuyoshi M,Taku N,et al.Contribution of shallow groundwater rapid fluctuation to soil salinization under arid and semiarid climate[J].Arab J Geosci,2014,7:3901-3911. doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-1084-1 URL
[39]	Northey J E,Christen E W,Ayars J E,et al.Occurrence and measurement of salinity stratification in shallow groundwater in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area, south-eastern Australia[J].Agric.Water Mana,2006,81:23-40
[40]	Xia J B,Zhao X M,Zhao Z G.Migration characteristics of soil water and salt and their interaction under different groundwater levels[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering Transactions of the CSAE,2015,31(15):93-100.
[41]	Yang F,Zhang GbX,Yin X R,et al.Field-scale spatial variation of saline-sodic soil and its relation with environmental factors in western Songnen Plain of China[J].Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health,2011,8:374-387. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8020374 URL

	最小值(Min)/%	最大值(Max)/%	平均值 (Mean)/%	标准差(SD)	变异系数(CV)/%
沙丘	4.01	11.07	9.20 cC	1.06	11.56
结合部	5.00	15.01	11.66 bB	1.64	14.10
草甸	7.61	17.65	14.05 aA	1.36	9.70

	最小值(Min)/%	最大值(Max)/%	平均值 (Mean)/%	标准差(SD)	变异系数(CV)/%
沙丘	4.01	11.07	9.20 cC	1.06	11.56
结合部	5.00	15.01	11.66 bB	1.64	14.10
草甸	7.61	17.65	14.05 aA	1.36	9.70

月份	沙丘			结合部			草甸
月份	土壤含水量	标准差	变异系数	土壤含水量	标准差	变异系数	土壤含水量	标准差	变异系数
5月	7.40abA	0.77	10.32	11.64aA	1.54	12.95	14.50aA	1.20	8.21
6月	6.26bB	0.74	10.72	9.41bB	0.95	9.98	12.56bB	1.25	10.24
7月	7.09abA	0.61	9.34	11.98aA	1.21	10.20	12.31bB	0.67	5.53
8月	8.10aA	0.91	11.72	10.62abA	1.96	17.74	13.82abA	1.51	10.52
9月	8.65aA	1.33	15.16	9.86bB	1.74	17.66	14.30aA	1.73	11.96

月份	沙丘			结合部			草甸
月份	土壤含水量	标准差	变异系数	土壤含水量	标准差	变异系数	土壤含水量	标准差	变异系数
5月	7.40abA	0.77	10.32	11.64aA	1.54	12.95	14.50aA	1.20	8.21
6月	6.26bB	0.74	10.72	9.41bB	0.95	9.98	12.56bB	1.25	10.24
7月	7.09abA	0.61	9.34	11.98aA	1.21	10.20	12.31bB	0.67	5.53
8月	8.10aA	0.91	11.72	10.62abA	1.96	17.74	13.82abA	1.51	10.52
9月	8.65aA	1.33	15.16	9.86bB	1.74	17.66	14.30aA	1.73	11.96

		最小值	最大值	平均值	标准差	变异系数/%
EC/(mS/m)	沙丘	19.7	28.3	23.5cC	1.12	4.77
	结合部	31.7	93.0	54.3bB	1.89	3.48
	草甸	41.7	144.3	75.9aA	2.55	3.36
pH	沙丘	8.01	8.33	8.14bB	0.013	0.16
	结合部	8.21	8.94	8.59aA	0.017	0.20
	草甸	8.22	9.00	8.64aA	0.018	0.21

松嫩平原沙丘-草甸复合生态系统土壤水分和盐碱时空变化特征

Spatiotemporal Variations of Soil Water and Saline-alkali in Compound Ecosystem of Sand and Meadow in the Songnen Plain

