Analysis of the Current Research Status of Wetland Ecosystem Service Functions Based on Web of Science

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0053

Abstract

Abstract:

This study used bibliometric analysis to investigate the research status, hotspots, and trends of wetland ecosystem service functions on a global scale by using literature published between 2002 and 2022 in the Web of Science core database. VOS viewer software was employed to conduct bibliometric and visualization analysis on the publication volume, countries, core authors, research institutions, and research hotspots of wetland ecosystem service function research. The results showed that the number of papers published in the field was generally increasing; the United States and China are the two countries with the highest number of papers published in the field; the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the USGS are the research institutions with the highest number of papers published; a grouping of high-frequency keywords identifies the research hotspots as “Benefit”, “Soil”, “China”,and “Marsh”, which are closely related to wetland ecosystem services and provide a variety of research directions for the future development of the field. This study provides a reference for relevant researchers in the research trend and future research hotspots of wetland ecosystem services.

Key words: wetlands, ecosystem service functions, bibliometrics, visualization analysis

WANG Mingyu, WENG Xiaohong, SONG Yu, HE Xin, ZENG Xiannan, SUI Xin. Analysis of the Current Research Status of Wetland Ecosystem Service Functions Based on Web of Science[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(29): 137-145.

Figures/Tables 6

References 54

[26]	张增可, 王齐, 吴雅华, 等. 基于CiteSpace植物功能性状的研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4):1101-1112.
[27]	BRAUMAN K A, DAILY G C, DUARTE T K, et al. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services[J]. Annual review of environment and resources, 2007, 32:67-98. doi: 10.1146/energy.2007.32.issue-1 URL
[28]	MORENO-MATEOS D, POWER M E, COMIN F A, et al. Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems[J]. Plos biology, 2012, 10(1):e1001247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247 URL
[29]	LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I. Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: diversity, centrality, and citations[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011, 5(1):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.09.002 URL
[30]	BORNMANN L, LEYDESDORFF L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: Bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research[J]. EMBO reports, 2014, 15(12):1228-1232. doi: 10.15252/embr.201439608 pmid: 25389037
[31]	GLÄNZEL W, SCHUBERT A. Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship[C] In: Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springer netherlands, 2005:257-276.
[32]	LEE P C, SU H N. Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research through keyword co-occurrence and social network analysis[J]. Innovation-management policy & practice, 2010, 12(1):26-40.
[33]	WALTMAN L, VAN ECK N J, NOYONS E C. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2010, 4(4): 629-635. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002 URL
[34]	DING Y, CRONIN B. The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2011, 62(3):416-427.
[35]	BOYACK K W, KLAVANS R. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2010, 61(12): 2389-2404. doi: 10.1002/asi.v61.12 URL
[36]	CHEN C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377. doi: 10.1002/asi.v57:3 URL
[37]	LEYDESDORFF L, VAUGHAN L. Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2006, 57(12):1616-1628. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890 URL
[38]	SMALL H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American society for information science, 1973, 24(4):265-269. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571 URL
[39]	关娟娟, 陈爱侠, 卫潇, 等. 基于文献计量分析的多孔碳吸附研究进展[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(12):4676-4687.
[40]	WANG D, SONG C, BARABÁSI A L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6154):127-132. doi: 10.1126/science.1237825 pmid: 24092745
[41]	KESSLER M M. An experimental communication center for scientific and technical information[R]. Massachusetts institute of technology, Lincoln Laboratory, 1960.
[42]	JARNEVING B. Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2007, 1:287-307. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.07.004 URL
[43]	王昊煜, 高培超, 宋长青, 等. 基于文献计量和遗传算法的土地利用优化研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(3):1286-1293.
[44]	MALTBY E, ACREMAN M C. Ecosystem services of wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm[J]. Hydrological sciences journal-journal des sciences hydrologiques, 2011, 56:1341-1359. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2011.631014 URL
[45]	OK P M, BIN Y S, YURI H, et al. A basic study on the evaluation Index of village wetland ecosystem services using function evaluation methods[J]. Journal of the Korea society of environmental restoration technology, 2018, 21:119-132.
[46]	CHEN C, SHAO C F, SHI Y M. Dynamic Evaluation of Ecological Service Function Value of Qilihai Wetland in Tianjin[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17:7108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197108 URL
[47]	ROJAS T V, BARTL K, ABAD J D. Assessment of the potential responses of ecosystem services to anthropogenic threats in the Eten wetland, Peru[J]. Ecosystem health and sustainability, 2021, 7: 1942224. doi: 10.1080/20964129.2021.1942224 URL
[1]	LANGAN C, FARMER J, RIVINGTON M, et al. Tropical wetland ecosystem service assessments in East Africa: A review of approaches and challenges[J]. Environmental modelling & software, 2018, 102:260-273.
[2]	ZHANG B, SHI Y T, Liu J H, et al. Economic values and dominant providers of key ecosystem services of wetlands in Beijing, China[J]. Ecological indicators, 2017, 77:48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.005 URL
