Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (19): 127-134.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200300180
Previous Articles Next Articles
Gulizige·Manhemuti1, Xu Linyun1, Li Yan1, Han Jian1,2, Yu Fan1, Luo Ming1,2()
Received:
2020-03-08
Revised:
2020-04-27
Online:
2020-07-05
Published:
2020-07-08
Contact:
Luo Ming
E-mail:luomingxjau@sina.com
CLC Number:
Gulizige·Manhemuti, Xu Linyun, Li Yan, Han Jian, Yu Fan, Luo Ming. Antagonistic Bacteria Against Korla Fragrant Pear Canker: Screening and Control Effects[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(19): 127-134.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20200300180
菌株 | 分离来源 | 抑菌圈直径/mm | 抑菌率% |
---|---|---|---|
G-FX12 | 瓜类酵素液 | 25.06±0.38a | 86.43±1.29a |
XG-FX70 | 西瓜酵素液 | 25.04±0.62a | 86.34±2.14a |
P-FX20 | 苹果酵素液 | 24.12±2.67b | 83.18±9.20b |
XG-FX22 | 西瓜酵素液 | 24.06±3.08b | 82.96±10.65b |
P-FX10 | 苹果酵素液 | 24.02±1.27b | 82.84±4.37b |
XG-FX72 | 西瓜酵素液 | 23.67±1.62b | 81.61±5.58b |
XG-FX69 | 西瓜酵素液 | 22.81±0.56b | 78.64±1.93b |
XG-FX1 | 西瓜酵素液 | 24.24±2.02b | 78.64±1.93c |
XG-FX42 | 西瓜酵素液 | 21.44±0.90c | 73.73±3.32c |
XG-FX41 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.59±0.48d | 64.11±1.67d |
HN89 | 香梨枝条 | 18.22±1.94d | 62.81±6.69d |
HN9 | 香梨枝条 | 16.05±0.99d | 54.72±3.61e |
菌株 | 分离来源 | 抑菌圈直径/mm | 抑菌率% |
---|---|---|---|
G-FX12 | 瓜类酵素液 | 25.06±0.38a | 86.43±1.29a |
XG-FX70 | 西瓜酵素液 | 25.04±0.62a | 86.34±2.14a |
P-FX20 | 苹果酵素液 | 24.12±2.67b | 83.18±9.20b |
XG-FX22 | 西瓜酵素液 | 24.06±3.08b | 82.96±10.65b |
P-FX10 | 苹果酵素液 | 24.02±1.27b | 82.84±4.37b |
XG-FX72 | 西瓜酵素液 | 23.67±1.62b | 81.61±5.58b |
XG-FX69 | 西瓜酵素液 | 22.81±0.56b | 78.64±1.93b |
XG-FX1 | 西瓜酵素液 | 24.24±2.02b | 78.64±1.93c |
XG-FX42 | 西瓜酵素液 | 21.44±0.90c | 73.73±3.32c |
XG-FX41 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.59±0.48d | 64.11±1.67d |
HN89 | 香梨枝条 | 18.22±1.94d | 62.81±6.69d |
HN9 | 香梨枝条 | 16.05±0.99d | 54.72±3.61e |
菌株 | 分离来源 | 抑菌圈直径/mm | 抑菌率/% |
---|---|---|---|
G-FX12 | 瓜类酵素液 | 23.25±1.27a | 80.18±4.37a |
P-FX20 | 苹果酵素液 | 21.45±2.19b | 73.96±7.56b |
XG-FX22 | 西瓜酵素液 | 21.13±1.93b | 72.87±6.67b |
XG-FX70 | 西瓜酵素液 | 22.42±2.06a | 73.75±3.65b |
XG-FX1 | 西瓜酵素液 | 21.42±1.24b | 72.73±4.53b |
P-FX10 | 苹果酵素液 | 20.26±1.39c | 69.86±4.82c |
XG-FX69 | 西瓜酵素液 | 19.03±1.38c | 65.63±4.76d |
XG-FX72 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.87±1.00d | 65.11±3.41d |
XG-FX42 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.81±2.02d | 64.87±6.97d |
XG-FX41 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.55±1.89d | 63.96±6.50d |
HN89 | 香梨枝条 | 17.13±1.09e | 59.68±3.11e |
HN9 | 香梨枝条 | 15.84±0.83e | 54.62±2.88e |
菌株 | 分离来源 | 抑菌圈直径/mm | 抑菌率/% |
---|---|---|---|
G-FX12 | 瓜类酵素液 | 23.25±1.27a | 80.18±4.37a |
P-FX20 | 苹果酵素液 | 21.45±2.19b | 73.96±7.56b |
XG-FX22 | 西瓜酵素液 | 21.13±1.93b | 72.87±6.67b |
XG-FX70 | 西瓜酵素液 | 22.42±2.06a | 73.75±3.65b |
XG-FX1 | 西瓜酵素液 | 21.42±1.24b | 72.73±4.53b |
P-FX10 | 苹果酵素液 | 20.26±1.39c | 69.86±4.82c |
