Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (26): 62-68.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0796
Previous Articles Next Articles
BAI Wei(), HU Yang, LI Feng, ZHANG Baoying, CUI Jinli, YANG Sumei(
)
Received:
2021-08-16
Revised:
2021-10-26
Online:
2022-09-15
Published:
2022-09-09
Contact:
YANG Sumei
E-mail:bai_wei@126.com;yangsumei1965@163.com
CLC Number:
BAI Wei, HU Yang, LI Feng, ZHANG Baoying, CUI Jinli, YANG Sumei. Effects of N, P and K Fertilizers on Yield Related Traits and Economic Benefits of Confectionary Sunflower[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 62-68.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0796
处理 | N | P | K | 氮肥施入量/(kg/hm2) | 磷肥施入量/(kg/hm2) | 钾肥施入量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 45 | 90 |
3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 45 | 45 | 90 |
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 90 | 22.5 | 90 |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 90 | 45 | 90 |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 90 | 67.5 | 90 |
8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 90 | 45 | 0 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 90 | 45 | 45 |
10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 90 | 45 | 135 |
11 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 135 | 45 | 90 |
12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 90 |
13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 22.5 | 45 |
处理 | N | P | K | 氮肥施入量/(kg/hm2) | 磷肥施入量/(kg/hm2) | 钾肥施入量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 45 | 90 |
3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 45 | 45 | 90 |
4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 90 | 0 | 90 |
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 90 | 22.5 | 90 |
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 90 | 45 | 90 |
7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 90 | 67.5 | 90 |
8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 90 | 45 | 0 |
9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 90 | 45 | 45 |
10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 90 | 45 | 135 |
11 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 135 | 45 | 90 |
12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 90 |
13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 90 | 22.5 | 45 |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 百粒重/g | 单盘粒重/g | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 平均 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 平均 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 平均 | |||
1 | 1282.5 | 1197.0 | 1031.9 | 1170.5gE | 10.7 | 11.7 | 15.8 | 12.7bC | 59.7 | 58.2 | 68.2 | 62.0gG | ||
2 | 1591.2 | 1660.5 | 1782.0 | 1677.9deCD | 19.5 | 18.2 | 16.7 | 18.1aA | 102.4 | 85.3 | 89.5 | 92.4defCDEF | ||
3 | 1855.2 | 1890.0 | 1999.5 | 1914.9cdBC | 17.5 | 21.7 | 17.4 | 18.9aA | 110.1 | 120.6 | 102.6 | 111.1bcdBCD | ||
4 | 1837.5 | 1552.4 | 1732.5 | 1707.5deCD | 19.9 | 16.7 | 15.9 | 17.5aAB | 87.0 | 93.3 | 96.4 | 92.2defCDEF | ||
5 | 2034.0 | 1954.5 | 2689.5 | 2226.0abAB | 18.0 | 17.6 | 19.1 | 18.2aA | 148.0 | 122.5 | 111.5 | 127.3abAB | ||
6 | 2113.5 | 2463.9 | 2034.0 | 2203.8abAB | 17.5 | 19.8 | 19.1 | 18.8aA | 138.1 | 138.8 | 133.2 | 136.7aA | ||
7 | 1548.6 | 1663.5 | 1732.5 | 1648.2defCD | 17.3 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 17.9aA | 91.4 | 71.2 | 75.9 | 79.5fgEFG | ||
