Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (17): 114-119.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0494
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIN Haizhong1(), ZHANG Minrong1, LIN Feirong2, YU Jihua3(
)
Received:
2023-07-07
Revised:
2023-10-07
Online:
2024-06-15
Published:
2024-06-11
LIN Haizhong, ZHANG Minrong, LIN Feirong, YU Jihua. Experimental Study on Prevention and Treatment of Stem Base Rot of Ipomoea batatas During Cutting Period[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 114-119.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0494
扦插期/(月/日) | 品种 | 病株数/株 | 发病株率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | |||
5/12 | 广台薯1号 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 23.81 | 23.81 | 9.52 | 19.05 | |
浙薯38 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 28.57 | 9.52 | 38.10 | 25.40 | ||
5/26 | 广台薯1号 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 19.05 | 9.52 | 28.57 | 19.05 | |
浙薯38 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 33.33 | 23.81 | 19.05 | 25.40 | ||
6/9 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 9.52 | 9.52 | 6.35 | |
浙薯38 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 23.81 | 9.52 | 23.81 | 19.05 | ||
6/23 | 广台薯1号 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 | |
浙薯38 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4.76 | 28.57 | 4.76 | 12.70 | ||
7/7 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 1.59 | ||
7/21 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 | ||
8/4 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 1.59 | ||
8/18 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 3.17 |
扦插期/(月/日) | 品种 | 病株数/株 | 发病株率/% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | |||
5/12 | 广台薯1号 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 23.81 | 23.81 | 9.52 | 19.05 | |
浙薯38 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 28.57 | 9.52 | 38.10 | 25.40 | ||
5/26 | 广台薯1号 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 19.05 | 9.52 | 28.57 | 19.05 | |
浙薯38 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 33.33 | 23.81 | 19.05 | 25.40 | ||
6/9 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 9.52 | 9.52 | 6.35 | |
浙薯38 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 23.81 | 9.52 | 23.81 | 19.05 | ||
6/23 | 广台薯1号 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 | |
浙薯38 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4.76 | 28.57 | 4.76 | 12.70 | ||
7/7 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 1.59 | ||
7/21 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 | ||
8/4 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 1.59 | ||
8/18 | 广台薯1号 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
浙薯38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 3.17 |
DF | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主处理 (扦插期) | 区组 | 2 | 15.14 | 7.57 | 0.25 | 3.74 | 6.51 |
A | 7 | 3731.94 | 533.13 | 17.63 | 2.77 | 4.28 | |
EA | 14 | 423.34 | 30.24 | / | |||
主区总变异 | 23 | 4170.42 | |||||