XG-FX69 | 西瓜酵素液 | 19.03±1.38c | 65.63±4.76d |
XG-FX72 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.87±1.00d | 65.11±3.41d |
XG-FX42 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.81±2.02d | 64.87±6.97d |
XG-FX41 | 西瓜酵素液 | 18.55±1.89d | 63.96±6.50d |
HN89 | 香梨枝条 | 17.13±1.09e | 59.68±3.11e |
HN9 | 香梨枝条 | 15.84±0.83e | 54.62±2.88e |
菌株 | 病原菌接种后3 d | 病原菌接种后7 d | 病原菌接种后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | |||
XG-FX22 | 0.06±0.06b | 91.14±0.15e | 0.27±0.19e | 82.29±0.12a | 0.76±0.59h | 77.71±0.17a | ||
G-FX12 | 0.03±0.07b | 96.14±0.10a | 0.25±0.24f | 82.86±0.17a | 1.18±0.28g | 65.29±0.08b | ||
XG-FX69 | 0.02±0.06b | 96.29±0.10a | 0.27±0.19e | 80.71±0.14b | 1.36±0.27f | 60.00±0.08c | ||
XG-FX42 | 0.06±0.10b | 92.14±0.14d | 0.32±0.16d | 79.14±0.10b | 1.42±0.29e | 58.43±0.07d | ||
XG-FX70 | 0.05±0.10b | 94.29±0.10c | 0.39±0.18d | 74.14±0.12b | 1.49±0.42e | 55.71±0.12d | ||
P-FX10 | 0.03±0.08b | 95.43±0.12b | 0.52±0.24c | 63.14±0.17d | 1.56±0.35e | 54.14±0.10e | ||
XG-FX72 | 0.04±0.06b | 96.29±0.06a | 0.44±0.22d | 69.29±0.18b | 1.54±0.43e | 54.00±0.15e | ||
XG-FX1 | 0.03±0.08b | 96.29±0.10a | 0.38±0.22d | 75.14±0.14b | 1.70±0.29c | 50.00±0.08f | ||
XG-FX41 | 0.03±0.08b | 95.14±0.13b | 0.47±0.24d | 68.57±0.16b | 1.74±0.34c | 48.86±0.08f | ||
HN89 | 0.06±0.01b | 95.00±0.10b | 0.52±0.15c | 63.71±0.11c | 1.77±0.31c | 48.14±0.07f | ||
HN9 | 0.04±0.10b | 94.14±0.15c | 0.54±0.24b | 63.00±0.18d | 1.61±0.41d | 46.29±0.09g | ||
P-FX20 | 0.07±0.07b | 91.29±0.87e | 0.52±0.26c | 65.29±0.18b | 1.92±0.19b | 42.57±0.12h | ||
CK | 0.84±0.18a | — | 1.48±0.19a | — | 3.40±0.38a | — |
菌株 | 病原菌接种后3 d | 病原菌接种后7 d | 病原菌接种后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | |||
XG-FX22 | 0.06±0.06b | 91.14±0.15e | 0.27±0.19e | 82.29±0.12a | 0.76±0.59h | 77.71±0.17a | ||
G-FX12 | 0.03±0.07b | 96.14±0.10a | 0.25±0.24f | 82.86±0.17a | 1.18±0.28g | 65.29±0.08b | ||
XG-FX69 | 0.02±0.06b | 96.29±0.10a | 0.27±0.19e | 80.71±0.14b | 1.36±0.27f | 60.00±0.08c | ||
XG-FX42 | 0.06±0.10b | 92.14±0.14d | 0.32±0.16d | 79.14±0.10b | 1.42±0.29e | 58.43±0.07d | ||
XG-FX70 | 0.05±0.10b | 94.29±0.10c | 0.39±0.18d | 74.14±0.12b | 1.49±0.42e | 55.71±0.12d | ||
P-FX10 | 0.03±0.08b | 95.43±0.12b | 0.52±0.24c | 63.14±0.17d | 1.56±0.35e | 54.14±0.10e | ||
XG-FX72 | 0.04±0.06b | 96.29±0.06a | 0.44±0.22d | 69.29±0.18b | 1.54±0.43e | 54.00±0.15e | ||
XG-FX1 | 0.03±0.08b | 96.29±0.10a | 0.38±0.22d | 75.14±0.14b | 1.70±0.29c | 50.00±0.08f | ||
XG-FX41 | 0.03±0.08b | 95.14±0.13b | 0.47±0.24d | 68.57±0.16b | 1.74±0.34c | 48.86±0.08f | ||
HN89 | 0.06±0.01b | 95.00±0.10b | 0.52±0.15c | 63.71±0.11c | 1.77±0.31c | 48.14±0.07f | ||
HN9 | 0.04±0.10b | 94.14±0.15c | 0.54±0.24b | 63.00±0.18d | 1.61±0.41d | 46.29±0.09g | ||
P-FX20 | 0.07±0.07b | 91.29±0.87e | 0.52±0.26c | 65.29±0.18b | 1.92±0.19b | 42.57±0.12h | ||
CK | 0.84±0.18a | — | 1.48±0.19a | — | 3.40±0.38a | — |
菌株 | 病原菌接种后3 d | 病原菌接种后7 d | 病原菌接种后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | |||
