Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (28): 129-135.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0966
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Jing1,2(), LIU Lina2, YANG Baoming2, WANG Yongfen2,3, HE Ping2, XU Shengtao2, YIN Kesuo2, LI Shu2, BAI Tingting2, LI Yongping2, LI Xundong2, ZHENG Sijun2,4(
)
Received:
2021-10-13
Revised:
2022-04-15
Online:
2022-10-05
Published:
2022-09-28
Contact:
ZHENG Sijun
E-mail:zhangjing226@sina.cn;sijunzheng63@163.com
CLC Number:
ZHANG Jing, LIU Lina, YANG Baoming, WANG Yongfen, HE Ping, XU Shengtao, YIN Kesuo, LI Shu, BAI Tingting, LI Yongping, LI Xundong, ZHENG Sijun. Analysis of Main Phenolic Acids in Green Peel of Different Ecological Banana Varieties Based on UPLC-MS/MS[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 129-135.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0966
名称 | 分子式 | 分子量 | 保留时间/min | 电喷雾模式 | 母离子(m/z) | 碎片离子(m/z) | DP/V | CE/eV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 | C7H6O5 | 170.12 | 2.55±0.10 | [M-H]- | 169.0 | 124.9 | -30 | -18 |
125.0 | -30 | -15 | ||||||
奎尼酸 | C7H12O6 | 192.17 | 3.85±0.12 | [M-H]- | 191.0 | 85.0 | -20 | -25 |
93.0 | -20 | -29 | ||||||
原儿茶酸 | C7H6O4 | 154.12 | 4.05±0.21 | [M-H]- | 152.9 | 109.0 | -20 | -25 |
108.9 | -20 | -30 | ||||||
儿茶素 | C15H14O6 | 290.27 | 6.50±0.10 | [M-H]- | 289.1 | 109.0 | -20 | -31 |
203.1 | -20 | -25 | ||||||
绿原酸 | C16H18O9 | 354.31 | 6.89±0.23 | [M-H]- | 353.1 | 191.1 | -20 | -23 |
179.0 | -20 | -18 | ||||||
阿魏酸 | C10H10O4 | 194.19 | 7.65±0.21 | [M-H]- | 193.0 | 134.0 | -30 | -20 |
178.0 | -30 | -15 | ||||||
芦丁 | C27H30O16 | 610.51 | 7.78±0.18 | [M-H]- | 609.2 | 300.1 | -20 | -49 |
271.1 | -20 | -35 |
名称 | 分子式 | 分子量 | 保留时间/min | 电喷雾模式 | 母离子(m/z) | 碎片离子(m/z) | DP/V | CE/eV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 | C7H6O5 | 170.12 | 2.55±0.10 | [M-H]- | 169.0 | 124.9 | -30 | -18 |
125.0 | -30 | -15 | ||||||
奎尼酸 | C7H12O6 | 192.17 | 3.85±0.12 | [M-H]- | 191.0 | 85.0 | -20 | -25 |
93.0 | -20 | -29 | ||||||
原儿茶酸 | C7H6O4 | 154.12 | 4.05±0.21 | [M-H]- | 152.9 | 109.0 | -20 | -25 |
108.9 | -20 | -30 | ||||||
儿茶素 | C15H14O6 | 290.27 | 6.50±0.10 | [M-H]- | 289.1 | 109.0 | -20 | -31 |
203.1 | -20 | -25 | ||||||
绿原酸 | C16H18O9 | 354.31 | 6.89±0.23 | [M-H]- | 353.1 | 191.1 | -20 | -23 |
179.0 | -20 | -18 | ||||||
阿魏酸 | C10H10O4 | 194.19 | 7.65±0.21 | [M-H]- | 193.0 | 134.0 | -30 | -20 |
178.0 | -30 | -15 | ||||||
芦丁 | C27H30O16 | 610.51 | 7.78±0.18 | [M-H]- | 609.2 | 300.1 | -20 | -49 |
