欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 105-111.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18080039

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇    下一篇

江淮丘陵区土壤可蚀性K值研究──以肥东县为例

管飞, 叶明亮, 马友华   

  1. 安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,合肥 230036
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-09 修回日期:2018-11-07 出版日期:2020-01-05 发布日期:2020-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 马友华
  • 作者简介:管飞,男,1992年出生,安徽肥东人,硕士,主要从事土壤信息技术研究。通信地址:230036 安徽省合肥市蜀山区长江西路130号 安徽农业大学资源环境与信息技术研究所,Tel:0551-65786289,Email:17730229460@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省农业生态环保与质量安全产业技术体系专项经费(201701425)

The K Value of Soil Erosion in the Jianghuai Hilly Area: A Case of Feidong County

Guan Fei, Ye Mingliang, Ma Youhua   

  1. College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036
  • Received:2018-08-09 Revised:2018-11-07 Online:2020-01-05 Published:2020-01-07
  • Contact: Ma Youhua

摘要:

水土流失是当前较为严重的环境问题之一。江淮丘陵区是水土流失较为严重的区域。本研究以肥东县为例研究土壤侵蚀问题,依据第二次土壤普查资料,采用分段3次Hermite插值法对土壤质地粒径进行转换及几何平均粒径修正模型进行计算,运用数理统计方法及SPSS相关性分析和ArcGIS软件地统计分析对研究区土壤质地类因子和可蚀性K值特征进行了研究。结果表明:(1)水稻土、黄褐土土壤质地组分含量变异系数差异较显著,黄棕壤变异系数差异较低;(2)水稻土、黄褐土质地类各因子主要通过CLA和Dg对土壤可蚀性进行作用,且均为负向作用;(3)肥东县土壤可蚀性K均值为0.02797,水稻土0.0279,黄褐土0.0281,黄棕壤0.0263;(4)不同土壤质地K值平均值中粉壤土最大,砂壤土最小,且土壤质地K值均呈弱变异性;(5)肥东县土壤可蚀性以中等可蚀性、高可蚀性为主。肥东县土壤可蚀性K值空间分布呈现由北向南先降低、后增高、再降低的趋势,由东向西逐渐增高的趋势,存在极大的土壤侵蚀风险。

关键词: 土壤可蚀性, 土壤质地, K值, 江淮丘陵区, GIS

Abstract:

Soil erosion, a severe environmental problem, is serious in the Jianghuai hilly area. Taking Feidong County as an example, and based on the second soil general survey data, we used the three-stage Hermite interpolation method to transform the soil texture particle size and conduct the calculation with the geometric mean particle size correction model, and adopted the mathematical statistics method, SPSS correlation analysis and ArcGIS software statistical analysis to study soil texture factors and erodibility K values. The results showed that: (1) the variation coefficient of soil texture components in paddy soil and yellow cinnamon soil was significantly different, and the variation coefficient of yellow brown soil was lower; (2) the factors of paddy soil and yellow clay soil mainly functioned through CLA and Dg, and they all had negative effects on soil erodibility; (3) soil erodibility K average value was 0.02797 in Feidong County, that of paddy soil was 0.0279, that of yellow cinnamon soil was 0.0281, and that of yellow brown soil was 0.0263; (4) among different soil textures, K value of the silt loam was the largest, and that of the sandy loam soil was the smallest, and the soil texture K value was weakly variable; (5) the soil erodibility of Feidong County was mainly moderately corrosive and highly corrosive. The spatial distribution of soil erodibility K value in Feidong County show a trend of decrease-increase-decrease from north to south, and a gradual increase from east to west, and there is a great risk of soil erosion.

Key words: soil erodibility, soil texture, K factor, Jianghuai hilly area, GIS

中图分类号: