Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 33-37.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0050
Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Caihong(), ZHANG Jingsuo, TIAN Yanan, ZHANG Songyang, WANG Zhongyi, CAO Lingling
Received:
2023-01-24
Revised:
2023-04-17
Online:
2024-01-05
Published:
2023-12-29
CAO Caihong, ZHANG Jingsuo, TIAN Yanan, ZHANG Songyang, WANG Zhongyi, CAO Lingling. Effects of Growth Promoting Microbes on the Growth of Tomato Seedlings[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 33-37.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0050
处理 | 有效菌种 | 名称 | 使用方法 |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 巨大芽孢杆菌 | 微宝 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T2 | 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 甲等兵 | 稀释250倍,2 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T3 | 长枝木霉菌 | 苗宝宝 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T4 | 蕈状芽孢杆菌 | 精赞 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T5 | 加纳木霉菌 | 天合1号 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
处理 | 有效菌种 | 名称 | 使用方法 |
---|---|---|---|
T1 | 巨大芽孢杆菌 | 微宝 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T2 | 枯草芽孢杆菌 | 甲等兵 | 稀释250倍,2 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T3 | 长枝木霉菌 | 苗宝宝 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T4 | 蕈状芽孢杆菌 | 精赞 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
T5 | 加纳木霉菌 | 天合1号 | 稀释500倍,1 g兑500 mL水(500 g) |
菌剂处理 | 发芽势 | 发芽率 |
---|---|---|
T1 | 61.3±0.090a | 89.8±0.043a |
T2 | 65.5±0.102a | 89.5±0.054a |
CK | 53.3±0.108a | 87.3±0.022a |
T3 | 28.8±0.044b | 75.8±0.061b |
T4 | 62.0±0.191a | 87.0±0.041a |
T5 | 56.3±0.182a | 87.5±0.017a |
菌剂处理 | 发芽势 | 发芽率 |
---|---|---|
T1 | 61.3±0.090a | 89.8±0.043a |
T2 | 65.5±0.102a | 89.5±0.054a |
CK | 53.3±0.108a | 87.3±0.022a |
T3 | 28.8±0.044b | 75.8±0.061b |
T4 | 62.0±0.191a | 87.0±0.041a |
T5 | 56.3±0.182a | 87.5±0.017a |
处理 | 叶片数/片 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 下胚轴长/cm | 地上鲜重/g | 地下鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 6.33±0.58a | 16.13±1.29b | 5.20±0.30a | 4.10±0.27ab | 5.44±0.76a | 0.86±0.10b |
T2 | 7.00±0.00a | 22.20±1.06a | 5.40±0.40a | 5.23±0.31a | 5.59±0.32a | 1.15±0.27a |
CK | 6.67±0.578a | 13.03±0.59c | 4.70±0.66a | 3.30±0.44b | 4.71±0.32b | 0.44±0.02c |
T3 | 6.33±0.58a | 13.73±0.84c | 4.63±0.15a | 4.53±0.95a | 4.14±0.09c | 0.68±0.13bc |
T4 | 6.33±0.58a | 15.93±1.68b | 4.87±0.53a | 4.07±0.29ab | 4.29±0.57c | 0.69±0.17bc |
T5 | 6.67±0.58a | 18.00±0.53b | 5.13±0.31a | 4.87±0.31a | 4.74±0.63b | 0.46±0.04c |
处理 | 叶片数/片 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/cm | 下胚轴长/cm | 地上鲜重/g | 地下鲜重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 6.33±0.58a | 16.13±1.29b | 5.20±0.30a | 4.10±0.27ab | 5.44±0.76a | 0.86±0.10b |
T2 | 7.00±0.00a | 22.20±1.06a | 5.40±0.40a | 5.23±0.31a | 5.59±0.32a | 1.15±0.27a |
CK | 6.67±0.578a | 13.03±0.59c | 4.70±0.66a | 3.30±0.44b | 4.71±0.32b | 0.44±0.02c |
T3 | 6.33±0.58a | 13.73±0.84c | 4.63±0.15a | 4.53±0.95a | 4.14±0.09c | 0.68±0.13bc |
T4 | 6.33±0.58a | 15.93±1.68b | 4.87±0.53a | 4.07±0.29ab | 4.29±0.57c | 0.69±0.17bc |
T5 | 6.67±0.58a | 18.00±0.53b | 5.13±0.31a | 4.87±0.31a | 4.74±0.63b | 0.46±0.04c |
处理 | 地上干重/g | 地下干重/g | 全株干重/g | 壮苗指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.37±0.05ab | 0.06±0.01b | 0.43±0.05b | 0.22±0.03ab |