XG-FX22 | 0.13±1.13b | 82.14±0.17a | 0.41±0.19d | 70.43±0.14a | 1.02±0.31h | 66.71±0.10a | ||
G-FX12 | 0.07±0.11b | 87.00±0.23a | 0.43±0.19a | 68.00±0.17a | 1.02±046e | 66.14±0.16b | ||
XG-FX41 | 0.13±0.12b | 79.14±0.23a | 0.45±0.23c | 68.43±0.07a | 1.08±0.26g | 64.29±0.09b | ||
XG-FX1 | 0.17±0.17b | 77.14±0.23a | 0.41±0.26d | 71.57±0.18a | 1.09±0.21f | 64.29±0.08b | ||
XG-FX70 | 0.16±0.13b | 76.14±0.21a | 0.42±0.20c | 70.29±0.19a | 1.10±0.18e | 63.86±0.08b | ||
P-FX10 | 0.18±0.14b | 71.00±0.37a | 0.45±0.20c | 66.14±0.08a | 1.19±0.32e | 61.29±0.10b | ||
XG-FX72 | 0.16±0.13b | 77.00±0.25a | 0.43±0.24c | 67.57±0.16a | 1.20±0.25e | 60.14±0.12b | ||
XG-FX69 | 0.13±0.13b | 77.00±0.23a | 0.45±0.30c | 66.43±0.15a | 1.26±0.23e | 58.71±0.09c | ||
HN89 | 0.15±0.16b | 76.29±0.24a | 0.43±0.09c | 67.29±0.17a | 1.26±0.23e | 58.00±0.11c | ||
P-FX20 | 0.11±0.09b | 82.57±0.17a | 0.53±0.28b | 63.57±0.10a | 1.42±0.24d | 53.57±0.09c | ||
XG-FX42 | 0.13±0.13b | 79.43±0.20a | 0.38±0.07e | 73.43±0.94a | 1.42±0.62c | 52.71±0.12d | ||
HN9 | 0.18±0.15b | 69.57±0.31a | 0.46±0.23c | 66.14±0.12a | 1.61±0.41b | 46.29±0.18e | ||
CK | 0.71±0.10a | — | 1.41±0.22a | — | 3.07±0.32a | — |
菌株 | 病原菌接种后3 d | 病原菌接种后7 d | 病原菌接种后10 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | 病斑面积/cm2 | 防效/% | |||
XG-FX22 | 0.13±1.13b | 82.14±0.17a | 0.41±0.19d | 70.43±0.14a | 1.02±0.31h | 66.71±0.10a | ||
G-FX12 | 0.07±0.11b | 87.00±0.23a | 0.43±0.19a | 68.00±0.17a | 1.02±046e | 66.14±0.16b | ||
XG-FX41 | 0.13±0.12b | 79.14±0.23a | 0.45±0.23c | 68.43±0.07a | 1.08±0.26g | 64.29±0.09b | ||
XG-FX1 | 0.17±0.17b | 77.14±0.23a | 0.41±0.26d | 71.57±0.18a | 1.09±0.21f | 64.29±0.08b | ||
XG-FX70 | 0.16±0.13b | 76.14±0.21a | 0.42±0.20c | 70.29±0.19a | 1.10±0.18e | 63.86±0.08b | ||
P-FX10 | 0.18±0.14b | 71.00±0.37a | 0.45±0.20c | 66.14±0.08a | 1.19±0.32e | 61.29±0.10b | ||
XG-FX72 | 0.16±0.13b | 77.00±0.25a | 0.43±0.24c | 67.57±0.16a | 1.20±0.25e | 60.14±0.12b | ||
XG-FX69 | 0.13±0.13b | 77.00±0.23a | 0.45±0.30c | 66.43±0.15a | 1.26±0.23e | 58.71±0.09c | ||
HN89 | 0.15±0.16b | 76.29±0.24a | 0.43±0.09c | 67.29±0.17a | 1.26±0.23e | 58.00±0.11c | ||
P-FX20 | 0.11±0.09b | 82.57±0.17a | 0.53±0.28b | 63.57±0.10a | 1.42±0.24d | 53.57±0.09c | ||
XG-FX42 | 0.13±0.13b | 79.43±0.20a | 0.38±0.07e | 73.43±0.94a | 1.42±0.62c | 52.71±0.12d | ||
HN9 | 0.18±0.15b | 69.57±0.31a | 0.46±0.23c | 66.14±0.12a | 1.61±0.41b | 46.29±0.18e | ||
CK | 0.71±0.10a | — | 1.41±0.22a | — | 3.07±0.32a | — |
[1] | 李海军. 库尔勒香梨蜜蜂授粉情况[J]. 中国蜂业, 2009,60(5):27. |
[2] | 刘普, 施园园, 薛程, 等. 梨树腐烂病抗性种质筛选及相关生理生化特性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014,34(6):1164-1172. |
[3] | 郭靖, 张王斌, 张琦, 等. 五种杀菌剂对库尔勒香梨腐烂病的防效[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(11):103-105. |
[4] | 马婷. 防治梨腐烂病高效、低毒化学药剂的室内筛选及田间应用[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2014. |
[5] | 程超, 赵廷存, 李红旭, 等. 产酶溶杆菌OH11代谢产物HSAF对梨树腐烂病的防治效果[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2017,33(1):114-120. |