[3]	GHERMANDI A, JEROEN C J M, van den Bergh, BRANDER L M, et al. Values of natural and human-made wetlands: A meta-analysis[J]. Tinbergen institute discussion papers, 2010(12).
[4]	GUL A. Comparing past and present hydrologic aspects of a Mediterranean wetland from a sustainable management perspective[J]. Water resources management, 2015, 29:2771-2787. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0969-z URL
[5]	SHARMA B, RASUL G, CHETTRI N. The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: Evidence from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal[J]. Ecosystem services, 2015, 12:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.007 URL
[6]	ENGELHARDT K A, RITCHIE M E. Effects of macrophyte species richness on wetland ecosystem functioning and services[J]. Nature, 2001, 411:687-689. doi: 10.1038/35079573
[7]	MITSCH W J, CRONK J K, WU X, et al. Phosphorus retention in constructed freshwater riparian marshes[J]. Ecological applications, 1995, 5:830-845. doi: 10.2307/1941991 URL
[8]	CHAMBERS R M, MEYERSON L A, SALTONSTALL K. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America[J]. Aquatic botany, 1999, 64:261-273. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00055-8 URL
[9]	MITSCH W J, GOSSELINK J G. WETLANDS[M]. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 2015.
[10]	NIU Z, ZHANG H, WANG X, et al. Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008[J]. Chinese science bulletin, 2012, 57:2813-2823. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5093-3 URL
[11]	COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[12]	ADHIKARI S, BAJRACHARAYA R M, SITAULA B K. A review of carbon dynamics and sequestration in wetlands[J]. Journal of wetlands ecology, 2009, 2:42-46.
[13]	MASI F, RIZZO A, REGELSBERGER M. The role of constructed wetlands in a new circular economy, resource oriented, and ecosystem services paradigm[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2018, 216(6):275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.086 URL
[14]	WANG W, FENG C, LIU F, et al. Biodiversity conservation in China: A review of recent studies and practices[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2020(2):100025.
[15]	CAI Y, LIANG J, ZHANG P, et al. Review on strategies of close-to-natural wetland restoration and a brief case plan for a typical wetland in northern China[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 285(12):131534. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131534 URL
[16]	Broadus R N. Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”[J]. Scientometrics, 1987, 12:373-379. doi: 10.1007/BF02016680 URL
[17]	唐棣, 高元竞, 陈明和, 等. 基于CiteSpace分析的海洋生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2022, 44(6):164-172.
[18]	张丽媛, 易帅莹, 胡广. 中国森林生态系统文化服务研究进展:基于文献计量分析[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 48(6):713-723.
[19]	LIAO H, TANG M, LUO L, et al. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(1):166. doi: 10.3390/su10010166 URL
[20]	HUANG L, XU G, SUN M, et al. Recent trends in acupuncture for chronic pain: A bibliometric analysis and review of the literature[J]. Complement ther med, 2023, 72(3):102915. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102915 URL
[21]	JIN L L, SUN X Z, REN H Q, HUANG H. Hotspots and trends of biological water treatment based on bibliometric review and patents analysis[J]. Journal of environmental sciences, 2023, 125:774-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.03.037 pmid: 36375959
[22]	LEWISON G, DEVEY M E. Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research[J]. Rheumatology, 1999, 38:13-20. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.1.13 URL
[23]	NINKOV A, FRANK J R, MAGGIO L A. Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing[J]. Perspectives on medical education, 2022, 11(3): 173-176. doi: 10.1007/S40037-021-00695-4 URL
[24]	FIGUEROA-RodrÍguez K A, HernáNdez-ROSAS F, FIGUEROA-SANDOVAL B, et al. What has been the focus of sugarcane research? A bibliometric overview[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019, 16(18):3326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183326 URL
[25]	VAN ECk N J, WALTMAN L, DEKKER R, et al. A Comparison of Two Techniques for Bibliometric Mapping: Multidimensional Scaling and VOS[J]. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 2010, 61(12):2405-2416. doi: 10.1002/asi.v61.12 URL
[48]	MURRAY N J, CLEMENS R S, PHINN S R, et al. Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea[J]. Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2014, 12:267-272. doi: 10.1890/130260 URL
[49]	WANG Z, ZHANG B, ZHANG S, et al. Changes of land use and of ecosystem service values in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China[J]. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2006, 112:69-91. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-0312-5 pmid: 16404535
[50]	SENEVIRATNE S I, LÜTHI D, LITSCHI M, SCHÄR C. Land-atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe[J]. Nature, 2006, 443:205-209. doi: 10.1038/nature05095
[51]	DESTOUNI G, JARAMILLO F, PRIETO C. Hydroclimatic shifts driven by human water use for food and energy production[J]. Nature climate change, 2013, 3:213-217. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1719
[52]	THORSLUND J, JARSJO J, JARAMILLO F, et al. Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions: Status and challenges for research, engineering and management[J]. Ecological engineering, 2017, 108:489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.012 URL
[53]	DAVIDSON N C, FINLAYSON C M. A global assessment of wetland ecosystem services and their role in poverty alleviation[J]. Wetlands ecology and management, 2013, 21(2):111-126.
[54]	MITSCH W J, BERNAL B, NAHLIK A M, et al. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change[J]. Landscape ecology, 2013, 28(4):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9758-8 URL

