Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (22): 148-155.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0253
Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Qi1,2(), ZHOU Ting1,2, LEI Jinshan1,2, YE Keyuan1,2, LIU Yi1,2, LIU Li1,2, HUANG Mingyue1,2, JIN Yile1,2, ZHANG Jing3, YUE Xiaolin3, TAN Wenyuan3, LI Ping3(
)
Received:
2025-03-31
Revised:
2025-07-18
Online:
2025-08-05
Published:
2025-08-11
CHEN Qi, ZHOU Ting, LEI Jinshan, YE Keyuan, LIU Yi, LIU Li, HUANG Mingyue, JIN Yile, ZHANG Jing, YUE Xiaolin, TAN Wenyuan, LI Ping. Determination and Difference Analysis of Organic Acid Content in Particulate Matter of Mainstream Smoke of Cigar Leaves[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(22): 148-155.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0253
化合物名称 | 保留时间/min | 定量离子(m/z) | 定性离子(m/z) | 储备液浓度/(mg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
乙酸 | 15.41 | 43 | 45 | 0.344 |
丙酸 | 17.92 | 74 | 57 | 0.0413 |
异丁酸 | 18.55 | 43 | 41 | 0.120 |
丁酸 | 20.43 | 60 | 73 | 0.0182 |
丙烯酸 | 21.02 | 72 | 45 | 0.0705 |
异戊酸 | 21.44 | 60 | 57 | 0.289 |
戊酸 | 23.46 | 60 | 73 | 0.171 |
巴豆酸 | 24.39 | 86 | 41 | 0.329 |
3-甲基戊酸 | 24.76 | 60 | 87 | 0.0208 |
乙酸苯乙酯 | 25.36 | 104 | 91 | 10.18 |
庚酸 | 28.84 | 60 | 73 | 0.098 |
苯甲酸 | 39.69 | 105 | 77 | 0.0805 |
苯乙酸 | 42.24 | 91 | 136 | 0.200 |
肉豆蔻酸 | 45.01 | 73 | 60 | 0.184 |
十五烷酸 | 46.99 | 73 | 60 | 0.284 |
棕榈酸 | 48.90 | 73 | 60 | 0.334 |
硬脂酸 | 53.20 | 73 | 129 | 0.305 |
油酸 | 53.91 | 55 | 69 | 0.359 |
化合物名称 | 保留时间/min | 定量离子(m/z) | 定性离子(m/z) | 储备液浓度/(mg/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
乙酸 | 15.41 | 43 | 45 | 0.344 |
丙酸 | 17.92 | 74 | 57 | 0.0413 |
异丁酸 | 18.55 | 43 | 41 | 0.120 |
丁酸 | 20.43 | 60 | 73 | 0.0182 |
丙烯酸 | 21.02 | 72 | 45 | 0.0705 |
异戊酸 | 21.44 | 60 | 57 | 0.289 |
戊酸 | 23.46 | 60 | 73 | 0.171 |
巴豆酸 | 24.39 | 86 | 41 | 0.329 |
3-甲基戊酸 | 24.76 | 60 | 87 | 0.0208 |
乙酸苯乙酯 | 25.36 | 104 | 91 | 10.18 |
庚酸 | 28.84 | 60 | 73 | 0.098 |
苯甲酸 | 39.69 | 105 | 77 | 0.0805 |
苯乙酸 | 42.24 | 91 | 136 | 0.200 |
肉豆蔻酸 | 45.01 | 73 | 60 | 0.184 |
十五烷酸 | 46.99 | 73 | 60 | 0.284 |
棕榈酸 | 48.90 | 73 | 60 | 0.334 |
硬脂酸 | 53.20 | 73 | 129 | 0.305 |
油酸 | 53.91 | 55 | 69 | 0.359 |
有机酸名称 | 线性范围/(μg/mL) | 回归方程 | R2 | 平均回收率/% | RSD/% | 检出限/(μg/支) | 定量限/(μg/支) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乙酸 | 15.10~172.00 | y=0.0057x-0.0527 | 0.9992 | 108.23 | 9.45 | 1.1798 | 3.9289 |
丙酸 | 2.72~41.30 | y=0.0036x-0.0017 | 0.9990 | 84.41 | 6.57 | 0.2906 | 0.9679 |
异丁酸 | 7.90~60.00 | y=0.0081x-0.0164 | 0.9993 | 113.94 | 8.29 | 0.2248 | 0.7487 |
丁酸 | 1.20~18.20 | y=0.006x-0.001 | 0.9993 | 82.59 | 11.00 | 0.1222 | 0.4070 |
丙烯酸 | 4.64~70.50 | y=0.0032x-0.0147 | 0.9997 | 113.29 | 9.14 | 0.2133 | 0.7103 |
异戊酸 | 19.03-289.00 | y=0.0067x+0.0038 | 0.9982 | 91.43 | 7.07 | 0.1850 | 0.6162 |
戊酸 | 11.26~85.50 | y=0.0115x-0.0764 | 0.9990 | 87.73 | 8.16 | 0.0882 | 0.2938 |
巴豆酸 | 21.66~329.00 | y=0.0017x-0.0314 | 0.9993 | 117.16 | 10.50 | 0.2128 | 0.7086 |
3-甲基戊酸 | 1.37~20.80 | y=0.0116x+0.0064 | 0.9997 | 93.46 | 8.94 | 0.0684 | 0.2277 |
庚酸 | 6.45~49.00 | y=0.0133x-0.0414 | 0.9992 | 82.00 | 3.36 | 0.3154 | 1.0504 |
苯甲酸 | 5.30~80.50 | y=0.0035x+0.0189 | 0.9994 | 90.92 | 5.35 | 0.1123 | 0.3740 |
苯乙酸 | 13.17~200.00 | y=0.0075x+0.0142 | 0.9993 | 96.37 | 6.10 | 0.1332 | 0.4436 |
肉豆蔻酸 | 12.12~184.00 | y=0.0094x-0.0118 | 0.9994 | 107.26 | 3.33 | 0.2251 | 0.7496 |
十五烷酸 | 18.70~284.00 | y=0.0089x-0.0167 | 0.9994 | 96.54 | 5.84 | 0.2078 | 0.6918 |
棕榈酸 | 22.00~167.00 | y=0.0153x-0.0753 | 0.9992 | 98.44 | 7.24 | 0.1957 | 0.6517 |
硬脂酸 | 20.08~152.50 | y=0.0023x-0.0023 | 0.9997 | 110.32 | 5.48 | 0.2240 | 0.7459 |
油酸 | 23.64~179.50 | y=0.0057x-0.0994 | 0.9991 | 81.03 | 9.29 | 0.4053 | 1.3496 |
有机酸名称 | 线性范围/(μg/mL) | 回归方程 | R2 | 平均回收率/% | RSD/% | 检出限/(μg/支) | 定量限/(μg/支) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
乙酸 | 15.10~172.00 | y=0.0057x-0.0527 | 0.9992 | 108.23 | 9.45 | 1.1798 | 3.9289 |
丙酸 | 2.72~41.30 | y=0.0036x-0.0017 | 0.9990 | 84.41 | 6.57 | 0.2906 | 0.9679 |
异丁酸 | 7.90~60.00 | y=0.0081x-0.0164 | 0.9993 | 113.94 | 8.29 | 0.2248 | 0.7487 |
丁酸 | 1.20~18.20 | y=0.006x-0.001 | 0.9993 | 82.59 | 11.00 | 0.1222 | 0.4070 |
丙烯酸 | 4.64~70.50 | y=0.0032x-0.0147 | 0.9997 | 113.29 | 9.14 | 0.2133 | 0.7103 |
异戊酸 | 19.03-289.00 | y=0.0067x+0.0038 | 0.9982 | 91.43 | 7.07 | 0.1850 | 0.6162 |
戊酸 | 11.26~85.50 | y=0.0115x-0.0764 | 0.9990 | 87.73 | 8.16 | 0.0882 | 0.2938 |
巴豆酸 | 21.66~329.00 | y=0.0017x-0.0314 | 0.9993 | 117.16 | 10.50 | 0.2128 | 0.7086 |
3-甲基戊酸 | 1.37~20.80 | y=0.0116x+0.0064 | 0.9997 | 93.46 | 8.94 | 0.0684 | 0.2277 |
庚酸 | 6.45~49.00 | y=0.0133x-0.0414 | 0.9992 | 82.00 | 3.36 | 0.3154 | 1.0504 |
苯甲酸 | 5.30~80.50 | y=0.0035x+0.0189 | 0.9994 | 90.92 | 5.35 | 0.1123 | 0.3740 |
苯乙酸 | 13.17~200.00 | y=0.0075x+0.0142 | 0.9993 | 96.37 | 6.10 | 0.1332 | 0.4436 |
肉豆蔻酸 | 12.12~184.00 | y=0.0094x-0.0118 | 0.9994 | 107.26 | 3.33 | 0.2251 | 0.7496 |
十五烷酸 | 18.70~284.00 | y=0.0089x-0.0167 | 0.9994 | 96.54 | 5.84 | 0.2078 | 0.6918 |
棕榈酸 | 22.00~167.00 | y=0.0153x-0.0753 | 0.9992 | 98.44 | 7.24 | 0.1957 | 0.6517 |
硬脂酸 | 20.08~152.50 | y=0.0023x-0.0023 | 0.9997 | 110.32 | 5.48 | 0.2240 | 0.7459 |
油酸 | 23.64~179.50 | y=0.0057x-0.0994 | 0.9991 | 81.03 | 9.29 | 0.4053 | 1.3496 |
[1] |
姬厚伟, 张丽, 满杰, 等. 振荡萃取-GC/MS法测定卷烟主流烟气总粒相物中的14种挥发性有机酸[J]. 烟草科技, 2015, 48(9):33-39.