[6] |
Lou L, Qian G, Xie Y, et al. Biosynjournal of HSAF, a tetramic acid-containing macrolactam from Lysobacter enzymogenes[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2011,133:643-645.
URL pmid: 21171605 |
[7] | 张峰, 李世强, 乔金岭, 等. 生物菌肥对库尔勒香梨腐烂病的发生及土壤养分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017,33(3):57-60. |
[8] | 周银唤. 植物酵素的研究进展[J]. 现代食品, 2018(11):27-30. |
[9] | 罗明, 芦云, 张祥林, 等. 内生拮抗细菌在哈密瓜植株体内的传导定殖和促生作用研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007(4):4719-4725. |
[10] | 陈臻. 两株生防菌株对苹果果数腐烂病菌拮抗作用的研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2013. |
[11] | 刘坤. 梨腐烂病生防细菌和高效低毒化学防控药剂的室内筛选[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2012. |
[12] | 东秀珠, 蔡妙英. 常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. |
[13] | 何子顺, 张峰, 木合塔尔·买买提, 等. 库尔勒市库尔勒香梨腐烂病发生情况分析[J]. 山西果树, 2012(6):43-44. |
[14] | 严婉荣, 赵廷昌, 肖彤斌, 等. 生防细菌在植物病害防治中的应用[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2013(4):122-128. |
[15] | 王磊. 苹果树腐烂病防治新药剂和拮抗菌的研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2007. |
[16] | 杨树, 刘海霞, 范万泽, 等. 苹果树腐烂病菌拮抗细菌筛选及鉴定[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019(4). |
[17] | 陈倩, 刘善江, 李亚星. 我国酵素菌技术概况及应用现状[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012(23):86-89. |
[18] | 晏殊. 水果酵素自然发酵中优势菌株的分离鉴定及其代谢产物功效特性的研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2019. |
[19] | 覃叶欣. 茄果类蔬菜酵素对西瓜幼苗生长及其枯萎病防治效果的研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2019. |
[20] | 刘艳娜. 喷施芳香植物源营养液抑制梨树病害[J]. 农家顾问, 2012(1):30. |
[21] | 欧阳传德, 顾丽霞. 大蒜酵素对大棚草莓2种常见病害的防治效果试验[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017,23:73-74. |
[22] | 王楠, 王锦, 许珺. 酵素技术及在我国的应用[A]. 第十六届中国科协年会——分5生态环境保护与绿色发展研讨会论文集[C]. 2014. |
[23] | 宗英, 赵月菊, 刘阳, 等. 一株贝莱斯芽孢杆菌抑制禾谷镰刀菌的研究[J]. 核农学报, 2018,32(2):310-317. |
[24] | 蔡高磊, 张凡, 欧阳友香, 等. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezensis)研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2018,42(12):162-167. |
[25] |
Liu G, Kong Y, Fan Y, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of Bacillus velezensis LS69, a strain with a broad inhibitory spectrum against pathogenic bacteria[J]. Journal of Biotechnology, 2017,249:20-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.03.018 URL pmid: 28323017 |
[1] | HUANG Yu, CHEN Bin, XIAO Guanli. The Physiological Response of the Local Rice Variety of ‘Acuce’ of Hani Nationality in Yunnan Against the Feeding of Nilaparvata lugens Stål [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 123-129. |
[2] | YU Hang, CHENG Qi, TANG Haiyun, CHEN Guoqi. Efficacy of Prometryn Against 10 Serious Wheat Weed Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 110-115. |
[3] | PU Yongyu, BAO Lingfeng, HE Xiang, LIU Rui, ZHANG Qing, SHI Zhufeng, HE Yonghong, YANG Peiwen. Screening, Identification and Control Efficacy of Antagonistic Bacteria Against Ralstonia solanacearum and Phytophthora parasitica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 116-123. |
