Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (20): 38-46.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0052
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Mengfei1(), LI Shuang1,2, LI Yunsheng1, MA Haixia1, LIU Yueqiu1(
)
Received:
2022-01-26
Revised:
2022-04-07
Online:
2022-07-15
Published:
2022-08-23
Contact:
LIU Yueqiu
E-mail:1020234122@qq.com;liuyueqiu@bua.edu.cn
CLC Number:
ZHANG Mengfei, LI Shuang, LI Yunsheng, MA Haixia, LIU Yueqiu. Evaluation on the Drought Resistance of Seedlings of Nine Greening Tree Species[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 38-46.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0052
树种 | 株高生长量/cm | 地径生长量/cm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 46.20±1.65ab | 56.70±7.86a | 51.63±7.58a | 40.13±0.93b | 10.84±0.19a | 10.65±0.16a | 10.54±0.12a | 10.80±0.84a |
女贞 | 110.27±6.65a | 104.60±0.96a | 99.83±1.80ab | 88.37±10.97b | 10.50±0.15a | 9.53±0.66b | 9.22±0.68b | 8.77±0.27b |
木槿 | 168.70±5.94a | 160.90±0.66ab | 157.10±3.59bc | 149.43±5.79 | 14.71±0.39a | 14.63±1.23ab | 13.30±0.52bc | 12.85±0.28c |
杜仲 | 111.77±5.37b | 124.90±4.98a | 95.00±7.42c | 88.13±7.10c | 10.06±0.31b | 11.33±0.58a | 10.82±0.66ab | 10.24±0.28b |
栾树 | 134.80±4.04a | 127.13±5.16b | 119.33±1.16c | 101.47±2.83d | 17.42±0.95a | 16.41±0.88ab | 15.39±0.95b | 12.15±0.54c |
楸树 | 127.70±5.73a | 118.00±1.25a | 101.57±9.20b | 92.80±3.18b | 15.04±0.53a | 15.99±1.01a | 12.92±1.13b | 12.15±0.69b |
玉兰 | 100.53±8.35a | 90.40±7.36ab | 86.90±7.47b | 77.77±6.30b | 13.37±0.89a | 12.19±0.41ab | 11.42±0.73b | 11.26±0.48b |
红花玉兰 | 76.13±7.58a | 71.70±5.86a | 67.60±1.75ab | 61.10±4.16b | 14.87±0.40a | 14.04±1.69ab | 12.90±0.53bc | 11.50±0.31c |
连翘 | 38.13±5.25a | 42.23±7.43a | 36.13±8.00a | 29.53±6.29a | 8.62±0.37bc | 10.73±0.20a | 9.28±0.57b | 8.25±0.27c |
树种 | 株高生长量/cm | 地径生长量/cm | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 46.20±1.65ab | 56.70±7.86a | 51.63±7.58a | 40.13±0.93b | 10.84±0.19a | 10.65±0.16a | 10.54±0.12a | 10.80±0.84a |
女贞 | 110.27±6.65a | 104.60±0.96a | 99.83±1.80ab | 88.37±10.97b | 10.50±0.15a | 9.53±0.66b | 9.22±0.68b | 8.77±0.27b |
木槿 | 168.70±5.94a | 160.90±0.66ab | 157.10±3.59bc | 149.43±5.79 | 14.71±0.39a | 14.63±1.23ab | 13.30±0.52bc | 12.85±0.28c |
杜仲 | 111.77±5.37b | 124.90±4.98a | 95.00±7.42c | 88.13±7.10c | 10.06±0.31b | 11.33±0.58a | 10.82±0.66ab | 10.24±0.28b |
栾树 | 134.80±4.04a | 127.13±5.16b | 119.33±1.16c | 101.47±2.83d | 17.42±0.95a | 16.41±0.88ab | 15.39±0.95b | 12.15±0.54c |
楸树 | 127.70±5.73a | 118.00±1.25a | 101.57±9.20b | 92.80±3.18b | 15.04±0.53a | 15.99±1.01a | 12.92±1.13b | 12.15±0.69b |
玉兰 | 100.53±8.35a | 90.40±7.36ab | 86.90±7.47b | 77.77±6.30b | 13.37±0.89a | 12.19±0.41ab | 11.42±0.73b | 11.26±0.48b |
红花玉兰 | 76.13±7.58a | 71.70±5.86a | 67.60±1.75ab | 61.10±4.16b | 14.87±0.40a | 14.04±1.69ab | 12.90±0.53bc | 11.50±0.31c |
连翘 | 38.13±5.25a | 42.23±7.43a | 36.13±8.00a | 29.53±6.29a | 8.62±0.37bc | 10.73±0.20a | 9.28±0.57b | 8.25±0.27c |
树种 | 根冠比/% | 生物量/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 1.02±0.11a | 1.07±0.13a | 1.15±0.03a | 1.10±0.20a | 127.82±2.84a | 120.16±7.32a | 92.75±7.76b | 87.79±3.16b |
女贞 | 1.15±0.13a | 1.07±0.23a | 1.18±0.20a | 1.20±0.07a | 165.99±6.70a | 160.75±4.39a | 145.15±7.21b | 131.01±6.21c |
木槿 | 0.96±0.08a | 1.01±0.03a | 0.96±0.08a | 0.80±0.10b | 276.19±12.69a | 234.40±5.45b | 179.34±5.87c | 133.89±8.05d |
杜仲 | 1.28±0.20a | 1.27±0.24a | 1.28±0.09a | 1.39±0.13a | 163.64±3.66b | 195.48±5.41a | 153.22±6.68b | 123.12±8.58c |
栾树 | 0.91±0.19a | 0.94±0.15a | 0.81±0.02a | 0.74±0.07a | 272.58±11.10a | 225.19±7.30b | 202.59±9.16bc | 183.19±20.89c |
楸树 | 1.65±0.26a | 1.57±0.07b | 1.55±0.35ab | 1.16±0.16b | 274.85±15.01a | 239.99±18.04b | 208.94±12.73c | 154.14±7.79d |
玉兰 | 0.73±0.02b | 1.04±0.12a | 1.06±0.14a | 1.09±0.14a | 172.54±7.29a | 149.46±12.01b | 141.65±1.51b | 120.54±6.86c |
红花玉兰 | 1.13±0.19a | 1.25±0.16a | 1.33±0.22a | 1.46±0.15a | 99.94±1.71a | 90.28±4.79b | 82.14±1.64c | 68.77±5.46d |
连翘 | 0.75±0.12b | 1.07±0.25a | 0.86±0.09ab | 0.87±0.09ab | 104.94±5.15b | 128.33±7.17a | 115.96±8.10b | 66.74±2.25c |
树种 | 根冠比/% | 生物量/g | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 1.02±0.11a | 1.07±0.13a | 1.15±0.03a | 1.10±0.20a | 127.82±2.84a | 120.16±7.32a | 92.75±7.76b | 87.79±3.16b |
女贞 | 1.15±0.13a | 1.07±0.23a | 1.18±0.20a | 1.20±0.07a | 165.99±6.70a | 160.75±4.39a | 145.15±7.21b | 131.01±6.21c |
木槿 | 0.96±0.08a | 1.01±0.03a | 0.96±0.08a | 0.80±0.10b | 276.19±12.69a | 234.40±5.45b | 179.34±5.87c | 133.89±8.05d |
杜仲 | 1.28±0.20a | 1.27±0.24a | 1.28±0.09a | 1.39±0.13a | 163.64±3.66b | 195.48±5.41a | 153.22±6.68b | 123.12±8.58c |
栾树 | 0.91±0.19a | 0.94±0.15a | 0.81±0.02a | 0.74±0.07a | 272.58±11.10a | 225.19±7.30b | 202.59±9.16bc | 183.19±20.89c |
楸树 | 1.65±0.26a | 1.57±0.07b | 1.55±0.35ab | 1.16±0.16b | 274.85±15.01a | 239.99±18.04b | 208.94±12.73c | 154.14±7.79d |
玉兰 | 0.73±0.02b | 1.04±0.12a | 1.06±0.14a | 1.09±0.14a | 172.54±7.29a | 149.46±12.01b | 141.65±1.51b | 120.54±6.86c |
红花玉兰 | 1.13±0.19a | 1.25±0.16a | 1.33±0.22a | 1.46±0.15a | 99.94±1.71a | 90.28±4.79b | 82.14±1.64c | 68.77±5.46d |
连翘 | 0.75±0.12b | 1.07±0.25a | 0.86±0.09ab | 0.87±0.09ab | 104.94±5.15b | 128.33±7.17a | 115.96±8.10b | 66.74±2.25c |
树种 | 净光合速率/µmol/(m2·s) | 叶绿素含量/(mg/g) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 7.84±0.68a | 6.39±0.33b | 4.49±0.72c | 3.06±0.43d | 4.59±0.04a | 4.48±0.13a | 3.5±0.14b | 3.19±0.14c |
女贞 | 8.5±0.84a | 6.94±0.38b | 5.27±0.4c | 3.32±0.76d | 4.64±0.05a | 4.58±0.13a | 4.24±0.10b | 3.61±0.14c |
木槿 | 6.48±0.53a | 5.27±0.21b | 3.33±0.34c | 2.46±0.39d | 2.27±0.21a | 1.92±0.19b | 1.66±0.06b | 1.25±0.16c |
杜仲 | 5.96±0.28a | 5.97±0.75a | 3.65±0.07b | 1.89±0.52c | 2.62±0.11b | 3.19±0.2a | 2.67±0.03b | 1.92±0.11c |
栾树 | 9.94±0.63a | 8.29±0.91b | 5.23±0.98c | 2.24±0.48d | 2.89±0.03a | 2.9±0.14a | 1.98±0.07b | 0.94±0.02c |
楸树 | 10.72±0.84a | 8.39±0.57b | 5.74±0.44c | 2.48±0.47d | 3.25±0.21a | 2.59±0.10b | 1.67±0.12c | 0.97±0.06d |
玉兰 | 6.84±0.57b | 8.20±0.11a | 6.25±0.65b | 3.28±0.64c | 3.8±0.09b | 4.09±0.11a | 3.73±0.22b | 3.25±0.14c |
红花玉兰 | 6.25±0.77a | 6.04±0.36a | 4.35±0.36b | 1.97±0.53c | 3.17±0.05b | 3.43±0.08a | 2.64±0.11c | 2.33±0.07d |
连翘 | 7.46±0.37a | 7.83±0.25a | 4.24±0.27b | 1.68±0.28c | 1.58±0.15b | 2.16±0.12a | 1.61±0.14b | 1.02±0.10c |
树种 | 净光合速率/µmol/(m2·s) | 叶绿素含量/(mg/g) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 7.84±0.68a | 6.39±0.33b | 4.49±0.72c | 3.06±0.43d | 4.59±0.04a | 4.48±0.13a | 3.5±0.14b | 3.19±0.14c |
女贞 | 8.5±0.84a | 6.94±0.38b | 5.27±0.4c | 3.32±0.76d | 4.64±0.05a | 4.58±0.13a | 4.24±0.10b | 3.61±0.14c |
木槿 | 6.48±0.53a | 5.27±0.21b | 3.33±0.34c | 2.46±0.39d | 2.27±0.21a | 1.92±0.19b | 1.66±0.06b | 1.25±0.16c |
杜仲 | 5.96±0.28a | 5.97±0.75a | 3.65±0.07b | 1.89±0.52c | 2.62±0.11b | 3.19±0.2a | 2.67±0.03b | 1.92±0.11c |
栾树 | 9.94±0.63a | 8.29±0.91b | 5.23±0.98c | 2.24±0.48d | 2.89±0.03a | 2.9±0.14a | 1.98±0.07b | 0.94±0.02c |
楸树 | 10.72±0.84a | 8.39±0.57b | 5.74±0.44c | 2.48±0.47d | 3.25±0.21a | 2.59±0.10b | 1.67±0.12c | 0.97±0.06d |
玉兰 | 6.84±0.57b | 8.20±0.11a | 6.25±0.65b | 3.28±0.64c | 3.8±0.09b | 4.09±0.11a | 3.73±0.22b | 3.25±0.14c |
红花玉兰 | 6.25±0.77a | 6.04±0.36a | 4.35±0.36b | 1.97±0.53c | 3.17±0.05b | 3.43±0.08a | 2.64±0.11c | 2.33±0.07d |
连翘 | 7.46±0.37a | 7.83±0.25a | 4.24±0.27b | 1.68±0.28c | 1.58±0.15b | 2.16±0.12a | 1.61±0.14b | 1.02±0.10c |
树种 | 蒸腾速率/[mmol/(m2·s)] | 水分利用效率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 2.44±0.15a | 1.93±0.12b | 1.27±0.21c | 0.83±0.09d | 3.22±0.28a | 3.33±0.39a | 3.56±0.23a | 3.67±0.15a |
女贞 | 1.93±0.06a | 1.66±0.16b | 1.28±0.10c | 0.91±0.05d | 4.40±0.31a | 4.21±0.25a | 4.12±0.25a | 3.61±0.66a |
木槿 | 2.24±0.16a | 1.69±0.27b | 1.25±0.12c | 0.92±0.11c | 2.91±0.38a | 3.17±0.47a | 2.68±0.29a | 2.68±0.19a |
杜仲 | 1.78±0.29a | 1.65±0.27a | 1.34±0.20a | 0.85±0.09b | 3.39±0.37a | 3.08±0.16a | 2.77±0.46ab | 2.20±0.42b |
栾树 | 2.55±0.24a | 2.01±0.27b | 1.90±0.39b | 1.11±0.15c | 3.93±0.54a | 4.13±0.16a | 2.78±0.42b | 2.01±0.16c |
楸树 | 3.38±0.25a | 2.53±0.19b | 1.90±0.22c | 1.24±0.28d | 3.18±0.26a | 3.32±0.22a | 3.04±0.21a | 2.03±0.24b |
玉兰 | 1.59±0.35ab | 1.83±0.23a | 1.26±0.08b | 0.59±0.09c | 4.41±0.76b | 4.52±0.48ab | 4.95±0.33ab | 5.55±0.55a |
红花玉兰 | 1.93±0.38ab | 2.37±0.11a | 1.50±0.14b | 0.80±0.17c | 3.28±0.51a | 2.55±0.13b | 2.89±0.04ab | 2.48±0.39b |
连翘 | 1.87±0.06a | 1.57±0.27a | 1.16±0.08b | 0.69±0.13c | 4.00±0.27a | 3.97±0.56a | 3.67±0.34a | 2.43±0.22a |
树种 | 蒸腾速率/[mmol/(m2·s)] | 水分利用效率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | |
冬青卫矛 | 2.44±0.15a | 1.93±0.12b | 1.27±0.21c | 0.83±0.09d | 3.22±0.28a | 3.33±0.39a | 3.56±0.23a | 3.67±0.15a |
女贞 | 1.93±0.06a | 1.66±0.16b | 1.28±0.10c | 0.91±0.05d | 4.40±0.31a | 4.21±0.25a | 4.12±0.25a | 3.61±0.66a |
木槿 | 2.24±0.16a | 1.69±0.27b | 1.25±0.12c | 0.92±0.11c | 2.91±0.38a | 3.17±0.47a | 2.68±0.29a | 2.68±0.19a |
