不同种植年限设施西瓜土壤可溶性盐组分变化特征

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18010002

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (35): 79-85.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18010002

所属专题：园艺

• 资源环境生态土壤气象 • 上一篇下一篇

不同种植年限设施西瓜土壤可溶性盐组分变化特征

杨艳菊,王娟娟,柯帅,单玉华,张海鹏,钱晓晴

扬州大学环境科学与工程学院,扬州大学环境科学与工程学院,扬州大学环境科学与工程学院,扬州大学环境科学与工程学院,扬州大学农学院,扬州大学环境科学与工程学院

收稿日期:2018-01-01 修回日期:2018-11-20 接受日期:2018-03-21 出版日期:2018-12-16 发布日期:2018-12-16
通讯作者: 杨艳菊
基金资助:
：国家自然科学基金项目“水稻土硝化能力对低氧环境的适应机理及其与氮损失的关系”(41701329)；中国博士后科学基金“低氧环境下水稻土中的硝化作用研究”(2017M621837)；江苏省产学研前瞻性联合研究项目“保护地硝酸盐积累的危害与生态消减机理与技术”(BY2015061-05)；江苏省农业三新工程项目“西甜瓜土壤改良与水肥一体化技术示范推广”(SXGC2017308)；中国博士后特别资助“水稻根际土壤硝化能力对肥料氮去向的调控作用”(2018T110562)。

Effect of Planting Ages on Soil Salts Content in Facility Cultivation Watermelon Soil

Received:2018-01-01 Revised:2018-11-20 Accepted:2018-03-21 Online:2018-12-16 Published:2018-12-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用田间取样及室内分析相结合的方法,研究了连续种植不同年限(0年-6年)西瓜的设施土壤可溶性盐含量及组分的变化。结果表明,与种植0年的麦地土壤相比,设施西瓜土壤pH显著降低(P < 0.01)；土壤碱解氮、速效磷和速效钾含量显著增加(P < 0.01)；电导率显著增加且随着设施西瓜种植年限的延长而显著增加趋势(R₂ = 0.90,P < 0.01)。设施西瓜土壤可溶性盐阳离子以Ca₂₊和Mg₂₊为主,阴离子以SO₄_2-和NO₃_-为主。随着设施西瓜种植年限的增加设施西瓜土壤可溶性盐总量显著增加(R₂ = 0.93, P < 0.01),增加的可溶性盐主要为Ca₂₊、K₊、NO₃_-和Cl_-,分配比例分别为31.3%、10.1%、23.6%和15.0%。相关分析表明,供试的设施西瓜土壤速效磷、速效钾与盐基离子Na₊、K₊、SO₄_2- 和Mg₂₊含量显著相关(P<0.05),土壤电导率(EC)与土壤可溶性盐总量相关关系达到显著水平(P<0.05)。

关键词: 花生, 花生, 上胚轴, 毒莠定, 愈伤, 体细胞胚

Abstract: To analyze the effects of watermelon planting years on changes of soil salts contents in facility cultivation watermelon soil, a field sampling in combination with analytical methods was carried out to measure the content and composition of soluble salts in soils with different facility cultivation planting ages. The results showed that soil pH value of facility cultivation watermelon soil significantly decreased compared with upland soil (P <0.05), while soil available nitrogen (AN), available phosphate (AP), available potassium (AK), andEC significantly increased (P <0.05). SoilEC was significantly increased with the increase of planting ages (R 2= 0.90，P <0.01). Ca2+ and Mg2+ were the major soluble salt cation, and SO42- and NO3- were the major soluble salt negative ions in facility cultivation watermelon soil. The content of soil total soluble salt were significantly increased with the increase of planting ages (R 2=0.93，P <0.01). The Ca2+, K+, NO3- and Cl- accounted for about 31.3%, 10.1%, 23.6% and 15.0% of the increased total soluble salt in soil. Correlation analysis indicated that soil available phosphate (P), available potassium (K) were important factor affecting the content of Na+ 、K+ 、SO42- and Mg2+. Soil electrical conductivity (EC ) could represent the level of soil secondary salinization.