271.1 | -20 | -35 |
化合物 | 线性方程 | r2 | 线性范围/(μg/L) | LOD/(μg/L) | LOQ/(μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 | y=1.15×104x-2.38×104 | 0.9999 | 1~200 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
奎尼酸 | y=1.61×104x-1.54×105 | 0.9997 | 1~2000 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
原儿茶酸 | y=1.46×104x-1.36×104 | 0.9996 | 1~200 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
儿茶素 | y=2.57×103x-6.24×103 | 0.9992 | 1~200 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
绿原酸 | y=1.31×104x-3.27×104 | 0.9996 | 1~200 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
阿魏酸 | y=7.71×103x-4.07×103 | 0.9999 | 2~200 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
芦丁 | y=9.04×103x-2.73×104 | 0.9998 | 1~500 | 0.8 | 2.0 |
化合物 | 线性方程 | r2 | 线性范围/(μg/L) | LOD/(μg/L) | LOQ/(μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 | y=1.15×104x-2.38×104 | 0.9999 | 1~200 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
奎尼酸 | y=1.61×104x-1.54×105 | 0.9997 | 1~2000 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
原儿茶酸 | y=1.46×104x-1.36×104 | 0.9996 | 1~200 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
儿茶素 | y=2.57×103x-6.24×103 | 0.9992 | 1~200 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
绿原酸 | y=1.31×104x-3.27×104 | 0.9996 | 1~200 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
阿魏酸 | y=7.71×103x-4.07×103 | 0.9999 | 2~200 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
芦丁 | y=9.04×103x-2.73×104 | 0.9998 | 1~500 | 0.8 | 2.0 |
名称 | 初始量/(μg/g) | 加标量/(μg/g) | 平均回收率/% | 标准偏差 | RSD/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 | 2.75 | 1.5 | 92.17 | 9.56 | 10.96 |
3.0 | |||||
4.5 | |||||
奎尼酸 | 1134.83 | 500 | 84.37 | 4.77 | 5.66 |
1000 | |||||
1500 | |||||
原儿茶酸 | 2.69 | 1.5 | 90.20 | 3.93 | 2.21 |
3.0 | |||||
4.5 | |||||
儿茶素 | 1.76 | 1 | 87.53 | 5.10 | 5.82 |
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
绿原酸 | 47.31 | 25 | 86.50 | 3.28 | 3.79 |
50 | |||||
75 | |||||
阿魏酸 | 1.00 | 0.5 | 87.03 | 7.46 | 8.58 |
1.0 | |||||
1.5 | |||||
芦丁 | 10.15 | 5 | 86.67 | 7.64 | 8.81 |
10 | |||||
15 |
名称 | 初始量/(μg/g) | 加标量/(μg/g) | 平均回收率/% | 标准偏差 | RSD/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
没食子酸 | 2.75 | 1.5 | 92.17 | 9.56 | 10.96 |
3.0 | |||||
4.5 | |||||
奎尼酸 | 1134.83 | 500 | 84.37 | 4.77 | 5.66 |
1000 | |||||
1500 | |||||
原儿茶酸 | 2.69 | 1.5 | 90.20 | 3.93 | 2.21 |
3.0 | |||||
4.5 | |||||