8 | 1551.0 | 1350.0 | 1521.6 | 1474.2efDE | 13.2 | 13.3 | 14.5 | 13.7bBC | 71.3 | 83.4 | 80.3 | 78.3fgFG | ||
9 | 2253.0 | 2395.5 | 2363.0 | 2337.2aA | 18.0 | 17.3 | 15.1 | 16.8aAB | 107.7 | 97.0 | 109.8 | 104.8cdeBCDE | ||
10 | 1332.0 | 1519.5 | 1315.5 | 1389.0fgDE | 16.3 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 13.7bBC | 108.5 | 75.0 | 81.4 | 88.3efDEF | ||
11 | 2031.0 | 1803.0 | 1888.7 | 1907.6cdBC | 15.4 | 18.5 | 16.8 | 16.9aAB | 101.1 | 127.7 | 115.9 | 114.9bcABC | ||
12 | 1882.5 | 2170.8 | 1947.0 | 2000.1bcABC | 17.7 | 16.0 | 16.8 | 16.8aAB | 135.0 | 130.7 | 117.2 | 127.6abAB | ||
13 | 2311.5 | 2259.0 | 1929.8 | 2166.8abcAB | 20.7 | 17.8 | 17.5 | 18.7aA | 125.9 | 101.1 | 104.2 | 110.4bcdBCD | ||
14 | 2136.8 | 1951.5 | 1890.0 | 1992.8bcABC | 17.9 | 14.9 | 17.0 | 16.6aAB | 133.3 | 128.4 | 103.4 | 121.7abcAB |
处理 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 百粒重/g | 单盘粒重/g | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 平均 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 平均 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 平均 | |||
1 | 1282.5 | 1197.0 | 1031.9 | 1170.5gE | 10.7 | 11.7 | 15.8 | 12.7bC | 59.7 | 58.2 | 68.2 | 62.0gG | ||
2 | 1591.2 | 1660.5 | 1782.0 | 1677.9deCD | 19.5 | 18.2 | 16.7 | 18.1aA | 102.4 | 85.3 | 89.5 | 92.4defCDEF | ||
3 | 1855.2 | 1890.0 | 1999.5 | 1914.9cdBC | 17.5 | 21.7 | 17.4 | 18.9aA | 110.1 | 120.6 | 102.6 | 111.1bcdBCD | ||
4 | 1837.5 | 1552.4 | 1732.5 | 1707.5deCD | 19.9 | 16.7 | 15.9 | 17.5aAB | 87.0 | 93.3 | 96.4 | 92.2defCDEF | ||
5 | 2034.0 | 1954.5 | 2689.5 | 2226.0abAB | 18.0 | 17.6 | 19.1 | 18.2aA | 148.0 | 122.5 | 111.5 | 127.3abAB | ||
6 | 2113.5 | 2463.9 | 2034.0 | 2203.8abAB | 17.5 | 19.8 | 19.1 | 18.8aA | 138.1 | 138.8 | 133.2 | 136.7aA | ||
7 | 1548.6 | 1663.5 | 1732.5 | 1648.2defCD | 17.3 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 17.9aA | 91.4 | 71.2 | 75.9 | 79.5fgEFG | ||
8 | 1551.0 | 1350.0 | 1521.6 | 1474.2efDE | 13.2 | 13.3 | 14.5 | 13.7bBC | 71.3 | 83.4 | 80.3 | 78.3fgFG | ||
9 | 2253.0 | 2395.5 | 2363.0 | 2337.2aA | 18.0 | 17.3 | 15.1 | 16.8aAB | 107.7 | 97.0 | 109.8 | 104.8cdeBCDE | ||
10 | 1332.0 | 1519.5 | 1315.5 | 1389.0fgDE | 16.3 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 13.7bBC | 108.5 | 75.0 | 81.4 | 88.3efDEF | ||
11 | 2031.0 | 1803.0 | 1888.7 | 1907.6cdBC | 15.4 | 18.5 | 16.8 | 16.9aAB | 101.1 | 127.7 | 115.9 | 114.9bcABC | ||
12 | 1882.5 | 2170.8 | 1947.0 | 2000.1bcABC | 17.7 | 16.0 | 16.8 | 16.8aAB | 135.0 | 130.7 | 117.2 | 127.6abAB | ||
13 | 2311.5 | 2259.0 | 1929.8 | 2166.8abcAB | 20.7 | 17.8 | 17.5 | 18.7aA | 125.9 | 101.1 | 104.2 | 110.4bcdBCD | ||
14 | 2136.8 | 1951.5 | 1890.0 | 1992.8bcABC | 17.9 | 14.9 | 17.0 | 16.6aAB | 133.3 | 128.4 | 103.4 | 121.7abcAB |
肥料 | 处理 | 产/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 增产率/% | 肥料成本/(元/hm2) | 收入/(元/hm2) | 产投比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N0P2K2 | 1677.9 | 11745.3 | — | 481.5 | 11263.8 | 24.4 |
N1P2K2 | 1914.9 | 13404.3 | 14.12 | 607.5 | 12796.8 | 22.1 | |
N2P2K2 | 2203.8 | 15426.6 | 31.34 | 733.5 | 14693.1 | 21.0 | |
N3P2K2 | 1907.6 | 13352.9 | 13.69 | 859.5 | 12493.4 | 15.5 | |
P2O5 | N2P0K2 | 1707.5 | 11952.2 | — | 630.0 | 11322.2 | 19.0 |
N2P1K2 | 2226.0 | 15582.0 | 30.37 | 682.5 | 14899.5 | 22.8 | |
N2P2K2 | 2203.8 | 15426.6 | 29.07 | 733.5 | 14693.1 | 21.0 | |
N2P3K2 | 1648.2 | 11537.4 | -3.47 | 786.0 | 10751.4 | 14.7 | |
K2O | N2P2K0 | 1474.2 | 10319.4 | — | 355.5 | 9963.9 | 29.0 |
