Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 74-79.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090098
Special Issue: 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Shouhong1, Wang Guiliang1, Kou Xiangming1, Zhang Jiahong1(), Zhu Lingyu1, Xu Rong2, Han Guangming1, Wu Leiming2, Tang Hejun2, Bi Jianhua2
Received:
2018-09-20
Revised:
2018-12-24
Online:
2020-01-15
Published:
2020-04-30
Contact:
Zhang Jiahong
E-mail:yzzhangjh@126.com
CLC Number:
Wang Shouhong, Wang Guiliang, Kou Xiangming, Zhang Jiahong, Zhu Lingyu, Xu Rong, Han Guangming, Wu Leiming, Tang Hejun, Bi Jianhua. Biogas Residue Substituting Chemical Fertilizer Nitrogen as Basal Fertilizer: Effect on Grape Yield and Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(2): 74-79.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18090098
处理 | 沼渣液 | 化肥 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施用量/(×103 kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | ||
CK | - | - | - | - | 135.00 | 112.50 | 33.75 | |
30%NZY | 57.86 | 40.50 | 11.57 | 52.07 | 94.50 | 100.93 | - | |
50% NZY | 96.43 | 67.50 | 19.29 | 86.79 | 67.50 | 93.21 | - | |
70% NZY | 135.00 | 94.50 | 27.00 | 121.50 | 40.50 | 85.50 | - | |
100% NZY | 192.86 | 135.00 | 38.57 | 173.57 | - | 73.93 | - | |
150% NZY | 289.29 | 202.50 | 57.86 | 260.36 | - | 54.64 | - |
处理 | 沼渣液 | 化肥 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施用量/(×103 kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | N/(kg/hm2) | P2O5/(kg/hm2) | K2O/(kg/hm2) | ||
CK | - | - | - | - | 135.00 | 112.50 | 33.75 | |
30%NZY | 57.86 | 40.50 | 11.57 | 52.07 | 94.50 | 100.93 | - | |
50% NZY | 96.43 | 67.50 | 19.29 | 86.79 | 67.50 | 93.21 | - | |
70% NZY | 135.00 | 94.50 | 27.00 | 121.50 | 40.50 | 85.50 | - | |
100% NZY | 192.86 | 135.00 | 38.57 | 173.57 | - | 73.93 | - | |
150% NZY | 289.29 | 202.50 | 57.86 | 260.36 | - | 54.64 | - |
处理 | 粒重/g | 穗粒数/粒 | 穗重/g | 株穗数/挂 | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.10b | 83.67a | 510.36a | 15.20a | 15476.29b |
30%NZY | 6.40b | 83.13a | 532.01a | 14.83a | 15743.43b |
50%NZY | 6.73ab | 84.19a | 566.46a | 15.17a | 17139.56a |
70%NZY | 7.12a | 79.89a | 570.23a | 15.00a | 17064.20a |
100%NZY | 7.14a | 82.67a | 588.47a | 15.50a | 18197.03a |
150%NZY | 6.23b | 90.33a | 562.61a | 15.00a | 16836.18a |
处理 | 粒重/g | 穗粒数/粒 | 穗重/g | 株穗数/挂 | 产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.10b | 83.67a | 510.36a | 15.20a | 15476.29b |
30%NZY | 6.40b | 83.13a | 532.01a | 14.83a | 15743.43b |
50%NZY | 6.73ab | 84.19a | 566.46a | 15.17a | 17139.56a |
70%NZY | 7.12a | 79.89a | 570.23a | 15.00a | 17064.20a |
100%NZY | 7.14a | 82.67a | 588.47a | 15.50a | 18197.03a |
150%NZY | 6.23b | 90.33a | 562.61a | 15.00a | 16836.18a |
处理 | 萌芽期(月/日) | 始花期(月/日) | 谢花期(月/日) | 膨大期(月/日) | 着色期(月/日) | 成熟期(月/日) | 从萌芽至成熟天数/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/18 | 144 |
30%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/3 | 8/18 | 144 |
50%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 |
70%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/1 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 |
100%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/3 | 8/16 | 142 |
150%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/4 | 8/20 | 146 |
处理 | 萌芽期(月/日) | 始花期(月/日) | 谢花期(月/日) | 膨大期(月/日) | 着色期(月/日) | 成熟期(月/日) | 从萌芽至成熟天数/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/18 | 144 |
30%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/2 | 7/3 | 8/18 | 144 |
50%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/2 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 |
70%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/18 | 6/1 | 7/2 | 8/17 | 143 |
100%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/3 | 8/16 | 142 |
150%NZY | 3/27 | 4/24 | 5/19 | 6/1 | 7/4 | 8/20 | 146 |
