Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (27): 135-141.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190900608
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2019-09-04
Revised:
2020-05-04
Online:
2020-09-25
Published:
2020-09-23
CLC Number:
Ma Jinlong, Chen Yin. Crop Protection with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Rice Field[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(27): 135-141.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190900608
试验 处理 | 面积/ hm2 | 作业设备 | 高度/ m | 速度/ (m/s) | 喷洒量/ (mL/hm2) | 喷幅/ m | 药剂试验方案/hm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.24 | 极飞P20 | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 3 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
2 | 0.24 | 极飞P20 | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 3 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+33%二甲戊灵1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
3 | 0.22 | 大疆MG-1S | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 4 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+33%二甲戊灵1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
4 | 0.21 | 大疆MG-1S | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 4 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
5 | 0.15 | 极飞P20 | 1.5 | 5 | 10650 | 3 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺570 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
6 | 0.14 | 人工喷药 | 240000 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL | |||
CK | 空白对照区 |
试验 处理 | 面积/ hm2 | 作业设备 | 高度/ m | 速度/ (m/s) | 喷洒量/ (mL/hm2) | 喷幅/ m | 药剂试验方案/hm2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.24 | 极飞P20 | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 3 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
2 | 0.24 | 极飞P20 | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 3 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+33%二甲戊灵1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
3 | 0.22 | 大疆MG-1S | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 4 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+33%二甲戊灵1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
4 | 0.21 | 大疆MG-1S | 1.5 | 5 | 15000 | 4 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
5 | 0.15 | 极飞P20 | 1.5 | 5 | 10650 | 3 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺570 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL |
6 | 0.14 | 人工喷药 | 240000 | 50 g/L五氟磺草胺750 mL+30%丙草胺1200 mL+红雨燕助剂150 mL | |||
CK | 空白对照区 |
方案名称 | 有效成分 | 制剂用量 |
---|---|---|
方案1 | 25%噻虫嗪WDG | 120 g/hm2 |
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC | 600 mL/hm2 | |
30%三环唑SC | 750 mL/hm2 | |
22%戊唑醇·10%噻呋酰胺SC | 300 mL/hm2 | |
0.0075%芸苔素内酯水剂 | 300 mL/hm2 | |
红雨燕低容量喷洒专用助剂 | 150 mL/hm2 |
方案名称 | 有效成分 | 制剂用量 |
---|---|---|
方案1 | 25%噻虫嗪WDG | 120 g/hm2 |
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC | 600 mL/hm2 | |
30%三环唑SC | 750 mL/hm2 | |
22%戊唑醇·10%噻呋酰胺SC | 300 mL/hm2 | |
0.0075%芸苔素内酯水剂 | 300 mL/hm2 | |
红雨燕低容量喷洒专用助剂 | 150 mL/hm2 |
方案名称 | 有效成分 | 制剂用量 |
---|---|---|
方案2 | 25%吡蚜酮SC | 300 g/hm2 |
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC | 600 mL/hm2 | |
40%稻瘟灵EC | 1200 mL/hm2 | |
22%戊唑醇·10%噻呋酰胺SC | 300 mL/hm2 | |
0.01%芸苔素内酯EC | 300 mL/hm2 | |
红雨燕低容量喷洒专用助剂 | 150 mL/hm2 |
方案名称 | 有效成分 | 制剂用量 |
---|---|---|
方案2 | 25%吡蚜酮SC | 300 g/hm2 |
5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC | 600 mL/hm2 | |
40%稻瘟灵EC | 1200 mL/hm2 | |
22%戊唑醇·10%噻呋酰胺SC | 300 mL/hm2 | |
0.01%芸苔素内酯EC | 300 mL/hm2 | |
红雨燕低容量喷洒专用助剂 | 150 mL/hm2 |
试验处理 | 株防效 | 鲜重防效 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
株数/棵 | 防效/% | 鲜重/g | 防效/% | |
1 | 3 | 93.52b | 0.7 | 99.73a |
2 | 12 | 74.10c | 0.9 | 99.66a |
3 | 4 | 91.37b | 1 | 99.62a |
4 | 0.1 | 99.9a | 0.1 | 99.9a |
5 | 3.6 | 92.23b | 0.89 | 99.66a |
6 (人工处理) | 1 | 97.84ab | 0.2 | 99.9a |
CK | 46.33 | 0 | 262.93 | 0 |
