Visualization Analysis of Research Hotspots of Rice Protein

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0476

Abstract

Abstract:

This article aims to provide relevant information about the current research status and hotspots in the field of rice protein. Based on relevant literature on the theme of ‘rice protein’ in the core database of Web of Science from 2018 to 2020, we studied the number of articles, institutions, institutional cooperation co-occurrence, high-frequency keywords by using the bibliometrics method and visual analysis software Citespace. The results show that the top 5 countries in the research field of rice protein from 2018 to 2020 are China, the United States, India, Japan, and South Korea; institutions with high numbers of publishing articles are all from China, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences ranks the first in publishing article numbers; the institutions that cooperate closely with other institutions are the International Rice Research Institute, Cornell University, and the University of California, Davis; Wang J publishes the most papers in the field of rice protein during 2018-2020, with 105 articles, followed by Zhang Y, Wang Y and Li Y, and there is still room for cooperation and exchanges among the authors; the current research hotspots in the field of rice protein are mainly proteomics analysis and genetic modification that regulate physiological properties such as stress resistance, and in the future, it is possible that the accumulation and output of rice protein, and the optimization of related genes will be the research hotspots in related fields.

Key words: rice protein, bibliometrics, hotspot, research trend, research hotspot

CLC Number:

Sun Meng, Li Rongtian. Visualization Analysis of Research Hotspots of Rice Protein[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(28): 136-141.

Figures/Tables 8

References 25

[1]	Serena B, Yves M. Exciton interaction in molecular beacons: a sensitive sensor for short range modifications of the nucleic acid structure[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, 29(13):62-72.
[2]	Guo L, Wang Z Y, Lin H, et al. Expression and functional analysis of the rice plasma-membrane intrinsic protein gene family[J]. Cell Research, 2006, 16(3):277-286. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310035 URL
[3]	Zhang H, Song T Q, Wang K L, et al. Prediction of crude protein content in rice grain with canopy spectral reflectance[J]. Plant Soil & Environment, 2012, 58(6):514-520.
[4]	Zhu F L, Zhang H L, Shao Y N, et al. Visualization of the chilling storage time for turbot flesh based on hyperspectral imaging technique[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(7):1938-1942.
[5]	魏蕊蕊, 王清晓. 国内外供应链风险管理研究的可视化分析——基于CNKI和WOS的研究[J]. 办公自动化, 2019, 24(16):25-30.
[6]	苏欣慰, 唐颖, 姚丽梅, 等. 国内非物质文化遗产旅游研究的知识图谱分析[J]. 岭南师范学院学报, 2019, 40(4):51-62.
[7]	陈诗言. 世界海岛旅游研究及对我国海岛旅游发展的启示[D]. 大连:辽宁师范大学, 2019.
[8]	侯克彧. 跨文化心理适应研究分析[D]. 西安:西安石油大学, 2016.
[9]	柯文涛. 工具的祛魅:Citespace在教育研究中的应用与反思[J]. 重庆高教研究, 2019, 7(5):117-128.
[10]	宿进江, 陈晓杭. 国内蛋白质组学研究现状及前沿热点可视化分析[J]. 生物技术, 2020, 30(6)
[11]	季楚玮. “5W”模式下政务抖音的传播现状及对策研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2019.
[12]	兑紫璇. 计算机视觉领域研究热点与前沿分析[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2020, 16(8):216-218.
[13]	林美惠, 江和基, 黄志坚, 等. 基于文献计量的国内非洲猪瘟研究分析[J]. 福建畜牧兽医, 2020, 42(2):26-29.
[14]	王光华, 刘俊杰, 于镇华, 等. 土壤酸杆菌门细菌生态学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2016, 32(2):14-20.
[15]	Zhang T, Shao M F, Ye L. 454 pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants[J]. Isme Journal, 2012, 6(6):1137-1147. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.188 pmid: 22170428
[16]	邱均平. 信息计量学在科学学与科技管理中的应用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2001(6):474-476.
[17]	闫惠红, 肖仙桃, 孙成权. 从文献计量分析看国际及中国农业科学发展态势[J]. 图书情报, 2004(2):29-31.
[18]	王秉, 吴超. 安全管理信息系统国际研究进展——基于Web of Science数据库的典型文献分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(11):131-136.
[19]	李通, 马雪婷, 李春杰, 等. 基于Web of Science的土壤微生物研究文献国际发展态势分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2017(10):198-207.
[20]	Wang Y, Sheng H F, He Y, et al. Comparison of the Levels of Bacterial Diversity in Freshwater, Intertidal Wetland, and Marine Sediments by Using Millions of Illumina Tags[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(23):8264-8271.
[21]	Sun L, Qiu F, Zhang X, et al. Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2008, 55(3):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9287-1 URL
[22]	Ge Y, Zhang J B, Zhang L M, et al. Long-term fertilization regimes affect bacterial community structure and diversity of an agricultural soil in northern China[J]. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 2008, 8(1):43-50.
[23]	Qiu M, Zhang R, Xue C, et al. Application of bio-organic fertilizer can control Fusarium wilt of cucumber plants by regulating microbial community of rhizosphere soil[J]. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2012, 48(7):807-816.
[24]	Rui J, Peng J, Lu Y. Succession of bacterial populations during plant residue decomposition in rice field soil[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(14):4879-4886.
[25]	Ye W J, Liu X L, Lin S Q, et al. The vertical distribution of bacterial and archaeal communities in the water and sediment of Lake Taihu[J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2010, 70(2):107-120.

