欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 157-162.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0620

• 植物保护·农药 • 上一篇    下一篇

芍药田土壤封闭及茎叶除草剂的安全性筛选及除草效果

任丽华1(), 高秋美1, 曹健1, 汪经轴3, 董秋颖1, 韩加坤1(), 韩金龙2()   

  1. 1 济宁市农业科学研究院， 山东济宁 272031
    2 山东省农业科学院经济作物研究所， 济南 250100
    3 莱州市方圆农业专业合作社， 山东莱州 261400
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-22 修回日期:2026-01-15 出版日期:2026-06-12 发布日期:2026-06-12
  • 通讯作者:
    韩加坤，男，1982年出生，山东高唐人，高级农艺师，博士，研究方向：药用植物遗传育种与栽培。通信地址：273031 山东省济宁市任城区济岱路9号，E-mail：；
    韩金龙，男，1977年出生，山东莱州人，研究员，硕士，研究方向：药用植物育种与栽培。通信地址：250100 济南市历城区工业北路23788号，E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    任丽华，女，1980年出生，山东嘉祥人，高级农艺师，硕士，研究方向：药用植物育种与栽培。通信地址：273031 山东省济宁市任城区济岱路9号，E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    山东省现代农业产业技术体系中草药创新团队项目(SDAIT-20-09); 山东省农业科技园区产业提升工程项目(2019YQ024)

Safety Screening and Weed Control Effect of Soil Sealing and Stem and Leaf Herbicides in Peony Fields

REN Lihua1(), GAO Qiumei1, CAO Jian1, WANG Jingzhou3, DONG Qiuying1, HAN Jiakun1(), HAN Jinlong2()   

  1. 1 Jining Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jining, Shandong 272031
    2 Institute of Cash Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100
    3 Laizhou Fangyuan Agricultural Professional Cooperative, Laizhou, Shandong 261400
  • Received:2025-07-22 Revised:2026-01-15 Published:2026-06-12 Online:2026-06-12

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

6

摘要：

本研究旨在筛选适用于芍药田的高效安全土壤封闭及茎叶除草剂。通过田间试验，评估了6种苗前封闭除草剂（精异丙甲草胺、二甲戊灵、乙氧氟草醚、复配精异丙甲草胺·丙炔氟草胺、扑草净、噁草酮）及2种茎叶除草剂（氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油、精喹禾灵乳油）对芍药的安全性和杂草防除效果。结果表明，在6种封闭除草剂中，扑草净对芍药生长表现出最佳安全性，株高与对照无显著差异。虽然其对打碗花的防效相对较差(34.62%)，但对其他杂草的鲜质量防效均达到80%以上。复配精异丙甲草胺·丙炔氟草胺虽然对打碗花防效较好，但对芍药生长产生显著抑制，株高只有4.57 cm，与CK株高(8.35 cm)差异极显著，且药害程度达到了Ⅳ级。2种茎叶除草剂对芍药生长安全，其中精喹禾灵对狗尾草、马唐的防效高达100%，氟氯吡氧乙酸对阔叶杂草防效达80%以上。综合考量，建议在茎叶处理除草剂的选择上，阔叶类杂草可考虑氟氯吡氧乙酸来进行防治，禾本科杂草类可考虑精喹禾灵来进行防治。

关键词: 芍药, 除草剂筛选, 封闭除草剂, 茎叶除草剂, 安全性

Abstract:

To screen soil sealing and stem and leaf herbicides suitable for peony fields, this study evaluated the safety and weed control efficacy of six pre-emergence closed herbicides (Glyphosate, Metformin, Ethoxyfen, Compound Glyphosate·Propynyl Fluoxamine, Prometryn, and Chlorpyruvic Acid Emulsion) and two stem and leaf herbicides (Fluroxypyr Emulsion, Quinclotrimazole Emulsion) on Paeonia lactiflora through field experiments. Among the six pre-emergence herbicides tested, Prometryn showed the highest safety for peony growth, with no significant difference in plant height compared to the control (CK). However, at the tested dosage, its efficacy against field bindweed was relatively poor, reaching only 34.62%, while its control effect on the fresh weight of other weeds was over 80%. In contrast, the mixed formulation of Compound Glyphosate·Propynyl Fluoxamine demonstrated good efficacy against field bindweed, but resulted in a plant height of only 4.57 cm, significantly lower than the CK height of 8.35 cm, with Phytotoxicity reaching grade IV. Both post-emergence herbicides tested were safe for peony growth. Quizalofop-P-ethyl achieved 100% efficacy against green foxtail and crabgrass, while Fluroxypyr provided over 80% control efficacy against broadleaf weeds. In the closed treatment herbicide experiment, comprehensive consideration was given to the control of glyphosate. In the herbicide experiment for stem and leaf treatment, Fluroxypyr can be considered for the control of broad-leaved weeds; Poaceae weeds can be controlled by using Quizalofop-P-ethyl.

Key words: Paeonia lactiflora, herbicide screening, closed herbicide, stem and leaf herbicides, safety

中图分类号: