Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Perennial Rice at Seedling Stage

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0675

Abstract

Abstract:

This study aims to assess the salt tolerance of perennial rice varieties (lines) ‘PR23’, ‘PR24’, ‘PR25’, ‘PR26’, ‘PR101’, ‘PR107’, and ‘PR109’, and to screen out elite salt-tolerant germplasm. The experiment employed NaCl solutions at concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mmol/L to conduct salinity stress treatments on perennial rice varieties (lines) and the parent ‘RD23’. The vitality parameters (seedling height, root length, fresh weight, dry weight, etc.) and salt tolerance coefficients of varieties were determined under different NaCl concentrations. Principal component analysis (PCA) and the membership function method were used to comprehensively evaluate the salt tolerance performance of the varieties (lines). The results showed that: (1) significant differences in salt damage levels among varieties (lines) were observed when NaCl concentration reached 150 mmol/L. Among all the phenotypic traits associated with salt stress, except for root length, all other traits under the 150 mmol/L NaCl treatment showed significant differences from the control group (P < 0.05), establishing this concentration as the optimal level for screening salt tolerance in perennial rice during the seedling stage. (2) PCA of the relative values of salt tolerance traits under the 150 mmol/L NaCl treatment generated membership function values. Combining with the principal component variance contribution rate weight, the comprehensive evaluation D value was obtained, showing that ‘Yun Da 107 (PR107) ’exhibited the strongest comprehensive salt tolerance ability at the seedling stage, while ‘PR101’ showed the weakest salt tolerance capacity. Other varieties (lines) had intermediate salt tolerance levels. This study provides high-quality germplasm resources for rice salt tolerance breeding and lays the foundation for future improvements in rice salt tolerance. This study not only identifies elite salt-tolerant rice germplasm resources through phenotypic and genotypic assessments, laying a foundation for genetic improvement of rice salt tolerance, but also provides critical data support for further research on salinity stress tolerance mechanisms.

Key words: salt tolerance, perennial rice, seedling stage, NaCl stress, principal component analysis (PCA), membership function method

LIU Yongxiu, ZHAO Ying, XU Ling, YUAN Yuan, ANG Lei, LUO Jing, YANG Tao, ZHANG Qinghua, XU Yeju, ZHANG Shilai. Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Perennial Rice at Seedling Stage[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(23): 1-9.

Figures/Tables 12

References 32

[1]	MUNNS R, TESTER M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance[J]. Annual review of plant biology, 2008, 59(1):651-681.
[2]	PARIDA A K, DAS A B. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review[J]. Ecotoxicology environmental safety, 2005, 60(3):324-349.
[3]	王旭明, 麦绮君, 周鸿凯, 等. 盐胁迫对4个水稻种质抗逆性生理的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2019, 27(2):149-156.
[4]	FLOWERS T, YEO A. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next?[J]. Functional plant biology, 1995, 22(6):875-884.
[5]	孟繁昊, 王聪, 徐寿军. 盐胁迫对植物的影响及植物耐盐机理研究进展[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(3):315-318,373.
[6]	GUO M X, WANG R C, WANG J, et al. ALT1, a Snf2 family chromatin remodeling ATPase, negatively regulates alkaline tolerance through enhanced defense against oxidative stress in rice[J]. Plos one, 2014, 9(12):e112515.
[7]	KUMAR K, KUMAR M, KIM S R, et al. Insights into genomics of salt stress response in rice[J]. Rice, 2013, 6:1-15.
[8]	GARG A K, KIM J K, OWENS T G, et al. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2002, 99(25):15898-15903.
[9]	刘梦霜, 郭海峰, 陈观秀, 等. 不同水稻品种对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2023, 44(2):326-336. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.02.012
[10]	杨淑琴, 李培富. 水稻不同种质资源幼苗耐盐性评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(33):20364-20367.
[11]	张治振, 李稳, 周起先, 等. 不同水稻品种幼苗期耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3):92-101.
[12]	刘艳, 王宝祥, 邢运高, 等. 水稻品种资源苗期耐盐性评价指标分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(17):75-79.
[13]	HU F, TAO D, SACKS E, et al. Convergent evolution of perenniality in rice and sorghum[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2003, 100(7):4050-4054.
[14]	ZHANG S L, HU J, YANG C D, et al. Genotype by environment interactions for grain yield of perennial rice derivatives (Oryza sativa L./Oryza longistaminata) in southern China and Laos[J]. Field crops research, 2017, 207:62-70.
[15]	HUANG G F, QIN S W, ZHANG S L, et al. Performance,economics and potential impact of perennial rice PR23 relative to annual rice cultivars at multiple locations in Yunnan province of China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4):1086.
[16]	ZHANG S L, HUANG G F, ZHANG Y J, et al. Sustained productivity and agronomic potential of perennial rice[J]. Nature sustainability, 2023, 6(1):28-38.
[17]	国家水稻数据中心. 多年生稻23(PR23)品种信息[EB/OL].[2024-10-25]. https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/618801.htm.
[18]	国家水稻数据中心. 云大25(PR25)品种信息[EB/OL]. [2024-10-25]. https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/623354.htm.
[19]	国家水稻数据中心. 云大107(PR107)品种信息[EB/OL]. [2024-10-25]. https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/623356.htm.
[20]	FERNANDO L H. The performance of the salt-resistant paddy, Pokkali in Ceylon[J]. Tropical agriculturist, 1949, 105:124-126.
[21]	朱家骝, 严中琪. 舟山盐碱地耐盐碱水稻品种的筛选试验[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(10):1913-1915. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20211004
[22]	国家水稻数据中心. IR29,1980品种信息[EB/OL]. https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/608562.htm?608562.
[23]	GREGORIA G B, SENADHIRA D, MENDOZA R D. Screening rice for salinity tolerance[R]. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1996.
[24]	GEORGE D, MALLERY P. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step[M]. New York: Routledge, 2018.
[25]	ZENG L H, SHANNON M C, LESCH S M. Timing of salinity stress affects rice growth and yield components[J]. Agricultural water management, 2001, 48(3):191-206.
[26]	YUAN L, ZHANG L C, WEI X, et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping of salt tolerance in wild rice Oryza longistaminata[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2022, 23(4):2379.
[27]	李月婷. 水稻苗期耐盐种质资源的筛选与鉴定[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学,2020:8-9.
[28]	冯明辉, 陈锦珠, 薛文侠, 等. 苏北水稻品系苗期耐盐性筛选[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(18):21.
[29]	耿雷跃, 马小定, 崔迪, 等. 水稻全生育期耐盐性鉴定评价方法研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(2):267-275. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20180815003
[30]	KRISHNAMURTHY S, GAUTAM R, SHARMA P, et al. Effect of different salt stresses on agro-morphological traits and utilisation of salt stress indices for reproductive stage salt tolerance in rice[J]. Field crops research, 2016, 190:26-33.
[31]	顾骁, 吴孚桂, 刘慧芳, 等. 30份水稻材料的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 热带生物学报, 2020, 11(3):314-323.
[32]	周玉杰, 贺治洲, 林秋云, 等. 热带水稻种质资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2023, 54(7):1944-1952.