杜仲 | 1.78±0.29a | 1.65±0.27a | 1.34±0.20a | 0.85±0.09b | 3.39±0.37a | 3.08±0.16a | 2.77±0.46ab | 2.20±0.42b |
栾树 | 2.55±0.24a | 2.01±0.27b | 1.90±0.39b | 1.11±0.15c | 3.93±0.54a | 4.13±0.16a | 2.78±0.42b | 2.01±0.16c |
楸树 | 3.38±0.25a | 2.53±0.19b | 1.90±0.22c | 1.24±0.28d | 3.18±0.26a | 3.32±0.22a | 3.04±0.21a | 2.03±0.24b |
玉兰 | 1.59±0.35ab | 1.83±0.23a | 1.26±0.08b | 0.59±0.09c | 4.41±0.76b | 4.52±0.48ab | 4.95±0.33ab | 5.55±0.55a |
红花玉兰 | 1.93±0.38ab | 2.37±0.11a | 1.50±0.14b | 0.80±0.17c | 3.28±0.51a | 2.55±0.13b | 2.89±0.04ab | 2.48±0.39b |
连翘 | 1.87±0.06a | 1.57±0.27a | 1.16±0.08b | 0.69±0.13c | 4.00±0.27a | 3.97±0.56a | 3.67±0.34a | 2.43±0.22a |
树种 | 抗旱系数 | 综合抗旱系数 | 排序 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗高 | 地径 | 生物量 | 叶片相对含水量 | 丙二醛 | 相对电导率 | 净光合速率 | 蒸腾速率 | 水分利用效率 | 叶绿素 含量 | 脯氨酸 含量 | 可溶性糖含量 | 可溶性蛋白含量 | SOD | POD | |||
冬青卫矛 | 86.9 | 99.6 | 68.7 | 58.5 | 262.2 | 308.7 | 39.1 | 34.4 | 114.3 | 69.5 | 776.1 | 412.5 | 449.0 | 321.3 | 86.9 | 229.5 | 1 |
女贞 | 80.7 | 83.5 | 79.0 | 60.9 | 174.1 | 233.9 | 39.4 | 47.3 | 82.6 | 77.8 | 392.8 | 307.4 | 362.0 | 284.8 | 80.7 | 175.9 | 3 |
木槿 | 88.6 | 87.4 | 48.6 | 51.0 | 238.0 | 356.3 | 37.8 | 41.2 | 92.8 | 55.6 | 328.7 | 273.4 | 287.5 | 306.3 | 88.6 | 170.9 | 5 |
杜仲 | 78.8 | 101.8 | 75.2 | 73.0 | 259.6 | 263.7 | 31.8 | 48.5 | 65.0 | 73.5 | 748.1 | 164.8 | 192.8 | 281.8 | 78.8 | 179.1 | 2 |
栾树 | 75.3 | 69.9 | 67.3 | 43.4 | 284.2 | 323.3 | 22.6 | 43.4 | 51.9 | 32.7 | 228.0 | 128.0 | 261.9 | 200.9 | 75.3 | 142.7 | 7 |
楸树 | 72.7 | 80.9 | 56.3 | 36.9 | 422.9 | 397.9 | 23.1 | 36.4 | 63.5 | 30.0 | 132.6 | 145.6 | 181.4 | 208.4 | 72.7 | 143.8 | 6 |
玉兰 | 77.9 | 84.3 | 70.1 | 73.4 | 134.8 | 149.0 | 47.7 | 37.7 | 127.4 | 85.6 | 204.1 | 207.3 | 210.3 | 144.7 | 77.9 | 123.0 | 8 |
红花玉兰 | 80.5 | 77.3 | 68.8 | 54.3 | 194.3 | 400.5 | 32.0 | 42.6 | 76.1 | 73.4 | 211.7 | 251.3 | 369.3 | 238.4 | 80.5 | 174.8 | 4 |
连翘 | 79.9 | 95.8 | 63.7 | 52.8 | 141.7 | 362.4 | 22.6 | 37.1 | 60.9 | 65.1 | 147.6 | 137.0 | 154.4 | 170.9 | 79.9 | 120.6 | 9 |
均值 | 80.2 | 86.7 | 66.4 | 56.0 | 234.7 | 310.6 | 32.9 | 41.0 | 81.6 | 62.6 | 352.2 | 225.3 | 274.3 | 239.7 | 289.8 | 162.3 | — |
标准差 | 5.1 | 10.6 | 9.3 | 12.2 | 88.9 | 82.8 | 8.9 | 5.0 | 25.6 | 19.5 | 246.4 | 95.1 | 100.8 | 62.4 | 79.7 | 34.0 | — |
变异系数/ % | 6.3 | 12.2 | 14.0 | 21.7 | 37.9 | 26.6 | 27.1 | 12.1 | 31.3 | 31.2 | 70.0 | 42.2 | 36.8 | 26.0 | 27.5 | 20.9 | — |
树种 | 抗旱系数 | 综合抗旱系数 | 排序 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗高 | 地径 | 生物量 | 叶片相对含水量 | 丙二醛 | 相对电导率 | 净光合速率 | 蒸腾速率 | 水分利用效率 | 叶绿素 含量 | 脯氨酸 含量 | 可溶性糖含量 | 可溶性蛋白含量 | SOD | POD | |||
冬青卫矛 | 86.9 | 99.6 | 68.7 | 58.5 | 262.2 | 308.7 | 39.1 | 34.4 | 114.3 | 69.5 | 776.1 | 412.5 | 449.0 | 321.3 | 86.9 | 229.5 | 1 |
女贞 | 80.7 | 83.5 | 79.0 | 60.9 | 174.1 | 233.9 | 39.4 | 47.3 | 82.6 | 77.8 | 392.8 | 307.4 | 362.0 | 284.8 | 80.7 | 175.9 | 3 |
木槿 | 88.6 | 87.4 | 48.6 | 51.0 | 238.0 | 356.3 | 37.8 | 41.2 | 92.8 | 55.6 | 328.7 | 273.4 | 287.5 | 306.3 | 88.6 | 170.9 | 5 |
