
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 74-79.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090098
Special Issue: 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
					
													Wang Shouhong1, Wang Guiliang1, Kou Xiangming1, Zhang Jiahong1( ), Zhu Lingyu1, Xu Rong2, Han Guangming1, Wu Leiming2, Tang Hejun2, Bi Jianhua2
), Zhu Lingyu1, Xu Rong2, Han Guangming1, Wu Leiming2, Tang Hejun2, Bi Jianhua2
												  
						
						
						
					
				
Received:2018-09-20
															
							
																	Revised:2018-12-24
															
							
															
							
																	Online:2020-01-15
															
							
																	Published:2020-04-30
															
						Contact:
								Zhang Jiahong   
																	E-mail:yzzhangjh@126.com
																					CLC Number:
Wang Shouhong, Wang Guiliang, Kou Xiangming, Zhang Jiahong, Zhu Lingyu, Xu Rong, Han Guangming, Wu Leiming, Tang Hejun, Bi Jianhua. Biogas Residue Substituting Chemical Fertilizer Nitrogen as Basal Fertilizer: Effect on Grape Yield and Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(2): 74-79.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090098
| 处理 | 沼渣液 | 化肥 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 施用量/(×103 kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | ||
| CK | - | - | - | - | 135.00 | 112.50 | 33.75 | |
| 30%NZY | 57.86 | 40.50 | 11.57 | 52.07 | 94.50 | 100.93 | - | |
| 50% NZY | 96.43 | 67.50 | 19.29 | 86.79 | 67.50 | 93.21 | - | |
| 70% NZY | 135.00 | 94.50 | 27.00 | 121.50 | 40.50 | 85.50 | - | |
| 100% NZY | 192.86 | 135.00 | 38.57 | 173.57 | - | 73.93 | - | |
| 150% NZY | 289.29 | 202.50 | 57.86 | 260.36 | - | 54.64 | - | |
| 处理 | 沼渣液 | 化肥 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 施用量/(×103 kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | ||
| CK | - | - | - | - | 135.00 | 112.50 | 33.75 | |
| 30%NZY | 57.86 | 40.50 | 11.57 | 52.07 | 94.50 | 100.93 | - | |
| 50% NZY | 96.43 | 67.50 | 19.29 | 86.79 | 67.50 | 93.21 | - | |
| 70% NZY | 135.00 | 94.50 | 27.00 | 121.50 | 40.50 | 85.50 | - | |
| 100% NZY | 192.86 | 135.00 | 38.57 | 173.57 | - | 73.93 | - | |
| 150% NZY | 289.29 | 202.50 | 57.86 | 260.36 | - | 54.64 | - | |
| 处理 | 粒重/g | 穗粒数/粒 | 穗重/g | 株穗数/挂 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 6.10b | 83.67a | 510.36a | 15.20a | 15476.29b | 
| 30%NZY | 6.40b | 83.13a | 532.01a | 14.83a | 15743.43b | 
| 50%NZY | 6.73ab | 84.19a | 566.46a | 15.17a | 17139.56a | 
| 70%NZY | 7.12a | 79.89a | 570.23a | 15.00a | 17064.20a | 
| 100%NZY | 7.14a | 82.67a | 588.47a | 15.50a | 18197.03a | 
| 150%NZY | 6.23b | 90.33a | 562.61a | 15.00a | 16836.18a | 
| 处理 | 粒重/g | 穗粒数/粒 | 穗重/g | 株穗数/挂 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 6.10b | 83.67a | 510.36a | 15.20a | 15476.29b | 
| 30%NZY | 6.40b | 83.13a | 532.01a | 14.83a | 15743.43b | 
| 50%NZY | 6.73ab | 84.19a | 566.46a | 15.17a | 17139.56a | 
| 70%NZY | 7.12a | 79.89a | 570.23a | 15.00a | 17064.20a | 
| 100%NZY | 7.14a | 82.67a | 588.47a | 15.50a | 18197.03a | 
| 150%NZY | 6.23b | 90.33a | 562.61a | 15.00a | 16836.18a | 
| 处理 | 萌芽期(月/日) | 始花期(月/日) | 谢花期(月/日) | 膨大期(月/日) | 着色期(月/日) | 成熟期(月/日) | 从萌芽至成熟天数/d | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/18 | 144 | 
| 30%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/3 | 8/18 | 144 | 
| 50%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 | 
| 70%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/1 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 | 
| 100%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/3 | 8/16 | 142 | 
| 150%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/4 | 8/20 | 146 | 
| 处理 | 萌芽期(月/日) | 始花期(月/日) | 谢花期(月/日) | 膨大期(月/日) | 着色期(月/日) | 成熟期(月/日) | 从萌芽至成熟天数/d | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/18 | 144 | 
| 30%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/3 | 8/18 | 144 | 
| 50%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 | 
| 70%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/1 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 | 
