Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (31): 49-53.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191100876
Previous Articles Next Articles
Kang Kaili1(), Wang Pu1, Jin Jing1, Liang Jing2
Received:
2019-11-26
Revised:
2020-02-23
Online:
2020-11-05
Published:
2020-11-20
CLC Number:
Kang Kaili, Wang Pu, Jin Jing, Liang Jing. Effects of Organic Waste Substrates on Growth of Potted Jasminum sambac[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 49-53.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191100876
处理 | 茎粗/cm | 根长/cm | 分枝数 | 花苞量 | SPAD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.81±0.08a | 36.30±2.38ab | 10.3±1.0c | 17.0±2.0c | 39.79±0.93c |
T1 | 0.76±0.06a | 29.03±2.21c | 8.2±1.6d | 9.0±1.3e | 24.49±0.80e |
T2 | 0.90±0.05a | 32.17±2.02bc | 17.3±1.8b | 39.6±4.8a | 36.94±1.37d |
T3 | 0.92±0.11a | 30.27±2.91c | 20.3±2.4a | 36.1±4.6b | 50.16±1.18a |
T4 | 0.57±0.09b | 23.83±2.47d | 5.8±1.0e | 9.0±1.9e | 22.55±0.87e |
T5 | 0.89±0.10a | 38.20±1.90a | 17.7±2.5b | 13.8±1.3d | 45.92±1.60b |
处理 | 茎粗/cm | 根长/cm | 分枝数 | 花苞量 | SPAD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.81±0.08a | 36.30±2.38ab | 10.3±1.0c | 17.0±2.0c | 39.79±0.93c |
T1 | 0.76±0.06a | 29.03±2.21c | 8.2±1.6d | 9.0±1.3e | 24.49±0.80e |
T2 | 0.90±0.05a | 32.17±2.02bc | 17.3±1.8b | 39.6±4.8a | 36.94±1.37d |
T3 | 0.92±0.11a | 30.27±2.91c | 20.3±2.4a | 36.1±4.6b | 50.16±1.18a |
T4 | 0.57±0.09b | 23.83±2.47d | 5.8±1.0e | 9.0±1.9e | 22.55±0.87e |
T5 | 0.89±0.10a | 38.20±1.90a | 17.7±2.5b | 13.8±1.3d | 45.92±1.60b |
处理 | 地上鲜重 | 地上干重 | 地下鲜重 | 地下干重 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 34.31±1.53d | 12.31±1.58d | 16.49±0.99d | 4.81±0.52c |
T1 | 14.74±1.14e | 5.64±0.95e | 24.82±2.36c | 8.95±1.97b |
T2 | 64.55±2.36b | 25.16±1.56b | 39.82±2.45a | 12.56±0.18a |
T3 | 93.25±2.53a | 37.90±2.06a | 37.90±2.04a | 12.67±1.59a |
T4 | 10.62±1.47f | 3.40±0.64e | 14.74±1.79d | 4.74±0.81c |
T5 | 46.23±2.15c | 17.29±1.33c | 29.53±2.92b | 9.58±1.65b |
处理 | 地上鲜重 | 地上干重 | 地下鲜重 | 地下干重 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 34.31±1.53d | 12.31±1.58d | 16.49±0.99d | 4.81±0.52c |
T1 | 14.74±1.14e | 5.64±0.95e | 24.82±2.36c | 8.95±1.97b |
T2 | 64.55±2.36b | 25.16±1.56b | 39.82±2.45a | 12.56±0.18a |
T3 | 93.25±2.53a | 37.90±2.06a | 37.90±2.04a | 12.67±1.59a |
T4 | 10.62±1.47f | 3.40±0.64e | 14.74±1.79d | 4.74±0.81c |
T5 | 46.23±2.15c | 17.29±1.33c | 29.53±2.92b | 9.58±1.65b |
处理 | 可溶性糖/% | 可溶性蛋白/(mg/g) | 根系活性/[μg/(g·h)] |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 66.53±2.22e | 1.98±0.14c | 665.78±54.38a |
T1 | 79.63±2.11b | 3.02±0.12b | 453.56±31.38b |
T2 | 75.92±1.94c | 2.21±0.18c | 230.16±19.32c |
T3 | 70.35±1.78d | 1.11±0.09e | 708.92±53.13a |
T4 | 83.42±2.27a | 3.41±0.24a | 172.23±12.38c |
T5 | 69.56±1.92de | 1.50±0.19d | 460.04±43.87b |
处理 | 可溶性糖/% | 可溶性蛋白/(mg/g) | 根系活性/[μg/(g·h)] |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 66.53±2.22e | 1.98±0.14c | 665.78±54.38a |
T1 | 79.63±2.11b | 3.02±0.12b | 453.56±31.38b |
T2 | 75.92±1.94c | 2.21±0.18c | 230.16±19.32c |
T3 | 70.35±1.78d | 1.11±0.09e | 708.92±53.13a |
T4 | 83.42±2.27a | 3.41±0.24a | 172.23±12.38c |
T5 | 69.56±1.92de | 1.50±0.19d | 460.04±43.87b |
项目 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 |
---|---|---|
茎粗 | 0.949 | -0.062 |
根长 | 0.584 | -0.636 |
分枝数 | 0.967 | 0.147 |
花苞量 | 0.787 | 0.461 |
SPAD | 0.931 | -0.283 |
地上鲜重 | 0.945 | 0.220 |
地上干重 | 0.936 | 0.243 |
地下鲜重 | 0.818 | 0.528 |
地下干重 | 0.774 | 0.551 |
可溶性糖 | -0.724 | 0.676 |
可溶性蛋白 | -0.942 | 0.285 |