排名	机构	发文量/篇	占比/%
1	中国科学院	430	5.95
2	中国农业科学院	414	5.73
3	南京农业大学	338	4.68
4	华中农业大学	245	3.39
5	中国科学院大学	211	2.92
6	浙江大学	211	2.92
7	扬州大学	156	2.16
8	福建农林大学	155	2.15
9	中国水稻研究所	149	2.06
10	华南农业大学	146	2.02

排名	机构	发文量/篇	占比/%
1	中国科学院	430	5.95
2	中国农业科学院	414	5.73
3	南京农业大学	338	4.68
4	华中农业大学	245	3.39
5	中国科学院大学	211	2.92
6	浙江大学	211	2.92
7	扬州大学	156	2.16
8	福建农林大学	155	2.15
9	中国水稻研究所	149	2.06
10	华南农业大学	146	2.02

排名	关键词	次数	排名	关键词	次数
1	水稻	2323	11	转录因子	405
2	蛋白质	1543	12	抵抗力	354
3	拟南芥	1275	13	稻瘟病菌	336
4	表达	1036	14	应激性	306
5	基因	849	15	小麦	264
6	识别	622	16	应答	260
7	植物	537	17	质量	258
8	生长	490	18	非生物胁迫	253
9	基因表达	482	19	积累	248
10	耐受性	445	20	家族	242

排名	关键词	次数	排名	关键词	次数
1	水稻	2323	11	转录因子	405
2	蛋白质	1543	12	抵抗力	354
3	拟南芥	1275	13	稻瘟病菌	336
4	表达	1036	14	应激性	306
5	基因	849	15	小麦	264
6	识别	622	16	应答	260
7	植物	537	17	质量	258
8	生长	490	18	非生物胁迫	253
9	基因表达	482	19	积累	248
10	耐受性	445	20	家族	242

排名	作者	发文量/篇	占比/%	排名	作者	发文量/篇	占比/%
1	Wang J	105	1.45	11	Liu Y	62	0.86
2	Zhang Y	96	1.33	12	Chen J	57	0.79
3	Wang Y	94	1.30	12	Li H	57	0.79
4	Li Y	92	1.27	14	Yang J	56	0.78
5	Wang L	82	1.14	14	Zhou Y	56	0.78
6	Zhang J	77	1.06	16	Chen L	53	0.73
7	Zhang H	74	1.02	17	Liu X	52	0.72
8	Zhang L	69	0.96	18	Qian Q	52	0.72
9	Li J	66	0.91	19	Zhang Q	50	0.69
10	Zhang X	63	0.87	20	Kumar A	49	0.68