耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0229

中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 88-94.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0229

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望

刘新坤(), 孙盛凯, 段霄汉, 崔冬梅, 张婷婷, 崔纪超, 朱旭毅, 韩惠芳()

作物生物学国家重点实验室/土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室/山东农业大学农学院，山东泰安 271018

收稿日期:2022-03-25 修回日期:2022-06-06 出版日期:2023-03-05 发布日期:2023-03-15
通讯作者: 韩惠芳，女，1975年出生，山西忻州人，教授，博士，研究方向：作物栽培与耕作学、农业生态学。通信地址：271018 山东泰安泰山区岱宗大街61号山东农业大学农学院，E-mail：hhf@sdau.edu.cn。
作者简介:
刘新坤，男，1998年出生，山东东营人，硕士，研究方向：作物栽培与耕作学、农业生态学。通信地址：271018 山东泰安泰山区岱宗大街61号山东农业大学农学院，E-mail：liuxinkun819@163.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“土壤团聚体多级结构调控有机碳矿化效应的微生物学机制”(32172127)

Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Aggregate Microorganisms and Organic Carbon Mineralization: A Review

LIU Xinkun(), SUN Shengkai, DUAN Xiaohan, CUI Dongmei, ZHANG Tingting, CUI Jichao, ZHU Xuyi, HAN Huifang()

State Laboratory of Crop Biology, National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong 271018

Received:2022-03-25 Revised:2022-06-06 Online:2023-03-05 Published:2023-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

农业碳排放约占全球年均总排放量的25%，为实现中国2060年碳中和的目标，农业对CO₂的吸收与排放需达到自然平衡。土壤有机碳(SOC)矿化是具有碳降解功能的微生物分解SOC为作物生长提供养分，向外界释放CO₂等温室气体的生物化学过程。农田SOC矿化与作物养分供给、CO₂形成和排放紧密相关，但SOC矿化受多种因素影响。土壤耕作是驱动农田土壤碳固定的关键因素，耕作方式对SOC的影响是农业生态系统碳循环研究的重要内容。土壤不同粒径团聚体被视为微生物碳矿化产生CO₂的生化反应器，SOC的矿化分解离不开其对微生物以及对应酶的利用。可见，耕作方式通过直接作用改变土壤团聚体结构，进而改变土壤中的微生物类群，最终对SOC矿化产生影响。就此归纳总结了关于耕作方式、土壤团聚体及关联土壤微生物对农田SOC矿化的影响，以期从改良土壤团聚体结构入手，减少农田SOC矿化，为中国实现“双碳”（碳达峰、碳中和）目标提供理论支撑。

关键词: 有机碳矿化, 土壤耕作, 土壤有机碳, 团聚体, 微生物

Abstract:

Agricultural carbon emissions account for about 25% of the annual global CO₂emissions. To achieve the goal of carbon neutrality in China before 2060, the absorption and emissions of CO₂ in agriculture need to reach a dynamic balance. Soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization is a biochemical process of microbial decomposition of SOC which provides nutrients for crop growth and releases greenhouse gases such as CO₂ to the environment. SOC mineralization in farmland is closely related to crop nutrient supply, carbon sequestration and CO₂emission, but SOC mineralization is affected by many factors. Soil tillage is the key factor driving farmland soil carbon fixation, and the impact of tillage methods on SOC is an important part of agricultural ecosystem carbon cycle research. Soil aggregates with different particle sizes are regarded as biochemical reactors for microbial carbon mineralization to produce CO₂. The mineralization and decomposition of SOC can not be separated from the use of microorganisms and corresponding enzymes. Therefore, the tillage methods directly change the structure of soil aggregates, then change the microbial groups in soil, and ultimately affect SOC mineralization. This review summarized the effects of tillage methods, soil aggregates and associated soil microorganisms on SOC mineralization in farmland, aiming to reduce the occurrence of SOC mineralization in farmland, and provide theoretical support for China to achieve the goal of “double carbon” (peaking carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality).

Key words: organic carbon mineralization, soil tillage, soil organic carbon, aggregates, microorganisms

刘新坤, 孙盛凯, 段霄汉, 崔冬梅, 张婷婷, 崔纪超, 朱旭毅, 韩惠芳. 耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(7): 88-94.

LIU Xinkun, SUN Shengkai, DUAN Xiaohan, CUI Dongmei, ZHANG Tingting, CUI Jichao, ZHU Xuyi, HAN Huifang. Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Aggregate Microorganisms and Organic Carbon Mineralization: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 88-94.