|
[2] |
王瑞新. 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003:98-105.
|
[3] |
申进朝, 冼可法. 烟草中有机酸分析研究进展[J]. 烟草科技, 2003(8):29-32.
|
[4] |
贺佩. 海南雪茄烟叶及其主流烟气中主要化学成分分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2023.
|
[5] |
张霞, 杨柳, 向刚, 等. 离子色谱法及聚类分析研究主流烟气中的有机酸[J]. 分析试验室, 2009, 28(12):82-85.
|
[6] |
李翔宇, 姜兴益, 张洪非, 等. 雪茄烟主流烟气指标测定及稳定性分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(10):44-51.
|
[7] |
doi: S0731-7085(16)30400-9 pmid: 27454081 |
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
张迎春, 郭国宁, 岳海波, 等. 卷烟主流烟气气相物和总粒相物中有机酸的分析研究[J]. 分析科学学报, 2010, 26(5):567-571.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.10.066 pmid: 24210300 |
[13] |
汪慧敏, 孙淼, 屈锋. 毛细管电泳法同时分析水、乳、膏类化妆品中5种有机酸[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(7):773-777.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.01021 |
[14] |
张玮, 吴达, 焦亮, 等. 不同手工雪茄烟主流烟气成分差异分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2025, 31(1):153-162.
|
[15] |
国家烟草质量监督检验中心, 中国烟草标准化研究中心, 山东中烟工业有限责任公司, 等. YC/T 462—2013,雪茄烟调节和测试的大气环境[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013:2.
|
[16] |
国家烟草质量监督检验中心, 中国烟草标准化研究中心, 山东中烟工业有限责任公司, 等. YC/T 461—2013,常规分析用雪茄烟吸烟机定义和标准条件[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013:2.
|
[17] |
河南中烟工业有限责任公司, 郑州轻工业学院. YC/T 500—2014,烟草及烟草制品挥发性有机酸的测定气相色谱-质谱联用法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014:4.
|
[18] |
余晶晶, 蔡君兰, 郭吉兆, 等. 烟叶类型、部位及生态区对总粒相物中主要有机酸释放量的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2020, 26(2):1-7.
|
[19] |
陈宇. 海南雪茄烟发酵过程中的烟叶质量变化研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2019.
|
[20] |
卢绍浩. 雪茄烟叶晾制过程中物质含量的动态变化[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2021.
|
[21] |
四川中烟工业有限责任公司, 安徽中烟工业有限责任公司, 山东中烟工业有限责任公司, 等. YC/T 588—2021,雪茄烟叶工商交接等级标准[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021:4.
|
[22] |
彭玉富, 张书伟, 蔡宪杰, 等. 不同成熟度对河南烤烟上部叶品质的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2011, 17(4):62-66.
|
[23] |
付秋娟, 郝贤伟, 杜咏梅, 等. 烤烟上部烟叶中非挥发性有机酸及高级脂肪酸与烟叶内在品质的关系[J]. 烟草科技, 2024, 57(9):24-32.
|
[24] |
周会娜, 刘萍萍, 张玉霞, 等. 八大香型风格新鲜烟叶代谢特征的生态成因分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2022, 55(6):19-26.
|
[25] |
耿召良, 高华军, 李方友, 等. 国内外部分雪茄烟叶主要化学成分比较及聚类分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2023, 44(9):1840-1853.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.09.012 |
[26] |
王硕立, 丁松爽, 王荣浩, 等. 我国云南和尼加拉瓜雪茄烟叶矿质元素含量和感官质量差异及其相关分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(3):139-147.
|
[27] |
赵亮, 王硕立, 赵曦, 等. 国内外典型茄衣烟叶常规化学成分和中性致香物质关键性差异指标研究[J]. 轻工学报, 2024, 39(1):79-86.
|
[28] |
周婷, 陈琦, 贾玉红, 等. 国产雪茄烟叶原料烟气特征分析的意义与关键技术[J]. 中国食品工业, 2024(16):132-134.
