Effects of Castor Bean Microbial Enzyme Biological Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0655

Abstract

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of castor bean microbial enzyme biological fertilizer on the growth, fruit yield, and quality of tomato plants, a pot experiment was conducted using cherry tomato varieties as experimental materials. A total of five treatments including no fertilization (CK), chemical fertilizer (HF, 4 g/plant) and three different application gradients [20 g/plant(BF₁), 40 g/plant(BF₂), 80 g/plant(BF₃)] of castor bean microbial enzyme biological fertilizer were set up. The results showed that compared with CK, the plant height of tomato plants treated with BF₃ during the fruiting and harvesting periods increased by 16.82%-20.23%. During the fruiting period, the stem diameter of BF₂ treatment increased by 34.04%, and during the harvesting period, the stem diameter of BF₁ treatment increased by 41.30%. Fruit weight and number of fruits per plant of BF₁ treatment were the best during the harvesting period, and the average yield per plant increased by 496.98%. The content of vitamin C, soluble sugar, soluble protein, and soluble solids in tomatoes treated with BF₃ increased by 28.57%, 63.49%, 77.43% and 16.43%, respectively. The dry matter mass of roots, stems and leaves showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of application rate of castor bean microbial enzyme biological fertilizer. 20 g/plant of castor bean microbial enzyme biological fertilizer has a significant promoting effect on the growth and yield of tomato plants, while 80 g/plant of castor bean microbial enzyme biological fertilizer has the best effect on the fruit quality of tomato plants.

Key words: castor bean microbial enzyme biological fertilizer, cherry tomato, potted plant, growth, dry matter, yield, quality

WANG Cheng, LI Guorui, DI Jianjun, LUO Rui, LI Mingjing, HUANG Fenglan. Effects of Castor Bean Microbial Enzyme Biological Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 69-75.

Figures/Tables 6

References 30

[1]	姚远, 李凤山, 陈永胜, 等. 国内外蓖麻研究进展[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 24(2):172-175.
[2]	王万龙. 大力发展蓖麻种植积极推广蓖麻杂交种[J]. 中国种业, 2012(4):74-75.
[3]	包春光, 黄凤兰, 朱国立, 等. 蓖麻种子性状的研究进展[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2014(6):102-104.
[4]	黄廷廷, 李久明, 春英, 等. 关于蓖麻饼粕在饲料方面的研究浅析[J]. 山东工业技术, 2015(10):206-207.
[5]	张智勇, 倪娜, 李国瑞, 等. 蓖麻及其衍生制品在食品工业中应用的研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2012, 33(22):428-431.
[6]	冀照君, 李华, 贾娟霞, 等. 蓖麻饼粕中有效成分的开发利用前景[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(32):170-171.
[7]	冀照君, 穆莎茉莉, 张继星, 等. 蓖麻饼粕蛋白酶解及毒素去除工艺研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(10):156-159.
[8]	李敬忠, 张宝贤, 杨云峰, 等. 蓖麻饼粕的开发利用[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(7):235-237.
[9]	袁朴芳, 文艳鹏, 霍玉淼, 等. 蓖麻饼粕综合开发利用研究进展[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2022, 25(11):73-76.
[10]	NOVAES M A S, VELOSO C M, SIQUEIRA O H, et al. Use of castor bean meal, biodiesel industry coproduct, in a lamb production system using creep-feeding in Brazil[J]. Animals, 2020, 10(8):1250.
[11]	LIMA A C R, SILVA R R, Teixeira F A, et al. Detoxified castor-bean meal replaces soybean meal in the diet of pasture-finished steers[J]. Chilean journal of agricultural research, 2022, 82(3):371-379.
[12]	LIMA R L, SEVERINO L S, SAMPAIO L R, et al. Blends of castor meal and castor husks for optimized use as organic fertilizer[J]. Industrial crops and products, 2011, 33(2):364-368.
[13]	王凡. 蓖麻饼粕与无机肥配施对玉米和油菜生长及产量的影响研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015.
[14]	李星星. 药用植物蓖麻加工产物对大豆和玉米早期生长的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[15]	马玉露, 宋秋玲, 王云. 蓖麻饼粕对茄子和红干椒的肥效研究[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2013(1):38-41.
[16]	李明静, 罗蕊, 梁啸天, 等. 蓖麻饼粕有机肥不同施肥量对花生田土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2023, 52(3):1-11.
[17]	刘贵锋, 白文斌, 赵建武, 等. 绿色有机肥料的开发与研制[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(1):224-225.
[18]	曹荣利, 王献杰, 密其鹏, 等. 不同蓖麻饼施用量对菌渣基质栽培有机番茄生长及产量的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(4):41-43.
[19]	郑少文. 富碳促进番茄生长的生理及分子机制研究[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2023.
[20]	费聪, 徐刚. 水氮互作对盆栽番茄生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(9):18-23.
[21]	黄凤兰, 李国瑞, 狄建军, 等. 包装贴纸(蓖麻饼粕肥发酵菌剂)[P]. 中国专利,ZL202230312727.9,2022-08-23.
[22]	赵学敬. 蓖麻饼粕的肥用与饲源开发[J]. 粮食流通技术, 2007(5):43-45.
[23]	李宣志, 张金珠, 王振华, 等. 水-肥-盐耦合对滴灌加工番茄生长和产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(4):133-140.
[24]	徐大兵, 焦忠久, 佀国涵, 等. 氮肥优化对高山避雨栽培番茄产量和养分利用率的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2022(5):41-46.
[25]	LAUFER D, NIELSEN O, WILTING P, et al. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of fodder and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in contrasting environments of northwestern Europe[J]. European journal of agronomy, 2016,73:124-132.
[26]	尹志荣, 柯英, 蔡进军. 水肥耦合对设施番茄土壤水分、养分运移及产量和水分利用效率影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(6):33-44.
[27]	王雪蓉, 张润芝, 李淑敏, 等. 不同供氮水平下玉米/大豆间作体系干物质积累和氮素吸收动态模拟[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(9):1354-1363.
[28]	尚永盼, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 等. 绿洲灌区绿肥还田利用方式对玉米干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3):686-694. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.33031
[29]	许俊锋, 杨蓉, 詹发强, 等. 有机-无机液体复合肥功能菌筛选及对设施番茄品质、生理活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7):1758-1766. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.023
[30]	韩顺斌, 华军, 马丽君, 等. 黄腐酸微生物菌剂和蚯蚓粪配施对日光温室番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2020(14):15-17.

