Analysis of Application Potentials of Chlorantraniliprole Against Conpomorpha sinensis

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0501

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to systematically evaluate the application potentials of chlorantraniliprole against Conpomorpha sinensis, the bioactivity of chlorantraniliprole to eggs, adults and the effect of chlorantraniliprole on longevity and fecundity were determined in laboratory, and the control effect was tested in the field. The result showed that the LC₅₀ of chlorantraniliprole to eggs of C. sinensis which were laid for 48 h was 10.650 mg/L, and the ovicidal activity of chlorantraniliprole was significantly higher than that of lambda-cyhalothrin and lower than diflubenzuron. The 24 h LC₅₀ of chlorantraniliprole to adults of C. sinensis was 145.856 mg/L, which was equal to lambda-cyhalothrin. The LC₁₀ and LC₃₀ doses of chlorantraniliprole had small effects on the longevity of C. sinensis male adult and egg hatchability, but they could effectively reduce the longevity and fecundity of female adult. When C. sinensis was in peak oviposition period to egg incubation period, insecticides were sprayed one time. The results of 14 days after treatment showed that effect of 200 g/L chlorantraniliprole SC which was diluted 1500 and 3000 times respectively was 95.29%, and the effect of 200 g/L chlorantraniliprole SC which was diluted 4500 times was 84.71%. The effects of above three treatments were significantly higher than that of 200 g/L diflubenzuron SC 1000 times and 25 g/L lambda-cyhalothrin 500 times. This study suggested that chlorantraniliprole exhibited the potential to be exploited as a control strategy for C. sinensis.

Key words: chlorantraniliprole, Conpomorpha sinensis, bioactivity, sublethal effect, field efficacy

CHI Yanyan, CHEN Bingxu, QUAN Linfa, DONG Yizhi, XU Shu, YAO Qiong. Analysis of Application Potentials of Chlorantraniliprole Against Conpomorpha sinensis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(16): 144-149.

Figures/Tables 4

References 31

[1]	杨学军, 严荷荣, 徐赛章, 等. 植保机械的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 农业机械学报, 2002, 33(6):129-131,137.
[2]	YAO Q, XU S, DONG Y Z, et al. Identification and characterisation of two general odourant-binding proteins from the litchi fruit borer, Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley[J]. Pest management science, 2016, 72(5):877-887.
[3]	荣哲彪, 郝丽萍, 王丽英. 荔枝园主要害虫群落动态调查研究[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2018, 337(1):4-5.
[4]	徐海明, 董易之, 林少源, 等. 荔枝钻蛀性害虫种类调查及防治[J]. 中国南方果树, 2019, 48(4):64-68.
[5]	吴黄泉, 黄常青, 沈鸣凤. 爻纹细蛾的研究[J]. 华东昆虫学报, 1995, 4(1):35-38.
[6]	SCHULTE M J, MARTIN K, SAUERBORN J. Biology and control of the fruit borer, Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley on litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) in northern Thailand[J]. Insect science, 2007, 14(6):525-529.
[7]	李康. 荔枝蒂蛀虫的发生及防治[J]. 广西农业科学, 2002(5):249-250.
[8]	宋坚利, 何雄奎, 曾爱军, 等. 三种果园施药机械施药效果研究[J]. 中国农机化, 2006(5):79-82.
[9]	傅锡敏, 吕晓兰, 丁为民, 等. 我国果园植保机械现状与技术需求[J]. 中国农机化, 2009(6):10-13,17.
[10]	陈炳旭, 张英杰, 董易之, 等. 荔枝蒂蛀虫生物防治研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2011, 28(3):493-497.
[11]	李文景, 董易之, 姚琼, 等. 荔枝蒂蛀虫研究进展[J]. 昆虫学报, 2018, 61(6):721-732. doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2018.06.011
[12]	李鹏燕, 柏建山, 刘艳萍, 等. 3种杀虫剂对荔枝蒂蛀虫的药剂敏感性和解毒酶活性影响[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2016, 36(11):15-19.
[13]	OGAWA Y. Role of ryanodine receptors[J]. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 1994, 29(4):229-274. pmid: 8001396
[14]	TEIXEIRA L A, ANDALORO J T. Diamide insecticides: Global efforts to address insect resistance stewardship challenges[J]. Pesticide biochemistry and physiology, 2013, 106(3):76-78.
[15]	LAHM G P, SELBY T P, FREUDENBERGER J H, et al. Insecticidal anthranilic diamides: A new class of potent ryanodine receptor activators[J]. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2005, 15(22):4898-4906.
[16]	徐尚成, 俞幼芬, 王晓军, 等. 新杀虫剂氯虫苯甲酰胺及其研究开发进展[J]. 现代农药, 2008(5):8-11.
[17]	林玉英, 金涛, 马光昌, 等. 15种杀虫剂对草地贪夜蛾卵的毒力测定[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(1):82-86.
[18]	王晓, 陈鹏, 张硕, 等. 12种杀虫剂对日本通草蛉不同虫态的毒力及安全性评价[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(2):211-217.
[19]	韩慧, 毛瑞卿, 赵志国, 等. 3种不同类型杀虫剂对梨小食心虫的室内毒力测定[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(8):1470-1473.
[20]	廖世纯, 黎柳锋, 王凤英, 等. 13种杀虫剂对荔枝蛀蒂虫成虫触杀效果测定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(12):2172-2176.
[21]	徐淑, 罗振亚, 姚琼, 等. 几种农药对荔枝蒂蛀虫的室内毒力和田间防效[J]. 中国南方果树, 2020, 49(6):58-60.
[22]	HUANG L, LU M X, HAN G J, et al. Sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on development, reproduction and vitellogenin gene (CsVg) expression in the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis[J]. Pest management science, 2016, 72(12):2280-2286.
[23]	GUO L, DNSENU N, SONODA S, et al. Sublethal and transgenerational effects of chlorantraniliprole on biological traits of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L.[J]. Crop protection, 2013, 48:29-34.
[24]	胡珍娣, 尹飞, 林庆胜, 等. 成虫期饲毒对小菜蛾试验种群当代与子代繁殖力的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2012, 34(4):514-518.
[25]	刘宴弟, 孙丽娜, 张怀江, 等. 氯虫苯甲酰胺对桃小食心虫生长发育的亚致死效应[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(5):158-163.
[26]	杨亚军, 王彩云, 徐红星, 等. 两种药剂亚致死浓度对稻纵卷叶螟生长发育及解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3):304-310.
[27]	支昊宇. 新疆亚洲玉米螟对氯虫苯甲酰胺抗性机制的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
[28]	吴学步, 杜家义. 6种杀虫剂对荔枝蒂蛀虫田间药效比较[J]. 中国南方果树, 2012, 41(1):61-62.
[29]	赵亚, 郭利军, 胡福初, 等. 荔枝蒂蛀虫的田间药效试验[J]. 农药, 2019, 58(4):300-302.
[30]	戴长庚, 李鸿波, 魏琪, 等. 5种杀虫剂对二化螟不同龄期幼虫的毒力和防效[J]. 杂交水稻, 2022, 37(3):25-28.
[31]	王猛, 王凯, 刘峰, 等. 溴氰虫酰胺和氯虫苯甲酰胺对三种鳞翅目害虫的毒力作用比较[J]. 植物保护学报, 2014, 41(3):360-366.