图/表 2

参考文献 60

[7]	WANG B, BREWER P E, SHUGART H H, et al. Soil aggregates as biogeochemical reactors and implications for soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases- A concept[J]. Global change biology, 2019, 25:373-385. doi: 10.1111/gcb.2019.25.issue-2 URL
[8]	ZHOU H, PENG X, PERFECT E, et al. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil aggregation in an Ultisol as characterized by synchrotron based X-ray micro-computed tomography[J]. Geoderma, 2013,195-196:23-30.
[9]	ZHONG Y, LI J, XIONG H. Effect of deficit irrigation on soil CO₂ and N₂O emissions and winter wheat yield[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2021, 279:123718. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123718 URL
[10]	潘根兴, 丁元君, 陈硕桐, 等. 从土壤腐殖质分组到分子有机质组学认识土壤有机质本质[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(5):451-470. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2019.05.0451
[11]	EDUARDO M, FUENTES J P, PINO V, et al. Chemical and biological properties as affected by no-tillage and conventional tillage systems in an irrigated Haploxeroll of Central Chile[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2013, 126(1):238-245. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.07.014 URL
[12]	王丽宏, 胡跃高, 杨光立, 等. 农田冬季覆盖作物对土壤有机碳含量和主作物产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2006(6):64-67.
[13]	刘红梅, 李睿颖, 高晶晶, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤团聚体及微生物学特性的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(6):1277-1284.
[14]	符卓旺, 彭娟, 杨静, 等. 耕作制度对紫色水稻土根际与非根际土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(1):165-169.
[15]	朱咏莉, 韩建刚, 吴金水. 农业管理措施对土壤有机碳动态变化的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(5):648-651.
[16]	唐晓红, 魏朝富, 吕家恪, 等. 保护性耕作对丘陵区水稻土团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(11):49-54.
[17]	ÁLVARO-FUENTES J, CANTERO-MARTINEZ C, LOPEZ M V, et al. Soil aggregation and soil organic carbon stabilization: Effects of management in semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystems[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2009, 73(5):1519-1529. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0333 URL
[18]	ZOTARELLI L, ALVESl B J R, URQUIAGA S, et al. Impact of tillage and crop rotation on light fraction and intra-aggregate soil organic matter in two Oxisols[J]. Soil and tillage research, 2007, 95(1-2):196-206. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2007.01.002 URL
[19]	薛斌, 黄丽, 鲁剑巍, 等. 连续秸秆还田和免耕对土壤团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):182-189.
[20]	李玉洁, 王慧, 赵建宁, 等. 耕作方式对农田土壤理化因子和生物学特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3):939-948.
[21]	陈升龙. 黑土团聚体的孔隙结构特征与有机碳矿化的关系研究[D]. 长春: 中国科学院研究生院, 2015.
[22]	王浩, 王淑兰, 王小利, 等. 黄土旱塬区三种耕作方式下土壤碳排放与有机碳储量[A].中国农学会耕作制度分会学术年会[C]. 2018.
[23]	ZHANG X, XIN X, ZHU A, et al. Effects of tillage and residue managements on organic C accumulation and soil aggregation in a sandy loam soil of the North China Plain[J]. Catena, 2017, 156:176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2017.04.012 URL
[24]	王永慧, 轩清霞, 王丽丽, 等. 不同耕作方式对土壤有机碳矿化及酶活性影响研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2020, 51(4):876-884.
[25]	刘定辉, 蒲波, 陈尚洪, 等. 秸秆还田循环利用对土壤碳库的影响研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2008(5):1316-1319.
[26]	BRIEDIS, CDM J, CAIRES, et al. Soil organic matter pools and carbon-protection mechanisms in aggregate classes influenced by surface liming in a no-till system[J]. Geoderma, 2012, 170:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.10.011 URL
[27]	WATZINGER A, FEICHTMAIR S, KITZLER B, et al. Soil microbial communities responded to biochar application in temperate soils and slowly metabolized ¹³C-labelled biochar as revealed by ¹³C PLFA analyses: results from a short-term incubation and pot experiment[J]. European journal of soil science, 2014, 65(1):40-51. doi: 10.1111/ejss.12100 URL
[28]	祝贞科, 沈冰洁, 葛体达, 等. 农田作物同化碳输入与周转的生物地球化学过程[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):5987-5997.
[29]	DOU X, HE P, ZHU P, et al. Soil organic carbon dynamics under long-term fertilization in a black soil of China: Evidence from stable C isotopes[J]. Scientific reports, 2016, 6:21488. doi: 10.1038/srep21488 pmid: 26898121
[30]	CHEN L, LIU L, QIN S, et al. Regulation of priming effect by soil organic matter stability over a broad geographic scale[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1):5112. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13119-z pmid: 31704929
[31]	LAL, RATTAN. Sequestering carbon and increasing productivity by conservation agriculture[J]. Journal of soil & water conservation, 2015, 70(3):55A-62 A.
[1]	FE D S, TUBIELLO F N, SALVATORE M, et al. New estimates of CO₂ forest emissions and removals:1990-2015[J]. Forest ecology & management, 2015, 352:89-98.
[2]	LAL R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security[J]. Science, 2004, 304:1623-1627. doi: 10.1126/science.1097396 pmid: 15192216
[3]	SMITH P, HABERL H, POPP A, et al. How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?[J]. Global change biology, 2013, 19(8):2285-2302. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12160 pmid: 23505220
[4]	刘昱, 陈敏鹏, 陈吉宁. 农田生态系统碳循环模型研究进展和展望[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(3):1-9.
[5]	张萌, 卢杰, 任毅华. 土壤呼吸影响因素及测定方法的研究进展[J]. 山东林业科技, 2021, 51(2):92,100-106.
