Effects on Canopy Light Distribution of Winter Wheat at Booting Stage: Irrigation, Drought and Nitrogen Level

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0628

Abstract

Abstract:

The aim was to discuss the effects of irrigation, drought and nitrogen on canopy light distribution of multi-spike and large-spike wheat, providing parameters for crop growth model. Taking nitrogen as main treatment, irrigation and drought as two sub-treatments, multi-spike ‘Jimai 22’ and large-spike ‘Lumai 21’ were used as test materials, the data of canopy light distribution at booting stage, flowering stage and filling stage were measured by using American CI-110 canopy analyzer. The results showed that MLA of different types of winter wheat decreased first and then increased with the growth stage, and the TCRP value of ‘Lumai 21’ was higher than that of ‘Jimai 22’ at booting stage. With the increase of zenith angle, the TCRP value of irrigation or drought decreased in both cultivars, TCDP decreased first and then increased in two cultivars under different nitrogen, irrigation or drought conditions, and K value increased with the increase of zenith angle. Nitrogen application and irrigation promoted the canopy light distribution of winter wheat at booting stage. The leaf area index (LAI) and leaf inclination angle (MLA) were increased at booting stage by irrigation and increasing nitrogen fertilizer, TCRP value of spikelet-type varieties increased at 7.5° and 22.5° zenith angle, TCDP value of spikelet-type varieties increased at high n. When N was medium or low, TCDP decreased first and then increased, and K value increased with the increase of zenith angle. The nitrogen and water supply of winter wheat with multi-panicle type should be earlier than those with large panicle type, which is beneficial to rational canopy light distribution at booting stage. This study has guiding significance for higher yield of different types of winter wheat varieties under fertilizer and water management.

Key words: winter wheat, booting stage, nitrogen application amount, water supply, canopy structure, light distribution, extinction coefficient K

CHEN Yingli, BI Jianjie. Effects on Canopy Light Distribution of Winter Wheat at Booting Stage: Irrigation, Drought and Nitrogen Level[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 12-19.

Figures/Tables 5

References 27

[1]	于振文. 作物栽培学(北方本)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013:21-22.
[2]	于舜章. 精准灌溉条件下种植方式对作物耗水规律的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2005:6-12.
[3]	马静丽, 方保停, 乔亚伟, 等. 减氮对豫北限水灌溉冬小麦冠层结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(3):346-355.
[4]	孟庆伟, 高辉远. 植物生理学(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2016:83-122.
[5]	李国强, 汤亮, 张文宇, 等. 施氮量对不同株型小麦品种叶型垂直分布特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(1):127-137.
[6]	李升东, 王法宏, 司纪升, 等. 垄作小麦群体的光分布特征及其对不同叶位叶片光合速率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(3):465-468.
[7]	胡延吉, 兰进好. 山东省冬小麦品种冠层结构及光截获的研究[J]. 中国农业气象, 2001, 22(3):28-32.
[8]	ARAUS J L, REYNOLDS M P, ACEVEDO E. Influence of leaf posture on grain yield and its components, crop growth pattern, leaf structure and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat[J]. Crop science, 1993, 33:1273-1279.
[9]	闫长生, 肖世和, 张秀英, 等. 冬小麦冠层内的光分[J]. 华北农学报, 2002, 17(3):7-13. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2002.03.002
[10]	REYNOLDS M P, DELGADO B M, GUTIEREZ-RODRIGUEZ M, et al. Photosythesis of wheat in a warm, irrigated environment: I. genetic diversity and crop productivity[J]. Field crop res., 2000, 66:37-50.
[11]	康祥波, 钟阳和, 张理, 等. 冬小麦群体叶层结构的研究[J]. 河南职业技术师范学院学报, 1990, 18(3):13-25.
[12]	韩东伟, 何建宁, 李浩然, 等. 灌水时期对冬小麦个体、群体结构和冠层光合作用的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(3):577-586.
[13]	熊淑萍, 曹文博, 张志勇, 等. 行距和播种量对冬小麦冠层光合有效辐射垂直分布、生物量和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4):1298-1306. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202104.026
[14]	张宏芝, 陈兴武, 赵奇, 等. 不同果麦间作模式下冬小麦冠层光分布和光合速率研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(10):1799-1805.
[15]	王炎, 毕建杰, 刘建栋, 等. 水分胁迫对冬小麦冠层内的分布影响的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2009, 24(增刊):119-125.
[16]	王纪华, 王之杰, 黄文江, 等. 冬小麦冠层氮素的垂直分布及光谱响应[J]. 遥感学报, 2004, 8(4):309-316.
[17]	赵琳, 吉春荣, 李世清, 等. 施氮和不同栽培模式对半湿润农田生态系统冬小麦群体特征的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(12):143-148.
[18]	刘海红, 于志青, 毕建杰, 等. 干旱与灌溉处理对冬小麦冠层内光分布的影响[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2016, 39(3):38-43.
[19]	WILSON J B. Shoot competition and root competition[J]. Journal of applied ecology, 1988, 25(1):279-296.
[20]	FENG Z B, WANG X Y, ZHOU X B, et al. Effects of planting patterns and irrigation conditions on the photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat[J]. The journal of animal plant science, 2014, 24(3):897-903.
[21]	ZHONG W W, LIU J Q, ZHOU X B, et al. Row spacing and irrigation effect on radiation use efficiency of winter wheat[J]. The journal of animal plant science, 2015, 25(2):448-445.
[22]	张黛静, 王真, 李雪梅, 等. 不同群体下小麦花期干物质转运和冠层光分布特性研究[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(10):24-28.
[23]	魏燮中. 小麦株型结构分析法与消光系数分布的基因型差异[J]. 南京农业大学学校, 1987(3):21-27.
[24]	毕建杰, 姜会飞, 刘建栋, 等. 根据冬小麦根系分布进行灌溉的方法[P]. 国家知识产权局, 2017.
[25]	毕建杰, 刘建栋, 田咏梅, 等. 一种农田节水灌溉的方法[P]. 国家知识产权局, 2014.
[26]	张文宇. 小麦株型及冠层光分布模拟研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
[27]	王立红, 张宏芝, 李剑峰, 等. 新疆冬小麦不同产量群体冠层光截获与干物质分布特性分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1):275-282.