儿茶素 | 1.76 | 1 | 87.53 | 5.10 | 5.82 |
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
绿原酸 | 47.31 | 25 | 86.50 | 3.28 | 3.79 |
50 | |||||
75 | |||||
阿魏酸 | 1.00 | 0.5 | 87.03 | 7.46 | 8.58 |
1.0 | |||||
1.5 | |||||
芦丁 | 10.15 | 5 | 86.67 | 7.64 | 8.81 |
10 | |||||
15 |
化合物 | 精密度 | 稳定性RSD/% | 重复性RSD/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
日间RSD/% | 日内RSD/% | |||
没食子酸 | 10.10 | 3.75 | 4.04 | 4.10 |
奎尼酸 | 8.83 | 3.47 | 1.62 | 1.23 |
原儿茶酸 | 8.96 | 3.70 | 1.40 | 1.15 |
儿茶素 | 2.71 | 2.87 | 2.99 | 3.13 |
绿原酸 | 8.76 | 2.84 | 3.29 | 2.10 |
阿魏酸 | 5.85 | 2.21 | 7.15 | 2.22 |
芦丁 | 5.96 | 1.22 | 4.02 | 1.73 |
化合物 | 精密度 | 稳定性RSD/% | 重复性RSD/% | |
---|---|---|---|---|
日间RSD/% | 日内RSD/% | |||
没食子酸 | 10.10 | 3.75 | 4.04 | 4.10 |
奎尼酸 | 8.83 | 3.47 | 1.62 | 1.23 |
原儿茶酸 | 8.96 | 3.70 | 1.40 | 1.15 |
儿茶素 | 2.71 | 2.87 | 2.99 | 3.13 |
绿原酸 | 8.76 | 2.84 | 3.29 | 2.10 |
阿魏酸 | 5.85 | 2.21 | 7.15 | 2.22 |
芦丁 | 5.96 | 1.22 | 4.02 | 1.73 |
分类 | 品种 | 没食子酸 | 奎尼酸 | 原儿茶酸 | 儿茶素 | 绿原酸 | 阿魏酸 | 芦丁 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非鲜食蕉 | Pahang | 3.92±0.07b | 1722.50±35.97a | 4.16±0.06a | 10.15±0.16a | 72.63±1.99b | 27.93±0.47a | 235.30±6.12a |
Inkira | 1.27±0.04h | 955.60±5.49efg | 0.92±0.02j | 0.76±0.11i | 55.96±1.01d | 1.23±0.36h | 14.08±0.42c | |
Kazirakwe | 1.30±0.16gh | 1195.80±10.73c | 1.04±0.02i | 1.28±0.09cd | 72.71±1.76ab | 1.49±0.24fgh | 53.00±1.25b | |
鲜食蕉 | 巴西蕉 | 2.02±0.11e | 907.45±8.58h | 2.22±0.03e | 0.93±0.08gh | 2.71±0.55ij | 1.51±0.08efgh | 3.87±0.19ghi |
热科2号 | 0.73±0.11j | 952.65±5.11fg | 3.86±0.07b | 0.64±0.03j | 4.23±0.34h | 1.16±0.21i | 1.09±0.08j | |
热科4号 | 4.01±0.12a | 1488.75±40.67bc | 2.25±0.03de | 1.39±0.09b | 16.81±0.15ef | 1.57±0.14defghij | 3.15±0.08hi | |
南天黄 | 2.03±0.09de | 939.85±16.43g | 1.91±0.01f | 1.22±0.08d | 5.24±0.04gh | 2.60±0.08b | 6.60±0.25def | |
宝岛蕉 | 2.75±0.09c | 1026.85±33.35d | 2.69±0.06c | 1.01±0.07efg | 2.58±0.41j | 1.49±0.11g | 2.80±0.10i | |
中蕉8号 | 1.54±0.12f | 852.15±3.29i | 1.36±0.03h | 0.87±0.05h | 59.95±1.12c | 1.15±0.39j | 5.84±0.12ef | |
云蕉1号 | 1.00±0.07i | 768.95±29.74j | 1.76±0.05g | 0.93±0.04fgh | 16.41±0.87f | 1.80±0.08ce | 4.54±0.18fghi |
分类 | 品种 | 没食子酸 | 奎尼酸 | 原儿茶酸 | 儿茶素 | 绿原酸 | 阿魏酸 | 芦丁 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
非鲜食蕉 | Pahang | 3.92±0.07b | 1722.50±35.97a | 4.16±0.06a | 10.15±0.16a | 72.63±1.99b | 27.93±0.47a | 235.30±6.12a |
Inkira | 1.27±0.04h | 955.60±5.49efg | 0.92±0.02j | 0.76±0.11i | 55.96±1.01d | 1.23±0.36h | 14.08±0.42c | |
