Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (19): 70-75.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0504
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2023-07-05
Revised:
2024-02-27
Online:
2024-07-05
Published:
2024-07-02
DAI Xun. Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Fertility in Dingqing County of Tibet Based on Fuzzy Mathematics[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 70-75.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0504
检测项 | 参考标准 | 方法 |
---|---|---|
pH | 土壤pH的测定(NY/T 1121.2—2006) | 台式酸度计JSYQ-N007 |
有机质 | 土壤有机质的测定(NY/T 1121.6—2006) | 50.00 mL滴定管ZB1910301 |
全氮 | 土壤全氮的测定 自动定氮仪法(NY/T 1121.24—2012) | 25.00 mL滴定管ZB1910303 |
全磷 | 森林土壤全磷的测定(LY/T 1232—2015) | 可见分光光度计T6新悦JSYQ-N126 |
全钾 | 土壤全钾测定法(NY/T 87—1988) | 火焰光度计JSYQ-N133 |
碱解氮 | 森林土壤氮的测定(LY/T 1228—2015) | 10 mL半微量滴定管ZB1910286 |
有效磷 | 土壤有效磷的测定(NY/T 1121.7—2014) | 可见分光光度计T6新悦JSYQ-N126 |
速效钾 | 土壤速效钾和缓效钾含量的测定(NY/T 889—2004) | 火焰光度计JSYQ-N066 |
检测项 | 参考标准 | 方法 |
---|---|---|
pH | 土壤pH的测定(NY/T 1121.2—2006) | 台式酸度计JSYQ-N007 |
有机质 | 土壤有机质的测定(NY/T 1121.6—2006) | 50.00 mL滴定管ZB1910301 |
全氮 | 土壤全氮的测定 自动定氮仪法(NY/T 1121.24—2012) | 25.00 mL滴定管ZB1910303 |
全磷 | 森林土壤全磷的测定(LY/T 1232—2015) | 可见分光光度计T6新悦JSYQ-N126 |
全钾 | 土壤全钾测定法(NY/T 87—1988) | 火焰光度计JSYQ-N133 |
碱解氮 | 森林土壤氮的测定(LY/T 1228—2015) | 10 mL半微量滴定管ZB1910286 |
有效磷 | 土壤有效磷的测定(NY/T 1121.7—2014) | 可见分光光度计T6新悦JSYQ-N126 |
速效钾 | 土壤速效钾和缓效钾含量的测定(NY/T 889—2004) | 火焰光度计JSYQ-N066 |
等级 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | >40.0 | >2.00 | >1.00 | >25.0 | >150 | >20 | >200 | >8.5 |
2级 | 30.1~40.0 | 1.51~2.00 | 0.81~1.00 | 20.1~25.0 | 121~150 | 16~20 | 151~200 | 7.6~8.5 |
3级 | 20.1~30.0 | 1.01~1.50 | 0.61~0.8 | 15.1~20.0 | 91~120 | 11~15 | 101~150 | 6.6~7.5 |
4级 | 10.1~20.0 | 0.75~1.00 | 0.41~0.6 | 10.1~15.0 | 61~90 | 6~10 | 51~100 | 5.6~6.5 |
5级 | <10.0 | <0.75 | <0.40 | <10.0 | <60 | <5 | <50 | <5.5 |
等级 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | >40.0 | >2.00 | >1.00 | >25.0 | >150 | >20 | >200 | >8.5 |
2级 | 30.1~40.0 | 1.51~2.00 | 0.81~1.00 | 20.1~25.0 | 121~150 | 16~20 | 151~200 | 7.6~8.5 |
3级 | 20.1~30.0 | 1.01~1.50 | 0.61~0.8 | 15.1~20.0 | 91~120 | 11~15 | 101~150 | 6.6~7.5 |
4级 | 10.1~20.0 | 0.75~1.00 | 0.41~0.6 | 10.1~15.0 | 61~90 | 6~10 | 51~100 | 5.6~6.5 |
5级 | <10.0 | <0.75 | <0.40 | <10.0 | <60 | <5 | <50 | <5.5 |
项目 | pH | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 | 7.78 | 169.60 | 2.19 | 14.15 | 0.46 | 253.68 | 24.36 | 9.41 |
最大值 | 8.80 | 313.00 | 5.35 | 26.20 | 1.50 | 617.00 | 71.00 | 41.20 |
最小值 | 6.30 | 79.90 | 1.04 | 4.40 | 0.02 | 67.00 | 8.10 | 1.00 |
标准差 | 0.51 | 53.12 | 0.64 | 4.30 | 0.29 | 95.65 | 9.70 | 7.38 |
变异系数/% | 6.56 | 31.32 | 29.48 | 30.36 | 64.08 | 37.70 | 39.83 | 78.48 |
项目 | pH | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 全钾/(g/kg) | 全磷/(g/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 有机质/(g/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 | 7.78 | 169.60 | 2.19 | 14.15 | 0.46 | 253.68 | 24.36 | 9.41 |
最大值 | 8.80 | 313.00 | 5.35 | 26.20 | 1.50 | 617.00 | 71.00 | 41.20 |
最小值 | 6.30 | 79.90 | 1.04 | 4.40 | 0.02 | 67.00 | 8.10 | 1.00 |
标准差 | 0.51 | 53.12 | 0.64 | 4.30 | 0.29 | 95.65 | 9.70 | 7.38 |
变异系数/% | 6.56 | 31.32 | 29.48 | 30.36 | 64.08 | 37.70 | 39.83 | 78.48 |
