
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (31): 72-78.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0483
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Ning(
), LI Yajie, WANG Yongdong, LI Lili(
)
Received:2025-06-11
Revised:2025-09-23
Online:2025-11-05
Published:2025-11-07
ZHANG Ning, LI Yajie, WANG Yongdong, LI Lili. Soil Nutrition Content and Distribution of Apple Orchards in Loess Plateau of Eastern Gansu Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(31): 72-78.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0483
| 分级标准 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰富 | >40 | >2.0 | >40 | >200 |
| 较丰富 | 30~40 | 1.5~2.0 | 20~40 | 150~200 |
| 中等 | 20~30 | 1.0~1.5 | 10~20 | 100~150 |
| 较缺 | 10~20 | 0.75~1.0 | 5~10 | 50~100 |
| 缺 | 6~10 | 0.5~0.75 | 3~5 | 30~50 |
| 极缺 | <6 | <0.5 | <3 | <30 |
| 分级标准 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 丰富 | >40 | >2.0 | >40 | >200 |
| 较丰富 | 30~40 | 1.5~2.0 | 20~40 | 150~200 |
| 中等 | 20~30 | 1.0~1.5 | 10~20 | 100~150 |
| 较缺 | 10~20 | 0.75~1.0 | 5~10 | 50~100 |
| 缺 | 6~10 | 0.5~0.75 | 3~5 | 30~50 |
| 极缺 | <6 | <0.5 | <3 | <30 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 17.85 | 1.2170 | 106.73 | 367.45 |
| 标准差 | 4.35 | 0.3635 | 44.77 | 168.81 | |
| 最小值 | 12.08 | 0.8075 | 45.06 | 108.99 | |
| 最大值 | 24.73 | 2.1514 | 181.91 | 638.92 | |
| 变异系数/% | 24.37 | 29.87 | 41.95 | 45.94 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 11.41 | 0.9038 | 43.20 | 229.62 |
| 标准差 | 1.64 | 0.1789 | 22.26 | 127.58 | |
| 最小值 | 8.75 | 0.4981 | 14.83 | 63.93 | |
| 最大值 | 13.65 | 1.1055 | 81.14 | 515.50 | |
| 变异系数/% | 14.37 | 19.79 | 51.53 | 55.57 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 17.85 | 1.2170 | 106.73 | 367.45 |
| 标准差 | 4.35 | 0.3635 | 44.77 | 168.81 | |
| 最小值 | 12.08 | 0.8075 | 45.06 | 108.99 | |
| 最大值 | 24.73 | 2.1514 | 181.91 | 638.92 | |
| 变异系数/% | 24.37 | 29.87 | 41.95 | 45.94 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 11.41 | 0.9038 | 43.20 | 229.62 |
| 标准差 | 1.64 | 0.1789 | 22.26 | 127.58 | |
| 最小值 | 8.75 | 0.4981 | 14.83 | 63.93 | |
| 最大值 | 13.65 | 1.1055 | 81.14 | 515.50 | |
| 变异系数/% | 14.37 | 19.79 | 51.53 | 55.57 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 18.90 | 1.0471 | 57.80 | 430.18 |
| 标准差 | 4.99 | 0.2294 | 33.44 | 204.57 | |
| 最小值 | 11.48 | 0.7271 | 14.62 | 133.70 | |
| 最大值 | 29.97 | 1.4420 | 97.73 | 703.00 | |
| 变异系数/% | 26.40 | 21.91 | 57.85 | 47.55 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 12.79 | 0.8020 | 30.76 | 271.81 |
| 标准差 | 3.82 | 0.1506 | 18.03 | 129.35 | |
| 最小值 | 8.20 | 0.5674 | 7.67 | 90.82 | |
| 最大值 | 21.65 | 0.9658 | 65.47 | 455.90 | |
| 变异系数/% | 29.87 | 18.78 | 58.61 | 47.59 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 18.90 | 1.0471 | 57.80 | 430.18 |
| 标准差 | 4.99 | 0.2294 | 33.44 | 204.57 | |
| 最小值 | 11.48 | 0.7271 | 14.62 | 133.70 | |
| 最大值 | 29.97 | 1.4420 | 97.73 | 703.00 | |
| 变异系数/% | 26.40 | 21.91 | 57.85 | 47.55 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 12.79 | 0.8020 | 30.76 | 271.81 |
| 标准差 | 3.82 | 0.1506 | 18.03 | 129.35 | |
| 最小值 | 8.20 | 0.5674 | 7.67 | 90.82 | |
| 最大值 | 21.65 | 0.9658 | 65.47 | 455.90 | |
| 变异系数/% | 29.87 | 18.78 | 58.61 | 47.59 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 17.03 | 1.2015 | 46.95 | 503.76 | ||||
| 标准差 | 5.44 | 0.3673 | 38.47 | 192.46 | |||||
| 最小值 | 9.71 | 0.7974 | 18.26 | 218.29 | |||||
| 最大值 | 26.93 | 2.1194 | 142.68 | 824.53 | |||||
| 变异系数/% | 31.94 | 30.57 | 81.94 | 38.20 | |||||
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 10.96 | 0.9002 | 24.52 | 371.62 | ||||
| 标准差 | 3.32 | 0.2595 | 31.32 | 156.20 | |||||
| 最小值 | 6.62 | 0.6375 | 5.94 | 169.58 | |||||
| 最大值 | 16.91 | 1.4824 | 105.35 | 637.72 | |||||
| 变异系数/% | 30.29 | 28.83 | 127.73 | 42.03 | |||||
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 17.03 | 1.2015 | 46.95 | 503.76 | ||||
| 标准差 | 5.44 | 0.3673 | 38.47 | 192.46 | |||||
| 最小值 | 9.71 | 0.7974 | 18.26 | 218.29 | |||||
| 最大值 | 26.93 | 2.1194 | 142.68 | 824.53 | |||||
| 变异系数/% | 31.94 | 30.57 | 81.94 | 38.20 | |||||
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 10.96 | 0.9002 | 24.52 | 371.62 | ||||
| 标准差 | 3.32 | 0.2595 | 31.32 | 156.20 | |||||
| 最小值 | 6.62 | 0.6375 | 5.94 | 169.58 | |||||
| 最大值 | 16.91 | 1.4824 | 105.35 | 637.72 | |||||
| 变异系数/% | 30.29 | 28.83 | 127.73 | 42.03 | |||||
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 19.96 | 1.4347 | 71.97 | 456.85 |
| 标准差 | 7.50 | 0.2568 | 35.55 | 180.84 | |
| 最小值 | 12.54 | 1.1157 | 32.58 | 292.60 | |
| 最大值 | 38.53 | 1.8295 | 157.51 | 939.95 | |
| 变异系数/% | 37.58 | 17.90 | 49.40 | 39.58 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 13.18 | 1.0406 | 35.62 | 339.59 |
| 标准差 | 3.57 | 0.1350 | 23.18 | 96.97 | |
| 最小值 | 10.28 | 0.8466 | 11.61 | 233.73 | |
| 最大值 | 22.44 | 1.2555 | 90.20 | 519.68 | |
| 变异系数/% | 27.09 | 12.97 | 65.08 | 28.56 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 19.96 | 1.4347 | 71.97 | 456.85 |
| 标准差 | 7.50 | 0.2568 | 35.55 | 180.84 | |
| 最小值 | 12.54 | 1.1157 | 32.58 | 292.60 | |
| 最大值 | 38.53 | 1.8295 | 157.51 | 939.95 | |
| 变异系数/% | 37.58 | 17.90 | 49.40 | 39.58 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 13.18 | 1.0406 | 35.62 | 339.59 |
| 标准差 | 3.57 | 0.1350 | 23.18 | 96.97 | |
| 最小值 | 10.28 | 0.8466 | 11.61 | 233.73 | |
| 最大值 | 22.44 | 1.2555 | 90.20 | 519.68 | |
| 变异系数/% | 27.09 | 12.97 | 65.08 | 28.56 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 静宁 | 庄浪 | 泾川 | 灵台 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 8.18 | 8.33 | 8.20 | 8.20 |
| 标准差 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.13 | |
| 最小值 | 7.78 | 8.13 | 7.65 | 7.93 | |
| 最大值 | 8.41 | 8.48 | 8.39 | 8.34 | |
| 变异系数/% | 2.32 | 1.57 | 2.69 | 1.64 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 8.12 | 8.25 | 8.10 | 8.19 |
| 标准差 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.11 | |
| 最小值 | 7.67 | 7.87 | 7.60 | 7.99 | |
| 最大值 | 8.35 | 8.42 | 8.36 | 8.35 | |
| 变异系数/% | 2.63 | 2.31 | 3.40 | 1.36 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 静宁 | 庄浪 | 泾川 | 灵台 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值 | 8.18 | 8.33 | 8.20 | 8.20 |
| 标准差 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.13 | |
| 最小值 | 7.78 | 8.13 | 7.65 | 7.93 | |
| 最大值 | 8.41 | 8.48 | 8.39 | 8.34 | |
| 变异系数/% | 2.32 | 1.57 | 2.69 | 1.64 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值 | 8.12 | 8.25 | 8.10 | 8.19 |
| 标准差 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.11 | |
| 最小值 | 7.67 | 7.87 | 7.60 | 7.99 | |
