Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (18): 28-34.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0777
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Junping1,2(), WANG Xiuping2,3, LIU Sujuan4, LU Xuelin2,3, WU Zhe2,3(
)
Received:
2021-08-10
Revised:
2021-12-04
Online:
2022-06-25
Published:
2022-07-14
Contact:
WU Zhe
E-mail:592784600@qq.com;wuzhe26@163.com
CLC Number:
LI Junping, WANG Xiuping, LIU Sujuan, LU Xuelin, WU Zhe. Salt Tolerance of Maize at Seedling Stage: Identification and Evaluation Method[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 28-34.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0777
盐浓度/% | 叶片数 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 株高 | 短径 | 长径 | 出苗率 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中位数 | 0.2 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.09 | 1.05 | 1.00 |
0.3 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 1.23 | 1.19 | 1.00 | |
0.4 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 1.16 | 1.12 | 1.00 | |
0.5 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 1.26 | 1.30 | 0.88 | |
0.8 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.94 | 0.62 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 0.79 | |
1.0 | 0.58 | 0.29 | 0.93 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.71 | |
四分位差 | 0.2 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
0.3 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.10 | |
0.4 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.10 | |
0.5 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 | |
0.8 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 | |
1.0 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.33 | |
偏度 | 0.2 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.49 | -2.06 |
0.3 | 0.75 | 1.02 | -0.09 | -0.29 | 0.12 | -0.12 | -1.75 | |
0.4 | 0.76 | 1.48 | -0.08 | 0.66 | 0.37 | -0.01 | -1.14 | |
0.5 | 0.70 | 1.09 | 0.57 | 0.20 | -0.20 | -0.29 | 5.39 | |
0.8 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.49 | -0.13 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 5.17 | |
1.0 | 0.64 | 1.56 | -0.27 | 1.26 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 4.52 | |
峰度 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.32 | -0.13 | 0.29 | -0.40 | -0.11 | 2.40 |
0.3 | 0.98 | 1.58 | 0.15 | 0.56 | 0.40 | -0.83 | 2.72 | |
0.4 | 0.79 | 2.33 | 0.03 | -0.38 | 0.45 | -0.52 | 0.26 | |
0.5 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.56 | 0.14 | -0.23 | -0.49 | 35.33 | |
0.8 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 1.03 | -0.11 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 33.60 | |
1.0 | -0.56 | 2.74 | -0.39 | 2.40 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 27.25 |
盐浓度/% | 叶片数 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 株高 | 短径 | 长径 | 出苗率 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
中位数 | 0.2 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.09 | 1.05 | 1.00 |
0.3 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 1.23 | 1.19 | 1.00 | |
0.4 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 1.16 | 1.12 | 1.00 | |
0.5 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 1.26 | 1.30 | 0.88 | |
0.8 | 0.67 | 0.49 | 0.94 | 0.62 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 0.79 | |
1.0 | 0.58 | 0.29 | 0.93 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.71 | |
四分位差 | 0.2 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
0.3 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.10 | |
0.4 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.10 | |
0.5 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 | |
0.8 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.33 | |