指标 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 5.61 | 68.37 | 24.49 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
碱解氮 | 55.10 | 26.53 | 15.82 | 2.55 | 0.00 |
全氮 | 57.14 | 28.57 | 14.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
全钾 | 1.53 | 9.18 | 26.53 | 48.47 | 14.29 |
全磷 | 8.16 | 5.61 | 10.20 | 14.29 | 61.73 |
速效钾 | 69.39 | 17.86 | 9.69 | 3.06 | 0.00 |
有机质 | 5.61 | 18.88 | 38.78 | 34.18 | 2.55 |
有效磷 | 0.51 | 2.55 | 5.61 | 26.02 | 65.31 |
指标 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | 5.61 | 68.37 | 24.49 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
碱解氮 | 55.10 | 26.53 | 15.82 | 2.55 | 0.00 |
全氮 | 57.14 | 28.57 | 14.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
全钾 | 1.53 | 9.18 | 26.53 | 48.47 | 14.29 |
全磷 | 8.16 | 5.61 | 10.20 | 14.29 | 61.73 |
速效钾 | 69.39 | 17.86 | 9.69 | 3.06 | 0.00 |
有机质 | 5.61 | 18.88 | 38.78 | 34.18 | 2.55 |
有效磷 | 0.51 | 2.55 | 5.61 | 26.02 | 65.31 |
函数类型 | 指标 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S型 | 全氮/(g/kg) | 0.75 | 2 | ||
全钾/(g/kg) | 10 | 25 | |||
全磷/(g/kg) | 0.4 | 1 | |||
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 60 | 150 | |||
速效钾/(mg/kg) | 50 | 200 | |||
有机质/(g/kg) | 10 | 40 | |||
有效磷/(mg/kg) | 5 | 20 | |||
抛物线型 | pH | 5.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 |
函数类型 | 指标 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S型 | 全氮/(g/kg) | 0.75 | 2 | ||
全钾/(g/kg) | 10 | 25 | |||
全磷/(g/kg) | 0.4 | 1 | |||
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 60 | 150 | |||
速效钾/(mg/kg) | 50 | 200 | |||
有机质/(g/kg) | 10 | 40 | |||
有效磷/(mg/kg) | 5 | 20 | |||
抛物线型 | pH | 5.5 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 8.5 |
指标 | pH | 碱解氮 | 全氮 | 全钾 | 全磷 | 速效钾 | 有机质 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碱解氮 | -0.08 | 1 | |||||
全氮 | -0.189** | 0.686** | 1 | ||||
全钾 | -0.593** | 0.005 | 0.055 | 1 | |||
全磷 | -0.410** | -0.289** | 0.015 | 0.418** | 1 | ||
速效钾 | 0.110 | 0.225** | 0.199** | -0.056 | 0.092 | 1 | |
有机质 | -0.360** | 0.396** | 0.599** | 0.293** | 0.305** | 0.203** | 1 |
有效磷 | -0.118 | 0.253** | 0.327** | 0.035 | 0.172* | 0.264** | 0.396** |
指标 | pH | 碱解氮 | 全氮 | 全钾 | 全磷 | 速效钾 | 有机质 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碱解氮 | -0.08 | 1 | |||||
全氮 | -0.189** | 0.686** | 1 | ||||
全钾 | -0.593** | 0.005 | 0.055 | 1 | |||
全磷 | -0.410** | -0.289** | 0.015 | 0.418** | 1 | ||
速效钾 | 0.110 | 0.225** | 0.199** | -0.056 | 0.092 | 1 | |
有机质 | -0.360** | 0.396** | 0.599** | 0.293** | 0.305** | 0.203** | 1 |
有效磷 | -0.118 | 0.253** | 0.327** | 0.035 | 0.172* | 0.264** | 0.396** |
[1] |
赵永志. 土壤是人类赖以生存的根基[J]. 河北农业, 2014(10):43-45.
|
[2] |
沈慧, 姜凤岐, 杜晓军, 等. 水土保持林土壤肥力及其评价指标[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14(2):6.
|
[3] |
孙梦, 冯昊翔, 张晓燕, 等. 不同土壤肥力下施氮量对小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2022, 42(7):826-834.
|
[4] |
林琪, 侯立白, 韩伟. 不同肥力土壤下施氮量对小麦子粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004(6):561-567.
|
[5] |
刘勤, 王玉宽, 严坤, 等. 三峡库区中部移民安置区土壤养分特征及变化评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(3):656-661.
|
[6] |
格桑顿珠. 西藏昌都市洛隆县土壤养分状况分析及肥力综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35):30-34.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0855 |
[7] |
鲜林霏, 夏月. 西藏农田土壤养分现状及丰缺分级[J]. 西藏科技, 2020(12):9-12,15.
