Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (15): 7-13.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0396
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Meiling1(), Liu Yue1, Chen Tingting1, Zou Juan2(
), Shi Wenqi1, Zeng Fansong1, Gong Shuangjun1, Huang Zhenyu3, Liu Wei1, Yang Lijun1(
), Yu Dazhao1
Received:
2020-08-25
Revised:
2020-11-16
Online:
2021-05-25
Published:
2021-05-18
Contact:
Zou Juan,Yang Lijun
E-mail:LML1593298753@163.com;zoujuan1010@163.com;yanglijun1993@163.com
CLC Number:
Liu Meiling, Liu Yue, Chen Tingting, Zou Juan, Shi Wenqi, Zeng Fansong, Gong Shuangjun, Huang Zhenyu, Liu Wei, Yang Lijun, Yu Dazhao. Rice Straw Biochar: Effects on Nutrient Absorption and Yield of Wheat in Jianghan Plain[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(15): 7-13.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0396
处理 | 籽粒 | 茎叶 | 氮总积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮含量/% | 氮积累量/(kg/hm2) | 氮含量/% | 氮积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
A1 | 1.77 a | 202.4±14.1 ab | 0.47 ab | 70.3±5.0 a | 272.6±17.5 a | |
A2 | 1.77 a | 215.6±17.3 a | 0.48 ab | 66.9±5.2 ab | 282.5±21.5 a | |
B1 | 1.86 a | 214.4±11.6 a | 0.51 ab | 66.1±1.7 ab | 280.5±13.6 a | |
B2 | 1.75 a | 207.3±11.4 ab | 0.54 a | 66.7±3.9 ab | 274.0±12.6 a | |
A1+B1 | 1.76 a | 219.6±14.3 a | 0.46 ab | 65.4±2.9 ab | 285.0±20.4 a | |
A2+B2 | 1.84 a | 221.5±16.0 a | 0.50 ab | 70.4±5.6 a | 291.9±21.6 a | |
CK | 1.74 a | 184.1±15.8 b | 0.44 b | 62.9±2.5 b | 246.9±18.7 b |
处理 | 籽粒 | 茎叶 | 氮总积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
氮含量/% | 氮积累量/(kg/hm2) | 氮含量/% | 氮积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
A1 | 1.77 a | 202.4±14.1 ab | 0.47 ab | 70.3±5.0 a | 272.6±17.5 a | |
A2 | 1.77 a | 215.6±17.3 a | 0.48 ab | 66.9±5.2 ab | 282.5±21.5 a | |
B1 | 1.86 a | 214.4±11.6 a | 0.51 ab | 66.1±1.7 ab | 280.5±13.6 a | |
B2 | 1.75 a | 207.3±11.4 ab | 0.54 a | 66.7±3.9 ab | 274.0±12.6 a | |
A1+B1 | 1.76 a | 219.6±14.3 a | 0.46 ab | 65.4±2.9 ab | 285.0±20.4 a | |
A2+B2 | 1.84 a | 221.5±16.0 a | 0.50 ab | 70.4±5.6 a | 291.9±21.6 a | |
CK | 1.74 a | 184.1±15.8 b | 0.44 b | 62.9±2.5 b | 246.9±18.7 b |
处理 | 籽粒 | 茎叶 | 磷总积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
磷含量/% | 磷积累量/(kg/hm2) | 磷含量/% | 磷积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
A1 | 0.36 a | 42.1±2.4 bc | 0.09 a | 12.8±2.3 a | 54.9±4.3 ab | |
A2 | 0.40 a | 46.5±3.0 a | 0.09 a | 14.1±3.0 a | 59.2±5.8 a | |
B1 | 0.41 a | 47.1±4.0 a | 0.08 a | 10.6±2.0 a | 57.7±5.9 ab | |
B2 | 0.40 a | 45.4±3.4 ab | 0.09 a | 11.7±1.5 a | 57.1±4.5 ab | |
A1+B1 | 0.41 a | 42.6±1.0 bc | 0.09 a | 12.7±1.6 a | 55.3±3.3 ab | |
A2+B2 | 0.40 a | 46.3±2.8 a | 0.09 a | 14.8±2.9 a | 62.5±5.7 a | |
CK | 0.35 a | 39.3±3.8 c | 0.08 a | 11.0±2.1 a | 50.4±5.0 b |
处理 | 籽粒 | 茎叶 | 磷总积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