根系活性 | 0.500 | -0.695 |
项目 | 第1主成分 | 第2主成分 |
---|---|---|
茎粗 | 0.949 | -0.062 |
根长 | 0.584 | -0.636 |
分枝数 | 0.967 | 0.147 |
花苞量 | 0.787 | 0.461 |
SPAD | 0.931 | -0.283 |
地上鲜重 | 0.945 | 0.220 |
地上干重 | 0.936 | 0.243 |
地下鲜重 | 0.818 | 0.528 |
地下干重 | 0.774 | 0.551 |
可溶性糖 | -0.724 | 0.676 |
可溶性蛋白 | -0.942 | 0.285 |
根系活性 | 0.500 | -0.695 |
处理 | FAC1 | FAC2 | F1 | F2 | F值 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -0.066 | -1.595 | -2.050 | 6.239 | -0.183 | 4 |
T1 | -0.773 | 0.165 | -4.838 | 7.799 | -1.991 | 5 |
T2 | 0.574 | 1.232 | 4.970 | 3.120 | 4.553 | 2 |
T3 | 1.265 | 0.364 | 8.564 | 1.560 | 6.985 | 1 |
T4 | -1.492 | 0.536 | -9.126 | 9.359 | -4.961 | 6 |
T5 | 0.493 | -0.701 | 2.481 | 4.679 | 2.977 | 3 |
处理 | FAC1 | FAC2 | F1 | F2 | F值 | 排名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | -0.066 | -1.595 | -2.050 | 6.239 | -0.183 | 4 |
T1 | -0.773 | 0.165 | -4.838 | 7.799 | -1.991 | 5 |
T2 | 0.574 | 1.232 | 4.970 | 3.120 | 4.553 | 2 |
T3 | 1.265 | 0.364 | 8.564 | 1.560 | 6.985 | 1 |
T4 | -1.492 | 0.536 | -9.126 | 9.359 | -4.961 | 6 |
T5 | 0.493 | -0.701 | 2.481 | 4.679 | 2.977 | 3 |
[1] | 何丽斯, 夏冰, 孟祥静, 等. 茉莉对自然降温的生理生化响应[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2010,33(6):28-32. |
[2] | 邓传远, 郭素枝, 王湘平, 等. 茉莉3品种叶肉细胞超微结构的季节变化研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2012,33(2):267-273. |
[3] | 周锦业, 卜朝阳, 卢家仕, 等. 我国茉莉研究文献统计分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(3):193-196. |
[4] | 姜云天, 王德礼, 顾地周. 不同生长调节剂及土壤基质对茉莉花扦插生根的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2009,37(32):15817-15818. |
[5] | 李春牛, 李俊玲, 严华兵, 等. 茉莉种质资源收集评价与繁育技术[J]. 热带农业科学, 2013,33(2):27-29. |
[6] | 卜朝阳, 周锦业, 黄昌艳, 卢家仕, 等. 我国茉莉研究现状及问题分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(19):199-203. |
[7] | 张杰, 黄军华, 顾海燕, 等. 不同基质对盆栽杜鹃花生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(34):116-119. |
[8] | 张崇洋, 赵颖, 刘世亮. 屋顶农业栽培基质配比的筛选及对生菜生长、品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(12):112-117. |
[9] | 何丽斯. 茉莉对低温胁迫的生理响应及离体快繁研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2010. |
[10] | 王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 276-277. |
[11] | 荆延德, 张志国. 主成分分析和聚类分析在花卉栽培基质配方选择中的应用[J]. 土壤通报, 2004,35(5):588-591. |
[12] | 王彦花, 张云, 王容, 等. 基于主成分分析的茶油品质综合评价研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019,39(6):46-51. |
[13] | 张露荷, 黄华梨, 张广忠, 等. 基于主成分分析法的鲜食枣品种综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018,49(4):727-734. |
[14] | 李杰, 祝凌, 仝利红, 等. 有机种植对温室土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2019,51(4):690-697. |
[15] | 徐刚, 高文瑞, 彭天沁, 等. 以木薯渣为主要原料的黄瓜无土栽培基质研究[J]. 土壤, 2015,47(1):161-165. |
[16] | Barana A C. Avaliacao de tratamento de manipueira em biodigestores fase acidogenicae metanogenica[M]. Botucatu: UNESP/FCA, 2000: 95. |
[17] | 彭天沁, 徐刚, 高文瑞, 等. 木薯渣资源化利用的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013,41(11):10-12. |
[18] | Preston T R, Botero R. Low cost biodigester for production of fuel and fertilizer from manure (Spanish)[M]. California: Manuscrito Ineditato CIPAV, 1995: 1-20. |
[19] | 吕振宇, 马永良. 蚯蚓粪有机肥对土壤肥力与甘蓝生长、品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(12):236-240. |
[20] | 康凯丽, 梁晶, 金晶, 等. 木薯渣等有机废弃物作为花卉栽培基质的效果研究[J]. 天津农业科学, 2019,25(5):50-53. |
[21] | 刘佳, 季延海, 王宝驹, 等. 椰糠复合基质对温室番茄生长及品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(17):150-154. |
[22] | 肖涵, 张鸿翎, 韩涛, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种宿根花卉生理生化指标的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019,34(5):102-107. |
[23] | 蔡汉, 李卫东, 熊作明, 等. 低温胁迫下水杨酸预处理对茉莉幼苗活性氧及保护酶的影响[J]. 植物生理科学, 2007,23(7):290-294. |