处理 | 新梢节间均长/cm | 新梢粗度/mm | 百叶鲜重/g | 单叶面积/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.10b | 11.54a | 1157.41b | 411.29b |
30%NZY | 13.12b | 11.55a | 1162.71b | 411.80b |
50%NZY | 13.43a | 11.61a | 1173.18b | 418.73ab |
70%NZY | 13.29ab | 11.59a | 1189.73b | 421.67ab |
100%NZY | 13.48a | 11.63a | 1192.65b | 429.82ab |
150%NZY | 14.34a | 12.21a | 1339.88a | 435.91a |
处理 | 新梢节间均长/cm | 新梢粗度/mm | 百叶鲜重/g | 单叶面积/cm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 13.10b | 11.54a | 1157.41b | 411.29b |
30%NZY | 13.12b | 11.55a | 1162.71b | 411.80b |
50%NZY | 13.43a | 11.61a | 1173.18b | 418.73ab |
70%NZY | 13.29ab | 11.59a | 1189.73b | 421.67ab |
100%NZY | 13.48a | 11.63a | 1192.65b | 429.82ab |
150%NZY | 14.34a | 12.21a | 1339.88a | 435.91a |
处理 | 氨基酸/(mg/g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 有机酸/% | Vc/(μg/g) | 固酸比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.35c | 13.50a | 0.48a | 26.54c | 28.17b |
30%NZY | 0.37c | 13.50a | 0.41b | 29.64c | 33.28ab |
50%NZY | 0.38c | 14.00a | 0.39b | 41.10a | 36.06a |
70%NZY | 0.42b | 14.50a | 0.42b | 44.23a | 34.84a |
100%NZY | 0.51a | 15.00a | 0.44ab | 36.76b | 34.05a |
150%NZY | 0.46b | 14.50a | 0.45a | 32.98b | 32.14ab |
处理 | 氨基酸/(mg/g) | 可溶性固形物/% | 有机酸/% | Vc/(μg/g) | 固酸比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.35c | 13.50a | 0.48a | 26.54c | 28.17b |
30%NZY | 0.37c | 13.50a | 0.41b | 29.64c | 33.28ab |
50%NZY | 0.38c | 14.00a | 0.39b | 41.10a | 36.06a |
70%NZY | 0.42b | 14.50a | 0.42b | 44.23a | 34.84a |
100%NZY | 0.51a | 15.00a | 0.44ab | 36.76b | 34.05a |
150%NZY | 0.46b | 14.50a | 0.45a | 32.98b | 32.14ab |
处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | Cr | Pb | As |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.733b | 0.560b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a |
30%NZY | 1.734b | 0.597b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a |
50%NZY | 1.826b | 0.610ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.043b | 0.011a |
70%NZY | 2.017ab | 0.683ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.045ab | 0.011a |
100%NZY | 2.050ab | 0.724a | 0.003a | 0.032ab | 0.049a | 0.011a |
150%NZY | 2.200a | 0.753a | 0.003a | 0.030b | 0.051a | 0.011a |
处理 | Cu | Zn | Cd | Cr | Pb | As |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.733b | 0.560b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a |
30%NZY | 1.734b | 0.597b | 0.003a | 0.034a | 0.043b | 0.010a |
50%NZY | 1.826b | 0.610ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.043b | 0.011a |
70%NZY | 2.017ab | 0.683ab | 0.003a | 0.033a | 0.045ab | 0.011a |
100%NZY | 2.050ab | 0.724a | 0.003a | 0.032ab | 0.049a | 0.011a |
150%NZY | 2.200a | 0.753a | 0.003a | 0.030b | 0.051a | 0.011a |
[1] | 杨金楼, 计中孚 . 上海地区畜禽场大、中型沼气工程沼渣液后处理技术调查研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 1993,9(S1):139-143. |
[2] | 王子臣, 管永祥, 盛婧 , 等. 水稻分蘖期沼液施灌对农田水体氮素的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23(12):1544-1551. |
[3] | 高威, 陶晓婷, 王远玲 , 等. 养猪场养殖废水与化肥配施对小麦中微量元素含量和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(2):433-440. |
[4] | 陶晓婷, 朱正杰, 高威 , 等. 规模化猪场处理废水与化肥配施对小麦氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014,33(3):555-561. |
[5] | Chen G, Zhao G H, Zhang H M , et al. Biogas slurry use as N fertilizer for two-season Zizania aquatica Turcz. in China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2017,107(3):303-320. |
[6] | 王志典, 马东辉 . 沼液间接地下滴灌对红提葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018,24(5):46-47. |
[7] | 颜炳佐, 徐维田, 于鹏波 . 沼渣沼液对提高红提葡萄产量和品质的研究[J]. 中国沼气, 2012,30(2):47-48. |
[8] | 嵇东 . 沼渣沼液对提高葡萄产量与品质的研究[J]. 河南农业, 2017,20(7):13-14. |
[9] | 张国听 . 沼肥在葡萄等作物上的应用试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018,59(6):953-954. |
[10] | 高英杰, 侯振安, 刘利鹏 , 等. 不同有机肥对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2013,36(9):30-31. |