1.0 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.33 | |
偏度 | 0.2 | 0.66 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.49 | -2.06 |
0.3 | 0.75 | 1.02 | -0.09 | -0.29 | 0.12 | -0.12 | -1.75 | |
0.4 | 0.76 | 1.48 | -0.08 | 0.66 | 0.37 | -0.01 | -1.14 | |
0.5 | 0.70 | 1.09 | 0.57 | 0.20 | -0.20 | -0.29 | 5.39 | |
0.8 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.49 | -0.13 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 5.17 | |
1.0 | 0.64 | 1.56 | -0.27 | 1.26 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 4.52 | |
峰度 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.32 | -0.13 | 0.29 | -0.40 | -0.11 | 2.40 |
0.3 | 0.98 | 1.58 | 0.15 | 0.56 | 0.40 | -0.83 | 2.72 | |
0.4 | 0.79 | 2.33 | 0.03 | -0.38 | 0.45 | -0.52 | 0.26 | |
0.5 | 0.00 | 0.98 | 0.56 | 0.14 | -0.23 | -0.49 | 35.33 | |
0.8 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 1.03 | -0.11 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 33.60 | |
1.0 | -0.56 | 2.74 | -0.39 | 2.40 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 27.25 |
指标 | 回归方程 | R2 | 耐盐阈值/% |
---|---|---|---|
叶片数 | y=-0.4079x2+2.986x+2.594 | 0.779 | 0.517 |
叶长 | y=-18.939x2+6.193x+16.62 | 0.697 | 0.846 |
叶宽 | y=0.0297x2-0.1107x+1.6674 | 0.016 | - |
株高 | y=-13.569x2-3.5315x+26.96 | 0.700 | 0.884 |
短径 | y=-6.2061x2+6.0083x+2.892 | 0.516 | 0.868 |
长径 | y=-7.3801x2+7.2783x+3.5525 | 0.439 | 0.886 |
出苗率 | y=14.083x2-74.691x+77.39 | 0.513 | 0.646 |
指标 | 回归方程 | R2 | 耐盐阈值/% |
---|---|---|---|
叶片数 | y=-0.4079x2+2.986x+2.594 | 0.779 | 0.517 |
叶长 | y=-18.939x2+6.193x+16.62 | 0.697 | 0.846 |
叶宽 | y=0.0297x2-0.1107x+1.6674 | 0.016 | - |
株高 | y=-13.569x2-3.5315x+26.96 | 0.700 | 0.884 |
短径 | y=-6.2061x2+6.0083x+2.892 | 0.516 | 0.868 |
长径 | y=-7.3801x2+7.2783x+3.5525 | 0.439 | 0.886 |
出苗率 | y=14.083x2-74.691x+77.39 | 0.513 | 0.646 |
F1 | F2 | F3 | 权重 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
长径 | 0.90 | -0.18 | 0.03 | 0.147 |
短径 | 0.89 | -0.20 | -0.02 | 0.138 |
株高 | 0.83 | -0.09 | 0.01 | 0.143 |
叶宽 | 0.71 | -0.32 | 0.00 | 0.091 |
叶片数 | 0.24 | 0.90 | -0.13 | 0.149 |
叶长 | 0.55 | 0.73 | -0.13 | 0.187 |
出苗率 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.97 | 0.146 |
特征值 | 3.17 | 1.58 | 0.98 | |
方差贡献率/% | 45.22 | 22.57 | 13.97 | |
权重/% | 55.31 | 27.61 | 17.08 |
F1 | F2 | F3 | 权重 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
长径 | 0.90 | -0.18 | 0.03 | 0.147 |
短径 | 0.89 | -0.20 | -0.02 | 0.138 |
株高 | 0.83 | -0.09 | 0.01 | 0.143 |
叶宽 | 0.71 | -0.32 | 0.00 | 0.091 |
叶片数 | 0.24 | 0.90 | -0.13 | 0.149 |
叶长 | 0.55 | 0.73 | -0.13 | 0.187 |
出苗率 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.97 | 0.146 |
特征值 | 3.17 | 1.58 | 0.98 | |
方差贡献率/% | 45.22 | 22.57 | 13.97 | |
权重/% | 55.31 | 27.61 | 17.08 |
品种 | 主成分 | 隶属函数 | 主成分得分(F) | 综合评价值(D) | 综合评判 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F1* | F2* | F3* | |||||
京科968 | 1.45 | -0.34 | -0.15 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 0.210 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 高耐 | |
农大108 | 0.81 | 0.04 | -0.11 | 0.78 | 0.33 | 0.240 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 耐 | |
农华101 | -0.45 | 1.46 | -0.14 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 0.220 | 0.15 | 0.50 | 中等 | |
先玉335 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.360 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 中等 | |
NK815 | -0.58 | 0.19 | 0.91 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 1.000 | 0.10 | 0.44 | 中等 | |
京科665 | 0.39 | -0.34 | -0.10 | 0.63 | 0.15 | 0.250 | -0.06 | 0.43 | 中等 | |
京单38 | 0.16 | -0.55 | 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.330 | -0.11 | 0.38 | 敏感 | |
郑单958 | -0.48 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.370 | -0.18 | 0.36 | 敏感 | |