T2 | 0.41±0.06a | 0.10±0.02a | 0.51±0.04a | 0.24±0.02a |
CK | 0.31±0.04ab | 0.04±0.00c | 0.35±0.04c | 0.17±0.02bc |
T3 | 0.31±0.05ab | 0.03±0.01c | 0.34±0.04c | 0.15±0.02c |
T4 | 0.27±0.05b | 0.04±0.01c | 0.31±0.05c | 0.14±0.03c |
T5 | 0.39±0.04ab | 0.04±0.00c | 0.44±0.05b | 0.17±0.01bc |
处理 | 地上干重/g | 地下干重/g | 全株干重/g | 壮苗指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.37±0.05ab | 0.06±0.01b | 0.43±0.05b | 0.22±0.03ab |
T2 | 0.41±0.06a | 0.10±0.02a | 0.51±0.04a | 0.24±0.02a |
CK | 0.31±0.04ab | 0.04±0.00c | 0.35±0.04c | 0.17±0.02bc |
T3 | 0.31±0.05ab | 0.03±0.01c | 0.34±0.04c | 0.15±0.02c |
T4 | 0.27±0.05b | 0.04±0.01c | 0.31±0.05c | 0.14±0.03c |
T5 | 0.39±0.04ab | 0.04±0.00c | 0.44±0.05b | 0.17±0.01bc |
处理 | 发芽势 | 发芽率 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 下胚轴长 | 全株干重 | 壮苗指数 | SOD | POD | CAT | MDA | 根系活力 | 平均隶属值 | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 1 |
T2 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 0.65 | 0.92 | 0.27 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 2 |
CK | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 6 |
T3 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.33 | 4 |
T4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 5 |
T5 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 3 |
处理 | 发芽势 | 发芽率 | 株高 | 茎粗 | 下胚轴长 | 全株干重 | 壮苗指数 | SOD | POD | CAT | MDA | 根系活力 | 平均隶属值 | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 1 |
T2 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 0.65 | 0.92 | 0.27 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 2 |
CK | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 6 |
T3 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.33 | 4 |
T4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 0.26 | 5 |
T5 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 3 |
[1] |
孙永珍, 贺靖, 魏芳, 等. “十三五”我国番茄产业发展及其国际竞争力评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(1):112-116.
|
[2] |
中共中央国务院关于做好2022年全面推进乡村振兴重点工作的意见[Z]. 2022.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
侯乐梅, 孟瑞青, 乜兰春, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对基质酶活性和番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(8):2520-2526.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201608.015 |
[5] |
王涛, 乔卫花, 李玉奇, 等. 轮作和微生物菌肥对黄瓜连作土壤理化性状及生物活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(3):578-583.
|
[6] |
李晶晶, 刘聪, 王鑫鑫, 等. 微生物菌剂对青椒生长、品质和土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(13):1-10.
|
[7] |
李婷, 时月, 陈艳利, 等. 根部追施促生菌剂提高网纹甜瓜的品质[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2022, 35(2):12-19.
|
[8] |
王西芝. 三种不同有益微生物复合菌剂在番茄育苗中的应用[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2015.
|
[9] |
安亚虹, 周珩, 李婧, 等. 黄瓜防病促长型微生物制剂的筛选与利用[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2014(2):36-41.
|
[10] |
张钰, 孙锦, 郭世荣. 基质中添加微生物制剂对黄瓜幼苗生长和枯萎病抗性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(4):780-786.
|
[11] |
韦峰, 祁娟霞, 李佳梅, 等. 不同光质对辣椒种子萌发、幼苗生长及抗寒性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(11):1932-1938.
|
[12] |
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000:119-120.
|
[13] |
屠洁, 沈文飚, 林国庆, 等. 一氧化氮供体SNP干扰NBT光化还原法测定小麦叶片SOD活性的消除[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2003, 39(5):483-485.
|
[14] |
赵炀, 李永生, 高秀峰. 基于愈创木酚荧光减量准确测定过氧化物酶活性的新方法[J]. 分析化学, 2015, 43(7):1040-1046.
|
[15] |
曹翠玲, 麻鹏达. 植物生理学教学实验指导[M]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学出版社, 2016:59-72.