[4] | XIAO Yang, LI Qingrong, XING Dongxu, YANG Qiong. Effects of High Temperature Stress on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Gene Expression in Larvae of Silkworm Varieties with Different Tolerance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 111-118. |
[5] | HAN Yajing, WANG Xinyu, LI Jiayue, HUANG Qunyi, WANG Hanting, YE Lefu, FU Xue. Effects of Two Types of Foliar Fertilizers on Cucumber-Thrips [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 113-119. |
[6] | Nuerxiati·Nuermaimaiti , LI Huanyu, YANG Chengde. Antagonistic Streptomyces Against Pepper Root Rot Pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum): Screening and Phylogenetic Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene Sequence [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 116-123. |
[7] | FAN Huacai, ZENG Li, LI Weiyan, DING Yunxiu, GUO Zhixiang, LI Shu, XU Shengtao, ZHENG Sijun, WANG Yongbin. Bactericides Screening and Field Application for Banana Bacterial Soft Rot [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 113-118. |
[8] | LIANG Tian, ZHANG Xiaodong, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Zuozhong, SI Riguleng, SU Budenggerile, NA Renhua. Effect of Bacterial Enzyme Preparation on Composting of Cow Manure Under Different C/N Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 77-82. |
[9] | LIU Yonghui, SHEN Yi, SHEN Yue, LIANG Man, CHEN Zhide. Sugar Accumulation Characteristics and Sucrose Metabolism Enzyme Activities of Peanut During Seed Development [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 29-34. |
[10] | LV Wei, LI Shengnan, FENG Guojun, YANG Xiaoxu, LIU Chang, YAN Zhishan, LIU Dajun. Physiological and Biochemical Analysis of Exogenous Melatonin for Reducing Propamocarb Residues in Cucumber [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 107-113. |
[11] | SUN Jiping, LI Xuejun, SUN Huan. Response of Signal Molecules and CAT Activities to Aphid in Resistant and Susceptible Tobacco Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 120-124. |
[12] | LUO You, XIAO Yang, ZHOU Tingyu, WANG Yue, XIE Chen, LI Dongying, CHEN Xueli. Resource Distribution, New Species and Isolation Methods of Actinobacteria in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 79-84. |
[13] | MA Guifang, XIN Haibo, XIU Li, SUN Chaoxia, ZHANG Hua. Buckwheat Seed Shelling Characters: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 19-27. |
[14] | HUANG Pingsheng, LIU Shinan, LI Ting, QIN Yonghua. Effects of Exogenous Silicon on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Antioxidant Enzymes of Cryptocarya concinna Seedlings Under Salt Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 32-38. |
[15] | WU Cuixia, XU Jiali, SONG Min, YANG Lina, ZHANG Tiantian, MA Chong. Control Efficacy of 7 Pre-emergence Herbicides Against Weeds in Winter Wheat Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 105-111. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||