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	黄磊, 李艺萌, 钟帅, 金保锋, 高晋军, 王晓园, 关罗浩, 王初亮, 黄妧婷, 李敏. 低氧贮存片烟解封后理化指标和质量变化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 107-112.
[2]	雷俊, 赵福年, 卢国阳, 姚瑞, 牛海洋, 李文举, 杨蕙宁. 黄土高原半干旱区春小麦产量变动的影响因子分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 55-62.
[3]	张云, 萨如拉, 包桂荣, 萨茹拉其其格, 邰继承, 李响. 秸秆降解菌系的筛选及其对酸碱度的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(28): 21-27.
[4]	姚志龙, 韩萍, 王军锋, 王嘉倩. 庆阳苹果树需水规律分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 27-31.
[5]	钟鑫, 刘柏鑫, 丁伟. 1960—2020年松嫩平原干湿时空演变及其与涛动指数的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 102-110.
[6]	苏欣欣, 胡晓航, 马亚怀, 李彦丽. 滤泥施用量对不同品种甜菜产量及土壤中氮磷钾含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(11): 38-45.
[7]	胡娟, 周道玮, 关胜超, 张丹. 覆沙对松嫩平原盐碱裸地的改良和利用效果研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(9): 85-94.
[8]	沐婵, 钱荣青, 杨绍聪, 姚照兵, 张钟, 李成春, 申文智, 费勇. 种植关键技术对‘灿烂’蓝莓叶片黄化症的矫治效果分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 49-53.
[9]	刘天海, 苗人云, 陈春秀, 刘理旭, 周洁, 彭卫红, 黄忠乾, 谭昊. 石灰质量调查及添加量对糙皮侧耳熟料栽培的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(6): 44-48.
[10]	刘霞, 张哲, 钱红洁, 张利杰, 杨艳丽. 致病疫霉木瓜蛋白酶亚家族基因C1A-PH-SCH1的克隆与表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(29): 13-19.
[11]	宁和平, 刘丽, 栾振斌, 罗王军. 甘南合作地区牧草生长季土壤水分气候变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 116-122.
[12]	陈志明, 李广, 吴建国, 闫丽娟. 灌溉和施氮方式对甘肃陇中黄土高原春小麦产量和土壤含水量与有效氮含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(8): 8-16.
[13]	平翠枝, 红梅, 王文东, 赵巴音那木拉, 美丽, 刘鹏飞, 赵乌英嘎. 不同耕作方式对黑土区农田土壤物理特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(7): 83-89.
[14]	董环, 娄春荣, 张青, 韩瑛祚, 王辉. 调节草炭pH值对其有效养分和番茄、辣椒幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(7): 55-62.
[15]	韩锦涛, 郭俊兵, 李素清. 山西云顶山亚高山草甸优势种种间关系分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27): 66-71.

	沙丘			结合部			草甸
	5月	7月	9月	5月	7月	9月	5月	7月	9月
EC/pH	0.0123^ns	0.0311^ns	0.0286^ns	0.8861^**	0.7920^**	0.9378^**	0.5804^**	0.3484^**	0.7574^**
SWC/pH	0.0065^ns	0.0457^ns	-0.0318^ns	0.0900^ns	0.1606^*	-0.0128^ns	0.0081^ns	-0.0241^ns	0.1953^**
SWC/EC	0.0760^ns	0.2167^**	0.0321^ns	0.0630^ns	0.2022^**	-0.0351^ns	-0.0274^ns	0.1026^*	0.0481^ns

	沙丘			结合部			草甸
	5月	7月	9月	5月	7月	9月	5月	7月	9月
EC/pH	0.0123^ns	0.0311^ns	0.0286^ns	0.8861^**	0.7920^**	0.9378^**	0.5804^**	0.3484^**	0.7574^**
SWC/pH	0.0065^ns	0.0457^ns	-0.0318^ns	0.0900^ns	0.1606^*	-0.0128^ns	0.0081^ns	-0.0241^ns	0.1953^**
SWC/EC	0.0760^ns	0.2167^**	0.0321^ns	0.0630^ns	0.2022^**	-0.0351^ns	-0.0274^ns	0.1026^*	0.0481^ns