副处理 (品种) | B | 1 | 370.35 | 370.35 | 5.60 | 4.49 | 8.53 |
A×B | 7 | 204.13 | 29.16 | 0.44 | 2.66 | 4.03 | |
EB | 16 | 1058.39 | 66.15 | / | |||
总变异 | 47 | 5803.29 |
DF | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主处理 (扦插期) | 区组 | 2 | 15.14 | 7.57 | 0.25 | 3.74 | 6.51 |
A | 7 | 3731.94 | 533.13 | 17.63 | 2.77 | 4.28 | |
EA | 14 | 423.34 | 30.24 | / | |||
主区总变异 | 23 | 4170.42 | |||||
副处理 (品种) | B | 1 | 370.35 | 370.35 | 5.60 | 4.49 | 8.53 |
A×B | 7 | 204.13 | 29.16 | 0.44 | 2.66 | 4.03 | |
EB | 16 | 1058.39 | 66.15 | / | |||
总变异 | 47 | 5803.29 |
扦插期(月/日) | 天数/d | 株发病率/% | 显著性 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
广台薯1号 | 浙薯38 | 平均 | P=0.05 | P=0.01 | ||
5/12 | 12 | 19.05 | 25.40 | 22.22 | a | A |
5/26 | 26 | 19.05 | 25.40 | 22.22 | a | A |
6/09 | 40 | 6.35 | 19.05 | 12.7 | b | B |
6/23 | 54 | 1.59 | 12.70 | 7.14 | bc | BC |
7/07 | 68 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.79 | c | C |
7/21 | 82 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.79 | c | C |
8/04 | 96 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.79 | c | C |
8/18 | 110 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 1.59 | c | C |
扦插期(月/日) | 天数/d | 株发病率/% | 显著性 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
广台薯1号 | 浙薯38 | 平均 | P=0.05 | P=0.01 | ||
5/12 | 12 | 19.05 | 25.40 | 22.22 | a | A |
5/26 | 26 | 19.05 | 25.40 | 22.22 | a | A |
6/09 | 40 | 6.35 | 19.05 | 12.7 | b | B |
6/23 | 54 | 1.59 | 12.70 | 7.14 | bc | BC |
7/07 | 68 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.79 | c | C |
7/21 | 82 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.79 | c | C |
8/04 | 96 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.79 | c | C |
8/18 | 110 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 1.59 | c | C |
(月/日)试验处理 | 鲜薯产量/(kg/hm2) | 平均产量/(kg/hm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | ||
5/12,广台薯1号 | 23220 | 20025 | 12810 | 18685.0 |
5/12,浙薯38 | 20820 | 19215 | 19215 | 19750.0 |
5/26,广台薯1号 | 14415 | 15210 | 17610 | 15745.0 |
5/26,浙薯38 | 16815 | 12810 | 12810 | 14145.0 |
6/09,广台薯1号 | 14415 | 14415 | 22425 | 17085.0 |
6/09,浙薯38 | 6405 | 24015 | 24015 | 18145.0 |
6/23,广台薯1号 | 10410 | 12015 | 16020 | 12815.0 |
6/23,浙薯38 | 11205 | 6405 | 17610 | 11740.0 |
7/07,广台薯1号 | 6405 | 4800 | 10410 | 7205.0 |
7/07,浙薯38 | 9615 | 10410 | 4800 | 8275.0 |
7/21,广台薯1号 | 7200 | 4005 | 3210 | 4805.0 |
7/21,浙薯38 | 11205 | 11205 | 8010 | 10140.0 |
8/04,广台薯1号 | 3690 | 2400 | 3210 | 3100.0 |
8/04,浙薯38 | 6405 | 7200 | 4800 | 6135.0 |
8/18,广台薯1号 | 1440 | 1920 | 1605 | 1655.0 |
8/18,浙薯38 | 3210 | 3210 | 3210 | 3210.0 |
(月/日)试验处理 | 鲜薯产量/(kg/hm2) | 平均产量/(kg/hm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | ||
5/12,广台薯1号 | 23220 | 20025 | 12810 | 18685.0 |
5/12,浙薯38 | 20820 | 19215 | 19215 | 19750.0 |
5/26,广台薯1号 | 14415 | 15210 | 17610 | 15745.0 |
5/26,浙薯38 | 16815 | 12810 | 12810 | 14145.0 |
6/09,广台薯1号 | 14415 | 14415 | 22425 | 17085.0 |
6/09,浙薯38 | 6405 | 24015 | 24015 | 18145.0 |
6/23,广台薯1号 | 10410 | 12015 | 16020 | 12815.0 |