|
[16] |
侯福林. 植物生理学试验教程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004:91.
|
[17] |
毛达如. 植物营养研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2000:43-79.
|
[18] |
班兆军, 关军锋, 李莉, 等. 非生物胁迫下植物体内活性氧产生和抗氧化机制的研究概述[J]. 中国果菜, 2012, 32(5):40-47.
|
[19] |
武维华. 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008:465.
|
[20] |
莫言玲, 郑俊鶱, 杨瑞平, 等. 不同西瓜基因型对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其抗旱性评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6):1942-1952.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201606.034 |
[21] |
|
[22] |
陈伟立, 李娟, 朱红惠, 等. 根际微生物调控植物根系构型研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(17):5285-5297.
|
[23] |
王君正, 张琪, 高子星, 等. 两种微生物菌剂对有机基质袋培秋黄瓜产量、品质及根际环境的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(14):3077.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.14.013 |
[24] |
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8050725 URL |
[1] | DOU Zongxin, PANG Yong, WANG Baochun, LI Guannan. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Tomato Under Solar Greenhouse Condition [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 28-32. |
[2] | WANG Cheng, ZHUANG Defeng, DU Xiaoyan, SUN Xiaoyan. Comparison of Cold Resistance of Rosa rugosa and R. xanthina During Natural Overwintering [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 46-51. |
[3] | MA Yongpeng, LIU Yuanjian, LONG Yunxing, QUAN Shenchun, WANG Xi, SONG Xianwu, YUE Kai, GAO Chaowen, HU Zuo. Effect of Plastic Film Mulching and Shading Degree on Growth and Yield of Corydalis saxicola [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 60-65. |
[4] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[5] | YANG Tai, YU Huiying, LU Liming, FU Haiyan, LI Guoliang, DAI Wenlong, LIU Chunguang, YANG Fengshan, MA Yukun. Endophytic Bacteria from Maize Seed with Growth-promoting Potential: Isolation, Identification and Optimization of Fermentation Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 16-23. |
[6] | HU Baigeng, LI Xueyang, KONG Haiming, SUN Shasha, WANG Kexiu, HU Jianjun, HE Wei, TANG Mingxia. Different Calcium Concentrations Under Aeroponics: Effects on Growth and Yield of Potato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 33-39. |
[7] | WANG Haiying, HAN Dejun, LI Xiaorui. A High Throughput Tomato Genomic DNA Extraction Method and Its Application in SNP Genotyping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 45-51. |
[8] | LI Cuihan, ZHAO Jianmei, ZUO Xiuli, LIU Na, WANG Juan, LIU Junhui, WANG Lin, ZHANG Qingqing, HUANG Xiumei, GAO Yubin, WANG Junwei, QU Zhina. Prevalence and Drug Resistance of ESBLs-Producing Salmonella Isolated from Different Poultry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 112-118. |
[9] | YANG Zhuoying, LIANG Xiaojing, ZENG Xiangyan, WEI Xiaojuan, WU Siyu, LI Baocai. Annual Growth Rhythm and Biomass Allocation of Cinnamomum cassia Presl Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 21-26. |
[10] | SHEN Jianguo, SU Guijun, LOU Ling, HE Linhai, HU Kangying. Effects of Salt Washing Methods on Soil Salinity and Nutrient Content and Vegetable Growth in Facility Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 69-73. |
[11] | CHEN Yuli, YANG Ping, BI Haibin, ZHAI Huabo, WANG Dongfeng, ZHUO Ma, GAO Minghui, GONG Fajiang. Response of Main Growth Indexes of Summer Soybean Canopy to Nitrogen [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 19-23. |
[12] | HE Lijuan, HONG Mingwei, WU Xing’en, ZHANG Hongchang, REN Jing, BAI Chunlan, WANG Zhenghe, YANG Rongping, ZHANG Hong. Effect of CO2 Capture Agent on Mineral Element Content of Pomegranate Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 46-50. |
[13] | HUANG Wenjing, YANG Shuhua, GE Hong, KOU Yaping, ZHAO Xin, JIA Ruidong, CHEN Jiren. Research of AMF on the Growth and Development of Ornamental Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 55-63. |
[14] | ZHENG Jianchao, DONG Fei. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction on Growth Characteristics and Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 52-57. |
[15] | LI Yali, BAI Jing, WU Zhenghu, HALIHASH Yibati, LI Qingjun. Effects of N, P and K Application Time on Yield, Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Processing Tomato Under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 58-63. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||