| 100%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/3 | 8/16 | 142 | 
| 150%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/4 | 8/20 | 146 | 
| 处理 | 新梢节间均长/cm | 新梢粗度/mm | 百叶鲜重/g | 单叶面积/cm2 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 13.10b | 11.54a | 1157.41b | 411.29b | 
| 30%NZY | 13.12b | 11.55a | 1162.71b | 411.80b | 
| 50%NZY | 13.43a | 11.61a | 1173.18b | 418.73ab | 
| 70%NZY | 13.29ab | 11.59a | 1189.73b | 421.67ab | 
| 100%NZY | 13.48a | 11.63a | 1192.65b | 429.82ab | 
| 150%NZY | 14.34a | 12.21a | 1339.88a | 435.91a | 
| 处理 | 新梢节间均长/cm | 新梢粗度/mm | 百叶鲜重/g | 单叶面积/cm2 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 13.10b | 11.54a | 1157.41b | 411.29b | 
| 30%NZY | 13.12b | 11.55a | 1162.71b | 411.80b | 
| 50%NZY | 13.43a | 11.61a | 1173.18b | 418.73ab | 
| 70%NZY | 13.29ab | 11.59a | 1189.73b | 421.67ab | 
| 100%NZY | 13.48a | 11.63a | 1192.65b | 429.82ab | 
| 150%NZY | 14.34a | 12.21a | 1339.88a | 435.91a | 
| 处理 | 氨基酸/(mg/g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 有机酸/% | Vc/(μg/g) | 固酸比 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.35c | 13.50a | 0.48a | 26.54c | 28.17b | 
| 30%NZY | 0.37c | 13.50a | 0.41b | 29.64c | 33.28ab | 
| 50%NZY | 0.38c | 14.00a | 0.39b | 41.10a | 36.06a | 
| 70%NZY | 0.42b | 14.50a | 0.42b | 44.23a | 34.84a | 
| 100%NZY | 0.51a | 15.00a | 0.44ab | 36.76b | 34.05a | 
| 150%NZY | 0.46b | 14.50a | 0.45a | 32.98b | 32.14ab | 
| 处理 | 氨基酸/(mg/g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 有机酸/% | Vc/(μg/g) | 固酸比 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 0.35c | 13.50a | 0.48a | 26.54c | 28.17b | 
| 30%NZY | 0.37c | 13.50a | 0.41b | 29.64c | 33.28ab | 
| 50%NZY | 0.38c | 14.00a | 0.39b | 41.10a | 36.06a | 
| 70%NZY | 0.42b | 14.50a | 0.42b | 44.23a | 34.84a | 
| 100%NZY | 0.51a | 15.00a | 0.44ab | 36.76b | 34.05a | 
| 150%NZY | 0.46b | 14.50a | 0.45a | 32.98b | 32.14ab | 
| 处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | Cr | Pb | As | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 1.733b | 0.560b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a | 
| 30%NZY | 1.734b | 0.597b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a | 
| 50%NZY | 1.826b | 0.610ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.043b | 0.011a | 
| 70%NZY | 2.017ab | 0.683ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.045ab | 0.011a | 
| 100%NZY | 2.050ab | 0.724a | 0.003a | 0.032ab | 0.049a | 0.011a | 
| 150%NZY | 2.200a | 0.753a | 0.003a | 0.030b | 0.051a | 0.011a | 
| 处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | Cr | Pb | As | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 1.733b | 0.560b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a | 
| 30%NZY | 1.734b | 0.597b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a | 
| 50%NZY | 1.826b | 0.610ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.043b | 0.011a | 
| 70%NZY | 2.017ab | 0.683ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.045ab | 0.011a | 
| 100%NZY | 2.050ab | 0.724a | 0.003a | 0.032ab | 0.049a | 0.011a | 
| 150%NZY | 2.200a | 0.753a | 0.003a | 0.030b | 0.051a | 0.011a | 
| [1] | 杨金楼, 计中孚 . 上海地区畜禽场大、中型沼气工程沼渣液后处理技术调查研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 1993,9(S1):139-143. | 
| [2] | 王子臣, 管永祥, 盛婧 , 等. 水稻分蘖期沼液施灌对农田水体氮素的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23(12):1544-1551. | 
| [3] | 高威, 陶晓婷, 王远玲 , 等. 养猪场养殖废水与化肥配施对小麦中微量元素含量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(2):433-440. | 
| [4] | 陶晓婷, 朱正杰, 高威 , 等. 规模化猪场处理废水与化肥配施对小麦氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014,33(3):555-561. | 
| [5] | Chen G, Zhao G H, Zhang H M , et al. Biogas slurry use as N fertilizer for two-season Zizania aquatica Turcz. in China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2017,107(3):303-320. | 
| [6] | 王志典, 马东辉 . 沼液间接地下滴灌对红提葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018,24(5):46-47. | 
| [7] | 颜炳佐, 徐维田, 于鹏波 . 沼渣沼液对提高红提葡萄产量和品质的研究[J]. 中国沼气, 2012,30(2):47-48. | 
| [8] | 嵇东 . 沼渣沼液对提高葡萄产量与品质的研究[J]. 河南农业, 2017,20(7):13-14. | 
| [9] | 张国听 . 沼肥在葡萄等作物上的应用试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018,59(6):953-954. | 