试验处理 | 株防效 | 鲜重防效 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
株数/棵 | 防效/% | 鲜重/g | 防效/% | |
1 | 3 | 93.52b | 0.7 | 99.73a |
2 | 12 | 74.10c | 0.9 | 99.66a |
3 | 4 | 91.37b | 1 | 99.62a |
4 | 0.1 | 99.9a | 0.1 | 99.9a |
5 | 3.6 | 92.23b | 0.89 | 99.66a |
6 (人工处理) | 1 | 97.84ab | 0.2 | 99.9a |
CK | 46.33 | 0 | 262.93 | 0 |
试验处理 | 稻纵卷叶螟 | 二化螟 | 纹枯病 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷叶率/% | 相对防效/% | 枯芯率/% | 相对防效/% | 病株率/% | 病指 | 相对防效/% | |
1 | 2.11 | 35.48e | 0.71 | 87.52a | 16.4 | 9.9 | 78.19d |
2 | 0.72 | 78.06b | 0.65 | 88.47a | 13.4 | 6.2 | 86.34b |
3 | 0.56 | 82.80a | 0.53 | 90.60a | 12.5 | 5.2 | 88.55a |
4 | 1.01 | 69.03c | 0.74 | 86.87ab | 13.6 | 6.4 | 85.90b |
6 (人工处理) | 1.37 | 58.06d | 0.82 | 85.46b | 22.6 | 8.5 | 81.28c |
CK | 3.27 | 5.64 | 45.6 | 45.4 |
试验处理 | 稻纵卷叶螟 | 二化螟 | 纹枯病 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卷叶率/% | 相对防效/% | 枯芯率/% | 相对防效/% | 病株率/% | 病指 | 相对防效/% | |
1 | 2.11 | 35.48e | 0.71 | 87.52a | 16.4 | 9.9 | 78.19d |
2 | 0.72 | 78.06b | 0.65 | 88.47a | 13.4 | 6.2 | 86.34b |
3 | 0.56 | 82.80a | 0.53 | 90.60a | 12.5 | 5.2 | 88.55a |
4 | 1.01 | 69.03c | 0.74 | 86.87ab | 13.6 | 6.4 | 85.90b |
6 (人工处理) | 1.37 | 58.06d | 0.82 | 85.46b | 22.6 | 8.5 | 81.28c |
CK | 3.27 | 5.64 | 45.6 | 45.4 |
试验处理 | 稻飞虱 | 稻瘟病 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
百蔸虫量 | 相对防效/% | 病株率/% | 病指 | 相对防效/% | |
1 | 42 | 91.98c | 5.4 | 5.9 | 83.33bc |
2 | 35 | 93.32b | 5.1 | 4.8 | 86.44b |
3 | 21 | 95.99a | 4.5 | 4.2 | 88.13a |
4 | 39 | 92.55b | 6.6 | 5.4 | 84.74b |
6 (人工处理) | 38 | 92.74b | 15.6 | 6.5 | 81.63c |
CK | 524.00 | 35.6 | 35.4 |
试验处理 | 稻飞虱 | 稻瘟病 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
百蔸虫量 | 相对防效/% | 病株率/% | 病指 | 相对防效/% | |
1 | 42 | 91.98c | 5.4 | 5.9 | 83.33bc |
2 | 35 | 93.32b | 5.1 | 4.8 | 86.44b |
3 | 21 | 95.99a | 4.5 | 4.2 | 88.13a |
4 | 39 | 92.55b | 6.6 | 5.4 | 84.74b |
6 (人工处理) | 38 | 92.74b | 15.6 | 6.5 | 81.63c |
CK | 524.00 | 35.6 | 35.4 |
[1] | 刘占山, 刘爱中, 肖启明, 等. 我国水稻病虫害综合防治技术研究现状及发展建议[J]. 中国种业, 2009(02):22-24. |
[2] | 董雪娟, 许中怀, 刘慧强. 小型植保无人机在水稻全程病虫害防治中的应用[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2014,34(S1):46-48. |
[3] | 荀栋, 张兢, 何可佳, 等. TH80-1植保无人机施药对水稻主要病虫害的防治效果研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2015(08):39-42. |
[4] | 廖发华. 小型植保无人机在防治水稻全程病虫害中的作用探讨[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2016(10):122. |
[5] | 魏小平. 小型植保无人机在水稻全程病虫害防治中的应用分析[J]. 中国农业信息, 2016(24):59. |
[6] | 王险峰. 飞防中的低容量喷洒技术[J]. 营销界(农资与市场), 2013(12):39-41. |
[7] | 王昌陵, 宋坚利, 何雄奎, 等. 植保无人机飞行参数对施药雾滴沉积分布特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017,33(23):109-116. |
[8] | 袁会珠, 王国宾. 雾滴大小和覆盖密度与农药防治效果的关系[J]. 植物保护, 2015,41(06):9-16. |
[9] | 何玲, 王国宾, 胡韬, 等. 喷雾助剂及施液量对植保无人机喷雾雾滴在水稻冠层沉积分布的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017,44(06):1046-1052. |
[10] | 许童羽, 于丰华, 曹英丽, 等. 粳稻多旋翼植保无人机雾滴沉积垂直分布研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017,48(10):101-107. |
[11] | 吴笛, 李君兴, 董云哲, 等. 植保无人机雾滴在水稻叶片表面结构附着规律[J]. 农机化研究, 2020(01):189-194. |
[12] | 陈盛德. 植保无人机在水稻喷施中的雾滴沉积机理及作业参数研究[D]. 广州:华南农业大学, 2018. |
[13] | 漆海霞, 陈鹏超, 兰玉彬, 等. 不同电动植保无人机稻田雾滴沉积分布试验研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2019,41(09):147-151. |
[14] | 何雄奎. 我国植保无人机的研究与发展应用浅析[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2018,39(09):10-17. |
[15] | 彭志清, 柏超, 宁国云. 基于农药减量下植保无人机施药对水稻病虫害防效的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019,25(02):106-107,110. |
[16] | 兰波, 刘方义, 徐善忠, 等. 植保无人机超低容量喷施技术防治水稻纹枯病的药效评价[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017,29(11):55-58. |
[17] | 张海艳, 兰玉彬, 文晟, 等. 植保无人机水稻田间农药喷施的作业效果[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019,40(01):116-124. |
[18] | 李明福, 蒋明兰, 胡大为. 中稻主要病虫草害无人机飞防效果与展望[J]. 湖北植保, 2019(01):39-40,43. |
[19] | 张国鸣, 钟雪明, 王晔青, 等. 植保无人机应用于水稻主要病虫害防治之效果评价[J]. 中国农技推广, 2018,34(11):72-74. |
[20] | 宁国云, 许琴芳, 柏超. 植保无人机施药防治水稻病虫害试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018,59(05):765-766. |