6/23,浙薯38 | 11205 | 6405 | 17610 | 11740.0 |
7/07,广台薯1号 | 6405 | 4800 | 10410 | 7205.0 |
7/07,浙薯38 | 9615 | 10410 | 4800 | 8275.0 |
7/21,广台薯1号 | 7200 | 4005 | 3210 | 4805.0 |
7/21,浙薯38 | 11205 | 11205 | 8010 | 10140.0 |
8/04,广台薯1号 | 3690 | 2400 | 3210 | 3100.0 |
8/04,浙薯38 | 6405 | 7200 | 4800 | 6135.0 |
8/18,广台薯1号 | 1440 | 1920 | 1605 | 1655.0 |
8/18,浙薯38 | 3210 | 3210 | 3210 | 3210.0 |
DF | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主区部分 | 区组 | 2 | 8001028.125 | 4000514.063 | 0.1987 | 3.74 | 6.51 | |||||||
A(扦插期) | 7 | 1592015583 | 227430797.5 | 11.2957 | 2.77 | 4.28 | ||||||||
EA | 14 | 281880196.9 | 20134299.78 | / | - | - | ||||||||
主区总变异 | 23 | 1881896808.025 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
副区部分 | B(品种) | 1 | 20455879.69 | 20455879.69 | 1.9348 | 4.49 | 8.53 | |||||||
A×B | 7 | 50358857.81 | 7194122.545 | 0.6804 | 2.66 | 4.03 | ||||||||
EB | 16 | 169165875 | 10572867.19 | / | - | - | ||||||||
总变异 | 47 | 2121877420 | - | - | - | - |
DF | SS | MS | F | F0.05 | F0.01 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主区部分 | 区组 | 2 | 8001028.125 | 4000514.063 | 0.1987 | 3.74 | 6.51 | |||||||
A(扦插期) | 7 | 1592015583 | 227430797.5 | 11.2957 | 2.77 | 4.28 | ||||||||
EA | 14 | 281880196.9 | 20134299.78 | / | - | - | ||||||||
主区总变异 | 23 | 1881896808.025 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||
副区部分 | B(品种) | 1 | 20455879.69 | 20455879.69 | 1.9348 | 4.49 | 8.53 | |||||||
A×B | 7 | 50358857.81 | 7194122.545 | 0.6804 | 2.66 | 4.03 | ||||||||
EB | 16 | 169165875 | 10572867.19 | / | - | - | ||||||||
总变异 | 47 | 2121877420 | - | - | - | - |
扦插期 (月/日) | 鲜薯产量/(kg/hm2) | 平均 | P=0.05 | P=0.01 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
广台薯1号 | 浙薯38 | ||||
5/12A1 | 18685 | 19750 | 19218 | a | A |
5/26A2 | 15745 | 14145 | 14945 | ab | AB |
6/09A3 | 17085 | 18145 | 17615 | ab | A |
6/23A4 | 12815 | 11740 | 12278 | bc | ABC |
7/07A5 | 7205 | 8275 | 7740 | cd | BCD |
7/21A6 | 4805 | 10140 | 7473 | cd | BCD |
8/04A7 | 3100 | 6135 | 4618 | d | CD |
8/18A8 | 1655 | 3210 | 2433 | d | D |
扦插期 (月/日) | 鲜薯产量/(kg/hm2) | 平均 | P=0.05 | P=0.01 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
广台薯1号 | 浙薯38 | ||||
5/12A1 | 18685 | 19750 | 19218 | a | A |
5/26A2 | 15745 | 14145 | 14945 | ab | AB |
6/09A3 | 17085 | 18145 | 17615 | ab | A |
6/23A4 | 12815 | 11740 | 12278 | bc | ABC |
7/07A5 | 7205 | 8275 | 7740 | cd | BCD |
7/21A6 | 4805 | 10140 | 7473 | cd | BCD |
8/04A7 | 3100 | 6135 | 4618 | d | CD |
8/18A8 | 1655 | 3210 | 2433 | d | D |
[1] |
林飞荣, 陶永刚, 张敏荣, 等. 甘薯茎基部腐烂病病原及药剂防治研究初报[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(9):168-172.
|
[2] |
余继华. 一种重要的甘薯新病害―甘薯基腐病[J]. 植物检疫, 2018, 32(6):51-54.
|
[3] |
黄立飞, 刘伟明, 刘也楠, 等. 甘薯茎基部腐烂病调查及病原鉴定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(18):135-141.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19030138 |
[4] |
刘伟明, 黄立飞, 何贤彪, 等. 甘薯茎基部腐烂病防控技术研究[J]. 农学学报, 2017, 7(10):19-24.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas17040014 |
[5] |
黄立飞, 罗忠霞, 房伯平, 等. 我国甘薯新病害茎腐病的研究初报[J]. 植物病理学报, 2011, 41(1):18-23.
|
[6] |
黄巧雯, 杨宏仁, 林静宜, 等. 甘薯基腐病菌Phomopsis destruens生理特性及防治技術研究[J]. 台湾农业研究, 2016, 65(1):45-53.
|
[7] |
黄巧雯, 庄明富, 曾显雄, 等. 由Phomopsis destruens引起之甘薯基腐病[J]. 台湾植物病理學會刊, 2012, 21(1):47-52.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
杨冬静, 谢逸萍, 孙厚俊, 等. 3株甘薯干腐病菌的生物学特性研究[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018, 30(4):1-8.
|
[10] |
李鹏, 马代夫, 李强, 等. 甘薯根腐病的研究现状和展望[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009(1):114-116.
|
[11] |
何贤彪, 刘伟明. 甘薯白绢病防治试验初报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2015(2):133-134.
|
[12] |
黄立飞, 罗忠霞, 房伯平, 等. 甘薯茎腐病的研究进展[J]. 植物保护学报, 2014, 41(1):118-122.
|
[13] |
沈肖玲, 林钗, 钱俊婷, 等. 甘薯茎腐病症状及其病原鉴定[J]. 植物病理学报, 2018, 48(1):25-34.
|
[14] |
张敏荣, 余继华, 卢璐, 等. 台州新发现甘薯茎腐病[J]. 植物检疫, 2016, 30(3):84-86.
|
[15] |
余继华, 林飞荣, 石建尧, 等. 甘薯2种新入侵有害生物的防控研究[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(2):18-23.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas18060015 |
[16] |
刘庆昌. 甘薯在我国粮食和能源安全中的重要作用[J]. 科技导报, 2004(9):21-22.
|
[17] |
周郑坤, 郑元林. 甘薯营养价值与保健功能的再认识[J]. 江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 34(4):16-19.
|
[18] |
李雨露. 甘薯营养价值及开发利用[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2002(4):42.
|
[19] |
张立明, 王庆美, 王荫墀. 甘薯的主要营养成分和保健作用[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2003(3):162-166.
|
[20] |
刘伟明, 何贤彪, 刘也楠, 等. 甘薯茎基部腐烂病病原鉴定及药剂防控试验[J]. 农学学报, 2019, 9(12):9-16.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas20190800164 |
[21] |
姚海峰, 仇智灵, 沈肖玲, 等. 甘薯茎腐病传播侵染途径与田间发病流行因子探讨[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(30):112-119.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191000723 |
[22] |
何贤彪, 刘伟明, 黄立飞. 9种药剂对甘薯茎基部腐烂病的防治效果[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2017, 58(5):806-808.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20170527 |
[23] |
林飞荣, 余继华. 石灰氮防治甘薯茎基部腐烂病试验研究初报[J]. 农学学报, 2021, 11(7):18-22.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.cjas2021-0013 |
[24] |
迟元凯, 赵伟, 李婷, 等. 安徽省甘薯病害的发生及防治[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(16):89-90.
|
[25] |
张成玲, 孙厚俊, 赵永强, 等. 甘薯根腐病病原分子鉴定及防治药剂筛选[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(8):46-51.
|
[26] |
林飞荣, 余继华. 黄岩甘薯茎基部腐烂病发生情况与防控措施[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2022, 42(2):41-43.
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
张义杰. 土壤酸化对三七根腐病的影响及缓解因素研究[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2022.
|
[30] |
魏国胜, 周恒, 朱杰, 等. 土壤pH值对烟草根茎部病害的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011(1):140-143.
|
[31] |
陶永刚, 张胜, 林飞荣, 等. 甘薯茎基部腐烂病防控药剂试验[J]. 现代园艺, 2020(8):10-11.
|
[1] | ZHANG Yaowen, DONG Yuhong, GUAN Zhoubo, WEI Shihao, LI Dianrong, LI Shaoqin, LIANG Fengzhi. CMS with High Linolenic Acid Content in Brassica napus L.: Rapid Breeding Method and Effect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(9): 30-36. |
[2] | YANG Lijuan, GAO Wei, LI Haiyan, XUE Tao, ZHANG Chunxiang, WANG Yong. Pathogen Identification of Radish Black Rot and Fungicides Screening in Laboratory [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 129-134. |
[3] | LIU Di, SHI Qiuping, JIANG Qinjie, TANG Xin, LI Huangkaimei, AN Fengxuan, CHEN Enhai. Visual Analysis of Research on Sublethal Effect of Insecticide on Insects Based on CiteSpace [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 135-143. |
[4] | SHAO Wenqi, DONG Qingjun, DONG Yubing, ZHONG Ping, JI Li, CHEN Chuan, ZHANG Ankang. Effect of Chemical Seed Dressing on Seedling Strength and Yield of Late-sowing Wheat in Huaihe River Region [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(6): 22-28. |
[5] | ZUO Pengxiang, JIN Fangpeng, LENG Yun, WANG Zhifei, WU Junjie, YU Hongman, DENG Yulin, ZU Xuepeng, LI Minghui, WANG Jianbo, ZHANG Xinghai. Anesthetic Effect of Eugenol on Juvenile Schizothorax chongi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 159-164. |
[6] | ZHANG Wenting, MEI Yu, WANG Jihua. Research Status and Prospect of Precious Medicinal Plant Anoectochilus roxburghii [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(5): 16-26. |
[7] | LIAO Yilong, LIU Wuge, WANG Feng, LIU Dilin, KONG Le, LI Jinhua, HUO Xing, FU Chongyun, ZHU Manshan, ZENG Xueqin. Dynamics of Leaf SPAD Values and Its General Combining Ability and Genetic Effects of Late-season Hybrid Rice in South China [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 1-7. |
[8] | GU Xingbo, ZHOU Xiao, LI Chunli, ZHANG Zhizhong. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Plant-Based Pesticides Against Tobacco Aphids Hosted by Cigar and Safety of Tobacco Aphid Cocoon Bees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 120-125. |
[9] | SUN Jing, CHENG Lixin, LI Yunhua, YUE Linfang, LIU Fang, PANG Yajuan. Antimicrobial Activity of Extracts from Stellera chamaejasme Against Three Vegetable Pathogenic Fungi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 115-119. |
[10] | DONG Wenzhi, XU Feng, JIANG Yalian, YANG Xiumei, TANG Dongsheng, ZHANG Yiping. Laboratory Toxicity Test of 10 Fungicides Against Pathogens of Stem Rot of Iris germanica [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 142-148. |
[11] | LIU Xiaozhou, LIU Shihan, FANG Bijun, LIANG Jian, ZHUO Dinglong, ZHOU Renchao, TAN Guangwen. Research on Cutting Technology of Four New Melestoma Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 65-69. |
[12] | WANG Jun, HU Yinghua, WANG Xianghui, ZHANG Li. Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefacien Mixed with Other Agents on Wheat Crown Rot Disease and Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 135-139. |
[13] | ZHANG Shenju, ZHANG Jing, GUO Zhensheng, TIAN Wei, HUANGFU Ziqi, ZHAO Hongxian. The Super High Yield Effect of Different Sowing Date and Quantity Experiments on ‘Zhengmai 1860’ in Eastern Henan Plain [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 14-20. |
[14] | HOU Hui, ZHANG Qingchuan, WANG Li, YUAN Hongbo, HUANG Tianxiang, CHEN Hanjie, TU Hongtao. Control Effects of Several Fungicides Against Apple Moldy Core in ‘Yuhua Yataka’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 139-143. |
[15] | CHI Yanyan, CHEN Bingxu, QUAN Linfa, DONG Yizhi, XU Shu, YAO Qiong. Analysis of Application Potentials of Chlorantraniliprole Against Conpomorpha sinensis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 144-149. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||