Kazirakwe | 1.30±0.16gh | 1195.80±10.73c | 1.04±0.02i | 1.28±0.09cd | 72.71±1.76ab | 1.49±0.24fgh | 53.00±1.25b | |
鲜食蕉 | 巴西蕉 | 2.02±0.11e | 907.45±8.58h | 2.22±0.03e | 0.93±0.08gh | 2.71±0.55ij | 1.51±0.08efgh | 3.87±0.19ghi |
热科2号 | 0.73±0.11j | 952.65±5.11fg | 3.86±0.07b | 0.64±0.03j | 4.23±0.34h | 1.16±0.21i | 1.09±0.08j | |
热科4号 | 4.01±0.12a | 1488.75±40.67bc | 2.25±0.03de | 1.39±0.09b | 16.81±0.15ef | 1.57±0.14defghij | 3.15±0.08hi | |
南天黄 | 2.03±0.09de | 939.85±16.43g | 1.91±0.01f | 1.22±0.08d | 5.24±0.04gh | 2.60±0.08b | 6.60±0.25def | |
宝岛蕉 | 2.75±0.09c | 1026.85±33.35d | 2.69±0.06c | 1.01±0.07efg | 2.58±0.41j | 1.49±0.11g | 2.80±0.10i | |
中蕉8号 | 1.54±0.12f | 852.15±3.29i | 1.36±0.03h | 0.87±0.05h | 59.95±1.12c | 1.15±0.39j | 5.84±0.12ef | |
云蕉1号 | 1.00±0.07i | 768.95±29.74j | 1.76±0.05g | 0.93±0.04fgh | 16.41±0.87f | 1.80±0.08ce | 4.54±0.18fghi |
[1] | AHMAD F, MARTAWI N M, POERBA Y S, et al. Genetic mapping of Fusarium wilt resistance in a wild banana Musa acuminata ssp. malaccensis accession[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2020,133(12). |
[2] |
BEDIAKO J K, SARKAR A K, LIN S, et al. Characterization of the residual biochemical components of sequentially extracted banana peel biomasses and their environmental remediation applications[J]. Waste management, 2019,89:141-153.
doi: S0956-053X(19)30222-3 pmid: 31079727 |
[3] | 唐瑞. 香蕉枯萎病菌在香蕉植株和蕉园土壤中的分布[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2018. |
[4] | FAO. Banana facts. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations[EB/OL]. www.fao.org/economic/est/est-commodities/bananas/bananafacts/en/, 2020. |
[5] | 郝俊光, 李芳杰, 陈静. 等. 香蕉皮中酚类和类胡萝卜素的国外研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019,45(12):265-271. |
[6] | 张婷婷. 香蕉皮的营养价值及在食品领域中的应用[J]. 农产品加工, 2018(10):67-69. |
[7] | QDAIS H A, WUENSCH C, DORNACK C, et al. The role of solid waste composting in mitigating climate change in Jordan[J]. Waste management & research, 2019,37(8): 833-842. |
[8] |
AHMAD T, DANISH M. Prospects of banana waste utilization in wastewater treatment: A review[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2018,206:330-348.
doi: S0301-4797(17)31058-7 pmid: 29100146 |
[9] | 刘攀, 汤琪, 文永林. 等. 碱化香蕉皮作为Pb2+吸附剂的性能研究[J]. 应用化工, 2016,45(2):286-290. |
[10] |
SULERIA H A R, BARROW C J, DUNSHEA F R. Screening and characterization of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant capacity in different fruit peels[J]. Foods, 2020,9(9):1206.
