Research Trend Analysis of Forest Greenhouse Gas Emissions

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0181

Abstract

Abstract:

To understand the research status and development trend of forest greenhouse gas emissions, based on the bibliometric method, the published literature in the Web of Science database from 2017 to 2021 was statistically and visually analyzed with the help of VOSviewer and Citespace tools. The results are as follows. (1) The literature on global forest greenhouse gas emissions was increasing year by year, and the impact factors of journals with high publication volume were high. The publication volume of China and the United States were far more than that of other countries, and the two countries had the closest cooperation, while they had cooperative research with almost all other core countries in this field. (2) The publication volume of the literature of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Chinese Academy of Forestry ranked among the top 10 in the world, they had a great global influence in this research field, and they were also the main research force in China. (3) Corre M D and Veldkamp E from Germany and Peng Ch from China ranked first in the number of published papers. There was more cooperation among authors in the same cluster, and the communication between authors in different clusters still needs to be strengthened. (4) Research on the law and mechanism of global warming and forest land-use change on greenhouse gas emissions, and the improvement of the data model and the monitor technology were the research priorities and hotspots in this field. Therefore, in view of China’s high comprehensive strength in this research field, to accurately determine the distribution of domestic forest carbon storage is particularly important. To realize the goal of ‘carbon neutrality’, the establishment of carbon sink trade mechanism, and the pilot and popularization of the urban carbon trade market will be important tasks in the next few years.

Key words: forest, greenhouse gas emissions, bibliometrics, land-use, climate warming, cooperation

CLC Number:

WU Song, LIU Yongzhi, YANG Libin, JIANG Yunbing, ZHOU Tian. Research Trend Analysis of Forest Greenhouse Gas Emissions[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 99-108.