N2P2K1 | 2337.2 | 16360.1 | 58.54 | 544.5 | 15815.6 | 30.0 | |
N2P2K2 | 2203.8 | 15426.6 | 49.49 | 733.5 | 14693.1 | 21.0 | |
N2P2K3 | 1389.0 | 9723.0 | -5.78 | 1111.5 | 8611.5 | 8.7 |
肥料 | 处理 | 产/(kg/hm2) | 产值/(元/hm2) | 增产率/% | 肥料成本/(元/hm2) | 收入/(元/hm2) | 产投比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N0P2K2 | 1677.9 | 11745.3 | — | 481.5 | 11263.8 | 24.4 |
N1P2K2 | 1914.9 | 13404.3 | 14.12 | 607.5 | 12796.8 | 22.1 | |
N2P2K2 | 2203.8 | 15426.6 | 31.34 | 733.5 | 14693.1 | 21.0 | |
N3P2K2 | 1907.6 | 13352.9 | 13.69 | 859.5 | 12493.4 | 15.5 | |
P2O5 | N2P0K2 | 1707.5 | 11952.2 | — | 630.0 | 11322.2 | 19.0 |
N2P1K2 | 2226.0 | 15582.0 | 30.37 | 682.5 | 14899.5 | 22.8 | |
N2P2K2 | 2203.8 | 15426.6 | 29.07 | 733.5 | 14693.1 | 21.0 | |
N2P3K2 | 1648.2 | 11537.4 | -3.47 | 786.0 | 10751.4 | 14.7 | |
K2O | N2P2K0 | 1474.2 | 10319.4 | — | 355.5 | 9963.9 | 29.0 |
N2P2K1 | 2337.2 | 16360.1 | 58.54 | 544.5 | 15815.6 | 30.0 | |
N2P2K2 | 2203.8 | 15426.6 | 49.49 | 733.5 | 14693.1 | 21.0 | |
N2P2K3 | 1389.0 | 9723.0 | -5.78 | 1111.5 | 8611.5 | 8.7 |
[1] | 白苇, 杨素梅, 胡杨,等. 河北省向日葵产业现状与分析[A].中国作物学会油料作物专业委员会第八次会员代表大会暨学术年会综述与摘要集[C].中国作物学会油料作物专业委员会、《中国油料作物学报》编辑部:中国作物学会 2018:62-64. |
[2] | 白苇, 杨素梅, 尹海峰,等. 冀西北地区施用氮磷钾肥对食葵产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2016(5):131-134. |
[3] | 妥德宝, 安昊, 张君,等. 国内外向日葵施肥栽培技术发展现状与发展趋势[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2010(6):1-2. |
[4] | 王文军. 施用氮、 磷、钾肥对食用向日葵产量和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015(8):40-44. |
[5] | 张君, 段玉, 赵维国, 等. N、P、K肥对向日葵干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2013(6):61-63. |
[6] | 白苇, 尹海峰, 王宽,等. 氮磷钾肥对食葵产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2017, 21(3):54-58. |
[7] |
LI S T, DUAN Y, GUO T W, et al. Sunflower response to potassium fertilization and nutrient requirement estimation[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2018, 17(12):2802-2812.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62074-X URL |
[8] | CHHAJRO M A, HASSAN Z U, SHAH A N, et al. Response of two hybrid sunflower genotypes to applied different levels of soil potassium[J]. Persian gulf crop protection, 2014, 3(2):45-52. |
[9] | 王鹏飞. 不同施肥量对向日葵产量相关性状的影响及经济效益分析[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学,2016. |
[10] | 段玉, 妥德宝, 张君,等. 氮磷钾平衡施用对油用向日葵产量及肥料效率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(3):767-771. |
[11] | 杨素梅, 白苇, 田国联,等. 冀西北食用向日葵肥料效应[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(17):9323-9326. |
[12] | 樊秀荣, 苏化洲, 刘杰,等. 临河区食用向日葵施肥指标体系的建立[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(33):12859-12860. |
[13] | 韩成, 樊秀荣, 张红萍,等. 临河区食用向日葵养分肥效和最佳施肥量研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(36):134-136,145. |
[14] |
段玉, 国世佳, 张君,等. 氮磷钾肥对食用向日葵产量性状和养分利用特性的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2019, 47(3):74-78.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1197.2019.03.14 |
[15] | 杨文耀, 安玉麟, 郭富国,等. 河套黄灌区食用向日葵高产栽培技术研究[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2009(3):27-29. |
[16] | 吴继仁, 杨培军. 食用向日葵氮磷钾肥料丰缺指标研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(11):12-13. |
[17] | 白苇, 杨素梅, 尹海峰,等. 播种期、密度、氮肥、磷肥、钾肥五因子对食用向日葵栽培技术的优化[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2015, 56(7):15-18,40. |
[18] | GB/T 31732—2015,测土配方施肥-配肥服务点技术规范[S]. |
[19] | 郝曦煜, 肖焕玉, 梁杰,等. 绿豆氮磷钾施肥效应与最优施肥量研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(5):127-132. |
[20] | 安玉麟, 郭富国, 杨文耀. 河套黄灌区油用向日葵氮磷钾肥料效应分析[J]. 华北农学报, 2007(5):147-151. |