[24] | 杨梅玉, 邱尧, 刘备. 不同有机生态型基质在上海青无土栽培上的应用研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(35):77-80. |
[25] | 郭世荣. 固体栽培基质研究、开发现状及发展趋势[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005,21(S):1-4. |
[1] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[2] | LIU Cuilan, WANG Kaifang, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, LI Shanwen, WANG Fang, REN Fei, WANG Yinhua. Responses of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Fraxinus Clones to Coastal Saline-Alkaline Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 7-16. |
[3] | YU Zhonghao, ZHOU Wei, LI Zhigang, LI Ziwen, JIA Juanxia, ZHOU Yaxing. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Traits of Soybean in Inner Mongolia from 2002 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 14-21. |
[4] | LU Mengyao, LIU Dehu, LU Xueli, LIANG Heng, SUN Yuanyuan, LIU Yalin, SONG Tingqiang, FAN Haisheng. Construction of Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Analysis in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 119-127. |
[5] | LUO Wei, ZHOU Wei, WANG Zhenguo, LI Yan, YU Wenhao, YANG Zhiqiang, YU Zhonghao, LI Ziwen, ZHOU Yaxing. Twenty-four Sweet Sorghum Materials: Comprehensive Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits and Biological Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 21-28. |
[6] | ZHAO Lijuan, ZHI Jiazeng, ZHANG Jianchun, DU Hao, ZHOU Jinsong, LIU Xuemin, ZHANG Rongqin. Diversity Analysis of Leaf Phenotypic Characters of Musa spp. Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 56-64. |
[7] | LIU Zifan, SU Bimeng, HUANG Jie, WEI Yunxia, XIAO Zili. Effects of Cassava-Peanut Intercropping Patterns on Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 102-107. |
[8] | WANG Zhiqiang, DU Huiying, LI Cheng, GUO Song, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, YU Rong. Genetic Distance and Heterosis of Quantitative Characters of Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 47-51. |
[9] | LUO Yulan, ZHANG Guobing, ZHANG Dongmei. Study on Cultivar Classification of Wisteria According Morphological Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 52-59. |
[10] | YAO Xiaojian, ZHANG Xiongjian, YAO Zhufang, LUO Zhongxia, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Lifei, FANG Boping, YANG Yiling. Potted Conservation Substrates of Sweet Potato Germplasms: Screening and Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 28-37. |
[11] | ZHANG Mengfei, LI Shuang, LI Yunsheng, MA Haixia, LIU Yueqiu. Evaluation on the Drought Resistance of Seedlings of Nine Greening Tree Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 38-46. |
[12] | LIU Yupeng, ZHANG Hao, CHEN Fang, YU Fei. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 32-37. |
[13] | WANG Yan, LI Lingzhi, GUO Wenzhong, WEN Jiangli, LI Yinkun, FAN Fengcui, WU Yuesheng, LI Haiping. Effects of Humic Acid on the Growth, Physiology and Water Use Efficiency of Zucchini Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(13): 47-53. |
[14] | ZHU Mingxia, BAI Ting, JIN Yulong, WANG Shanshan, LIU Xiaojiao, ZHANG Yuhong. Analysis of Flavor Substances of Different Highland Barley Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 146-152. |
[15] | YANG Yiwei, WANG Jiazhe, REN Ping, LIU Chen, LI Mingming, LI Yingmei. Effects of Low Temperature Stress on Growth and Yield of Tomato Varieties of Early Spring [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(10): 32-37. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||