Figures/Tables 12

References 46

[1]	JOHN B, SONALDE D, DENNIS H, et al. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5℃ Switzerland : IPCC, 2018[J]. Population and development review, 2019, 45(1):251-252. doi: 10.1111/padr.12234 URL
[2]	MILLER A D, DIETZE M C, DELUCIA E H, et al. Alteration of forest succession and carbon cycling under elevated CO₂[J]. Global change biology, 2016, 22(1):351-363. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13077 URL
[3]	CREIGHTON M L, JAMES W R, MICHAEL G R. Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems[J]. Global change biology, 2007, 13(10):2089-2109. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01420.x URL
[4]	EGLE K, KAJAR K, FRANK B, et al. Carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from a fire chronosequence in subarctic boreal forests of Canada[J]. Science of the total environment, 2017, 601:895-905.
[5]	BENJAMIN W S, THOMAS E K, STEPHEN C H, et al. Wildfire reduces carbon dioxide efflux and increases methane uptake in ponderosa pine forest soils of the southwestern USA[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2011, 104(1/3):251-265. doi: 10.1007/s10533-010-9499-1 URL
[6]	YONGWON K, NORIYUKI T. Effect of forest fire on the fluxes of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O in boreal forest soils, interior Alaska[J]. Journal of geophysical research: Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D1):8154. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000663 URL
[7]	MATHEUS F S. The role of forests and protected areas in climate change mitigation: a review and critique of the ecosystem services and REDD+ approaches[J]. Desenvolvimento e meio ambiente, 2018, 46:23-36.
[8]	COBLE K H, MISHRA A K, FERRELL S, et al. Big data in agriculture: A challenge for the future[J]. Applied economic perspectives and policy, 2018, 40(1):79-96. doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppx056 URL
[9]	丁恩俊, 谢佳, 申丽娟, 等. 基于文献计量的国内外农业信息化研究态势分析[J]. 西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 39(8):116-125.
[10]	覃诚, 方向明, 陈典. 中国农村产业融合发展研究现状与展望——基于CiteSpace文献计量分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(10):198-208.
[11]	牛善栋, 吕晓. 基于文献计量的中国耕地保护补偿研究进展分析[J]. 土壤, 2018, 50(1):195-201.
[12]	SCHULTEUEBBING L F, ROS G H, de VRIES W. Experimental evidence shows minor contribution of nitrogen deposition to global forest carbon sequestration[J]. Global change biology, 2021, 28(3):899-917. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15960 URL
[13]	RYHTI K, KULMALA L, PUMPANEN J, et al. Partitioning of forest floor CO₂ emissions reveals the belowground interactions between different plant groups in a Scots pine stand in southern Finland[J]. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2021, 297:108266. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108266 URL
[14]	KYASCHENKO J, OVANSKAINEN O, EKBLAD A, et al. Soil fertility in boreal forest relates to root-driven nitrogen retention and carbon sequestration in the mor layer[J]. The new phytologist, 2019, 221(3):1492-1502. doi: 10.1111/nph.15454 URL
[15]	SOKOL N W, BRADFORD M A. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input[J]. Nature geoscience, 2019, 12(1):46-53. doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0258-6 URL
[16]	YANG L, ASHLEY N C, AMRITA B, et al. Differential effects of redox conditions on the decomposition of litter and soil organic matter[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2021, 154(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10533-021-00790-y URL
[17]	RODTASSANA C, UNAWONG W, YAEMPHUM S, et al. Different responses of soil respiration to environmental factors across forest stages in a Southeast Asian forest[J]. Ecology and evolution, 2021, 11(21):15430-15443. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8248 URL
[18]	JIANG Z, BIAN H, XU L, et al. Effects of pulse precipitation on soil organic matter mineralization in forests: spatial variation and controlling factors[J]. Journal of plant ecology, 2021, 14(5):970-980. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtab057 URL
[19]	VERCHOT L V, DANNENMANN M, KENGDO S K, et al. Land-use change and biogeochemical controls of soil CO₂, N₂O and CH₄ fluxes in Cameroonian forest landscapes[J]. Journal of integrative environmental sciences, 2020, 17(3):45-67.
[20]	NNNES L J R, MEIRELES C I R, GOMES C J P, et al. Forest contribution to climate change mitigation: Management oriented to carbon capture and storage[J]. Climate, 2020, 8(2):21. doi: 10.3390/cli8020021 URL
[21]	GUSTAVSSON L, HAUS S, LUNDBLAD M, et al. Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2017, 67:612-624. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.056 URL
[22]	COOMES D, ALLEN R, SCOTT N, et al. Designing systems to monitor carbon stocks in forests and shrublands[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2002, 164(1/3):89-108. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00592-8 URL
[23]	Li M, Cui Y, Fu Y, et al. Simulating the potential sequestration of three major greenhouse gases in China's natural ecosystems[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(2):128. doi: 10.3390/f11020128 URL
[24]	CADE S M, CLEMITSHAW K C, MOLINAHERRERA S, et al. Evaluation of LandscapeDNDC model predictions of CO₂ and N₂O fluxes from an oak forest in SE England[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(11):1517. doi: 10.3390/f12111517 URL
[25]	SILJANDER R, EKHOLM T. Integrated scenario modelling of energy, greenhouse gas emissions and forestry[J]. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 2018, 23(5):783-802. doi: 10.1007/s11027-017-9759-7 URL
[26]	SILJANEN H M P, WELTI N, VOIGT C, et al. Atmospheric impact of nitrous oxide uptake by boreal forest soils can be comparable to that of methane uptake[J]. Plant and soil, 2020, 454(1/2):121-138. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04638-6 URL
[27]	SONG X, PENG C, CIAIS P, et al. Nitrogen addition increased CO₂ uptake more than non-CO₂ greenhouse gases emissions in a Moso bamboo forest[J]. Science advances, 2020, 6(12):w5790.
[28]	SONG L, TIAN P, ZHANG J, et al. Effects of three years of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil nitrogen dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions in a Korean pine plantation of northeast China[J]. Science of the total environment, 2017, 609:1303-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.017 URL
[29]	LI Y, HU S, CHEN J, et al. Effects of biochar application in forest ecosystems on soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions: A review[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2018, 18(2):546-563. doi: 10.1007/s11368-017-1906-y URL
[30]	POKHAREL P, KWAK J H, YONG S O, et al. Pine sawdust biochar reduces GHG emission by decreasing microbial and enzyme activities in forest and grassland soils in a laboratory experiment[J]. Science of the total environment, 2018, 625:1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.343 URL
[31]	AYAYEE P A, TAURA J, ROBERTO A A, et al. Patterns of denitrification and methanogenesis rates from vernal pools in a temperate forest driven by seasonal, microbial functional gene abundances, and soil chemistry[J]. Wetlands, 2020, 40(4):721-731. doi: 10.1007/s13157-019-01225-z URL
[32]	GRUENING M M, GERMESHAUSEN F, THIES C, et al. Increased forest soil CO₂ and N₂O emissions during insect infestation[J]. Forests, 2018, 9(10):612. doi: 10.3390/f9100612 URL
[33]	SA M F, SCHAEFER C E G R, LOUREIRO D C, et al. Fluxes of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O in tundra-covered and Nothofagus forest soils in the Argentinian Patagonia[J]. Science of the total environment, 2019, 659:401-409. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.328 URL
[34]	WU X, ZANG S, MA D, et al. Emissions of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O fluxes from forest soil in permafrost region of Daxing'an Mountains, Northeast China[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019, 16(16):2999. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162999 URL
[35]	MANNAN A, FENG Z, AHAMAD A, et al. CO₂ emission trends and risk zone mapping of forest fires in subtropical and moist temperate forests of Pakistan[J]. Global warming focus, 2019, 17(2):2983-3002.
[36]	MCROBERTS R E, NAESSET E, SANNIER C, et al. Remote sensing support for the gain-loss approach for greenhouse gas inventories[J]. Remote sensing, 2020, 12(11):1891. doi: 10.3390/rs12111891 URL
[37]	NOOJIPADY P, MORTON D C, MACEDO M N, et al. Forest carbon emissions from cropland expansion in the Brazilian Cerrado biome[J]. Environmental research letters, 2017, 12(2):25004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5986 URL
[38]	ASNER G P, POWELL G V N, MASCARO J, et al. High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(38):16738-16742.
[39]	BOGAERTS M, CIRHIGIRI L, ROBINSON I, et al. Climate change mitigation through intensified pasture management: Estimating greenhouse gas emissions on cattle farms in the Brazilian Amazon[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2017, 162:1539-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.130 URL
[40]	BERNARDINO A F, NÓBREGA G N, FERREIRA T O. Consequences of terminating mangrove’s protection in Brazil[J]. Marine policy, 2021, 125:104389. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104389 URL
[41]	SASMITO S D, TAILLARDAT P, CKENDENNING J N, et al. Effect of land-use and land-cover change on mangrove blue carbon: A systematic review[J]. Global change biology, 2019, 25(12):4291-4302. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14774 URL
[42]	HAN M, ZHU B. Changes in soil greenhouse gas fluxes by land use change from primary forest[J]. Global change biology, 2020, 26(4):2656-2667. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14993 URL
[43]	LIU M, LIU M, LI P, et al. Variations in soil organic carbon decompositions of different land use patterns on the tableland of Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental science and pollution research, 2020, 27(4):4337-4352. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07099-2 URL
[44]	ZHOU M, WANG X, REN X, et al. Afforestation and deforestation enhanced soil CH₄ uptake in a subtropical agricultural landscape: Evidence from multi-year and multi-site field experiments[J]. Science of the total environment, 2019, 662:313-323. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.247 URL
[45]	RICHARDS M, POGSON M, DONDINI M, et al. High-resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change to energy crops in the United Kingdom[J]. GCB bioenergy, 2017, 9(3):627-644. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12360 URL
[46]	XIE Y, HOU Z, LIU H, et al. The sustainability assessment of CO₂ capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) and the conversion of cropland to forestland program (CCFP) in the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) framework towards China’s carbon neutrality by 2060[J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2021, 80(14):468. doi: 10.1007/s12665-021-09762-9 URL