| [10] | 高英杰, 侯振安, 刘利鹏 , 等. 不同有机肥对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2013,36(9):30-31. | 
| [11] | 董志新, 卜玉山, 续珍 , 等. 沼气肥养分物质和重金属含量差异及安全农用分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(3):105-110. | 
| [12] | 董越勇, 聂新军, 王强 , 等. 不同养殖规模猪场沼气工程沼液养分差异性分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017,58(12):2089-2092. | 
| [13] | 刘芳, 李泽碧, 苏胜齐 , 等. 沼液与化肥配施对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国沼气, 2009(2):21-23. | 
| [14] | 张进, 吴良欢, 王敏艳 . 铁氮配施对稻米中铁、锌、钙、镁和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2007,26(1):122-125. | 
| [15] | 李玲玲 . 有机肥氮素有效性和替代化肥氮比例研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2011. | 
| [16] | 刘红江, 陈虞雯, 孙国峰 , 等. 有机肥-无机肥不同配施比例对水稻产量和农田养分流失的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017,36(2):405-412. | 
| [17] | 唐海明, 程爱武, 徐一兰 , 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对双季稻区水稻干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015,36(6):1091-1098. | 
| [18] | 王秀娟 . 基于沼渣的无土栽培有机基质特性的研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2006. | 
| [19] | 马嘉伟 . 沼渣、竹炭对土壤肥力质量和水稻产量及养分吸收的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2013. | 
| [20] | 周敏, 廖淼玲, 郭亮 , 等. 不同有机肥对葡萄产量、品质及土壤养分的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2014,26(11):24-28. | 
| [21] | 孙聪伟, 杨丽丽, 陈展 , 等. 施氮量对巨峰葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2017,21(5):38-41. | 
| [22] | 李淑红, 王磊, 史文婷 , 等. 不同营养液浓度对“巨峰”葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(3):394-401. | 
| [23] | 程杰山, 蒋爱丽, 奚晓军 , 等. 不同施肥量对“巨玫瑰”葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(25):167-171. | 
| [24] | 秦文弟, 夏金亮, 蒋湖波 , 等. 沼渣施肥对豇豆产量和重金属含量及土壤重金属积累的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2018,402(3):125-129. | 
| [25] | 中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB 2762—2005食品中污染物限量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005. | 
| [26] | 姜丽娜, 王强, 陈丁江 , 等. 沼液稻田消解对水稻生产、土壤与环境安全影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(7):1328-1336. | 
| [27] | 石先罗, 张卫东, 王风 , 等. 沼液沼渣农用生态环境风险研究进展[J]. 生态经济:学术版, 2014(1):12-15,19. | 
| [28] | Odlare M, Pell M, Svensson K . Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues[J]. Waste Management, 2008,28(7):1246-1253. | 
| [29] | 杨乐, 王开勇, 庞玮 , 等. 新疆绿洲区连续五年施用沼液对农田土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(5):15-21. | 
| [1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. | 
| [2] | HU Jun, DORJE Tashi, LABA , GESANG Droma, LUOSONG Quzhen. Definition of Grape Crowing Period and Analysis of Meteorological Conditions in Yanjing of Mangkang County of Qamdo City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 103-106. | 
| [3] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. | 
| [4] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. | 
| [5] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. | 
| [6] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. | 
| [7] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. | 
| [8] | MA Meng, WANG Kehua, QU Liang, DOU Taocun, GUO Jun, WANG Xingguo, HU Yuping, LU Jian. Determination and Analysis of Slaughter Performance, Chest Muscle Quality and Composition of Different Chicken Breeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 137-142. | 
| [9] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. | 
| [10] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. | 
| [11] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. | 
| [12] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. | 
| [13] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. | 
| [14] | WU Xuanke, WANG Renjun, HUANG Wei, LIU Yongyu, YAO Yuqun. Spatial Distribution of Heat Injury of Grape in Guangxi Based on SURFER Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 118-121. | 
| [15] | REN Shuxia, HAO Ling, DONG Jingming, HU Dongli, WEI Yikun. Meteorological Disaster Analysis and Climatic Regionalization for Grape Planting in Guannan, Lianyungang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 122-128. | 
| Viewed | ||||||
| Full text |  | |||||
| Abstract |  | |||||