The Enhancement of Nutrient Utility Efficiency in Paddy Field Based on Tail Water Irrigation of ‘Macrobrachium Rosenbergii’ Aquiculture

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190400054

Abstract

Abstract:

To achieve the steady yield of rice and to maximize the nutrient use efficiency during the paddy rice production irrigated by the tail water of ‘Macrobrachium Rosenbergii’ aquiculture completely, four treatments were set up for the pot experiment which contained CK (blank control), BC (biochar), TG (soil improvement solution), BT (biochar and soil improvement solution). The suitable material types were screened by the comparison of nutrient transport status in rice-soil system and the growth indexes of paddy rice in different treatments. The results showed that the addition of BC, TG and BT had positive effects on TN accumulation in topsoil (0-10 cm), TP accumulation in soil （0-25cm）,and system nutrition loss;meanwhile, the former two treatment were also helpful for TN accumulation in soil（0-25cm）,and the system nutrition. TG promoted the NO₃ ^- accumulation in the topsoil (0-10 cm) (P<0.05). Except BC treatment,TN and TP in paddy rice showed a downward trend at the same time in the existence of materials. In the BT treatment, the chlorophyll content at filling stage was higher than that of TG and CK (P<0.05) apparently, the first internode length of material treatment was lower than that of CK (P<0.05), while the difference of the other treatments was not significant(P>0.05). There was no significant difference between actual yield and theoretical yield of different treatments (P>0.05). To summarize, comparing with other materials, TG holds back NO₃ ^- as the main nitrogen nutrition effectively, enhances the nutrition utility efficiency of aquiculture wastewater, decreases the leaching risk, controls the internode growth of the rice bottom obviously, reduces the lodging risk and has no inhibition on the growth and yield of rice. Thus, TG is a potential material for the enhancement of nutrient utility efficiency in paddy rice irrigated by the wastewater from ‘Macrobrachium rosenbergii’ aquiculture completely.

Key words: paddy field, ‘Macrobrachium rosenbergii’, aquiculture wastewater, nutrient utility efficiency, enhancement

CLC Number:

S158.5

Xu Rong, Zhu Lingyu, Wang Shouhong, Bi Jianhua, Zhang Jiahong, Wang Guiliang, Kou Xiangming, Wu Leiming, Han Guangming, Tang Hejun. The Enhancement of Nutrient Utility Efficiency in Paddy Field Based on Tail Water Irrigation of ‘Macrobrachium Rosenbergii’ Aquiculture[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(23): 142-150.

Figures/Tables 11

References 32

[1]	韩士群, 周庆, 姚东瑞, 等. 水产养殖模式对池塘水环境和环境负荷量的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018,34(3):578-584.
[2]	王曙光, 李萍, 杨显祥, 等. 扬州市特种水产养殖现状及发展对策[J]. 水产养殖, 2019,40(2):34-36.
[3]	薛利红, 杨林章. 太湖流域稻田湿地对低污染水中氮磷的净化效果[J]. 环境科学研究, 2015,28(1):117-124.
[4]	Li S, Li H, Liang X, et al. Rural wastewater irrigation and nitrogen removal by the paddy wetland system in the Tai Lake region of China[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2009,9(5).
[5]	谢迎新, 熊正琴, 赵旭, 等. 富营养化河水灌溉对稻田土壤氮磷养分贡献的影响——以太湖地区黄泥土为例[J].生态学报, 2008(8):3618-3625.
[6]	李学平, 孙燕, 石孝均. 紫色土稻田磷素淋失特征及其对地下水的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008,( 09):1832-1838.
[7]	刘源, 崔二苹, 李中阳, 等. 养殖废水灌溉下施用生物质炭和果胶对土壤养分和重金属迁移的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(2):424-34.
[8]	于妍, 夏梦婧, 裴定宇, 等. 废水灌溉下有机物料对重度盐渍土养分及芦苇生长的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013,21(4):448-55.
[9]	崔虎, 王莉霞, 欧洋, 等. 生物炭-化肥配施对稻田土壤氮磷迁移转化的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019,38(2):412-421.
[10]	冯轲, 田晓燕, 王莉霞, 等. 化肥配施生物炭对稻田田面水氮磷流失风险影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016,35(2):329-335.
[11]	武丽君, 王朝旭, 张峰, 等. 玉米秸秆和玉米芯生物炭对水溶液中无机氮的吸附性能[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(1):74-81.
[12]	潘萌娇, 孙姣, 贺强, 等. 热解终温和加热速率对棉杆热解生物炭的影响研究[J]. 河北工业大学学报, 2014,43(5):60-66.
[13]	徐义亮. 生物碳的制备热动力学特性及其对镉的吸附性能和机理[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
[14]	董珊珊, 窦森, 邵满娇, 等. 秸秆深还不同年限对黑土腐殖质组成和胡敏酸结构特征的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2017,54(1):150-159.
[15]	尤雯, 刘海成, 曹家炜, 等. 磁性壳聚糖接枝聚丙烯酰胺去除水体中腐殖酸[J]. 环境科学, 2018,39(12):5532-5540.
[16]	Gong C, Chen D, Jiao X, et al. Continuous Hollow α-Fe₂O₃ and α-Fe Fibers Prepared by the Sol-Gel Method[M]. 2002.
[17]	Zhao D L, Wang X X, Zeng X W, et al. Preparation and inductive heating property of Fe₃O₄ -chitosan composite nanoparticles in an AC magnetic field for localized hyperthermia[J]. Journal of Alloys & Compounds, 2009,477(1):739-743.
[18]	Shen Y, Zhuang L, Zhang J, et al. A study of ferric-carbon micro-electrolysis process to enhance nitrogen and phosphorus removal efficiency in subsurface flow constructed wetlands[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019,359:706-712. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.152 URL
[19]	Li P, Lin K, Fang Z, et al. Enhanced nitrate removal by novel bimetallic Fe/Ni nanoparticles supported on biochar[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,151:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.042 URL
[20]	王静, 付伟章, 葛晓红, 等. 玉米生物炭和改性炭对土壤无机氮磷淋失影响的研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018,37(12):2810-2820.
[21]	王荣荣, 赖欣, 李洁, 等. 花生壳生物炭对硝态氮的吸附机制研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016,35(9):1727-1734.
[22]	崔虎, 王莉霞, 欧洋, 等. 生物炭-化肥配施对稻田土壤氮磷迁移转化的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019,38(2):412-421.
[23]	许云翔, 何莉莉, 刘玉学, 等. 施用生物炭6年后对稻田土壤酶活性及其肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报: 1-11.
[24]	张继宁, 周胜, 李广南, 等. 秸秆生物炭对水稻生长及滩涂土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018,35(6):492-499.
[25]	Sun X, Zhong T, Zhang L, et al. Reducing ammonia volatilization from paddy field with rice straw derived biochar[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,660:512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.450 URL pmid: 30640118
[26]	Wu D, Feng Y F, Xue L H, et al. Biochar Combined with Vermicompost Increases Crop Production While Reducing Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Paddy Soil[J]. Pedosphere, 2019,29(1):82-94.
[27]	Yang S H, Xiao Y N, Sun X, et al. Biochar improved rice yield and mitigated CH₄ and N₂O emissions from paddy field under controlled irrigation in the Taihu Lake Region of China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019,200:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.003 URL
[28]	王悦满, 冯彦房, 杨林章, 等. 水热及裂解生物炭对水稻产量及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2018,34(08):755-761.
[29]	王悦满, 高倩, 薛利红, 等. 生物炭不同施加方式对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018,35(1):58-65.
[30]	勾芒芒, 屈忠义, 王凡, 等. 生物炭施用对农业生产与环境效应影响研究进展分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018,49(7):1-12.
[31]	廖萍, 汤军, 曾勇军, 等. 生物炭和石灰对酸性稻田水稻产量、土壤性状和经济效益的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019,25(1):44-48.
[32]	张斌, 刘晓雨, 潘根兴, 等. 施用生物质炭后稻田土壤性质、水稻产量和痕量温室气体排放的变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(23):4844-4853. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.23.011 URL