杨艳菊,王娟娟,柯帅,单玉华,张海鹏,钱晓晴. 不同种植年限设施西瓜土壤可溶性盐组分变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(35): 79-85.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Z, Hu H C, Tian F Q, et al. Soil salt distribution under mulched drip irrigation in an aired area of northwestern China [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2014, 104: 23-33
[2] 蔡祖聪, 张金波, 黄新琦, 等. 强还原土壤灭菌防控作物土传病的应用研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(3): 469-476
[3] Chu S H, Zhang D, Wang D X, et al. Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of assimilatory nitrate and nitrite reductase reveals adaption and potential of Bacillus megaterium NCT-2 in secondary salinization soil [J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2017, 101: 1019-1028
[4] Devkota M, Martius C, Gupta R K, et al. Managing soil salinity with permanent bed planting in irrigated production systems in Central Asia [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2015, 202: 90-97
[5] Wang R S, Wan S Q, Kang Y H, et al. Assessment of secondary soil salinity prevention and economic benefit under different drip line placement and irrigation regime in northwest China [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 131: 41-49
[6] Devkota M, Gupta R K, Martius C, et al. Soil salinity management on raised beds with different furrow irrigation modes in salt-affected lands [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2015, 152: 243-250
[7] Shen W S, Ni Y Y, Gao N, et al. Bacterial community composition is shaped by soil secondary salinization and acidification brought on by high nitrogen fertilization rates [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 108: 76-83
[8] Kamble P N, Gaikwad V B, Kuchekar S R, et al. Microbial growth, biomass, community structure and nutrient limitation in high pH and salinity soils from Pravanagar (India) [J]. European Journal of soil Biology, 2014, 65: 87-95
[9] Liu M X, Yang J S, Li X M, et al. Distribution and dynamics of soil water and salt under different drip irrigation regimes in northwest China [J]. Irrigation Science, 2013, 31: 675-688
[10] Jesus J, Castro F, Niemela A, et al. Evaluation of the impact of different soil salinization processes on organic and mineral soils [J]. Water Air Soil Pollution, 2015, 226: 2-12
[11] Delaney J, Shiel R, Storey A. Prioritising wetlands subject to secondary salinization for ongoing management using aquatic invertebrate assemblages: a case study from the Wheatbelt Region of Western Australia [J]. Wetlands Ecology Management, 2016, 24: 15-32
[12] Li P Y, Wu J H, Qian H. Regulation of secondary soil salinization in semi-arid regions: a simulation research in the Nanshantaizi area along the Silk Road, northwest China [J]. Environmental Earth Science, 2016, 75: 2-12.
[13] 余海英, 李廷轩, 周建民. 典型设施栽培土壤盐分变化规律及潜在的环境效应研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(4): 571-576.
[14] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社. 2000, 85-96.
[15] Yang H C, Chen Y, Zhang F H, et al. Prediction of salt transport in different soil textures under drip irrigation in an arid zone using the SWAGMAN destiny model [J]. Soil Research, 2016, 54: 869-879.
[16] Wang H Y, Zhou J M, Zhang H Y, et al. Evaluation of current fertilizer practice and soil fertilizer in vegetable production in Beijing region [J]. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems, 2004, 69(1): 51-58
[17] 黄敏, 于婉霞, 李亚兵, 等. 武汉城郊设施蔬菜地土壤pH与可溶性盐分的变化规律分析[]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(6): 51-61
[18] Yang F, An F H, Ma H Y, et al. Variations on soil salinity and sodicty and its driving factors analysis under microtopography in different hydrological conditions [J]. Water, 2016, 8: 2-13
[19] 李涛, 于蕾, 吴越, 等. 山东省设施蔬菜地土壤次生盐渍化特征及影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, DOI:10.11766/trxb201705090108
[20] 蔡祖聪, 黄新琦. 土壤学不应忽视对作物土传病原微生物的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(2): 305-310
[21] 茅国芳, 陆利民, 杨晓华, 等. 沪郊西瓜甜瓜设施栽培土壤次生盐渍化的基本特性与防治技术研究[]. 上海农业学报, 2005, 21(1): 58-66
[22] Lin X G, Yin R, Zhang H Y, et al. Changes of soil microbiological properties caused by land use changing from rice-wheat rotation to vegetable cultivation [J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2004, 26: 119-128
[23] Miao Y X, Stewart B A, Zhang F S. Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient managements in China [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2011, 31: 83-93
[24] Shen W S, Lin X G, Gao N, et al. Land use intensification affects soil microbial populations, functional diversity and related supressiveness of cucumber Fusarium wilt in China’s Yangtze River Delta [J]. Plant and soil, 2008, 306: 117-127
[25] Shi W M, Yao J, Yan F. Vegetable cultivation under greenhouse conditions leads to rapid accumulation of nutrients, acidification and salinity of soils and groundwater contamination in South-Eastern China []. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems, 2009, 83: 73-84
[26] Adams P, Ho L C. Effect of constant and fluctuating salinity on the yield, quanlity and cacium status of tomatoes [J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1989, 64: 725-732
[27] Eltez R Z, Tuzel Y, Gul A, et al. Effects of different EC levels of nutrient solution on greenhouse tomato growing [J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2002, 573: 443-448
[28] Magán J J, Gallardo M, Thompson R B, et al. Effects of salinity on fruit yield and quality of tomato grown in soil-less culture in greenhouses in Mediterranean climatic conditions [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95: 1041-1055