doi: 10.3390/foods9091206 URL |
[11] | 陈志杰, 吴嘉琪, 马燕. 等. 植物食品原料中酚酸的生物合成与调控及其生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品科学, 2018,39(7):321-328. |
[12] | KUMAR N, GOEL N. Phenolic acids: Natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications[J]. Biotechnology reports, 2019,24:e370. |
[13] |
MORAIS D R, ROTTA E M, SARGI S C, et al. Antioxidant activity, phenolics and UPLC-ESI(-)-MS of extracts from different tropical fruits parts and processed peels[J]. Food research international, 2015,77: 392-399.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.08.036 URL |
[14] | MATHEW N S, NEGI P S. Phenolic content and anti-oxidative attributes of various parts of wild banana (Ensete superbum Roxb. Cheesman) plant[J]. Journal of food biochemistry, 2021,45(4). |
[15] |
PEREIRA A, MARASCHIN M. Banana (Musa spp.) from peel to pulp: ethnopharmacology, source of bioactive compounds and its relevance for human health[J]. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2015,160: 149-163.
doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.11.008 URL |
[16] | 李美婷, 陈跃, 李亚茹. 等. 动态pH连接-毛细管电泳法测定和表征饮品中7种酚酸[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,39(6):594-604. |
[17] | GARCIA-VAQUERO M, RAJAURIA G. Analytical techniques for phytochemical estimation in fruit juices[J]. Fruit juices, 2018:669-692. |
[18] | 郑洁, 赵其阳, 张耀海. 等. 超高效液相色谱法同时测定柑橘中主要酚酸和类黄酮物质[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014(23):4706-4717. |
[19] | 王雪, 林彦君, 梁梦洁. 等. 不同品种石榴皮中挥发油的GC-MS成分分析[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2018(6):83-87. |
[20] |
易方, 黄香宜, 任吉存. 毛细管电泳与化学发光检测联用方法的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2017(1):110-120.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2016.08043 |
[21] | 耿楚皓. 色谱法在药物分析中的应用[J]. 健康大视野, 2018(21):189-190. |
[22] | 宋方祥, 李焱. 高效液相色谱法在化妆品检测中的应用[J]. 贵州科学, 2017(4). |
[23] | 周帅, 张飞云. UPLC-MS/MS检测运动食品中β-受体激动剂残留[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2017,38(11):148-152. |
[24] |
YONG H, SUN H Y, QIN X L, et al. A UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of free and total forms of a phenolic acid and two flavonoids in rat plasma and its application to comparative Pharmacokinetic studies of Polygonum capitatum extract in rats[J]. Molecules, 2017,22(3):353.
doi: 10.3390/molecules22030353 URL |
[25] | 凌云, 雍炜, 何佩霞. 等. 超高效液相色谱-三重四级杆串联质谱法同时测定饮料中11种磷酸酯类增塑剂含量[J]. 中国食品卫生杂志, 2019(6). |
[26] | 周亚萍, 魏东伟, 孙武勇. 等. 高效液相色谱法测定玉米幼苗叶片中4种酚酸类化合物[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(13):36-41. |
[27] | 杨春霞. 高效液相色谱法测定枸杞中9种酚酸化合物含量[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021,42(20):148-153. |
[28] |
HERNÁNDEZ-CARRANZA P, ÁVILA-SOSA R, GUERRERO-BELTRÁN J A, et al. Optimization of antioxidant compounds extraction from fruit by-products: Apple pomace, orange and banana peel[J]. Journal of food processing and preservation, 2016,40:103-115.
doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12588 URL |
[29] |
VU H T, SCARLETT C J, VUONG Q V. Phenolic compounds within banana peel and their potential uses: A review[J]. Journal of functional foods, 2018,40:238-248.
doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.11.006 URL |
[30] |
PASSO TSAMO C V, HERENT M F, TOMEKPE K, et al. Phenolic profiling in the pulp and peel of nine plantain cultivars (Musa sp.)[J]. Food chemistry, 2015,167:197-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.095 URL |
[31] |
BORGES C V, MARASCHIN M, COELHO D S, et al. Nutritional value and antioxidant compounds during the ripening and after domestic cooking of bananas and plantains[J]. Food research international, 2020,132:109061.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109061 URL |
[32] |
SERAGLIO SKT, SCHULZ M, NEHRING P, et al. Nutritional and bioactive potential of Myrtaceae fruits during ripening[J]. Food chemistry, 2018,239:649-656.
doi: S0308-8146(17)31100-7 pmid: 28873617 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||