|
[29] |
杨涓, 罗诚, 李东亮, 等. 雪茄烟气化学成分研究进展[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2021, 27(4):100-105.
|
[1] | WU Dandan, WU Xiaoxing, LIN Menghua, LIANG Ying, GU Hongsheng. Fruit Quality Analysis of Pyrus bretschneideri ‘Laiyang’ at Different Tree Ages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(22): 156-164. |
[2] | HUANG Huaxi, LU Enke, ZANG Qingmin, XU Shijuan, CHEN Rong, LIU Qin. Analysis of Volatile Oil Components in Different Organs of Echinacea purpurea [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(19): 143-150. |
[3] | GUO Yidian, DING Songshuang, ZHANG Kai, QUAN Yihua, WANG Zhenhua, TAN Yonghao, PEI Yubing, SHI Xiangdong. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Cigar Leaf Quality at Different Harvest Times Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(18): 57-64. |
[4] | WANG Zhenghao, XING Zhuoran, CAI Baocai, ZHONG Junwen, MA Lijuan, HUANG Ke, YIN Guangting, DUAN Weidong, SHI Xiangdong, LI Jianhua. Effects of Air-curing Environment and Methods on Moisture Variation and Quality of Cigar Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 152-157. |
[5] | GUO Wenlong, WANG Huiqing, DING Songshuang, XING Zhuoran, LIU Feng, DENG Cheng, TANG Jie, SHI Xiangdong, DING Jianbing. Research Progress on Effect of Light Intensity on Production of Cigar Wrapper Leaves Under Shade Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(10): 38-44. |
[6] | ZHOU Xiao, XU Zhengrong, LU Xin, YANG Gang, DONG Junzhong, WANG Yue, WANG Bingbing, LI Tian, LIU Yan. Optimization of Fermentation Process for Yunnan Produced Cigar Tobacco Leaves Using Response Surface Methodology [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 141-147. |
[7] | ZHANG Ting, LI Jinhai, XIAO Shaohong, WANG Kang, LIU Jun, LIAO Xiaoling, CHEN Hui, YU Fei, PENG Longjun, YE Jiaojiao, MA Tong. Relationship Between Appearance Quality and Physicochemical Indexes of Main Variety of Cigar Wrapper Leaves in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 148-153. |
[8] | ZHOU Xiao, HE Fuying, YU Ziyun, LU Xin, DONG Junzhong, WANG Yue, WANG Bingbing, LI Tian, LIU Yan. Influence of Altitude on Quality and Microbial Community Structure of Yunnan Produced Cigar Tobacco Leaves [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(34): 8-14. |
[9] | XING Xiangyu, CONG Tianyue, GUAN Xin, QI Kexiang, LI Wanru, ZHANG He, YOU Mengyao, WU Tong, ZHENG Chunying. Analysis of Volatile Components of Endophytic Fungus HDM07 in Cannabis sativa L. [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(30): 103-113. |
[10] | HOU Bingqing, WANG Shuoli, ZHANG Youjie, CAO Yang, SHI Xiangdong, DING Songshuang, LIU Bingyang, WANG Yihui. Prediction Model of Sensory Quality of Cigar Raw Materials Based on BP Neural Network [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(27): 126-133. |
[11] | ZHOU Quanwei, LIU Lulu, YANG Zhen, JIANG Zhongrong, ZHANG Jiabao, SHI Xiangdong, LI Dongliang. Analysis of Flavor Substances of Cigar Tobacco Under Different Fermentation Conditions: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(27): 144-151. |
[12] | LIU Lu, LIU Jing, REN Yongjian, CHENG Dan. Climate Influencing Factors in Growing Period of Chinese Cigars——A Case Study of Laifeng, Hubei [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(26): 73-79. |
[13] | LIU Yu, WANG Chongqing, LIANG Jingbo, PAN Xingliang, LIU Jun. Research Progress on Application and Mechanism of Antibiotic Substitutes in Livestock and Poultry Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(26): 126-132. |
[14] | GU Xingbo, ZHOU Xiao, LI Chunli, ZHANG Zhizhong. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Plant-Based Pesticides Against Tobacco Aphids Hosted by Cigar and Safety of Tobacco Aphid Cocoon Bees [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 120-125. |
[15] | WANG Huifang, ZHANG Xi, WANG Zhihui, GUO Chuangjiang, WEN Junming, YANG Zhao, LIU Yun. Effects of Different Humidity Conditions on Enzymatic Browning Reaction and Quality of Cigar Tobacco Leaves During Air-Curing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(21): 131-138. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||