杜仲 | 78.8 | 101.8 | 75.2 | 73.0 | 259.6 | 263.7 | 31.8 | 48.5 | 65.0 | 73.5 | 748.1 | 164.8 | 192.8 | 281.8 | 78.8 | 179.1 | 2 |
栾树 | 75.3 | 69.9 | 67.3 | 43.4 | 284.2 | 323.3 | 22.6 | 43.4 | 51.9 | 32.7 | 228.0 | 128.0 | 261.9 | 200.9 | 75.3 | 142.7 | 7 |
楸树 | 72.7 | 80.9 | 56.3 | 36.9 | 422.9 | 397.9 | 23.1 | 36.4 | 63.5 | 30.0 | 132.6 | 145.6 | 181.4 | 208.4 | 72.7 | 143.8 | 6 |
玉兰 | 77.9 | 84.3 | 70.1 | 73.4 | 134.8 | 149.0 | 47.7 | 37.7 | 127.4 | 85.6 | 204.1 | 207.3 | 210.3 | 144.7 | 77.9 | 123.0 | 8 |
红花玉兰 | 80.5 | 77.3 | 68.8 | 54.3 | 194.3 | 400.5 | 32.0 | 42.6 | 76.1 | 73.4 | 211.7 | 251.3 | 369.3 | 238.4 | 80.5 | 174.8 | 4 |
连翘 | 79.9 | 95.8 | 63.7 | 52.8 | 141.7 | 362.4 | 22.6 | 37.1 | 60.9 | 65.1 | 147.6 | 137.0 | 154.4 | 170.9 | 79.9 | 120.6 | 9 |
均值 | 80.2 | 86.7 | 66.4 | 56.0 | 234.7 | 310.6 | 32.9 | 41.0 | 81.6 | 62.6 | 352.2 | 225.3 | 274.3 | 239.7 | 289.8 | 162.3 | — |
标准差 | 5.1 | 10.6 | 9.3 | 12.2 | 88.9 | 82.8 | 8.9 | 5.0 | 25.6 | 19.5 | 246.4 | 95.1 | 100.8 | 62.4 | 79.7 | 34.0 | — |
变异系数/ % | 6.3 | 12.2 | 14.0 | 21.7 | 37.9 | 26.6 | 27.1 | 12.1 | 31.3 | 31.2 | 70.0 | 42.2 | 36.8 | 26.0 | 27.5 | 20.9 | — |
指标 | 主因子1 | 主因子2 | 主因子3 | 主因子4 | 主因子5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高生长量 | 0.239 | 0.335 | 0.166 | -0.384 | -0.425 |
地径生长量 | 0.483 | -0.073 | 0.767 | -0.022 | -0.139 |
生物量 | 0.502 | -0.229 | -0.189 | 0.543 | -0.325 |
叶片含水量 | 0.818 | -0.454 | 0.129 | 0.084 | -0.102 |
丙二醛 | -0.535 | 0.402 | 0.378 | 0.120 | 0.431 |
相对电导率 | -0.636 | 0.573 | 0.073 | -0.054 | -0.194 |
净光合速率 | 0.791 | -0.119 | -0.216 | -0.133 | 0.465 |
蒸腾速率 | 0.169 | -0.130 | -0.104 | 0.763 | 0.302 |
水分利用效率 | 0.717 | -0.036 | -0.147 | -0.575 | 0.301 |
叶绿素含量 | 0.850 | -0.277 | -0.145 | 0.020 | -0.234 |
脯氨酸含量 | 0.656 | 0.320 | 0.538 | 0.282 | 0.007 |
可溶性糖含量 | 0.718 | 0.616 | -0.077 | -0.186 | 0.067 |
可溶性蛋白含量 | 0.515 | 0.748 | -0.339 | 0.004 | -0.004 |
SOD | 0.437 | 0.739 | 0.340 | 0.219 | 0.102 |
POD | 0.052 | 0.745 | -0.519 | 0.268 | -0.169 |
特征值 | 5.195 | 3.117 | 1.711 | 1.632 | 1.036 |
贡献率/% | 34.635 | 20.781 | 11.406 | 10.879 | 6.904 |
累计贡献率率/% | 34.635 | 55.415 | 66.821 | 77.700 | 84.604 |
指标 | 主因子1 | 主因子2 | 主因子3 | 主因子4 | 主因子5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高生长量 | 0.239 | 0.335 | 0.166 | -0.384 | -0.425 |
地径生长量 | 0.483 | -0.073 | 0.767 | -0.022 | -0.139 |
生物量 | 0.502 | -0.229 | -0.189 | 0.543 | -0.325 |
叶片含水量 | 0.818 | -0.454 | 0.129 | 0.084 | -0.102 |
丙二醛 | -0.535 | 0.402 | 0.378 | 0.120 | 0.431 |
相对电导率 | -0.636 | 0.573 | 0.073 | -0.054 | -0.194 |
净光合速率 | 0.791 | -0.119 | -0.216 | -0.133 | 0.465 |
蒸腾速率 | 0.169 | -0.130 | -0.104 | 0.763 | 0.302 |
水分利用效率 | 0.717 | -0.036 | -0.147 | -0.575 | 0.301 |
叶绿素含量 | 0.850 | -0.277 | -0.145 | 0.020 | -0.234 |
脯氨酸含量 | 0.656 | 0.320 | 0.538 | 0.282 | 0.007 |
可溶性糖含量 | 0.718 | 0.616 | -0.077 | -0.186 | 0.067 |
可溶性蛋白含量 | 0.515 | 0.748 | -0.339 | 0.004 | -0.004 |
SOD | 0.437 | 0.739 | 0.340 | 0.219 | 0.102 |