[6]	LENKA N K, LAL R. Soil aggregation and greenhouse gas flux after 15 years of wheat straw and fertilizer management in a no-till system[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2013, 126:78-89.
[32]	PLAZA C, COURTIER-MURIAS D, FERNANDEZ J M, et al. Physical, chemical, and biochemical mechanisms of soil organic matter stabilization under conservation tillage systems: A central role for microbes and microbial by-products in C sequestration[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2013, 57:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.026 URL
[33]	陈晓芬, 刘明, 江春玉, 等. 不同施肥处理红壤性水稻土团聚体有机碳矿化特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(17):3325-3334. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.17.008
[34]	杨芳, 段惠敏, 段建军, 等. 温度对黑色石灰土原土及不同粒径土壤颗粒有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(2):68-76.
[35]	安世花, 李渝, 王小利, 等. 长期施有机肥对黄壤旱地不同粒径有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(8):47-51.
[36]	郝瑞军, 李忠佩, 车玉萍, 等. 好气与淹水条件下水稻土各粒级团聚体有机碳矿化量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(9):1944-1950.
[37]	刘晶, 田耀武, 张巧明. 豫西黄土丘陵区不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体有机碳含量及其矿化特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(3):255-261.
[38]	高菲, 林维, 崔晓阳. 过筛处理对小兴安岭2种森林类型土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(2):30-39.
[39]	ADEKANMBI A A, SHAW L J, SIZMUR T. Effect of sieving on ex situ soil respiration of soils from three land use types[J]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, 2020, 20:912-916. doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00177-2
[40]	TRIVEDI P, DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M, JEFFRIES T C, et al. Soil aggregation and associated microbial communities modify the impact of agricultural management on carbon content[J]. Environmental microbiology, 2017, 19(8):3070-3086. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13779 pmid: 28447378
[41]	ANANYEVA K, WANG W, SMUCKER A. J. M., et al. Can intra- aggregate pore structures affect the aggregate's effectiveness in protecting carbon?[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2013, 57:868-875. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.10.019 URL
[42]	GUPTA V, GERMIDA J J. Soil aggregation: Influence on microbial biomass and implications for biological processes[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2015, 80:A3-A9. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.002 URL
[43]	KRAVCHENKO A N, NEGASSA W C, GUBER A K, et al. Intra-aggregate pore structure influences phylogenetic composition of bacterial community in macroaggregates[J]. Soil science society of America journal, 2016, 78(6):1924. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2014.07.0308 URL
[44]	JIANG Y j, SUN B, JIN C, et al. Soil aggregate stratification of nematodes and microbial communities affects the metabolic quotient in an acid soil[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2013, 60:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.006 URL
[45]	荣慧, 房焕, 张中彬, 等. 团聚体大小分布对孔隙结构和土壤有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(2):476-485.
[46]	N. DAL FERRO, L. SARTORI, G. SIMONETTI, et al. Soil macro-and microstructure as affected by different tillage systems and their effects on maize root growth[J]. Soil & tillage research, 2014, 140:55-65.
[47]	刘满强, 胡锋, 陈小云. 土壤有机碳稳定机制研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007(6):2642-2650.
[48]	孙慧兰, 李卫红, 杨余辉, 等. 伊犁山地不同海拔土壤有机碳的分布[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(5):603-608. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2012.05.603
[49]	ERIC C. BREVIK. The potential impact of climate change on soil properties and processes and corresponding influence on food security[J]. Agriculture, 2013, 3(3):398-417. doi: 10.3390/agriculture3030398 URL
[50]	XIAO H B, LI Z W, CHANG X F, et al. The mineralization and sequestration of organic carbon in relation to agricultural soil erosion[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 329:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.018 URL
[51]	SCHIMEL J P, SCHAEFFER S M. Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2012,3.
[52]	KUZYAKOV Y. Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter[J]. Soil biology & biochemistry, 2010, 42(9):1363-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003 URL
[53]	GUENET B, DANGER M, ABBADIE L, et al. Priming effect: bridging the gap between terrestrial and aquatic ecology[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(10):2850-2861. pmid: 21058546
[54]	马欣, 魏亮, 唐美玲, 等. 长期不同施肥对稻田土壤有机碳矿化及激发效应的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(12):5680-5686.
[55]	张晓曦, 张玲玲, 雷航宇, 等. 草本凋落物与尿素联合修复对油污土壤生物化学性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8):2715-2725.
[56]	MITCHELL P J, SIMPSON A J, SOONG R, et al. Shifts in microbial community and water-extractable organic matter composition with biochar amendment in a temperate forest soil[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2015, 81:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.017 URL
[57]	卢晓蓉, 尹艳, 冯竞仙, 等. 杉木凋落物及其生物质炭对土壤原有有机碳矿化的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(4):943-953.
[58]	林先贵. 土壤微生物研究原理与方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010:53-249.
[59]	郭婷. 短期耕作和施肥对草甸黑土酶活性和细菌多样性的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2018.
[60]	张乃明. 环境土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2012:71-72,180.