浚单20 | -0.02 | -0.67 | -0.10 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.250 | -0.21 | 0.31 | 敏感 | |
京农科728 | -1.40 | -0.31 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.000 | -0.94 | 0.05 | 高敏 |
品种 | 主成分 | 隶属函数 | 主成分得分(F) | 综合评价值(D) | 综合评判 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F1* | F2* | F3* | |||||
京科968 | 1.45 | -0.34 | -0.15 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 0.210 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 高耐 | |
农大108 | 0.81 | 0.04 | -0.11 | 0.78 | 0.33 | 0.240 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 耐 | |
农华101 | -0.45 | 1.46 | -0.14 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 0.220 | 0.15 | 0.50 | 中等 | |
先玉335 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.360 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 中等 | |
NK815 | -0.58 | 0.19 | 0.91 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 1.000 | 0.10 | 0.44 | 中等 | |
京科665 | 0.39 | -0.34 | -0.10 | 0.63 | 0.15 | 0.250 | -0.06 | 0.43 | 中等 | |
京单38 | 0.16 | -0.55 | 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 0.330 | -0.11 | 0.38 | 敏感 | |
郑单958 | -0.48 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.370 | -0.18 | 0.36 | 敏感 | |
浚单20 | -0.02 | -0.67 | -0.10 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.250 | -0.21 | 0.31 | 敏感 | |
京农科728 | -1.40 | -0.31 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.000 | -0.94 | 0.05 | 高敏 |
D值 | 叶片 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 株高 | 短径 | 长径 | 出苗率 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D值 | ||||||||
叶片 | 0.397 | |||||||
叶长 | 0.127 | 0.000 | ||||||
叶宽 | 0.201 | 0.109 | 0.185 | |||||
株高 | 0.004 | 0.231 | 0.453 | 0.284 | ||||
短径 | 0.007 | 0.222 | 0.112 | 0.135 | 0.043 | |||
长径 | 0.004 | 0.322 | 0.154 | 0.082 | 0.072 | 0.001 | ||
出苗率 | 0.215 | 0.383 | 0.341 | 0.355 | 0.486 | 0.241 | 0.458 |
D值 | 叶片 | 叶长 | 叶宽 | 株高 | 短径 | 长径 | 出苗率 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D值 | ||||||||
叶片 | 0.397 | |||||||
叶长 | 0.127 | 0.000 | ||||||
叶宽 | 0.201 | 0.109 | 0.185 | |||||
株高 | 0.004 | 0.231 | 0.453 | 0.284 | ||||
短径 | 0.007 | 0.222 | 0.112 | 0.135 | 0.043 | |||
长径 | 0.004 | 0.322 | 0.154 | 0.082 | 0.072 | 0.001 | ||
出苗率 | 0.215 | 0.383 | 0.341 | 0.355 | 0.486 | 0.241 | 0.458 |
[1] | 刘春荣, 张国新, 王秀萍. 主成分分析及隶属函数法综合评价玉米苗期耐盐性[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(28):13-14. |
[2] | 付艳. 玉米耐盐机理的研究[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2014(1):70-71. |
[3] | 单长建. 抗逆转基因玉米苗期耐盐碱评价方法的初步建立及功能验证[D]. 泰安: 东北农业大学, 2012. |
[4] | 郝德荣, 程玉静, 徐辰武, 等. 玉米耐盐种质筛选及群体遗传结构分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013, 14(6):1153-1160. |
[5] | 张春宵, 李淑芳, 金峰学, 等. 用3种方法定位玉米萌发期和苗期的耐盐和耐碱相关性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4):28-41. |
[6] | 沈丹丹, 程文, 王志武, 等. 中国玉米耐盐种质研究现状与展望[J]. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(11):163-167. |
[7] | 刘学, 周璇, 曾兴, 等. 玉米芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定方法的比较分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2015(1):115-121. |
[8] | 杨书华, 张春宵, 朴明鑫, 等. 大田苗期耐盐碱鉴定指标筛选及玉米自交系盐碱耐性分析[J]. 种子, 2012, 31(1):13-17. |
[9] | 张晓东, 李兵, 刘广明, 等. 复合改良物料对滨海盐土的改土降盐效果与综合评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(11):P.1744-1754. |
[10] | 张晓东, 鲁雪林, 吴哲, 等. 生态有机肥配施对滨海盐渍化土壤性质和玉米产量的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2021, 25(2):53-60. |
[11] | 吴哲, 张晓东, 鲁雪林, 等. 基于自吸水设施的耐盐鉴定基质配比对水盐分布的影响研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2019, 25(8):22-24,30. |
[12] | 耿雷跃, 马小定, 崔迪, 等. 水稻全生育期耐盐性鉴定评价方法研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(2):33-41. |
[13] |
WU Z, XUE Z, LI H, et al. Cultivation of dandelion (Taraxacum erythropodium) on coastal saline land based on the control of salinity and fertilizer[J]. Folia horticulturae, 2019, 31(2):277-284.