POD | 0.052 | 0.745 | -0.519 | 0.268 | -0.169 |
特征值 | 5.195 | 3.117 | 1.711 | 1.632 | 1.036 |
贡献率/% | 34.635 | 20.781 | 11.406 | 10.879 | 6.904 |
累计贡献率率/% | 34.635 | 55.415 | 66.821 | 77.700 | 84.604 |
树种 | 主因子得分(PC) | 隶属函数值(Ui) | 综合评价值D | 排序 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | ||||
冬青卫矛 | 3.37 | 2.62 | 0.88 | -0.71 | 0.09 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.24 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1 | |
女贞 | 3.06 | 0.34 | -1.05 | 1.10 | -0.13 | 0.93 | 0.61 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 3 | |
木槿 | -0.85 | 1.26 | 0.59 | -1.24 | 0.81 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.91 | 0.57 | 4 | |
杜仲 | 2.72 | -1.15 | 2.25 | 1.84 | -0.24 | 0.89 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.76 | 2 | |
栾树 | -3.97 | 0.04 | -0.87 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.41 | 7 | |
楸树 | -6.12 | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.36 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 9 | |
玉兰 | 3.80 | -3.28 | -1.00 | -1.52 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.51 | 6 | |
红花玉兰 | -0.56 | 1.48 | -2.01 | 0.52 | -0.86 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 5 | |
连翘 | -1.45 | -1.74 | 0.61 | -0.55 | -1.44 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 8 | |
权重 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.08 | — | — |
树种 | 主因子得分(PC) | 隶属函数值(Ui) | 综合评价值D | 排序 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | U1 | U2 | U3 | U4 | U5 | ||||
冬青卫矛 | 3.37 | 2.62 | 0.88 | -0.71 | 0.09 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.24 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 1 | |
女贞 | 3.06 | 0.34 | -1.05 | 1.10 | -0.13 | 0.93 | 0.61 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 3 | |
木槿 | -0.85 | 1.26 | 0.59 | -1.24 | 0.81 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.08 | 0.91 | 0.57 | 4 | |
杜仲 | 2.72 | -1.15 | 2.25 | 1.84 | -0.24 | 0.89 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.76 | 2 | |
栾树 | -3.97 | 0.04 | -0.87 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.41 | 7 | |
楸树 | -6.12 | 0.44 | 0.60 | -0.36 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 9 | |
玉兰 | 3.80 | -3.28 | -1.00 | -1.52 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.51 | 6 | |
红花玉兰 | -0.56 | 1.48 | -2.01 | 0.52 | -0.86 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.23 | 0.53 | 5 | |
连翘 | -1.45 | -1.74 | 0.61 | -0.55 | -1.44 | 0.47 | 0.26 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 8 | |
权重 | — | — | — | — | — | 0.41 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.08 | — | — |
[1] | 李艳, 王庆, 刘国宇, 等. 4种地被植物干旱胁迫下的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6):9-15. |
[2] | 王劲松, 李耀辉, 王润元, 等. 我国气象干旱研究进展评述[J]. 干旱气象, 2012, 30(4):497-508. |
[3] | 杜新强, 何立滢, 姚泓钰, 等. 近15年来中国北方水资源-社会经济-生态环境耦合协调发展评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2022, 472(2):1-18 |
