Effects of Fertilization Measures on Nutrient Change and Crop Yield of Newly-cultivated Land

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0498

Abstract

Abstract:

To increase crop yield, farmers' income and utilization efficiency of newly-cultivated land, the authors carried out fertilization experiments in Hedong District of Linyi City in Shandong Province from 2018 to 2020 by integrating soil testing for formulated fertilization, organic fertilizer application, controlled-release fertilization and straw returning. The results showed that the soil nutrient content with different fertilization measures increased in varying degrees in 2020, and the largest increasing rate was found under organic fertilizer application and straw returning. And compared with conventional fertilization, soil testing for formulated fertilization, organic fertilizer application and straw returning all had higher yield and income. However, considering the cost of organic fertilizer application and straw returning, the combination of formulated fertilization with straw returning is the best for improving the nutrient content of newly-cultivated land and increasing farmers' income.

Key words: fertilization measures, newly-cultivated land, nutrient change, crop yield, soil testing for formulated fertilization, straw returning

CLC Number:

S146.1
158.3

YAN Tong, YANG Huaen, LIU Fenghua, SUN Yuying. Effects of Fertilization Measures on Nutrient Change and Crop Yield of Newly-cultivated Land[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 74-78.

Figures/Tables 7

References 8

[1]	陆瑶. 浅析中国耕地占补平衡对策[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020,31(15):28-29.
[2]	晓叶. 新时期耕地占补平衡制度的改进与优化[J]. 中国土地, 2020(12):1.
[3]	全国农业技术推广服务中心. 土壤分析技术规范[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006:1-76.
[4]	闫波. 不同肥料配施对新增耕地土体养分含量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018,57(17):42-44,48.
[5]	张春霞, 郝明德, 谢佰承. 长期秸秆还田对黄土旱塬区土壤肥力的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2010(2):18-20.
[6]	劳秀荣, 孙伟红, 王真, 等. 秸秆还田与化肥配合施用对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2003,40(4):618-623
[7]	刘娣, 范丙全, 龚明波. 秸秆还田技术在中国生态农业发展中的作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008,24(6):404-407.
[8]	曾洪玉, 唐宝国, 蔡建华, 等. 秸秆还田对耕地质量及稻麦产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011,39(4):499-501.

处理	T₀	T₁	T₂	T₃	T₄
2018年	7.28a	7.30a	7.32a	7.33a	7.32a
2019年	7.26a	7.22a	7.31a	7.27a	7.34a
2020年	7.25a	7.25a	7.26a	7.26a	7.29a

处理	T₀	T₁	T₂	T₃	T₄
2018年	7.28a	7.30a	7.32a	7.33a	7.32a
2019年	7.26a	7.22a	7.31a	7.27a	7.34a
2020年	7.25a	7.25a	7.26a	7.26a	7.29a

处理	T₀	T₁	T₂	T₃	T₄
2018年	10.2a	9.9a	10.1a	9.7a	10.2a
2019年	9.8b	10.3ab	11.5ab	12.3a	13.1a
2020年	10.5c	11.1bc	12.7b	13.6a	14.9a

处理	T₀	T₁	T₂	T₃	T₄
2018年	10.2a	9.9a	10.1a	9.7a	10.2a
2019年	9.8b	10.3ab	11.5ab	12.3a	13.1a
2020年	10.5c	11.1bc	12.7b	13.6a	14.9a

处理	T₀	T₁	T₂	T₃	T₄
2018年	75.9a	76.3a	75.2a	76.4a	76.6a
2019年	74.3b	78.6a	77.3a	78.5a	77.9a
2020年	73.4b	80.3a	80.6a	81.3a	81.6a