|
[8] |
林圣玉, 李英, 张华明, 等. 鄱阳湖区坡耕地土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 中国水土保持, 2018(11):60-63.
|
[9] |
秋香, 付强, 王子龙, 等. 黑龙江省西部半干旱区土壤水分空间变异性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(5):5.
|
[10] |
陈延良, 雷国平. 松嫩平原南部土壤养分空间变异规律分析及其等级评价[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2010(2):43-47.
|
[11] |
吴小芳, 张振山, 范琼, 等. 海南省果园土壤肥力综合评价研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(7):2109-2118.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2021.07.039 |
[12] |
叶回春, 张世文, 黄元仿, 等. 粗糙集理论在土壤肥力评价指标权重确定中的应用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(4):710-717.
|
[13] |
杨文娜, 任嘉欣, 李忠意, 等. 主成分分析法和模糊综合评价法判断喀斯特土壤的肥力水平[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(6):1307-1313.
|
[14] |
杨旭初, 叶会财, 李大明, 等. 基于模糊数学和主成分分析的长期施肥红壤旱地土壤肥力评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(3):79-84.
|
[15] |
郑立臣, 宇万太, 马强, 等. 农田土壤肥力综合评价研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(5):156-161.
|
[16] |
孙波, 张桃林, 赵其国. 我国东南丘陵山区土壤肥力的综合评价[J]. 土壤学报, 1995, 32(4):362-369.
|
[17] |
李小庆. 西藏山南地区耕地肥力等级评价[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 23(12):54-57.
|
[1] | CHEN Guoan, SONG Xiaoqin, LIU Wenbin, LIU Dan, YE Zhengqian. Effects of Different Soil Amendments on Cadmium Uptake and Accumulation in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 89-96. |
[2] | YU Shuhui, ZHU Guoliang, MU Xiaoling, DONG Hao, SHI Guifang, ZHENG Zheng, ZHANG Weijian. Effects of Peanut and Green Fertilizer Rotation on Soil Water Content and Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 74-79. |
[3] | DENG Bo, GUO Peng, WEI Leijia, CHEN Shangmao, MA Ze, CHEN Dan, BI Lidong. Effects of Exogenous Additives on Soil Fertility Under Different Land Use Type [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(8): 91-100. |
[4] | MA Aiping, JING Hua, KANG Xiuli, ZHAO Yukun, CUI Huanhu, HUANG Xuefang, XI Jilong. Effects of Soil Fertility Gradient and Its Indicators on Wheat Yield and Quality Traits in Hilly Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 101-107. |
[5] | DING Lan, XU Shengnan, ZHOU Dan, LIU Mei, LI Wanqi, ZOU Songbao. Effects of Organic Fertilizer from Aquaculture Solid Waste on Soil Fertility and Vegetable Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 102-108. |
[6] | GAO Peng, LEI Xingyu, LU Yaoxiong, PENG Fuyuan, CUI Xinwei. Effects of Partial Substitution of Organic Nitrogen Fertilizer for Chemical Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(13): 1-6. |
[7] | LI Chunqing, QU Yonghan, NONG Quandong, NONG Chuanjiang, LI Xueping, RU Ruihong, CHEN Xianmei, ZHONG Zhengyang. Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Typical Rocky Desertification Area in Wenshan of Yunnan Based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 66-72. |
[8] | ZHU Xiaoyue, FANG Yan, SHANGGUAN Zhouping. Mechanism and Technology of Soil Fertility Cultivation in Loess Desert: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 95-101. |
[9] | KAN Jianluan, WANG Xiaoyun, SU Jianping, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo, CAI Yuntong. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Inhibitors on Wheat Yield, Soil Fertility and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 69-74. |
[10] | TANG Weidong, WEI Linyuan, KANG Caizhou, WANG Duoze, QIU Xiaona, ZHANG Weixing, ZHANG Xiaojuan. Soil Physicochemical Properties of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Plantations of Different Ages in Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 93-98. |
[11] | FENG Qian, JIN Lihui, XUE Haiqing, YUE Ya, MIAO Huan, MIAO Shujie, QIAO Yunfa. Effects of Elevated Temperature and Soil Fertility on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Soybean [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 111-117. |
[12] | WANG Haoji, GUAN Huilin, SHI Mengxin, DENG Sidi, DONG Mingxing, LU Zicun, WANG Haibo, HAO Yunying, XU Wumei. Effects of Tobacco Stalk Biochar with Different Particle Sizes on Physicochemical Properties of Acidic Red Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 85-91. |
[13] | SONG Li, QIN Jie, LI Xuan, WU Xiaoyan. Effects of Liquid Mulching Film on Agronomic Traits, Yield of Peanut and Soil Fertility [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(33): 33-37. |
[14] | LI Xuemei, SHU Yingge. Analysis of Soil Nutrient Changes and Ecological Stoichiometry Under Different Land Use Types [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(28): 62-69. |
[15] | LI Minjun, DU Jian. Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility of Arable Land in Gangcha County Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(26): 51-59. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||