磷含量/% | 磷积累量/(kg/hm2) | 磷含量/% | 磷积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
A1 | 0.36 a | 42.1±2.4 bc | 0.09 a | 12.8±2.3 a | 54.9±4.3 ab | |
A2 | 0.40 a | 46.5±3.0 a | 0.09 a | 14.1±3.0 a | 59.2±5.8 a | |
B1 | 0.41 a | 47.1±4.0 a | 0.08 a | 10.6±2.0 a | 57.7±5.9 ab | |
B2 | 0.40 a | 45.4±3.4 ab | 0.09 a | 11.7±1.5 a | 57.1±4.5 ab | |
A1+B1 | 0.41 a | 42.6±1.0 bc | 0.09 a | 12.7±1.6 a | 55.3±3.3 ab | |
A2+B2 | 0.40 a | 46.3±2.8 a | 0.09 a | 14.8±2.9 a | 62.5±5.7 a | |
CK | 0.35 a | 39.3±3.8 c | 0.08 a | 11.0±2.1 a | 50.4±5.0 b |
处理 | 籽粒 | 茎叶 | 钾总积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钾含量/% | 钾积累量/(kg/hm2) | 钾含量/% | 钾积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
A1 | 0.44 a | 50.7±1.4 ab | 1.53 a | 211.5±15.4ab | 262.2±16.4 ab | |
A2 | 0.45 a | 53.2±2.9 a | 1.45 ab | 227.2±18.4 a | 280.4±20.6 a | |
B1 | 0.46 a | 51.5±2.7 ab | 1.55 a | 224.2±11.5 a | 275.7±13.5 a | |
B2 | 0.47 a | 52.5±1.4 a | 1.36 bc | 196.1±6.1b | 248.6±10.0 b | |
A1+B1 | 0.46 a | 52.8±1.4 a | 1.29 c | 210.8±11.2 ab | 263.7±11.8 ab | |
A2+B2 | 0.43 a | 54.2±1.4 a | 1.52 a | 226.1±15.5 a | 280.4±16.7 a | |
CK | 0.43 a | 48.2±2.4 b | 1.23 c | 198.5± 09.0 b | 246.7±11.3 b |
处理 | 籽粒 | 茎叶 | 钾总积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钾含量/% | 钾积累量/(kg/hm2) | 钾含量/% | 钾积累量/(kg/hm2) | |||
A1 | 0.44 a | 50.7±1.4 ab | 1.53 a | 211.5±15.4ab | 262.2±16.4 ab | |
A2 | 0.45 a | 53.2±2.9 a | 1.45 ab | 227.2±18.4 a | 280.4±20.6 a | |
B1 | 0.46 a | 51.5±2.7 ab | 1.55 a | 224.2±11.5 a | 275.7±13.5 a | |
B2 | 0.47 a | 52.5±1.4 a | 1.36 bc | 196.1±6.1b | 248.6±10.0 b | |
A1+B1 | 0.46 a | 52.8±1.4 a | 1.29 c | 210.8±11.2 ab | 263.7±11.8 ab | |
A2+B2 | 0.43 a | 54.2±1.4 a | 1.52 a | 226.1±15.5 a | 280.4±16.7 a | |
CK | 0.43 a | 48.2±2.4 b | 1.23 c | 198.5± 09.0 b | 246.7±11.3 b |
处理 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 全氮/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 7.12±0.03 d | 38.4±4.5 ab | 39.8±2.1 ab | 210.1±11.2 a | 0.26±0.03 b |
A2 | 7.30±0.03 c | 43.1±4.1 ab | 32.3±3.6 bc | 198.7±13.6 a | 0.27±0.01 b |
B1 | 7.34±0.02 bc | 37.0±1.4 b | 37.7±3.5 ab | 210.1±06.6 a | 0.26±0.01 b |
B2 | 7.42±0.01 ab | 40.5±6.3 ab | 36.2±1.9 b | 219.0±13.6 a | 0.26±0.02 b |
A1+B1 | 7.44±0.04 a | 45.7±5.9 ab | 43.5±5.8 a | 225.3±14.9 a | 0.28±0.01 b |
A2+B2 | 7.47±0.05 a | 51.9±3.3 a | 43.6±6.5 a | 224.7±16.8 a | 0.28±0.03 b |
CK | 6.48±0.01 e | 35.8±2.4 b | 34.6±2.1 bc | 182.8±11.7 a | 0.26±0.01 b |
处理 | pH | 有机质/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 全氮/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 7.12±0.03 d | 38.4±4.5 ab | 39.8±2.1 ab | 210.1±11.2 a | 0.26±0.03 b |
A2 | 7.30±0.03 c | 43.1±4.1 ab | 32.3±3.6 bc | 198.7±13.6 a | 0.27±0.01 b |
B1 | 7.34±0.02 bc | 37.0±1.4 b | 37.7±3.5 ab | 210.1±06.6 a | 0.26±0.01 b |
B2 | 7.42±0.01 ab | 40.5±6.3 ab | 36.2±1.9 b | 219.0±13.6 a | 0.26±0.02 b |
A1+B1 | 7.44±0.04 a | 45.7±5.9 ab | 43.5±5.8 a | 225.3±14.9 a | 0.28±0.01 b |
A2+B2 | 7.47±0.05 a | 51.9±3.3 a | 43.6±6.5 a | 224.7±16.8 a | 0.28±0.03 b |
CK | 6.48±0.01 e | 35.8±2.4 b | 34.6±2.1 bc | 182.8±11.7 a | 0.26±0.01 b |
处理 | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 结实率/% | 公顷穗数/万 | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 81.5±1.3a | 6.6±0.2b | 94.9±2.1 a | 466.5±57.0 a | 27.3±2.4a | 40.8±1.5 a |
A2 | 83.3±2.1a | 6.6±0.4b | 93.2±1.2 a | 436.5±24.0 a | 27.5±1.1a | 39.6±2.8 a |
B1 | 80.7±1.9a | 6.6±0.2b | 92.9±0.8 a | 468.0±31.5 a | 29.2±1.7a | 40.8±1.8 a |
B2 | 80.6±1.7a | 6.6±0.2b | 94.5±3.1 a | 450.0±51.0 a | 28.2±1.2a | 40.3±2.3 a |
A1+B1 | 80.3±1.1a | 6.9±0.3ab | 94.8±1.4 a | 447.0±43.6 a | 26.3±1.9a | 40.9±1.3 a |
A2+B2 | 80.5±1.9a | 6.5±0.2b | 93.9±1.9 a | 457..5±61.5 a | 25.9±1.8a | 42.5±1.3 a |
CK | 78.2±1.3b | 7.1±0.2a | 92.1±0.3 a | 451.5±54.0 a | 28.1±1.1a | 33.7±2.2 b |
处理 | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 结实率/% | 公顷穗数/万 | 穗粒数/粒 | 千粒重/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 81.5±1.3a | 6.6±0.2b | 94.9±2.1 a | 466.5±57.0 a | 27.3±2.4a | 40.8±1.5 a |
A2 | 83.3±2.1a | 6.6±0.4b | 93.2±1.2 a | 436.5±24.0 a | 27.5±1.1a | 39.6±2.8 a |
B1 | 80.7±1.9a | 6.6±0.2b | 92.9±0.8 a | 468.0±31.5 a | 29.2±1.7a | 40.8±1.8 a |
B2 | 80.6±1.7a | 6.6±0.2b | 94.5±3.1 a | 450.0±51.0 a | 28.2±1.2a | 40.3±2.3 a |
A1+B1 | 80.3±1.1a | 6.9±0.3ab | 94.8±1.4 a | 447.0±43.6 a | 26.3±1.9a | 40.9±1.3 a |
A2+B2 | 80.5±1.9a | 6.5±0.2b | 93.9±1.9 a | 457..5±61.5 a | 25.9±1.8a | 42.5±1.3 a |
CK | 78.2±1.3b | 7.1±0.2a | 92.1±0.3 a | 451.5±54.0 a | 28.1±1.1a | 33.7±2.2 b |
处理 | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 生物学产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数(kg/kg) | 实际产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 5 857.7±275.2 bc | 13 396.6±315.2 b | 0.55±0.2 a | 4 564.5±300.2 ab |
A2 | 5 915.1±188.6 b | 13 404.8±298.5 b | 0.55±0.1 a | 4 701.1±271.1 a |
B1 | 6 882.8±310.4 a | 14 603.5±318.7 a | 0.59±0.2 a | 4 383.2±298.5 ab |
B2 | 5 015.8±263.4 d | 11 668.4±256.3 c | 0.54±0.1 a | 4 467.2±391.4 ab |
A1+B1 | 5 712.7±267.3 bc | 12 729.2±379.4 bc | 0.56±0.2 a | 4 450.5±422.6 ab |
A2+B2 | 6 090.9±200.4 b | 13 189.6±267.5 bc | 0.58±0.1 a | 5 104.5±375.5 a |
CK | 5 524.6±211.8 cd | 13 023.9±256.3 bc | 0.53±0.1 a | 3 940.5±250.5 b |
处理 | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 生物学产量/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数(kg/kg) | 实际产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 5 857.7±275.2 bc | 13 396.6±315.2 b | 0.55±0.2 a | 4 564.5±300.2 ab |
A2 | 5 915.1±188.6 b | 13 404.8±298.5 b | 0.55±0.1 a | 4 701.1±271.1 a |
B1 | 6 882.8±310.4 a | 14 603.5±318.7 a | 0.59±0.2 a | 4 383.2±298.5 ab |
B2 | 5 015.8±263.4 d | 11 668.4±256.3 c | 0.54±0.1 a | 4 467.2±391.4 ab |
A1+B1 | 5 712.7±267.3 bc | 12 729.2±379.4 bc | 0.56±0.2 a | 4 450.5±422.6 ab |
