欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 45-54.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0099

• 林学·园艺·园林 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于DTOPSIS法的油茶轻简化栽培综合评价

程一鸣1,2,3(), 魏振宇1,2, 杜洋文3, 刘文静1,2, 李寄凡1,2, 潘冬梅1,2, 于添1,2, 刘慧敏4, 舒常庆1,2(), 程军勇3()   

  1. 1 华中农业大学园艺林学学院，武汉 430070
    2 华中农业大学湖北省林业信息工程技术研究中心，武汉 430070
    3 湖北省林业科学研究院，武汉 430075
    4 中国林业科学研究院经济林研究所，郑州 450003
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-15 修回日期:2023-08-30 出版日期:2024-02-05 发布日期:2024-01-29
  • 通讯作者:
    舒常庆，男，1966年出生，副教授，从事经济林研究。E-mail：。
    程军勇，男，1977年出生，研究员，从事经济林研究。E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    程一鸣，男，1995年出生，湖北武汉人，硕士，研究方向为林木遗传育种。E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    湖北省2020年重点研发项目“油茶林提质增效与省力化经营技术研发”(2020BBA042); 国家重点研发计划项目“特色经济林优质轻简高效栽培技术集成与示范”(2020YFD1000700); 中央财政林业科技推广示范资金“油茶良种应用关键技术推广示范”(鄂[2023]TG11号)

Comprehensive Evaluation of Light and Simplified Cultivation of Camellia oleifera Based on DTOPSIS Method

CHENG Yiming1,2,3(), WEI Zhenyu1,2, DU Yangwen3, LIU Wenjing1,2, LI Jifan1,2, PAN Dongmei1,2, YU Tian1,2, LIU Huimin4, SHU Changqing1,2(), CHENG Junyong3()   

  1. 1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070
    2 Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center for Forestry Information, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070
    3 Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075
    4 Research Institute of Non-timber Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Zhengzhou 450003
  • Received:2023-02-15 Revised:2023-08-30 Published-:2024-02-05 Online:2024-01-29

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

17

摘要：

为解决油茶采摘费时费力的问题，以15个湖北省主栽油茶品种为研究对象，选取12个与轻简化栽培相关的性状为评价指标（单果鲜重、干果出籽率、干籽出仁率、种仁含油率、枝叶密度、树形指数、单株产量、病害级别、旱害级别、冠外果实比例、红色果实比例、采摘效率），采用DTOPSIS分析法，对15个湖北省主栽品种进行轻简化栽培适宜性的分析评价。品种的轻简化栽培适宜性评价值由高到低依次为‘长林53号’(C>0.6)，‘长林3号’、‘长林40号’、‘长林4号’(0.5<C<0.6)，‘华硕’、‘华鑫’、‘华金’(0.4<C<0.5)，‘长林23号’、‘鄂油102号’、‘鄂油63号’、‘长林18号’、‘鄂油465号’、‘鄂油81号’、‘鄂油151号’、‘鄂油54号’(C<0.4)。采用欧式距离对DTOPSIS评价值进行系统聚类，当类间距离为15时，可将15个品种聚为3类，即3个轻简化栽培适宜性档次，前2个档次有‘长林53号’、‘长林3号’、‘长林40号’、‘长林4号’、‘华硕’、‘华鑫’和‘华金’。此评价结果基本符合湖北省油茶栽植现状，亦可为后续油茶造林及品种选育提供参考。

关键词: 油茶, 轻简化栽培, DTOPSIS, 果实性状, 品种评价

Abstract:

The paper aims to solve the problem of time-consuming and laborious picking of Camellia oleifera. In this paper, 15 main C. oleifera varieties in Hubei Province were selected as the research objects, and 12 characters (fresh weight per fruit, dried fruit seed yield, dry seed kernel rate, seed kernel oil content, density of branches and leaves, tree shape index, average fruit yield per plant, average disease level, average drought damage level, proportion of the fruit outside of crown, proportion of red fruit, picking efficiency) were selected which related to light and simplified cultivation as evaluation indexes. DTOPSIS analysis method was used to evaluate the suitability for light and simplified cultivation of 15 main C. oleifera varieties in Hubei Province. The evaluation values of the light and simplified cultivation suitability of the varieties were in descending order: ‘Changlin 53’ (C>0.6); ‘Changlin 3’, ‘Changlin 40’, ‘Changlin 4’ (0.5<C<0.6); ‘Huashuo’, ‘Huaxin’, ‘Huajin’ (0.4<C<0.5); ‘Changlin 23’, ‘Eyou 102’, ‘Eyou 63’, ‘Changlin 18’, ‘Eyou 465’, ‘Eyou 81’, ‘Eyou 151’, ‘Eyou 54’ (C<0.4). Euclidean distance was used to systematically cluster the DTOPSIS evaluation values.When the inter-class distance was 15, 15 varieties could be clustered into 3 categories, that were the 3 light and simplified cultivation suitability grades. The first 2 grades included ‘Changlin 53’, ‘Changlin 3’, ‘Changlin 40’, ‘Changlin 4’, ‘Huashuo’, ‘Huaxin’ and ‘Huajin’. The evaluation results are basically in line with the planting status of C. oleifera in Hubei Province, and can also provide reference for subsequent afforestation and variety breeding of C. oleifera.

Key words: Camellia oleifera, light and simplified cultivation, DTOPSIS, fruit characteristics, variety evaluation