| 最大值 | 8.35 | 8.42 | 8.36 | 8.35 | |
| 变异系数/% | 2.63 | 2.31 | 3.40 | 1.36 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 静宁 | 庄浪 | 泾川 | 灵台 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值/(μS/cm) | 307.12 | 279.60 | 188.39 | 132.17 |
| 标准差/(μS/cm) | 244.33 | 208.32 | 185.88 | 39.66 | |
| 最小值/(μS/cm) | 102.10 | 110.00 | 104.85 | 76.05 | |
| 最大值/(μS/cm) | 906.50 | 643.00 | 681.00 | 215.00 | |
| 变异系数/% | 79.55 | 74.51 | 98.67 | 30.01 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值/(μS/cm) | 399.32 | 284.88 | 250.56 | 203.50 |
| 标准差/(μS/cm) | 307.62 | 211.80 | 272.47 | 165.10 | |
| 最小值/(μS/cm) | 108.85 | 119.15 | 101.00 | 109.25 | |
| 最大值/(μS/cm) | 1110.00 | 724.50 | 928.00 | 660.00 | |
| 变异系数/% | 77.04 | 74.35 | 108.74 | 81.13 |
| 土层/cm | 项目 | 静宁 | 庄浪 | 泾川 | 灵台 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~20 | 平均值/(μS/cm) | 307.12 | 279.60 | 188.39 | 132.17 |
| 标准差/(μS/cm) | 244.33 | 208.32 | 185.88 | 39.66 | |
| 最小值/(μS/cm) | 102.10 | 110.00 | 104.85 | 76.05 | |
| 最大值/(μS/cm) | 906.50 | 643.00 | 681.00 | 215.00 | |
| 变异系数/% | 79.55 | 74.51 | 98.67 | 30.01 | |
| 20~40 | 平均值/(μS/cm) | 399.32 | 284.88 | 250.56 | 203.50 |
| 标准差/(μS/cm) | 307.62 | 211.80 | 272.47 | 165.10 | |
| 最小值/(μS/cm) | 108.85 | 119.15 | 101.00 | 109.25 | |
| 最大值/(μS/cm) | 1110.00 | 724.50 | 928.00 | 660.00 | |
| 变异系数/% | 77.04 | 74.35 | 108.74 | 81.13 |
| [1] |
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05914-9 pmid: 28710438 |
| [2] |
聂胜委, 黄绍敏, 张水清, 等. 长期定位施肥对作物效应的研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(4):979-987.
|
| [3] |
赵佐平, 同延安, 刘芬, 等. 长期不同施肥处理对苹果产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(11):3091-3098.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
胡道春, 金龙, 武瑞婵. 黄土高原苹果园施肥现状调查分析[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2017, 63(11):44-49.
|
| [6] |
葛顺峰, 郝文强, 姜翰, 等. 烟台苹果产区土壤有机质和pH分布特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(13):274-278.
|
| [7] |
姚志龙, 李科, 吴健君, 等. 陇东旱塬苹果园土壤主要肥力性状研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(27):132-140.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16020001 |
| [8] |
何美美, 杨明霞, 刘政海, 等. 山西晋中太谷苹果园土壤肥力现状评价[J]. 果树资源学报, 2022, 3(6):41-44.
|
| [9] |
于年文, 刘志, 王宏, 等. 义县苹果园土壤养分状况分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(2):650-654.
|
| [10] |
黄国嫣, 龚占斌, 王进, 等. 西南冷凉高地昭通苹果园土壤养分现状分析与评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(23):66-71.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18030117 |
| [11] |
张进, 吴发启, 张扬, 等. 渭北优质苹果种植区土壤养分调查与评价[J]. 西北农业学报, 2011, 20(1):102-108.
|
| [12] |
李序进. 不同种植年限天水花牛苹果园土壤碳、氮组分变化特征[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021.
|
| [13] |
闫敏, 李磊, 陈晓斌, 等. 山西省乔化苹果园土壤养分分布现状调查分析[J]. 中国果树, 2021(6):80-85.
|
| [14] |
刘小勇, 张坤, 董铁, 等. 陇东旱塬苹果园养分状况的测定与分析[J]. 经济林研究, 2010, 28(1):73-77.
|
| [15] |
刘小勇, 董铁, 张坤, 等. 甘肃陇东旱塬不同树龄苹果园矿质氮的分布和积累特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(3):796-800.
|
| [16] |
白勇龙, 王远东, 张正军, 等. 甘肃正宁苹果园土壤养分测定分析[J]. 现代园艺, 2012(19):14-15.
|
| [17] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
郑朝霞, 王颖, 石磊, 等. 陕西省苹果主产区土壤有机质、氮磷钾养分含量与分布特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5):1191-1198.
|
| [20] |
王红叶, 鲁兴凯, 赵伟丽, 等. 西南冷凉高地苹果园土壤养分状况分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(3):209-213.