[1] | ZHONG Qiu, LIU Tao, WU Junqian, CHEN Yong, XU Hao, YI Kai, FAN Dan. The Impact of Cooperative Membership on the Economic Benefits of Cigar Leaf Cultivation: A Case of Shifang in Sichuan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 134-142. |
[2] | LI Xiancai, ZHANG Xiaolong, PAN Yihong, ZHENG Shifang, SUN Yonghua, ZHOU Fangfang, LEI Fuhou, CAO Jiayuan. Combined Application of Different Proportions of Slow-release Fertilizer and Compound Fertilizer for Tobacco: Effects on Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(36): 47-53. |
[3] | Zhang Jinbin, Wang Xiaoyun, Meng Yuan, Sun Yuxiang, Ma Hongbo. Effects of Different Amounts of Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Fertilizer Utilization and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 96-101. |
[4] | Fan Haiping, Xue Lingzhan, Yang Xiaoyan, Zhong Quanfu, Qin Zhiqing, Huang Derong, Zhang Shuxing. Feeding and Non-feeding Breeding of FFRC Common Carp in Paddy Fields: Economic Benefits Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(8): 155-159. |
[5] | Fan Haiping, Xue Lingzhan, Yang Xiaoyan, Zhong Quanfu, Huang Derong, Zhang Shuxing, Chen Bin. Study on Allogynogenetic Gibel Carp ‘CAS Ⅴ’ in Paddy Field Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(31): 144-147. |
[6] | Tian Changyu, Tang Jiwei, Li Jianhua, Zhao Bingqiang, Xu Jiukai, Lin Zhi’an. Combination of Organic Fertilizer N and Inorganic Fertilizer N: Environmental Safety Threshold [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(22): 69-77. |
[7] | Wei Xiaoyi, Wei Feng, Hong Defeng, Ma Yi, Ma Junfeng, Wang Jiamu, Zhang Xueshun. High Temperature Affects Agronomic Characters and Yield Related Traits of Maize Hybrid ‘Xindan 68’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(18): 22-26. |
[8] | Tang Jianghua, Su Lili, Li Ling, Wang Fang. Effects of Sowing Date on Growth and Development, Ear Characteristics and Economic Benefits of Fresh Corn in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(17): 21-25. |
[9] | . Interaction Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density on Yield of Super Rice‘Longjing 31’in Cold Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(6): 8-13. |
[10] | . Grass-grain Planting Type of Alfalfa-corn-triticale: Yield and Economic Benefit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(33): 17-20. |
[11] | . Interaction Effect of Nitrogen and Sulfur on Plant Growth of Garlic [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(35): 81-87. |
[12] | . Effects of Slowed Controlled-release Fertilizers on indica-japonica hybrid rice yield, quality and economic benefits [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(21): 1-5. |
[13] | Ma Jun,Liu Shuang and Liu Yong. Effect of Different Corn Tillage Managements on Soil Moisture and Economic Benefit in Northwestern Shanxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(14): 152-158. |
[14] | Zhang Zhaohui,Jiang Yuping,Yang Xiaofeng,Zuo Enqiang and Chen Chunhong. The Mathematics Model on Balanced Fertilization of N, P and K for the Content of Vc in Melon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(4): 99-104. |
[15] | Guo Song,Liu Shengfeng,Yu Rong,Tian Mei,Li Cheng,Wang Zhiqiang and Dong Rui. Study on Watermelon Pruning Density and Nitrogen Phosphorus Interaction Mathematical Model and Optimum Combination Scheme [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(34): 75-81. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||