doi: 10.2478/fhort-2019-0022 URL |
[14] | 汤华, 柳晓磊. 盐胁迫下玉米苗期农艺性状和脯氨酸含量变化的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(3):244-249. |
[15] | 王明泉, 张翼飞, 杨克军, 等. 玉米自交系苗期耐盐性鉴定及筛选研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(12):30-35. |
[16] | 李赵嘉, 左永梅, 宋明月, 等. 盐胁迫对大叶蒲公英生长生理指标及耐盐阈值的影响[J]. 中药材, 2020, 43(7):1560-1564. |
[17] |
WU Z, XUE Z, LU X, et al. Salt-tolerance identification and quality evaluation of Abelmoschus manihot (L.) Medik.[J]. Can j plant sci, 2020, 100(5):568-574.
doi: 10.1139/cjps-2019-0231 URL |
[18] | 丁丁, 王红宝, 郑伶杰, 等. 不同品种茶菊对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(3):692-702. |
[19] | 孟然, 李赵嘉, 吴哲, 等. 河北省不同地区蒲公英主效成分变化及土壤因子相关性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(15):189-193. |
[20] | 罗敏, 张荣, 吴翠萍, 等. 玉米幼苗期耐盐性评价适宜盐浓度的研究[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2015(1):6-9. |
[1] | JI Kun, WANG Bin, ZHAO Bowen, XUE Hao, WU Jianmin, ZHU Xiaojian, WANG Yixin, ZHAO Haijun, HAN Zanping. Different Maize Germplasm Materials: Grey Correlation Analysis of Plant and Ear-kernel Traits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 27-32. |
[2] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
[3] | FU Yanyan, LI Yunfeng, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Water Surplus and Deficit of Maize Growing Season and Its Effect on Yield in Major Grain Producing Areas of Jilin Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 99-105. |
[4] | ZHANG Hongfen, YANG Lijie, ZHAO Yujuan, ZHANG Feng. Strong Cool Summer in East Gansu in 2020: Climate Characteristics and the Impact on Agriculture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 117-123. |
[5] | LI Rui, SHANG Xiao, SHANG Chunshu, CHANG Lifang, YAN Lei, BAI Jianrong. 224 Maize Inbred Lines from Shanxi: Genetic Structure and Genetic Relationships Based on SSR Markers by Fluorescence Detection [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 9-16. |
[6] | ZHOU Zhongwen, ZHANG Moucao, LIU Ying, LIU Donghui, ZHANG Hongni, ZHANG Junlin, HAN Bo. The Influence of Meteorological Factors on Grain Filling Speed of Spring Maize in the Plateau Area of Eastern Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 94-98. |
[7] | WANG Hui, LU Xinhai, DU Meifang, ZHANG Qi. Spatio-temporal Characteristics of Extreme Heat During Summer Maize Growing Season in Haihe Plain from 1960 to 2019 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 62-68. |
[8] | HUA Limin, LIU Huiying, XUE Yinghao, LAN Xiping, WANG Yitao, CAI Guangxing. Quantitative Assessment on Comprehensive Effects of Mulching Films by Integrated Evaluation Index Method [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 76-80. |
[9] | SUN Yanming, HUANG Shaohui, LIU Ketong, YANG Yunma, YANG Junfang, XING Suli, JIA Liangliang. Effects of Soil Fertility Difference on Summer Maize Yield in Piedmont Plain and Low Plain in Central and Southern Hebei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 35-42. |
[10] | LIU Cuilan, WANG Kaifang, WU Dejun, YAN Liping, LI Shanwen, WANG Fang, REN Fei, WANG Yinhua. Responses of Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Fraxinus Clones to Coastal Saline-Alkaline Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 7-16. |
[11] | HU Xuechun, XIE Wenyan, MA Xiaonan, ZHOU Huaiping, YANG Zhenxing, LIU Zhiping. Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Organic Carbon and Carbon Pool Management Index in Dryland Maize Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 8-13. |
[12] | SONG Yingbo, WANG Nannan, ZHANG Hongquan, FAN Weimin, LI Yu, MENG Fanxiang, LI Candong, CHEN Qingshan. The Application of Excel VBA Array in the Design of Matching Test List for Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 106-110. |
[13] | JIANG Jufang, YANG Hua, HU Wenqing, WEI Yuguo. Effects of Continuous High Temperature and Drought Stress on the Growth of Spring Maize [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 63-68. |
[14] | ZHANG Huimin, BAO Guangling, ZHOU Xiaotian, GAO Linlin, HU Hongxiang, MA Youhua. Safety Assessment of Heavy Metals in Specific Crops of Strictly Controlled Farmland [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 52-58. |
[15] | CHEN Huiling, ZHANG Xinye, PENG Chan, LIU Zongkun, PANG Hongdong, LIU Lian, YANG Yanling. Comparative Study on Biological Characteristics of 13 Medicinal Dendrobium Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 94-101. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||