虫态	杀虫剂	LC₅₀/(mg/L)	95%置信限/(mg/L)	回归方程	相关系数
卵	氯虫苯甲酰胺	10.650	9.250~12.301	y=2.893+2.051x	0.998
	高效氯氟氰菊酯	57.598	48.793~68.649	y=2.066+1.667x	0.990
	除虫脲	0.892	0.768~1.043	y=5.094+1.892x	0.995
成虫	氯虫苯甲酰胺	145.856	126.117~166.176	y=-0.126+2.369x	0.989
	高效氯氟氰菊酯	111.947	93.381~133.127	y=1.752+1.585x	0.990
	除虫脲	332.051	286.646~390.775	y=0.017+1.976x	0.993

虫态	杀虫剂	LC₅₀/(mg/L)	95%置信限/(mg/L)	回归方程	相关系数
卵	氯虫苯甲酰胺	10.650	9.250~12.301	y=2.893+2.051x	0.998
	高效氯氟氰菊酯	57.598	48.793~68.649	y=2.066+1.667x	0.990
	除虫脲	0.892	0.768~1.043	y=5.094+1.892x	0.995
成虫	氯虫苯甲酰胺	145.856	126.117~166.176	y=-0.126+2.369x	0.989
	高效氯氟氰菊酯	111.947	93.381~133.127	y=1.752+1.585x	0.990
	除虫脲	332.051	286.646~390.775	y=0.017+1.976x	0.993

处理	雌蛾寿命/d	雄蛾寿命/d	单雌产卵量/(粒/雌）	子一代卵孵化率/%
LC₁₀	8.50±0.13ab	8.35±0.09a	55.00±1.10ab	84.00±2.48a
LC₃₀	7.85±0.25b	8.10±0.24a	50.78±2.27b	81.85±2.77a
空白对照	8.65±0.25a	8.55±0.29a	57.98±0.89a	88.70±1.35a

处理	雌蛾寿命/d	雄蛾寿命/d	单雌产卵量/(粒/雌）	子一代卵孵化率/%
LC₁₀	8.50±0.13ab	8.35±0.09a	55.00±1.10ab	84.00±2.48a
LC₃₀	7.85±0.25b	8.10±0.24a	50.78±2.27b	81.85±2.77a
空白对照	8.65±0.25a	8.55±0.29a	57.98±0.89a	88.70±1.35a

杀虫剂	稀释倍数	总果数/粒	蛀果数/粒	蛀果率/%	防效/%
200 g/L氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂	6000	400	24	6.00±0.41b	71.76±1.92c
	4500	400	13	3.25±0.48a	84.71±2.25b
	3000	400	4	1.00±0.41a	95.29±1.92a
	1500	400	4	1.00±0.58a	95.29±2.72a
25 g/L高效氯氟氰菊酯乳油	500	400	23	5.50±0.65b	74.12±3.04c
200 g/L除虫脲悬浮剂	1000	400	22	5.75±1.11b	72.94±5.22c
空白对照		400	85	21.25±1.11c