序号	论文题目	第一作者	机构	被引频次	期刊	影响因子
1	The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services	Brauman Kate A	Stanford University	782	Annual Review of Environment and Resources	19.644
2	Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems	Moreno-Mateos David.	University of California Berkeley	479	Plos Biology	10.462
3	The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection	Costanza Robert	University of Vermont	422	Ambio	7.194
4	Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability	Bennett Elena M	Avignon Universite	409	Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability	8.764
5	The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services	Keesstra Saskia.	Wageningen University& Research	403	Science of The Total Environment	10.237
6	A global perspective on wetland salinization: ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands	Herbert Ellen R	Indiana University Bloomington	384	Ecosphere	4.057
7	The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and Biotic and Abiotic Controls	Jackson Robert B	Stanford University	356	Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics	20.645
8	Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs	Barbier Edward B	University of Wyoming	323	Economic Policy	6.654
9	Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems	Klove Bjorn	University of Oulu	307	Journal of Hydrology	6.731
10	Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: Creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden	Olsson Per	Stockholm University	289	Ecology and Society	6.486

序号	论文题目	第一作者	机构	被引频次	期刊	影响因子
1	The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services	Brauman Kate A	Stanford University	782	Annual Review of Environment and Resources	19.644
2	Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems	Moreno-Mateos David.	University of California Berkeley	479	Plos Biology	10.462
3	The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection	Costanza Robert	University of Vermont	422	Ambio	7.194
4	Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability	Bennett Elena M	Avignon Universite	409	Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability	8.764
5	The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services	Keesstra Saskia.	Wageningen University& Research	403	Science of The Total Environment	10.237
6	A global perspective on wetland salinization: ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands	Herbert Ellen R	Indiana University Bloomington	384	Ecosphere	4.057
7	The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and Biotic and Abiotic Controls	Jackson Robert B	Stanford University	356	Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics	20.645
8	Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs	Barbier Edward B	University of Wyoming	323	Economic Policy	6.654
9	Climate change impacts on groundwater and dependent ecosystems	Klove Bjorn	University of Oulu	307	Journal of Hydrology	6.731
10	Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: Creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden	Olsson Per	Stockholm University	289	Ecology and Society	6.486

序号	国家	数量	所占百分比/%
1	美国	358	39.90
2	中国	216	24.10
3	澳大利亚	79	8.80
4	英国	64	7.13
5	加拿大	57	6.35
6	德国	45	5.01
7	法国	35	3.90
8	西班牙	33	3.68
9	意大利	32	3.56
10	南非	31	3.45

序号	国家	数量	所占百分比/%
1	美国	358	39.90
2	中国	216	24.10
3	澳大利亚	79	8.80
4	英国	64	7.13
5	加拿大	57	6.35
6	德国	45	5.01
7	法国	35	3.90
8	西班牙	33	3.68
9	意大利	32	3.56
10	南非	31	3.45