简称	处理内容	使用方法
CK	对照
BC	生物炭	按照2 g/盆用量,与10 cm表层土混匀后,移栽秧苗。
TG	土壤改良液	按照0.004 g/盆,稀释2万倍灌溉,移栽秧苗;1个月后,按照0.002 g/盆,稀释2万倍再次灌溉。
BT	生物炭+土壤改良液	生物炭和土壤改良液用量均减半,使用方法同BC、TG。

简称	处理内容	使用方法
CK	对照
BC	生物炭	按照2 g/盆用量,与10 cm表层土混匀后,移栽秧苗。
TG	土壤改良液	按照0.004 g/盆,稀释2万倍灌溉,移栽秧苗;1个月后,按照0.002 g/盆,稀释2万倍再次灌溉。
BT	生物炭+土壤改良液	生物炭和土壤改良液用量均减半,使用方法同BC、TG。

处理	株高/cm	有效分蘖	剑叶面积/cm²	倒二叶面积/cm²	叶绿素含量
CK	81.83±2.49a	3.56±0.15a	16.61±0.94a	24.01±0.32b	34.58±0.65b
BC	81.00±2.89a	3.17±0.17a	18.40±1.56a	29.08±0.81a	36.54±0.76ab
TG	81.17±2.91a	3.42±0.13a	19.59±0.75a	28.23±1.57a	35.51±0.70b
BT	82.00±1.61a	3.36±0.06a	18.83±1.88a	27.97±1.07a	38.29±0.94a

处理	株高/cm	有效分蘖	剑叶面积/cm²	倒二叶面积/cm²	叶绿素含量
CK	81.83±2.49a	3.56±0.15a	16.61±0.94a	24.01±0.32b	34.58±0.65b
BC	81.00±2.89a	3.17±0.17a	18.40±1.56a	29.08±0.81a	36.54±0.76ab
TG	81.17±2.91a	3.42±0.13a	19.59±0.75a	28.23±1.57a	35.51±0.70b
BT	82.00±1.61a	3.36±0.06a	18.83±1.88a	27.97±1.07a	38.29±0.94a

处理	穗长/cm	有效穗数//株	每穗粒数	结实率/%	千粒重/g	单穗重/g
CK	11.006±0.085a	7.111±0.278a	109.96±3.56a	97.667±0.333a	26.858±0.309a	3.159±0.118a
BC	10.704±0.370a	6.222±0.389a	114.23±1.97a	97.333±0.882a	26.558±0.845a	3.077±0.063a
TG	10.821±0.181b	6.833±0.333a	104.30±7.02a	97.670±1.450a	26.061±0.894a	2.726±0.207a
BT	10.613±0.128a	6.556±0.111a	109.24±3.71a	97.000±0.577a	26.708±0.573a	2.834±0.163a