A2+B2 | 6 090.9±200.4 b | 13 189.6±267.5 bc | 0.58±0.1 a | 5 104.5±375.5 a |
CK | 5 524.6±211.8 cd | 13 023.9±256.3 bc | 0.53±0.1 a | 3 940.5±250.5 b |
[1] | 宋延静, 龚骏. 施用生物质炭对土壤生态系统功能的影响[J]. 鲁东大学学报:自然科学版, 2010(4):361-365. |
[2] | Ojeda G, Mattana S, àvila, Anna, et al. Are soil-water functions affected by biochar application?[J]. Geoderma, 2015, 249-250:1-11. |
[3] |
Lehmann J, Rillig M C, Thies J, et al. Biochar effects on soil biota-A review[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011,43(9):1812-1836.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 URL |
[4] |
Wrobeltobiszewska A, Boersma M, Sargison J, et al. Nutrient changes in potting mix and Eucalyptus nitens leaf tissue under macadamia biochar amendments[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018,29(2):1-11.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0460-1 URL |
[5] | 刘玉学, 唐旭, 杨生茂, 等. 生物炭对土壤磷素转化的影响及其机理研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(6):1690-1695. |
[6] | 陈温福, 张伟明, 孟军. 农用生物炭研究进展与前景[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(16):3324-3333. |
[7] | Li S, Shangguan Z. Positive effects of apple branch biochar on wheat yield only appear at a low application rate, regardless of nitrogen and water conditions[J]. Journal of soil & sediments, 2018,18(11):3235-3243. |
[8] | 刘欢欢, 董宁禹, 柴升, 等. 生态炭肥防控小麦根腐病效果及对土壤健康修复机理分析[J]. 植物保护学报, 2015,42(4):504-509. |
[9] | 王典, 张祥, 朱盼, 等. 添加生物质炭对黄棕壤和红壤上油菜生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(3):63-67. |
[10] | Zwieten L V, Kimber S, Morris S, et al. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility[J]. Plant & Soil, 2010,327(s1-2):235-246. |
[11] | Kloss S, Zehetner F, Oburger E, et al. Trace element concentrations in leachates and mustard plant tissue (Sinapis alba L.) after biochar application to temperate soils[J]. ence of the Total Environment, 2014,481(may 15):498-508. |
[12] | 薛超群, 杨立均, 王建伟. 生物质炭用量对烤烟烟叶净光合速率和香味物质含量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2015,48(5):19-22. |
[13] | 阚正荣, 马守田, 祁剑英, 等. 施用生物炭对冬小麦光合潜力和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019,39(6):719-727. |
[14] |
Madari B E, Mellissa A S S, Márcia T M C, et al. Properties of a sandy clay loam Haplic Ferralsol and soybean grain yield in a five-year field trial as affected by biochar amendment[J]. Geoderma, 2017,305:100-112.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.029 URL |
[15] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[16] | 周应军. 联合收割机收获条件下小麦理论产量和实收产量的比较[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2017,5:79 |
[17] | 刘红恩, 张胜男, 刘世亮, 等. 腐植酸尿素对冬小麦产量、养分吸收利用和土壤养分的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(7):944-952. |
[18] |
Mohan D, Abhishek K, Sarswat A, et al. Biochar production and applications in soil fertility and carbon sequestration-a sustainable solution to crop-residue burning in India[J]. RSC Advances, 2018,8(1):508-520.
