Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 42-51.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0062
Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Danni1(), SHENG Jiandong1, ZHANG Kun2, MAO Jiefei3,4, CHANG Song1, WANG Yaofeng1(
)
Received:
2023-01-09
Revised:
2023-07-07
Online:
2024-01-10
Published:
2024-01-10
MA Danni, SHENG Jiandong, ZHANG Kun, MAO Jiefei, CHANG Song, WANG Yaofeng. Effect of Biochar Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 42-51.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0062
原料 | 温度/℃ | C/% | H/% | O/% | N/% | P/% | K/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小麦秸秆[ | 300 | 51.70 | 1.38 | 0.26 | 3.00 | ||
400 | 62.00 | 0.94 | 0.30 | 3.20 | |||
500 | 66.20 | 0.85 | 0.34 | 3.60 | |||
玉米秸秆[ | 400 | 56.46 | 2.86 | 39.21 | 1.29 | ||
450 | 57.14 | 2.54 | 38.95 | 1.20 | |||
500 | 58.85 | 2.81 | 37.02 | 1.17 | |||
550 | 59.29 | 2.50 | 36.91 | 1.13 | |||
600 | 60.84 | 2.15 | 35.87 | 1.00 | |||
油菜秸秆[ | 300 | 71.03 | 4.66 | 21.48 | 2.07 | ||
400 | 77.13 | 4.14 | 16.27 | 1.43 | |||
500 | 81.66 | 3.04 | 13.27 | 0.94 | |||
600 | 85.79 | 2.19 | 10.09 | 0.77 | |||
700 | 86.82 | 1.54 | 10.06 | 0.67 | |||
水稻秸秆[ | 300 | 45.20 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 3.6 | ||
400 | 55.50 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 4.1 | |||
500 | 63.00 | 0.85 | 0.14 | 4.8 | |||
300 | 54.62 | 3.10 | 40.97 | 1.31 | |||
400 | 58.70 | 2.61 | 37.73 | 0.96 | |||
500 | 64.80 | 2.08 | 32.34 | 0.78 | |||
600 | 66.47 | 1.63 | 31.52 | 0.38 | |||
700 | 68.67 | 1.55 | 29.45 | 0.33 | |||
草皮草[ | 450 | 59.38 | 2.44 | 16.67 | 1.78 | ||
500 | 57.93 | 2.21 | 17.34 | 1.72 | |||
550 | 55.24 | 1.83 | 17.63 | 1.66 | |||
竹片[ | 300 | 64.57 | 4.85 | 25.72 | 0.11 | ||
400 | 75.84 | 4.17 | 19.28 | 0.17 | |||
500 | 84.50 | 3.19 | 11.93 | 0.21 | |||
600 | 90.38 | 2.28 | 10.26 | 0.20 | |||
700 | 92.28 | 1.58 | 10.29 | 0.21 | |||
松木屑[ | 550 | 80.00 | 0.37 | 0.23 | |||
木材混合物[ | 450 | 63.58 | 2.35 | 20.16 | 1.17 | ||
500 | 63.84 | 2.21 | 19.04 | 1.11 | |||
550 | 62.83 | 1.97 | 19.27 | 1.01 | |||
杏仁壳[ | 550 | 84.40 | 0.53 | 0.73 | |||
山核桃壳[ | 300 | 66.02 | 5.36 | 28.14 | 0.5 | ||
400 | 76.3 | 3.97 | 18.93 | 0.63 | |||
500 | 83.96 | 3.13 | 10.58 | 0.39 | |||
600 | 91.08 | 2.27 | 8.41 | 0.35 | |||
700 | 92.8 | 1.52 | 7.32 | 0.36 | |||
牛粪[ | 350 | 0.12 | 1.84 | 3.73 | |||
450 | 0.84 | 2.07 | 4.33 | ||||
550 | 0.59 | 2.36 | 4.88 | ||||
650 | 0.40 | 2.46 | 5.12 | ||||
750 | 0.41 | 2.70 | 4.87 | ||||
猪粪[ | 350 | 0.90 | 2.94 | 1.46 | |||
450 | 0.68 | 3.11 | 1.67 | ||||
550 | 0.57 | 3.13 | 1.99 | ||||
650 | 0.40 | 3.30 | 2.20 | ||||
750 | 0.41 | 3.33 | 2.47 | ||||
鸡粪[ | 350 | 0.79 | 3.37 | 1.31 | |||
450 | 0.69 | 4.05 | 1.34 | ||||
550 | 0.67 | 3.94 | 1.36 | ||||
650 | 0.37 | 4.28 | 1.35 | ||||
750 | 0.38 | 4.38 | 1.57 | ||||
污泥[ | 250 | 36.26 | 5.23 | ||||
350 | 32.71 | 3.68 | |||||
450 | 27.47 | 3.87 | |||||
550 | 27.01 | 3.17 | |||||
300 | 25.6 | 2.55 | 8.33 | 3.32 | 0.05 | ||
400 | 20.2 | 1.28 | 4.61 | 2.40 | 0.07 | ||
500 | 20.3 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.13 | 0.06 | ||
700 | 20.4 | 0.51 | 0 | 1.20 | 0.05 |
原料 | 温度/℃ | C/% | H/% | O/% | N/% | P/% | K/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
小麦秸秆[ | 300 | 51.70 | 1.38 | 0.26 | 3.00 | ||
400 | 62.00 | 0.94 | 0.30 | 3.20 | |||
500 | 66.20 | 0.85 | 0.34 | 3.60 | |||
玉米秸秆[ | 400 | 56.46 | 2.86 | 39.21 | 1.29 | ||
450 | 57.14 | 2.54 | 38.95 | 1.20 | |||
500 | 58.85 | 2.81 | 37.02 | 1.17 | |||
550 | 59.29 | 2.50 | 36.91 | 1.13 | |||
600 | 60.84 | 2.15 | 35.87 | 1.00 | |||
油菜秸秆[ | 300 | 71.03 | 4.66 | 21.48 | 2.07 | ||
400 | 77.13 | 4.14 | 16.27 | 1.43 | |||
500 | 81.66 | 3.04 | 13.27 | 0.94 | |||
600 | 85.79 | 2.19 | 10.09 | 0.77 | |||
700 | 86.82 | 1.54 | 10.06 | 0.67 | |||
水稻秸秆[ | 300 | 45.20 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 3.6 | ||
400 | 55.50 | 0.98 | 0.13 | 4.1 | |||
500 | 63.00 | 0.85 | 0.14 | 4.8 | |||
300 | 54.62 | 3.10 | 40.97 | 1.31 | |||
400 | 58.70 | 2.61 | 37.73 | 0.96 | |||
500 | 64.80 | 2.08 | 32.34 | 0.78 | |||
600 | 66.47 | 1.63 | 31.52 | 0.38 | |||
700 | 68.67 | 1.55 | 29.45 | 0.33 | |||
草皮草[ | 450 | 59.38 | 2.44 | 16.67 | 1.78 | ||
500 | 57.93 | 2.21 | 17.34 | 1.72 | |||
550 | 55.24 | 1.83 | 17.63 | 1.66 | |||
竹片[ | 300 | 64.57 | 4.85 | 25.72 | 0.11 | ||
400 | 75.84 | 4.17 | 19.28 | 0.17 | |||
500 | 84.50 | 3.19 | 11.93 | 0.21 | |||
600 | 90.38 | 2.28 | 10.26 | 0.20 | |||
700 | 92.28 | 1.58 | 10.29 | 0.21 | |||
松木屑[ | 550 | 80.00 | 0.37 | 0.23 | |||
木材混合物[ | 450 | 63.58 | 2.35 | 20.16 | 1.17 | ||
500 | 63.84 | 2.21 | 19.04 | 1.11 | |||
550 | 62.83 | 1.97 | 19.27 | 1.01 | |||
杏仁壳[ | 550 | 84.40 | 0.53 | 0.73 | |||
山核桃壳[ | 300 | 66.02 | 5.36 | 28.14 | 0.5 | ||
400 | 76.3 | 3.97 | 18.93 | 0.63 | |||
500 | 83.96 | 3.13 | 10.58 | 0.39 | |||
600 | 91.08 | 2.27 | 8.41 | 0.35 | |||
700 | 92.8 | 1.52 | 7.32 | 0.36 | |||
牛粪[ | 350 | 0.12 | 1.84 | 3.73 | |||
450 | 0.84 | 2.07 | 4.33 | ||||
550 | 0.59 | 2.36 | 4.88 | ||||
650 | 0.40 | 2.46 | 5.12 | ||||
750 | 0.41 | 2.70 | 4.87 | ||||
猪粪[ | 350 | 0.90 | 2.94 | 1.46 | |||
450 | 0.68 | 3.11 | 1.67 | ||||
550 | 0.57 | 3.13 | 1.99 | ||||
650 | 0.40 | 3.30 | 2.20 | ||||
750 | 0.41 | 3.33 | 2.47 | ||||
鸡粪[ | 350 | 0.79 | 3.37 | 1.31 | |||
450 | 0.69 | 4.05 | 1.34 | ||||
550 | 0.67 | 3.94 | 1.36 | ||||
650 | 0.37 | 4.28 | 1.35 | ||||
750 | 0.38 | 4.38 | 1.57 | ||||
污泥[ | 250 | 36.26 | 5.23 | ||||
350 | 32.71 | 3.68 | |||||
450 | 27.47 | 3.87 | |||||
550 | 27.01 | 3.17 | |||||
300 | 25.6 | 2.55 | 8.33 | 3.32 | 0.05 | ||
400 | 20.2 | 1.28 | 4.61 | 2.40 | 0.07 | ||
500 | 20.3 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.13 | 0.06 | ||
700 | 20.4 | 0.51 | 0 | 1.20 | 0.05 |
土壤类型 | 有机肥/(t/hm2) | 生物炭/(t/hm2) | 有机质/(g/kg) | TN/% | 有效P/(mg/kg) | 速效K/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碱性土[ | 0 | 0 | 14.80 | 0.14 | 5.30 | 54.60 |
0 | 2.5 | 16.60 | 0.16 | 11.50 | 81.90 | |
0 | 5 | 18.40 | 0.19 | 13.50 | 101.40 | |
25 | 0 | 21.00 | 0.15 | 5.20 | 58.50 | |
25 | 2.5 | 25.60 | 0.18 | 13.80 | 93.60 | |
25 | 5 | 29.10 | 0.20 | 15.20 | 113.10 | |
50 | 0 | 32.00 | 0.15 | 5.40 | 58.50 | |
50 | 2.5 | 35.20 | 0.20 | 16.30 | 109.20 | |
50 | 5 | 38.90 | 0.22 | 19.10 | 132.60 | |
灰漠土[ | 0 | 0 | 28.42 | 0.12 | ||
67.5 | 0 | 30.64 | 0.17 | |||
135 | 0 | 34.16 | 0.17 | |||
67.5 | 22.5 | 47.7 | 0.18 | |||
135 | 22.5 | 50.94 | 0.21 | |||
67.5 | 67.5 | 75.88 | 0.25 | |||
135 | 67.5 | 81.55 | 0.17 | |||
旱地燥红土[ | 0 | 0 | 12.79 | 3.31 | 69.21 | |
0 | 22.5 | 19.84 | 3.94 | 83.14 | ||
0 | 45 | 19.39 | 4.85 | 100.59 | ||
0 | 90 | 20.36 | 5.67 | 98.14 | ||
0.68 | 22.5 | 18.81 | 4.09 | 79.14 | ||
1.35 | 45 | 22.39 | 5.89 | 102.13 | ||
2.7 | 90 | 20.04 | 6.66 | 100.15 | ||
1.35 | 22.5 | 19.51 | 5.31 | 77.07 | ||
2.7 | 45 | 21.10 | 6.28 | 90.69 | ||
5.4 | 90 | 22.21 | 7.49 | 97.59 | ||
矿区土壤[ | 0 | 0 | 2.81 | 4.23 | ||
0 | 22.5 | 4.24 | 6.68 | |||
0 | 45 | 7.32 | 9.85 | |||
0 | 112.5 | 18.59 | 16.13 | |||
45 | 0 | 4.12 | 6.46 | |||
112.5 | 0 | 6.03 | 7.82 | |||
225 | 0 | 9.32 | 9.22 | |||
36 | 9 | 7.32 | 6.23 | |||
90 | 22.5 | 11.46 | 8.54 | |||
180 | 45 | 20.84 | 14.23 | |||
沙化土壤[ | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | 4.97 | 87.20 | |
20 | 0 | 0.07 | 16.35 | 145.46 | ||
0 | 10 | 0.07 | 6.51 | 184.63 | ||
20 | 5 | 0.07 | 16.81 | 201.03 | ||
20 | 10 | 0.09 | 20.49 | 238.73 | ||
黄褐土[ | 0 | 0 | 22.85 | 167.18 | ||
9 | 0 | 26.90 | 187.65 | |||
0 | 4.5 | 40.91 | 173.95 | |||
9 | 4.5 | 62.61 | 190.45 | |||
壤土[ | 0 | 0 | 14.70 | 0.14 | 52.70 | 125.95 |
0 | 22.5 | 19.41 | 0.15 | 61.14 | 226.25 | |
22.5 | 0 | 14.62 | 0.15 | 60.89 | 164.34 | |
22.5 | 22.5 | 19.96 | 0.15 | 55.90 | 276.53 | |
11.5 | 11.5 | 18.21 | 0.14 | 60.17 | 224.20 |
土壤类型 | 有机肥/(t/hm2) | 生物炭/(t/hm2) | 有机质/(g/kg) | TN/% | 有效P/(mg/kg) | 速效K/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
碱性土[ | 0 | 0 | 14.80 | 0.14 | 5.30 | 54.60 |
0 | 2.5 | 16.60 | 0.16 | 11.50 | 81.90 | |
0 | 5 | 18.40 | 0.19 | 13.50 | 101.40 | |
25 | 0 | 21.00 | 0.15 | 5.20 | 58.50 | |
25 | 2.5 | 25.60 | 0.18 | 13.80 | 93.60 | |
25 | 5 | 29.10 | 0.20 | 15.20 | 113.10 | |
50 | 0 | 32.00 | 0.15 | 5.40 | 58.50 | |
50 | 2.5 | 35.20 | 0.20 | 16.30 | 109.20 | |
50 | 5 | 38.90 | 0.22 | 19.10 | 132.60 | |
灰漠土[ | 0 | 0 | 28.42 | 0.12 | ||
67.5 | 0 | 30.64 | 0.17 | |||
135 | 0 | 34.16 | 0.17 | |||
67.5 | 22.5 | 47.7 | 0.18 | |||
135 | 22.5 | 50.94 | 0.21 | |||
67.5 | 67.5 | 75.88 | 0.25 | |||
135 | 67.5 | 81.55 | 0.17 | |||
旱地燥红土[ | 0 | 0 | 12.79 | 3.31 | 69.21 | |
0 | 22.5 | 19.84 | 3.94 | 83.14 | ||
0 | 45 | 19.39 | 4.85 | 100.59 | ||
0 | 90 | 20.36 | 5.67 | 98.14 | ||
0.68 | 22.5 | 18.81 | 4.09 | 79.14 | ||
1.35 | 45 | 22.39 | 5.89 | 102.13 | ||
2.7 | 90 | 20.04 | 6.66 | 100.15 | ||
1.35 | 22.5 | 19.51 | 5.31 | 77.07 | ||
2.7 | 45 | 21.10 | 6.28 | 90.69 | ||
5.4 | 90 | 22.21 | 7.49 | 97.59 | ||
矿区土壤[ | 0 | 0 | 2.81 | 4.23 | ||
0 | 22.5 | 4.24 | 6.68 | |||
0 | 45 | 7.32 | 9.85 | |||
0 | 112.5 | 18.59 | 16.13 | |||
45 | 0 | 4.12 | 6.46 | |||
112.5 | 0 | 6.03 | 7.82 | |||
225 | 0 | 9.32 | 9.22 | |||
36 | 9 | 7.32 | 6.23 | |||
90 | 22.5 | 11.46 | 8.54 | |||
180 | 45 | 20.84 | 14.23 | |||
沙化土壤[ | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | 4.97 | 87.20 | |
20 | 0 | 0.07 | 16.35 | 145.46 | ||
0 | 10 | 0.07 | 6.51 | 184.63 | ||
20 | 5 | 0.07 | 16.81 | 201.03 | ||
20 | 10 | 0.09 | 20.49 | 238.73 | ||
黄褐土[ | 0 | 0 | 22.85 | 167.18 | ||
9 | 0 | 26.90 | 187.65 | |||
0 | 4.5 | 40.91 | 173.95 | |||
9 | 4.5 | 62.61 | 190.45 | |||
壤土[ | 0 | 0 | 14.70 | 0.14 | 52.70 | 125.95 |
0 | 22.5 | 19.41 | 0.15 | 61.14 | 226.25 | |
22.5 | 0 | 14.62 | 0.15 | 60.89 | 164.34 | |
22.5 | 22.5 | 19.96 | 0.15 | 55.90 | 276.53 | |
11.5 | 11.5 | 18.21 | 0.14 | 60.17 | 224.20 |
农作物 | 生物炭/ (t/hm2) | 有机肥/ (t/hm2) | 产量/ (t/hm2) | N/% | P/% | K/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘薯[ | 0 | 0 | 9.5 | 0.11 | 0.65 | 3.51 |
0 | 5 | 14.6 | 0.13 | 0.86 | 4.29 | |
10 | 0 | 10.4 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 5.46 | |
10 | 10 | 22.9 | 0.19 | 1.49 | 7.80 | |
20 | 0 | 12.7 | 0.17 | 0.84 | 7.02 | |
20 | 5 | 25.6 | 0.21 | 1.75 | 8.97 | |
20 | 10 | 28.4 | 0.23 | 1.98 | 10.53 | |
30 | 0 | 15.3 | 0.19 | 0.96 | 11.70 | |
30 | 5 | 31 | 0.25 | 2.14 | 13.26 | |
30 | 10 | 33.7 | 0.27 | 2.41 | 14.82 | |
玉米[ | 0 | 0 | 0.98 | |||
22.50 | 0 | 1.06 | ||||
0 | 33.75 | 1.15 | ||||
11.25 | 16.88 | 1.26 | ||||
椰子[ | 0 | 0 | 3.1 | 0.52 | 3.52 | 0.04 |
0 | 7.5 | 5.3 | 1.31 | 22.26 | 0.15 | |
10 | 0 | 3.7 | 0.73 | 10.55 | 0.11 | |
10 | 7.5 | 5.9 | 2.1 | 23.43 | 0.17 | |
30 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 3.27 | 38.67 | 0.28 | |
萝卜[ | 0 | 0 | 2.4 | 2.20 | 0.11 | 1.16 |
0 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 0.17 | 1.95 | |
0 | 5 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 0.22 | 2.13 | |
25 | 0 | 2.4 | 2.21 | 0.1 | 1.10 | |
25 | 2.5 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 0.19 | 2.10 | |
25 | 5 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 0.21 | 2.42 | |
50 | 0 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 1.11 | |
50 | 2.5 | 6.9 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 2.35 | |
50 | 5 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 0.23 | 2.65 | |
芦蒿[ | 0 | 0 | 14.78 | |||
0 | 22.5 | 14.40 | ||||
22.5 | 0 | 13.95 | ||||
22.5 | 22.5 | 14.39 | ||||
大麦[ | 0 | 0 | 2.98 | 2.65 | 0.28 | 3.07 |
10 | 0 | 3.87 | 3.01 | 0.32 | 3.39 | |
0 | 10 | 4.21 | 3.19 | 0.34 | 3.63 | |
2 | 10 | 4.43 | 3.11 | 0.31 | 3.34 |
农作物 | 生物炭/ (t/hm2) | 有机肥/ (t/hm2) | 产量/ (t/hm2) | N/% | P/% | K/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
甘薯[ | 0 | 0 | 9.5 | 0.11 | 0.65 | 3.51 |
0 | 5 | 14.6 | 0.13 | 0.86 | 4.29 | |
10 | 0 | 10.4 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 5.46 | |
10 | 10 | 22.9 | 0.19 | 1.49 | 7.80 | |
20 | 0 | 12.7 | 0.17 | 0.84 | 7.02 | |
20 | 5 | 25.6 | 0.21 | 1.75 | 8.97 | |
20 | 10 | 28.4 | 0.23 | 1.98 | 10.53 | |
30 | 0 | 15.3 | 0.19 | 0.96 | 11.70 | |
30 | 5 | 31 | 0.25 | 2.14 | 13.26 | |
30 | 10 | 33.7 | 0.27 | 2.41 | 14.82 | |
玉米[ | 0 | 0 | 0.98 | |||
22.50 | 0 | 1.06 | ||||
0 | 33.75 | 1.15 | ||||
11.25 | 16.88 | 1.26 | ||||
椰子[ | 0 | 0 | 3.1 | 0.52 | 3.52 | 0.04 |
0 | 7.5 | 5.3 | 1.31 | 22.26 | 0.15 | |
10 | 0 | 3.7 | 0.73 | 10.55 | 0.11 | |
10 | 7.5 | 5.9 | 2.1 | 23.43 | 0.17 | |
30 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 3.27 | 38.67 | 0.28 | |
萝卜[ | 0 | 0 | 2.4 | 2.20 | 0.11 | 1.16 |
0 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 0.17 | 1.95 | |
0 | 5 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 0.22 | 2.13 | |
25 | 0 | 2.4 | 2.21 | 0.1 | 1.10 | |
25 | 2.5 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 0.19 | 2.10 | |
25 | 5 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 0.21 | 2.42 | |
50 | 0 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 1.11 | |
50 | 2.5 | 6.9 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 2.35 | |
50 | 5 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 0.23 | 2.65 | |
芦蒿[ | 0 | 0 | 14.78 | |||
0 | 22.5 | 14.40 | ||||
22.5 | 0 | 13.95 | ||||
22.5 | 22.5 | 14.39 | ||||
大麦[ | 0 | 0 | 2.98 | 2.65 | 0.28 | 3.07 |
10 | 0 | 3.87 | 3.01 | 0.32 | 3.39 | |
0 | 10 | 4.21 | 3.19 | 0.34 | 3.63 | |
2 | 10 | 4.43 | 3.11 | 0.31 | 3.34 |
[1] |
宁川川, 王建武, 蔡昆争. 有机肥对土壤肥力和土壤环境质量的影响研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25(1):175-181.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.01.026 |
[2] |
|
[3] |
何绪生, 耿增超, 佘雕, 等. 生物炭生产与农用的意义及国内外动态[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(2):1-7.
|
[4] |
doi: 10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z |
[5] |
燕金锐, 律其鑫, 高增平, 等. 有机肥与生物炭对沙化土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(9):303-307.
|
[6] |
刘睿, 王正银, 朱洪霞. 中国有机肥料研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(1):310-313.
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60047-4 URL |
[8] |
陈雪梅, 王冀川, 石元强, 等. 生物有机肥在作物上应用的研究进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2021, 41(17):11-16.
|
[9] |
牛新胜, 巨晓棠. 我国有机肥料资源及利用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6):1462-1479.
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
刘兰英, 何肖云, 黄薇, 等. 福建省有机肥中养分和重金属含量特征[J]. 福建农业学报, 2020, 35(6):640-648.
|
[12] |
黄红卫, 吴彦虎, 李晓梅, 等. 宁夏规模养殖场畜禽粪便养分含量和重金属、抗生素残留量测定及安全性评估[J]. 农业科学研究, 2018, 39(2):1-8.
|
[13] |
周博, 朱振国, 周建斌, 等. 杨凌地区不同畜禽有机肥养分及重金属含量研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(3):714-718.
|
[14] |
覃丽霞, 马军伟, 孙万春, 等. 浙江省畜禽有机肥重金属及养分含量特征研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(4):604-610.
|
[15] |
韦智获, 苏敏, 张凌云, 等. 不同有机肥对茶叶生长和土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(13):159-161,178.
|
[16] |
安军, 肖玉平. 有机肥改良土壤作用分析[J]. 乡村科技, 2020, 36(15):77-78.
|
[17] |
张冠华, 孙金伟, 牛俊, 等. W-OH固化剂对玉米生长及土壤养分淋失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(5):247-252,259.
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
pmid: 16899751 |
[20] |
|
[21] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054 URL |
[22] |
doi: 10.1007/s42773-019-00008-3 |
[23] |
doi: 10.1071/SR10009 URL |
[24] |
彭友舜, 秦兆文, 杨敬波. 炭化温度对3种果核类生物炭特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(23):304-307,317.
|
[25] |
刘菊莲, 纪立东, 司海丽, 等. 不同炭化温度对葡萄枝条炭特性的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022, 12(9):85-89.
|
[26] |
林珈羽, 张越, 刘沅, 等. 不同原料和炭化温度下制备的生物炭结构及性质[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(6):3200-3206.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
doi: 10.1098/rsos.172346 URL |
[29] |
林肖庆. 不同材料与制备工艺对生物炭性质及水稻土壤甲烷排放的影响[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2016:26-27.
|
[30] |
简敏菲, 高凯芳, 余厚平. 不同裂解温度对水稻秸秆制备生物炭及其特性的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(5):1757-1765.
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
doi: 10.1002/jpln.v177.1 URL |
[33] |
王煌平, 张青, 章赞德, 等. 不同热解温度限氧制备的畜禽粪便生物炭养分特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(20):233-239.
|
[34] |
吴诗雪, 王欣, 陈灿, 等. 凤眼莲、稻草和污泥制备生物炭的特性表征与环境影响解析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(12):4021-4032.
|
[35] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.008 pmid: 20870338 |
[36] |
胡政权, 金敏, 袁朗月, 等. 生物炭土壤改良剂特性与应用[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(S2):13-16.
|
[37] |
李正兴, 李海福. 生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的国内外研究现状分析[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2015, 12(2):61,67.
|
[38] |
王娟, 黄成真, 冯绍元, 等. 生物炭对滨海滩涂区土壤理化特性的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(10):125-130,138.
|
[39] |
武玉, 徐刚, 吕迎春, 等. 生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(1):68-79.
doi: 1001-8166(2014)01-0068-12 |
[40] |
doi: 10.1111/gcbb.2013.5.issue-2 URL |
[41] |
doi: 10.1186/s12898-019-0268-2 |
[42] |
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113944 URL |
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
刘赛男. 生物炭影响土壤磷素、钾素有效性的微生态机制[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2016:99-100.
|
[46] |
刘玉学, 唐旭, 杨生茂, 等. 生物炭对土壤磷素转化的影响及其机理研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(6):1690-1695.
|
[47] |
王秋君, 徐丽萍, 郭德杰, 等. 设施土壤中连续施用生物炭对土壤磷形态及吸附与释放特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(11):114-121.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0347 |
[48] |
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60375-8 URL |
[49] |
包灿鑫, 张园, 陈明龙, 等. 不同生物炭对猪粪堆肥过程中抗生素及抗生素抗性基因的削减规律研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2022, 44(2):160-164,172.
|
[50] |
doi: 10.1139/L10-101 URL |
[51] |
doi: S0960-8524(18)31456-1 pmid: 30399607 |
[52] |
戚鑫鑫. 添加生物炭对牛粪好氧堆肥的影响研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020:15-16.
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
李梦轲. 添加猪粪生物炭对猪粪堆肥过程及应用效果的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2021:22-23.
|
[55] |
doi: S0301-4797(18)31384-7 pmid: 30517840 |
[56] |
谢胜禹, 余广炜, 潘兰佳, 等. 添加生物炭对猪粪好氧堆肥的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019(6):1365-1372.
|
[57] |
doi: S0960-8524(17)30322-X pmid: 28360019 |
[58] |
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.193 URL |
[59] |
doi: S0960-8524(18)31434-2 pmid: 30336399 |
[60] |
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122962 URL |
[61] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.061 URL |
[62] |
doi: 10.1002/jpln.v175.5 URL |
[63] |
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.039 pmid: 26009473 |
[64] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.048 URL |
[65] |
|
[66] |
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12477-w |
[67] |
doi: 10.3390/land10040372 URL |
[68] |
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.016 URL |
[69] |
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 |
[70] |
陈丽美. 生物炭与有机肥配施对火龙果园地土壤肥力及产量的影响[D]. 昆明: 西南林业大学, 2021:41-42.
|
[71] |
doi: 10.1007/s00128-020-03011-8 |
[72] |
吕泽先, 马宏卫, 王贺东, 等. 生物质炭和有机肥施用对芦蒿产量及土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(1):32-35.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110131 |
[73] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030569 URL |
[74] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.039 URL |
[75] |
|
[76] |
郑钰铟, 胡素萍, 陈辉, 等. 油茶饼粕生物炭和有机肥对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(3):348-354.
|
[77] |
孙家骏, 付青霞, 谷洁, 等. 生物有机肥对猕猴桃土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3):829-837.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.012 |
[78] |
doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-1067-5 URL |
[79] |
陈伟, 周波, 束怀瑞. 生物炭和有机肥处理对平邑甜茶根系和土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(18):3850-3856.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.18.014 |
[80] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101562 URL |
[81] |
doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0126 pmid: 22751045 |
[82] |
doi: 10.1002/jpln.v175.3 URL |
[83] |
doi: 10.1111/sum.2014.30.issue-2 URL |
[84] |
doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0150-0 URL |
[85] |
王春雪, 岳学文, 史亮涛, 等. 元谋干热河谷青枣光合及产量对不同比例有机肥与生物炭配施的响应[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(1):128-136.
|
[86] |
doi: 10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100051 URL |
[87] |
doi: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1381734 URL |
[88] |
doi: 10.1080/00103624.2020.1744621 URL |
[89] |
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2016.02.003 URL |
[1] | ZHAO Weijin, XIE Yiyan, YANG Dehai, LI Xiancai, SUN Yonghua, ZHENG Shifang, PENG Ren, YANG Yan, MA Junjie, LI Xiaoting. Difference of Physical Characteristics of ‘KRK26’ Upper Tobacco Leaves and Correlation with Soil Nutrients in Dali [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 71-76. |
[2] | GUO Xinsong, WEI Juhua, SHA Chunyan, GAO Han, SONG Zhi, FAN Zhongqing, YIN Jing, DING Fangjun. Effect of Optimizing Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Potato and Soil Nutrient Supply [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 84-90. |
[3] | DOU Zongxin, PANG Yong, WANG Baochun, LI Guannan. Effects of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Tomato Under Solar Greenhouse Condition [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 28-32. |
[4] | CHEN Guiyun, WANG Huifang, WANG Duo, SHI Dingguo, ZHANG Zhijun, XU Dongya, LI Yunchuan, KONG Decui, WANG Na, WANG Ge, DING Yi, BAI Yuxiang. Effects of Tobacco Stem Biochar Based Fertilizer Application on Production and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(1): 12-19. |
[5] | REN Haiying, ZHENG Jingmeng, SHI Wei, WU Haodi, WANG Kangqiang, YU Mingquan, WANG Zhenshuo, WANG Qi. Effects of Micro-ecology Preparation Improving Soil on the Vegetative Growth and Fruit Quality of Twig Blight Diseased Bayberry [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 153-157. |
[6] | MIAO Huan, QIAO Yunfa, LI Qing, MIAO Shujie. The Responses of Nitrogen Loss from Paddy Field to Simulated Rainfall and Restored Materials [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(9): 85-91. |
[7] | LIU Yu, LI Ping, ZHAO Kaili, YAN Shi, LIU Jipei, LIU Lei, GUO Ning. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Application of Bio-organic Fertilizer on Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 63-68. |
[8] | GAO Bohang, XIA Tongyong, WANG Guangfei, MA Yan, XU Yehong. Application Effect of Organic Fertilizer Combined with Chemical Fertilizer Reduction on Xinyi Honey Peach [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(7): 33-39. |
[9] | TENG Bingqin, MA Qianqian, WU Jun, DUAN Xuejiao, BI Dongmei, CAI Liqun. Effects of Biochar Addition on Cd Enrichment in Lettuce [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(6): 90-96. |
[10] | WANG Yan, YANG Yuanning, HUANG Liankang, WANG Xueli, OU Kunpeng. Effects of Selenium Application Methods on Selenium Distribution, Yield and Quality of Pueraria thomsonii Benth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 81-86. |
[11] | XIE Kunhao, SHI Aokun, DI Qinghua, CHEN Ru, LI Yansu, YU Xianchang, CHEN Shuangchen, HE Chaoxing. Effects of Vegetable Residue Compost on Ginger Yield and Soil Environment in Root Zone [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 87-91. |
[12] | LI Yanlan, YANG Jincheng, JIN Hongyun, LUO Zhimin, LI Xiang, LI Zaofu, ZHANG Chunfan, HU Xinzhou, YU Zonghong, LIU Jianjian, GAO Shilan, AN Zhengyun, WANG Aiming, CAI Shujiang. Application Rates and Proportions of Organic Fertilizers: Control Effects on Three Diseases of Grain Pea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 106-111. |
[13] | LIN Baigui, ZHONG Wenliang, HUANG Jichuan. Investigation on Soil Fertility of Paddy Field in Yingde City [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(36): 89-96. |
[14] | RENZENG Wangdui. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer and Mixed Sowing Ratio on Forage Value of Avena sativa + Vicia sativa in Alpine Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 81-86. |
[15] | LIU Futong, ZHENG Meiying, WANG Hui, LI Maosen, ZHAO Peiyan, ZHENG Bangxi, HE Wenqin, YAO Feng, REN Tianbao. Analysis of Nutrient Status and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Tobacco Planting Soil in Hanzhong of Qinling Mountains based on ArcGIS [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 103-110. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||