|
| [21] |
doi: 10.1080/01904160701615483 URL |
| [22] |
邵蕾, 张民, 陈学森, 等. 控释氮肥对土壤和苹果树氮含量及苹果产量的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007, 34(1):43-46.
|
| [23] |
张丽娜, 李军, 范鹏, 等. 黄土高原典型苹果园地深层土壤氮磷钾养分含量与分布特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(6):1907-1915.
|
| [24] |
赵旸, 李卓, 刘明, 等. 中国苹果主产区2006—2016年磷元素收支及其环境风险变化[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(12):2779-2787.
|
| [25] |
孙琛梅, 程冬冬, 杨越超, 等. 土壤肥力质量与苹果生长、产量及品质关系的研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(2):207-215.
|
| [1] | WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, LU Xiaohong, JIN Shuquan. Biological Effects of Trichoderma W1 Bio-organic Fertilizer on Coastal Tomato Planting [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(7): 100-106. |
| [2] | LI Xianghua, FAN Caiying, XU Qin, HOU Jian, WANG Hui, LIU Yanyan, WANG Heng, LIU Guangya, HAN Wei. Effects of Different Maize and Soybean Planting Patterns on Crop Yield, Economic Benefit and Soil Nutrient [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(6): 22-28. |
| [3] | LIU Xiangrong, TANG Yun, ZHU Wei, XIAO Zhixiang, HE Liwei, NING Zhuo, WANG Hexin, DING Chunxia. Nutrient Abundance and Comprehensive Fertility Evaluation of Tobacco Planting Soil in Shaoyang [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(30): 113-121. |
| [4] | ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Ling. Research on Status of Cotton Straw Crushing and Decomposition in Xinjiang Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(3): 48-58. |
| [5] | YANG Qiuping, PAN Peng, LIU Yingzi, DING Yang, YANG Dong, MIAO Yu, SUN Han. Study on Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Spatial Differentiation in Green Rice Growing Areas of Jilin Province: Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Multi-index Geographic Information System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(28): 87-93. |
| [6] | ZHOU Xiaofeng, LI Jiaqi, ZHANG Lijun, LIN Haidong, LIN Xiaoxing, LI Xiang, YANG Xiping, HU Yajie. Effects of Magnesium Fertilization on Calcium and Magnesium Nutrients and Softness of Flue-cured Tobacco in Jingxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 36-43. |
| [7] | LIU Naijia, SA Rula, YANG Hengshan, TAI Jicheng, WU Yunlong. Effect of Application Periods of Straw Composting Agent on Soil Fertility and Soil Enzyme Activity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 79-84. |
| [8] | CHENG Wen, DING Rongrong, ZHANG Limin, WANG Guoping, WANG Haijuan. Analysis on Soil Nutrient Content Characteristics of Continuous High Yield Cotton Fields in 7th Division Reclamation Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(27): 94-98. |
| [9] | TENZIN Tarchen, TUDENG Qunpei, CI Zhen, YIXI Yangzong, NIMA Cangjue, SANG Dan, DORJEEH Tondrob. Effects of Plantation Duration on Soil Nutrient Level and Microbial Community Characteristics of Alfalfa Artificial Grassland in Xizang River Valley Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(24): 69-78. |
| [10] | ZHANG Nan, PAN Xue, LIU Jie, YU Hongjiu, ZHANG Bo, DU Hailun, LIU Fengman, HAO Shuai. Response of Soil Nutrients and Microbial Communities to Increased Application of Mushroom Dreg in Albic Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 49-55. |
| [11] | TANG Xu, TIAN Hui, ZHANG Haoran, CHAI Guohua, WU Xiuwen. Effects of Exogenous L-aspartic Acid Nano-calcium on Physical and Chemical Properties and Microbial Community Distribution in Cadmium Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(2): 98-108. |
| [12] | FAN Jingjing, LUO Xinghua, LI Wanqiu, CHEN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Xinhua. Variation Characteristics of Soil Nutrients in Tomato Protected Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(14): 68-73. |
| [13] | TIAN Xiaoqin, LI Zhuo, LIU Yonghong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Urea on Soil Nutrient, Respiration and Rape Yield in Dryland Purple Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(13): 13-18. |
| [14] | ZHANG Guangdong, SHANG Zhiwei, ZHAO Mengdi, YANG Chunhua, WANG Ting, RUAN Haiming, ZHANG Xuefeng, ZHOU Fangfang. Analysis of Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil pH and Its Potential Regulatory Factorsin in Tobacco Planting Areas of Shiping County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(12): 80-87. |
| [15] | QIN Xinke, LI Qi, LI Yuhang, ZHANG Huiyuan, HE Changlong, HUANG Xinrui, ZHANG Weizhen, LEI Ningfei, PEI Xiangjun. Impact of “Moss-Algae-SJP” on Restoration of Biological Soil Crusts in Sandy Land [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(11): 64-73. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||