筛分粒级/mm		团聚体分级	培养主要条件		CO₂排放量		CO₂排放速率/[μg/(kg·h)]		文献
>2		大团聚体	35 d		167.20~295.60 mg/kg		199.05~351.90		[33]
1~2		小团聚体	35 d		212.80~276.50 mg/kg		253.33~329.17
1~0.25		小团聚体	35 d		147.60~242.00 mg/kg		175.71~288.10
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	35 d		110.90~236.20 mg/kg		132.02~281.19
<0.053		粉-黏颗粒	35 d		136.20~214.20 mg/kg		162.14~255.00
0.25~2		小团聚体	8 d，15℃		120.45 mg/kg		627.34		[34]
0.25~2		小团聚体	8 d，25℃		134.50 mg/kg		700.52
0.25~2		小团聚体	8 d，35℃		172.91 mg/kg		900.57
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	8 d，15℃		252.95 mg/kg		1317.45
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	8 d，25℃		310.70 mg/kg		1618.23
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	8 d，35℃		351.01 mg/kg		1828.18
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	8 d，15℃		161.40 mg/kg		840.63
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	8 d，25℃		223.27 mg/kg		1162.86
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	8 d，35℃		271.47 mg/kg		1413.91
2~0.25		小团聚体	28 d，不施肥		3.0727 g/kg		4572.47		[35]
2~0.25		小团聚体	28 d，施肥		3.6500 g/kg		5431.55
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	28 d，不施肥		3.8475 g/kg		5725.45
1~2		小团聚体	49 d，好气		1497.68 mL CO₂/kg		2501.19		[36]
<0.053		粉-黏颗粒	49 d，好气		399.34 mL CO₂/kg		667.04		[36]
0.25~2	小团聚体			90 d		2223.00 mg/kg	1029.17	[37]