处理	孕穗期		开花期		灌浆期
处理	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21
高N灌溉	5.86	3.70	8.20	5.56	5.28	4.65
高N干旱	5.03	3.25	7.10	5.20	5.72	4.53
中N灌溉	5.90	3.56	6.70	6.22	3.40	3.21
中N干旱	5.52	3.12	66.45	5.05	3.62	3.16
低N灌溉	5.38	3.78	6.80	5.80	5.18	4.45
低N干旱	4.91	3.31	6.65	4.95	5.07	3.13

处理	孕穗期		开花期		灌浆期
处理	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21
高N灌溉	5.86	3.70	8.20	5.56	5.28	4.65
高N干旱	5.03	3.25	7.10	5.20	5.72	4.53
中N灌溉	5.90	3.56	6.70	6.22	3.40	3.21
中N干旱	5.52	3.12	66.45	5.05	3.62	3.16
低N灌溉	5.38	3.78	6.80	5.80	5.18	4.45
低N干旱	4.91	3.31	6.65	4.95	5.07	3.13

处理	孕穗期		开花期		灌浆期
处理	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21
高N灌溉	68.1	74.6	65.4	67.5	72.7	73.6
高N干旱	64.8	73.2	64.6	54.6	77.6	74.3
中N灌溉	67.5	77.5	64.3	65.3	77.0	75
中N干旱	64.0	70.3	71.4	75.7	76.8	74.2
低N灌溉	67.2	77.8	50.2	73.8	73.5	82.3
低N干旱	66.8	75.0	58.7	71.0	72.9	78.7

处理	孕穗期		开花期		灌浆期
处理	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21	济麦22	鲁麦21
高N灌溉	68.1	74.6	65.4	67.5	72.7	73.6
高N干旱	64.8	73.2	64.6	54.6	77.6	74.3
中N灌溉	67.5	77.5	64.3	65.3	77.0	75
中N干旱	64.0	70.3	71.4	75.7	76.8	74.2
低N灌溉	67.2	77.8	50.2	73.8	73.5	82.3
低N干旱	66.8	75.0	58.7	71.0	72.9	78.7

处理	孕穗期
	济麦22					鲁麦21
	7.5°	22.5°	37.5°	52.5°	67.5°	7.5°	22.5°	37.5°	52.5°	67.5°
高N灌溉	0.23	0.17	0.06	0.01	0.01	0.42	0.16	0.02	0.01	0.01
高N干旱	0.20	0.15	0.05	0.02	0.01	0.35	0.12	0.01	0.01	0.01
中N灌溉	0.20	0.10	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.26	0.13	0.03	0.01	0.01
中N干旱	0.18	0.05	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.24	0.14	0.04	0.01	0.01
低N灌溉	0.22	0.10	0.04	0.01	0.01	0.30	0.12	0.07	0.02	0.01
低N干旱	0.26	0.11	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.27	0.13	0.07	0.01	0.01