[11] | 董志新, 卜玉山, 续珍 , 等. 沼气肥养分物质和重金属含量差异及安全农用分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(3):105-110. |
[12] | 董越勇, 聂新军, 王强 , 等. 不同养殖规模猪场沼气工程沼液养分差异性分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017,58(12):2089-2092. |
[13] | 刘芳, 李泽碧, 苏胜齐 , 等. 沼液与化肥配施对葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国沼气, 2009(2):21-23. |
[14] | 张进, 吴良欢, 王敏艳 . 铁氮配施对稻米中铁、锌、钙、镁和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2007,26(1):122-125. |
[15] | 李玲玲 . 有机肥氮素有效性和替代化肥氮比例研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2011. |
[16] | 刘红江, 陈虞雯, 孙国峰 , 等. 有机肥-无机肥不同配施比例对水稻产量和农田养分流失的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017,36(2):405-412. |
[17] | 唐海明, 程爱武, 徐一兰 , 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对双季稻区水稻干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015,36(6):1091-1098. |
[18] | 王秀娟 . 基于沼渣的无土栽培有机基质特性的研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2006. |
[19] | 马嘉伟 . 沼渣、竹炭对土壤肥力质量和水稻产量及养分吸收的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2013. |
[20] | 周敏, 廖淼玲, 郭亮 , 等. 不同有机肥对葡萄产量、品质及土壤养分的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2014,26(11):24-28. |
[21] | 孙聪伟, 杨丽丽, 陈展 , 等. 施氮量对巨峰葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2017,21(5):38-41. |
[22] | 李淑红, 王磊, 史文婷 , 等. 不同营养液浓度对“巨峰”葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(3):394-401. |
[23] | 程杰山, 蒋爱丽, 奚晓军 , 等. 不同施肥量对“巨玫瑰”葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(25):167-171. |
[24] | 秦文弟, 夏金亮, 蒋湖波 , 等. 沼渣施肥对豇豆产量和重金属含量及土壤重金属积累的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2018,402(3):125-129. |
[25] | 中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB 2762—2005食品中污染物限量[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005. |
[26] | 姜丽娜, 王强, 陈丁江 , 等. 沼液稻田消解对水稻生产、土壤与环境安全影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011,30(7):1328-1336. |
[27] | 石先罗, 张卫东, 王风 , 等. 沼液沼渣农用生态环境风险研究进展[J]. 生态经济:学术版, 2014(1):12-15,19. |
[28] | Odlare M, Pell M, Svensson K . Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues[J]. Waste Management, 2008,28(7):1246-1253. |
[29] | 杨乐, 王开勇, 庞玮 , 等. 新疆绿洲区连续五年施用沼液对农田土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(5):15-21. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | HU Jun, DORJE Tashi, LABA , GESANG Droma, LUOSONG Quzhen. Definition of Grape Crowing Period and Analysis of Meteorological Conditions in Yanjing of Mangkang County of Qamdo City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 103-106. |
[3] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[4] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[5] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
[6] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[7] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[8] | MA Meng, WANG Kehua, QU Liang, DOU Taocun, GUO Jun, WANG Xingguo, HU Yuping, LU Jian. Determination and Analysis of Slaughter Performance, Chest Muscle Quality and Composition of Different Chicken Breeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 137-142. |
[9] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[10] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[11] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[12] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[13] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[14] | WU Xuanke, WANG Renjun, HUANG Wei, LIU Yongyu, YAO Yuqun. Spatial Distribution of Heat Injury of Grape in Guangxi Based on SURFER Technology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 118-121. |
[15] | REN Shuxia, HAO Ling, DONG Jingming, HU Dongli, WEI Yikun. Meteorological Disaster Analysis and Climatic Regionalization for Grape Planting in Guannan, Lianyungang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 122-128. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||