盐害等级	盐害症状	耐盐性
1	正常生长，无叶片症状	极强
3	生长几乎正常，少数叶片的叶尖发白并卷曲	强
5	生长迟缓，大部分叶片卷曲，只有少数叶片伸长	中
7	完全停止生长，大部分叶片干枯	弱
9	植株死亡或接近死亡	极弱

盐害等级	盐害症状	耐盐性
1	正常生长，无叶片症状	极强
3	生长几乎正常，少数叶片的叶尖发白并卷曲	强
5	生长迟缓，大部分叶片卷曲，只有少数叶片伸长	中
7	完全停止生长，大部分叶片干枯	弱
9	植株死亡或接近死亡	极弱

性状	平均值	标准差	峰度	偏度	最小值	最大值	变异系数/%
相对苗高	0.76	0.03	-0.88	-0.28	0.69	0.83	3.97
相对根长	0.82	0.08	0.56	-0.29	0.65	0.94	9.72
相对地上部鲜重	0.32	0.09	0.43	0.91	0.19	0.50	29.85
相对地下部鲜重	0.45	0.10	-0.64	0.53	0.32	0.62	21.98
相对地上部干重	0.51	0.11	0.17	0.72	0.37	0.85	21.06
相对地下部干重	0.50	0.07	-0.66	-0.44	0.40	0.78	14.46
盐害等级	6	1.60	0.15	-1.29	3	7	26.60

性状	平均值	标准差	峰度	偏度	最小值	最大值	变异系数/%
相对苗高	0.76	0.03	-0.88	-0.28	0.69	0.83	3.97
相对根长	0.82	0.08	0.56	-0.29	0.65	0.94	9.72
相对地上部鲜重	0.32	0.09	0.43	0.91	0.19	0.50	29.85
相对地下部鲜重	0.45	0.10	-0.64	0.53	0.32	0.62	21.98
相对地上部干重	0.51	0.11	0.17	0.72	0.37	0.85	21.06
相对地下部干重	0.50	0.07	-0.66	-0.44	0.40	0.78	14.46
盐害等级	6	1.60	0.15	-1.29	3	7	26.60

	相对苗高	相对根长	相对地上部鲜重	相对地下部鲜重	相对地上部干重	相对地下部干重	盐害等级
相对苗高	1
相对根长	0.555	1
相对地上部鲜重	0.540	0.586^*	1
相对地下部鲜重	0.607^*	0.787^*	0.557^*	1
相对地上部干重	0.715^**	0.730^**	0.848^**	0.665^**	1
相对地下部干重	0.483	0.324	0.267	0.089	0.404	1
盐害等级	-0.573	-0.702^*	-0.919^**	-0.656^*	-0.880^**	-0.160	1