序号	机构		作者
序号	名称	发文量/篇	姓名	发文量/篇
1	中国科学院(Chinese Academy of Sciences)	78	Peng Ch	11
2	中国科学院大学(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)	32	Corre M D	11
3	赫尔辛基大学(University of Helsinki)	23	Veldkamp E	11
4	俄罗斯科学院(Russian Academy of Sciences)	23	Machacova K	8
5	兰斯卡特大学(University of Lancaster)	18	Sjogersten S	8
6	东芬兰大学(University of Eastern Finland)	18	Berninger F	7
7	瑞典农业科学大学(Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)	17	Maher D T	7
8	中国林业科学研究院(Chinese Academy of Forestry)	16	Hirano T	7
9	圣保罗大学(Universidade de Sao Paulo)	15	Vargas R	7
10	北海道大学(Hokkaido University)	15	Minkkinen K	6

序号	机构		作者
序号	名称	发文量/篇	姓名	发文量/篇
1	中国科学院(Chinese Academy of Sciences)	78	Peng Ch	11
2	中国科学院大学(University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)	32	Corre M D	11
3	赫尔辛基大学(University of Helsinki)	23	Veldkamp E	11
4	俄罗斯科学院(Russian Academy of Sciences)	23	Machacova K	8
5	兰斯卡特大学(University of Lancaster)	18	Sjogersten S	8
6	东芬兰大学(University of Eastern Finland)	18	Berninger F	7
7	瑞典农业科学大学(Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)	17	Maher D T	7
8	中国林业科学研究院(Chinese Academy of Forestry)	16	Hirano T	7
9	圣保罗大学(Universidade de Sao Paulo)	15	Vargas R	7
10	北海道大学(Hokkaido University)	15	Minkkinen K	6

序号	期刊	中科院分区	发文量/篇
1	《Science of the Total Environment》	2	45
2	《Forests》	3	41
3	《Global Change Biology》	1	30
4	《Biogeosciences》	2	25
5	《Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences》	3	20
6	《Agricultural and Forest Meteorology》	1	19
7	《Biogeochemistry》	2	16
8	《Scientific Reports》	3	15
9	《Forest Ecology and Management》	2	15
10	《Soil Biology & Biochemistry》	1	14
10	《Ecosystems》	2	14

序号	期刊	中科院分区	发文量/篇
1	《Science of the Total Environment》	2	45
2	《Forests》	3	41
3	《Global Change Biology》	1	30
4	《Biogeosciences》	2	25
5	《Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences》	3	20
6	《Agricultural and Forest Meteorology》	1	19
7	《Biogeochemistry》	2	16
8	《Scientific Reports》	3	15
9	《Forest Ecology and Management》	2	15
10	《Soil Biology & Biochemistry》	1	14
10	《Ecosystems》	2	14

关键词	频次	中心度	关键词	频次	中心度
二氧化碳(carbon dioxide)	219	0.19	通量(fluxe)	112	0.05
甲烷(methane)	159	0.09	气候改变(climate change)	112	0.03
氧化亚氮(nitrous oxide)	155	0.19	呼吸(respiration)	103	0.21
排放(emission)	125	0.05	温室气体排放(greenhouse gas emission)	103	0.05
森林(forest)	114	0.18	氧化亚氮排放(nitrous oxide emission)	100	0.20