不同种植年限设施西瓜土壤可溶性盐组分变化特征

Effect of Planting Ages on Soil Salts Content in Facility Cultivation Watermelon Soil

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	高伟, 张俊, 郝西, 刘娟, 臧秀旺. 河南省花生生产区域变化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 22-30.
[2]	秦乃群, 马巧云, 高敬伟, 杨璞, 蔡金兰, 郝迎春, 李艳梅, 冀洪策, 廖祥政. 沼渣施用对花生小麦轮作作物产量及土壤养分和重金属含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 58-63.
[3]	董红业, 徐婷, 刘文豪, 李强, 柳延涛. 新疆塔里木盆地东南缘花生主要农艺性状的分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 26-30.
[4]	何孟霞, 崔顺立, 郑宝智, 毕志乐, 路随增, 齐丽雅, 李新娜, 刘红, 韩鹏, 王瑾, 刘立峰. 不同花生品种适宜单粒精播密度研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33): 23-27.
[5]	李婷婷, 陈红. 刺梨叶片愈伤组织诱导及抗褐化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 12-21.
[6]	李爽, 张小军, 王平, 徐永菊, 侯睿, 朱勋路, 刘行, 张相琼, 岳福良, 李文均, 张小红. 花生不同遗传背景下的花生芽产出系数比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 17-23.
[7]	刘永惠, 沈一, 沈悦, 梁满, 陈志德. 花生籽仁发育过程中糖分积累特征及蔗糖代谢酶活性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(30): 29-34.
[8]	杨露露, 秦华伟. 基于颜色和纹理特征的花生仁外观品质检测研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 151-156.
[9]	刘子凡, 苏必孟, 黄洁, 魏云霞, 肖子丽. 木薯花生不同间作模式对木薯地土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(25): 102-107.
[10]	邝瑞彬, 杨敏, 周陈平, 杨护, 黄炳雄, 魏岳荣. 西番莲细胞悬浮系建立与培养条件优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(24): 92-99.
[11]	韩艳红, 刘软枝, 杨海棠, 胡延岭, 李盼, 朱桢桢, 石彦召, 于沐. 中国北方地区大果花生品种综合品质评价与分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(24): 14-18.
[12]	韩艳红, 于沐, 石彦召, 杨海棠, 胡延岭, 刘软枝, 李盼, 朱桢桢. 基于隶属函数法对13个花生品种品质的综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(2): 7-11.
[13]	李瑞静, 田菊, 刘洋. 桃叶卫矛茎段愈伤组织诱导及不定芽再生体系的建立[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(19): 18-24.
[14]	秦文洁, 郭润泽, 邹晓霞, 张晓军, 于晓娜, 王月福, 司彤. 膜下滴灌追肥种类对花生衰老特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(7): 28-36.
[15]	郭陞垚, 陈剑洪, 詹柳琪, 黄佳华, 龙安, 陈茹艳, 谢贤斌. 单粒播种不同密度对‘泉花551’产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(36): 30-35.