[4] | 俞永玮, 程玮哲, 高建社, 等. 5种引进意大利黑杨无性系幼苗抗旱性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(2):84-90. |
[5] | 李禄军, 蒋志荣, 邵玲玲. 3树种抗旱性的灰色关联分析[J]. 河北林果研究, 2006, 21(4):378-380. |
[6] | 蒋进, 高海峰. 柽柳属植物抗旱性排序研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 1992, 9(4):41-45 |
[7] | 覃奎, 刘秀, 马道承, 等. 3个种源池杉幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(2):1-13 |
[8] | 谭雪红, 高艳鹏, 郭小平, 等. 五种高速公路边坡绿化植物的生理特性及抗旱性综合评价[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(16):5076-5086. |
[9] | 张志良, 翟伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导(3版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003:120-137. |
[10] | MAGHSOODI M, RAZMJOO J. Advances in applied agricultural science[J]. Acta advances in agricultural sciences, 2014, 12 (2):33-55. |
[11] | 孔波, 李雪平, 李夷骞, 等. 9竹种抗旱性评价与指标筛选[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 47(6):663-668. |
[12] | 薄伟, 王松, 康红梅, 等. 太原市五种园林地被植物抗旱性评价及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 北方园艺, 2021, 486(15):65-72. |
[13] |
张皓, 丁亚娜, 赵启红, 等. 北方城市绿化常用灌木树种抗旱性评价[J]. 核农学报, 2016, 30(7):1446-1451.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.07.1446 |
[14] | 崔桂宾. 干旱和PEG胁迫下小麦幼苗对褪黑素处理的生理响应及其蛋白质组学分析[D]. 陕西: 西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
[15] | 张少颖, 任小林, 程顺昌, 等. 外源一氧化氮供体浸种对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2004, 40(3):309-310. |
[16] | 关军锋, 马春红, 李广敏. 干旱胁迫下小麦根冠生物量变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2004, 27(1):1-5. |
[17] | 曲杰. 干旱胁迫对不同类型花生根冠比和产量及品质的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014, 510(6):129-132 |
[18] | 王爽, 侯毅兴, 褚佳瑶, 等. 干旱胁迫下7个鲜食葡萄品种光合日变化特征的差异分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2021, 39(4):126-136. |
[19] | 孙娅楠, 赵杨, 赵渊祥, 等. 棕榈幼苗光合和叶绿素荧光对干旱胁迫及复水的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(9):45-52. |
[20] | 杨振亚, 周本智, 陈庆标, 等. 干旱对杉木幼苗根系构型及非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18):6729-6740. |
[21] | 关东明. 水稻抗旱性与光合特征的资源评价及其根系抗旱生理基础的研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院植物研究所, 2002. |
[22] | 熊伟, 王彦辉, 于澎涛, 等. 树木水分利用效率研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(4):417-421. |
[23] | 吴际友, 李志辉, 刘球, 等. 干旱胁迫对红椿无性系幼苗叶片相对含水量和叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(4):19-22. |
[24] | 弓泽涛, 姚爱彬, 李锦馨, 等. 四个玫瑰品种的水分胁迫耐受性[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(14):73-79. |
[25] | 陈立明, 尹艳豹. 干旱区园林植物抗旱机制研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(4):73-76. |
[26] | 朱凤荣. 干旱胁迫对三种草本植物生理生化特性的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2019, 58(6):88-91 |
[27] |
GUO H, CUI Y N, PAN Y Q, et al. Sodium chloride facilitates the secretohalophyte Atriplex canescens adaptation to drought stress[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2020, 150:99-108
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.018 URL |
[28] |
ORIGIN A B. Osmotic adjustment is a prime drought stress adaptive engine in support of plant production[J]. Plant, cell and environment, 2017, 40(1):4-10.