doi: 10.1039/C7RA10353K URL |
[19] | 姜佰文, 许欣桐, 张迪, 等. 减量施肥条件下生物炭与耕作方式对玉米氮吸收及产量的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2019,50(10):23-31. |
[20] | 张宏, 李俊华, 高丽秀, 等. 生物炭对滴灌春小麦产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016,2:55-60. |
[21] | 潘复燕, 薛利红, 卢萍, 等. 不同土壤添加剂对太湖流域小麦产量及氮磷养分流失的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015(5):118-126. |
[22] | 陈心想. 生物炭对土壤性质、作物产量及养分吸收的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014. |
[23] |
Niu Y, Chen Z, Mueller C, et al. Yield-scaled N2O emissions were effectively reduced by biochar amendment of sandy loam soil under maize - wheat rotation in the North China Plain[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2017,170:58-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.050 URL |
[24] |
José AA, Pablo S, Vidal B, et al. Enhanced wheat yield by biochar addition under different mineral fertilization levels[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2013,33(3):475-484.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-012-0128-3 URL |
[25] |
Lehmann J, Weigl D, Peter I, et al. Nutrient interactions of alley-cropped Sorghum bicolor and Acacia saligna in a run off irrigation system in Northern Kenya[J]. Plant and Soil, 1999,210:249-262.
doi: 10.1023/A:1004698403770 URL |
[26] | 南学军. N肥配施生物质炭和秸秆还田对土壤和小麦氮磷含量及其N:P的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2017. |
[27] | Lychuk T E, Lzaurralde R C, Hill R L, et al. Biochar as a global change adaptation: predicting biochar impacts on crop productivity and soil quality for a tropical soil with the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model[J]. Mitigation & Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2015,20(8):1437-1458. |
[28] |
Smebye A, Ailing V, Vogt R D, et al. Biochar amendment to soil changes dissolved organic matter content and composition[J]. Chemosphere, 2016,142(JAN.):100-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.087 URL |
[29] | 赵进, 赵旭, 王慎强, 等. 长期秸秆黑炭施加对石灰性潮土肥力、固碳及氨挥发的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(1):176-184. |
[30] | 殷大伟, 宋章玉, 孟令义, 等. 生物炭对白浆土养分含量及水稻产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2019,31(3):15-21. |
[31] | 张斌, 刘晓雨, 潘根兴, 等. 施用生物质炭后稻田土壤性质、水稻产量和痕量温室气体排放的变化[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(23):4844-4853. |
[32] | 吴昱, 赵雨森, 刘慧, 等. 秸秆生物炭对黑土区坡耕地生产能力影响分析与评价[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017(7):247-256. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[3] | HONG Ciqing, GUI Fangze, CHEN Fangrong, FANG Yun, YOU Yuxin, GUAN Xiong, PAN Xiaohong. The Adsorption of Heavy Metal Nickel by Biochar Prepared from Tea Residue [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 109-114. |
[4] | WU Di, ZHANG Feng, SUI Chunying, SHI Junhui, WAN Xuejie, LIU Yiguo, HAN Wei, SHI Changhai. Exogenous Active Substances: Effect on Stress Resistance of Wheat Seedling [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 14-19. |
[5] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[6] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[7] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[8] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[9] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[10] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[11] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[12] | WANG Lina, YANG Ying, Du Su. Effects of Biochar Application on Saline-alkali Soil: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 81-87. |
[13] | YU Hang, CHENG Qi, TANG Haiyun, CHEN Guoqi. Efficacy of Prometryn Against 10 Serious Wheat Weed Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 110-115. |
[14] | ZHENG Benchuan, ZHANG Jinfang, JIANG Jun, CUI Cheng, CHAI Liang, HUANG Youtao, ZHOU Zhengjian, LI Haojie, JIANG Liangcai. Correlation Analysis of Main Traits and Yield of Brassica napus ‘Chuanyou’ Varieties with Different Maturity Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 7-17. |
[15] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||