筛分粒级/mm		团聚体分级	培养主要条件		CO₂排放量		CO₂排放速率/[μg/(kg·h)]		文献
>2		大团聚体	35 d		167.20~295.60 mg/kg		199.05~351.90		[33]
1~2		小团聚体	35 d		212.80~276.50 mg/kg		253.33~329.17
1~0.25		小团聚体	35 d		147.60~242.00 mg/kg		175.71~288.10
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	35 d		110.90~236.20 mg/kg		132.02~281.19
<0.053		粉-黏颗粒	35 d		136.20~214.20 mg/kg		162.14~255.00
0.25~2		小团聚体	8 d，15℃		120.45 mg/kg		627.34		[34]
0.25~2		小团聚体	8 d，25℃		134.50 mg/kg		700.52
0.25~2		小团聚体	8 d，35℃		172.91 mg/kg		900.57
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	8 d，15℃		252.95 mg/kg		1317.45
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	8 d，25℃		310.70 mg/kg		1618.23
0.25~0.053		微团聚体	8 d，35℃		351.01 mg/kg		1828.18
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	8 d，15℃		161.40 mg/kg		840.63
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	8 d，25℃		223.27 mg/kg		1162.86
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	8 d，35℃		271.47 mg/kg		1413.91
2~0.25		小团聚体	28 d，不施肥		3.0727 g/kg		4572.47		[35]
2~0.25		小团聚体	28 d，施肥		3.6500 g/kg		5431.55
0.053~0.002		粉-黏颗粒	28 d，不施肥		3.8475 g/kg		5725.45
1~2		小团聚体	49 d，好气		1497.68 mL CO₂/kg		2501.19		[36]
<0.053		粉-黏颗粒	49 d，好气		399.34 mL CO₂/kg		667.04		[36]
0.25~2	小团聚体			90 d		2223.00 mg/kg	1029.17	[37]

耕作方式对土壤团聚体微生物及有机碳矿化的影响研究进展及展望

Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Aggregate Microorganisms and Organic Carbon Mineralization: A Review

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 60

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	郑微, 袁龙珍, 王建花, 杨耀, 吴传光, 黄颖, 游萍, 薛晓辉. 煤矿复垦区不同植被对土壤可培养微生物多样性和理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(7): 81-87.
[2]	殷丽萍, 刘思远, 蔡成梅, 石小丽, 朱小娟, 袁国明, 汪吉东, 张辉, 徐聪, 马洪波. 嘉博文土壤调理剂对萝卜产量品质、土壤理化性质的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 64-71.
[3]	夏丽娟, 许中怀, 董雪娟, 万莉. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌对黄瓜白粉病的毒力与防效及对黄瓜的安全性评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 111-115.
[4]	陈义勇, 周波, 黎健龙, 唐颢, 崔莹莹, 吴文浩, 刘嘉裕, 唐劲驰. 茶饼病病叶表面微生物多样性及病害真菌的分离鉴定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 116-123.
[5]	黄颖博, 罗凡, 龚雪蛟, 王迎春, 李兰英, 刘东娜, 尧渝. 有机肥对土壤微生物群落特征影响的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3): 88-96.
[6]	武明雅, 陈俊强, 马海林, 刘方春, 刘丙花, 刘幸红, 司东霞. 印度梨形孢定殖策略和促生机制研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3): 119-126.
[7]	郭巨先, 李桂花, 符梅, 刘县明, 罗文龙, 骆善伟, 刘玉涛. 微生物有机肥对芋头产量品质性状及土壤微生物类群的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3): 20-27.
[8]	陈桢禄, 潘晓英, 卢钰升, 黄振瑞, 顾文杰, 郭俊杰, 魏彬, 曾瑜玲, 刘意旋, 何经纬, 李集勤. 有机无机复配调理剂对酸化土壤性状和烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3): 28-34.
[9]	包雨情, 陈云鹏, 韩颖颖. 黄瓜采后生理变化及贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(3): 35-41.
[10]	刘敏, 赵财, 范虹, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 孙亚斌. 长期间作及免耕对土壤物理性状及作物产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(2): 28-35.
[11]	孙慧, 吴中能, 苗婷婷, 刘俊龙, 苏晓华, 丁昌俊, 曹志华, 闫彩霞, 王涛. 不同施肥处理对杨树林地土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(2): 36-43.
[12]	吴松, 周甜, 杨立宾, 江云兵, 潘虹, 刘永志, 杜君. 基于VOSviewer的叶际微生物研究现状可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 142-150.
[13]	殷婷婷, 李志慧, 苏佳贺, 吴世迪, 徐红岩, 贺帅, 刘培, 李相前. 生物法制备纳米硒的研究进展和应用前景[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 33-41.
[14]	王丽娜, 杨瑛, 杜苏. 生物炭施入对盐碱土壤影响的研究现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 81-87.
[15]	赵双梅, 刘宪斌, 李红梅, 董文彩, 沈健萍, 包金美, 梁芳, 鲁美. 云南哀牢山湿性常绿阔叶林土壤碳分布特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 88-95.