doi: 10.1111/pce.12800 URL |
[29] | 孔维鹏, 张小艾. 四个无花果品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(S1):105-113. |
[30] | 张文香, 田梦妍, 农柳青, 等. 植物抗旱生理生化机理研究概况[J]. 南方农业, 2016, 10(31):51-53. |
[31] | 阮凌暄, 马骁勇, 林秀莲, 等. 干旱胁迫对铁皮石斛叶片活性氧清除系统与叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2017, 46 (6):103-107. |
[32] | 高昆, 石义妃. 干旱胁迫对粉葛幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(8):153-157. |
[33] | 崔颖, 李芊夏, 刘彬, 等. 干旱胁迫对地果幼苗形态与生理特性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35 (6):82-88. |
[34] |
邹苗, 王月林, 李钢铁, 等. 干旱胁迫对酸枣幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(2):65-72.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0137 |
[35] | 李诗琴. 16个苜蓿品种抗旱、耐盐碱性研究及综合评价[D]. 吉林: 吉林农业大学, 2019. |
[36] | 黄纯杨, 钱晓刚, 杨相. 贵州烤烟种质资源抗旱性聚类分析[J]. 种子, 2009, 28(5):70-72. |
[37] | 刘汝温. 应用抗旱指数法筛选抗旱小麦品种[J]. 农业科技通讯, 1996, 291(1):7. |
[38] | 蔺豆豆, 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮, 等. 15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11):108-121. |
[1] | LU Qianqian, FENG Linjiao, WANG Shuang, GULIZHATI·Baoerhan , CHU Ren, ZHOU Long. Effects of Compound Saline-alkali Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Table Grapes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 62-70. |
[2] | SHEN Jicheng, ZHAO Caixia, YE Fahui, LI Yaxin, LIU Demei, LIU Ruijuan, SHEN Yuhu, ZHANG Huaigang, CHEN Wenjie. Analysis of Germplasm Differentiation of Ledu Long Pepper Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 29-34. |
[3] | DONG Hongye, XU Ting, LIU Wenhao, LI Qiang, LIU Yantao. Peanut in the Southeastern Margin of Tarim Basin of Xinjiang: Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Agronomic Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 26-30. |
[4] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[5] | LIU Cuilan, WANG Kaifang, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, LI Shanwen, WANG Fang, REN Fei, WANG Yinhua. Responses of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Fraxinus Clones to Coastal Saline-Alkaline Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 7-16. |
[6] | YU Zhonghao, ZHOU Wei, LI Zhigang, LI Ziwen, JIA Juanxia, ZHOU Yaxing. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Traits of Soybean in Inner Mongolia from 2002 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 14-21. |
[7] | LU Mengyao, LIU Dehu, LU Xueli, LIANG Heng, SUN Yuanyuan, LIU Yalin, SONG Tingqiang, FAN Haisheng. Construction of Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Model Based on Principal Component Analysis in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 119-127. |
[8] | LUO Wei, ZHOU Wei, WANG Zhenguo, LI Yan, YU Wenhao, YANG Zhiqiang, YU Zhonghao, LI Ziwen, ZHOU Yaxing. Twenty-four Sweet Sorghum Materials: Comprehensive Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits and Biological Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 21-28. |
[9] | ZHAO Lijuan, ZHI Jiazeng, ZHANG Jianchun, DU Hao, ZHOU Jinsong, LIU Xuemin, ZHANG Rongqin. Diversity Analysis of Leaf Phenotypic Characters of Musa spp. Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 56-64. |
[10] | FAN Xian, QUAN Yiji, YANG Shaolin, LI Rudan, DENG Jun, ZHANG Yuebin. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance in Sugarcane Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 17-24. |
[11] | WANG Shuo, JIA Xiaoqian, HE Lu, LI Haoran, WANG Hongguang, HE Jianning, LI Dongxiao, FANG Qin, LI Ruiqi. Response Mechanism of Crops to Drought Stress and Measures for Improving Drought Resistance of Crops: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 31-44. |
[12] | CHEN Minmin, NIE Gongping, LI Xin, ZHOU Lin, YANG Liuyan, ZHANG Yongchun. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Lilium spp. Cultivars Under Natural High Temperature [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 86-95. |
[13] | LAI Jia, WEI Shugu, HUANG Ling, SHENG Yuzhen, LIU Yong, ZHANG Qianfang, YE Pengsheng. Identification and Evaluation on Bolting Traits of Chinese Cabbage Group Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 41-47. |
[14] | WANG Zhiqiang, DU Huiying, LI Cheng, GUO Song, TIAN Mei, YANG Wanbang, YU Rong. Genetic Distance and Heterosis of Quantitative Characters of Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 47-51. |
[15] | LUO Yulan, ZHANG Guobing, ZHANG Dongmei. Study on Cultivar Classification of Wisteria According Morphological Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 52-59. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||