[21] | 方海维. 水稻主要病虫害植保无人机全程施药防治示范效果初报[J]. 中国农技推广, 2018,34(07):67-69. |
[22] | 韦玉全, 吴峰, 蒙国洲, 等. 植保无人机防治水稻穗颈瘟应用示范[J]. 广西植保, 2018,31(03):42-44. |
[23] | 张海艳, 孙国俊, 李粉华, 等. 五氟磺草胺混用丙草胺及丁草胺封闭防除水稻田杂草效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2016(01):145-146,149. |
[24] | 孙娟, 蔡银杰, 冯成玉, 等. 无人机施药防治水稻病虫害参数组合初选[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2018,38(12):72-73. |
[25] | 毕金德. 水田植保无人机作业技术探讨[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2019(04):71-72,75. |
[26] | 卢小平, 肖冬芽, 甘贱根, 等. 4种施药器械对水稻基部病虫害的防效比较及经济效益分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018,30(05):61-64. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | Pema Rigzin, Dhonyo Dorji, Delek Kunkyi, Dekyi Yangzom, Yeshe Dorji, Penpa Tsring. Constructing the Monitoring Model of High Temperature Damage on Rice by Combining Data from Satellites and Ground Automatic Weather Stations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 133-141. |
[3] | LUO Xianfu, LIU Wenqiang, PAN Xiaowu, DONG Zheng, LIU Sanxiong, LIU Licheng, YANG Biaoren, SHENG Xinnian, LI Xiaoxiang. Mapping of Plant Height QTL Using NILs Derived from Residual Heterozygous Lines in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 1-5. |
[4] | ZHANG Shuangyan, REN Hao, DING Wenqing, WU Yutao. Research Progress on Material Utilization of Agricultural Waste Rice Husk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 101-108. |
[5] | HUANG Yu, CHEN Bin, XIAO Guanli. The Physiological Response of the Local Rice Variety of ‘Acuce’ of Hani Nationality in Yunnan Against the Feeding of Nilaparvata lugens Stål [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 123-129. |
[6] | SHI Yonghai, CAO Xiangde, XU Jiabo. Effect of COVID-19 Epidemic on Alosa sapidissima Production in China and the Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 151-156. |
[7] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[8] | YE Pei, LIU Kequn, SHEN Shuanghe, LIU Kaiwen, LIU Zhixiong, DENG Yanjun. Risk Analysis and Regionalization of Heat Damage During Heading and Flowering Stage of Mid-season Rice in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 110-117. |
[9] | WANG Yifan, LAO Xiaocan, YU Liping, YE Hailong. Rice Variety ‘Yongyou 15’: The Suitability of Meteorological Conditions for Sowing by Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 106-109. |
[10] | LIU Xiaohang, MA Shuqing, ZHAO Jing, QUAN Hujie, DENG Kuicai, CHAI Qingrong. Yield Response of Japonica Rice of Northeast China to Low Temperature in Different Time Periods of Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 91-98. |
[11] | LI Xuefeng, WANG Jian, YE Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Xiuting, WANG Lixue. Plant Aqueous Extract of Momordica charantia: Effects on Rice Seed Germination and Seedling Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 1-7. |
[12] | SHAO Xuehua, LAI Duo, XIAO Weiqiang, HE Han, LIU Chuanhe, KUANG Shizi. The Effects of Drying Methods on Fruit Quality and Antioxidant Activity of Guava [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 134-140. |
[13] | YAN Yuntao, HE Xi, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. Advances in Research on the Storability of Rice Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 1-8. |
[14] | ZHAI Caijiao, ZHANG Jiao, CUI Shiyou, CHEN Pengjun. Effects of Salt Stress on the Panicle Traits and Yield Components of Rice Cultivars [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 1-9. |
[15] | LIU Yuting, HUANG Shiyu, LI Liujia, ZHAO Tianzhang, LI Huiying, SU Zifeng, LONG Xiaowen. Comparative Study on Biological Indexes and Meat Nutritional Value of Cyprinus carpio Under Earth Pond Reared Mode and Rice Field Reared Mode [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 159-164. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||