处理	施用量/(g/株)	养分含量/(g/kg)
处理	施用量/(g/株)	氮	磷	钾
HF	4	0.600	0.600	0.600
BF1	20	0.870	0.053	0.188
BF2	40	1.740	0.106	0.376
BF3	80	3.480	0.212	0.752

处理	施用量/(g/株)	养分含量/(g/kg)
处理	施用量/(g/株)	氮	磷	钾
HF	4	0.600	0.600	0.600
BF1	20	0.870	0.053	0.188
BF2	40	1.740	0.106	0.376
BF3	80	3.480	0.212	0.752

处理	根长/cm	根鲜重/g	根干重/g	茎鲜重/g	茎干重/g	叶鲜重/g	叶干重/g
CK	55.13±4.75ab	4.97±0.93b	0.38±0.02c	18.40±4.06b	3.33±1.68b	9.80±3.38d	1.36±0.49c
HF	60.70±11.23ab	7.44±2.46b	0.65±0.23ab	30.23±13.40ab	4.00±2.36b	41.80±11.51b	4.56±1.54b
BF1	58.50±8.53ab	6.56±1.14b	0.50±0.09bc	32.50±8.93ab	3.88±1.08b	55.27±1.22b	5.99±0.05ab
BF2	71.67±17.56a	11.30±2.07a	0.79±0.16a	42.80±2.39a	5.11±0.29a	68.43±4.38a	6.81±0.41a
BF3	40.77±5.78b	5.00±1.08b	0.39±0.08c	24.47±9.15b	2.89±1.23b	44.47±1.72bc	4.91±0.19b

处理	根长/cm	根鲜重/g	根干重/g	茎鲜重/g	茎干重/g	叶鲜重/g	叶干重/g
CK	55.13±4.75ab	4.97±0.93b	0.38±0.02c	18.40±4.06b	3.33±1.68b	9.80±3.38d	1.36±0.49c
HF	60.70±11.23ab	7.44±2.46b	0.65±0.23ab	30.23±13.40ab	4.00±2.36b	41.80±11.51b	4.56±1.54b
BF1	58.50±8.53ab	6.56±1.14b	0.50±0.09bc	32.50±8.93ab	3.88±1.08b	55.27±1.22b	5.99±0.05ab
BF2	71.67±17.56a	11.30±2.07a	0.79±0.16a	42.80±2.39a	5.11±0.29a	68.43±4.38a	6.81±0.41a
BF3	40.77±5.78b	5.00±1.08b	0.39±0.08c	24.47±9.15b	2.89±1.23b	44.47±1.72bc	4.91±0.19b

处理	单果重/g	单株结果数	平均单株产量/g	果实纵径/cm	果实横径/cm	果形指数
CK	8.85±0.26a	9.11±0.69e	80.07±6.07e	2.43±0.07c	2.54±0.08b	0.96±0.01c
HF	9.03±0.20a	14.00±1.58d	126.60±16.36d	2.50±0.09bc	2.43±0.08b	1.03±0.01b
BF1	10.12±0.41a	46.80±1.30a	478.00±18.96a	2.71±0.07b	2.54±0.16b	1.07±0.04a
BF2	11.41±0.64b	29.86±2.24b	340.78±25.52b	2.76±0.14b	2.56±0.13b	1.08±0.02ab
BF3	14.13±2.05c	19.35±1.00c	273.40±14.18c	3.03±0.13a	2.77±0.08a	1.10±0.02ab