Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 1-8.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18110133
Special Issue: 水稻
• Research article • Next Articles
Chunyuan Yin(), Jianquan Sun, Shuyu Wang(
), Hemei Liu, Xiuming Hu, Hele Wang, Fanghui Tian, Chaoyang Ma, Xingkuan Shao, Shengli Hu, Donghai Wang, Xu Zhang, Ruiping Zhang
Received:
2018-11-30
Revised:
2018-12-28
Online:
2020-03-25
Published:
2020-03-15
CLC Number:
Chunyuan Yin, Jianquan Sun, Shuyu Wang, Hemei Liu, Xiuming Hu, Hele Wang, Fanghui Tian, Chaoyang Ma, Xingkuan Shao, Shengli Hu, Donghai Wang, Xu Zhang, Ruiping Zhang. Direct Seeding Mode of Rice: Nitrogen Regulation of Flag Leaf Photosynthesis, Superior and Inferior Grains Filling Characteristics and Yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 1-8.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18110133
品种 | 处理 | 穗数/(×104/hm2) | 穗粒数 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 实际产量/(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻567 | 0 N | 401.02a | 112b | 93.32aA | 21.8aA | 6.88cC |
中 N | 445.02a | 161.6a | 91.41bA | 20.1bAB | 9.38aA | |
高N | 452.53a | 144.88a | 81.99cB | 19.7bB | 8.50bB | |
新稻568 | 0 N | 370.02b | 125.09b | 89.65a | 21a | 6.38bB |
中 N | 430.02a | 154.2a | 87.35a | 20ab | 8.50aA | |
高N | 465.02a | 137.3b | 84.65a | 19.2b | 8.25aA | |
新科稻31 | 0 N | 320.02a | 101.45b | 94.87a | 24.5a | 7.13bB |
中 N | 415.02a | 156a | 95.56a | 24.1a | 10.63aA | |
高N | 422.52a | 150.6a | 95.07a | 24a | 10.13aA |
品种 | 处理 | 穗数/(×104/hm2) | 穗粒数 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 实际产量/(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻567 | 0 N | 401.02a | 112b | 93.32aA | 21.8aA | 6.88cC |
中 N | 445.02a | 161.6a | 91.41bA | 20.1bAB | 9.38aA | |
高N | 452.53a | 144.88a | 81.99cB | 19.7bB | 8.50bB | |
新稻568 | 0 N | 370.02b | 125.09b | 89.65a | 21a | 6.38bB |
中 N | 430.02a | 154.2a | 87.35a | 20ab | 8.50aA | |
高N | 465.02a | 137.3b | 84.65a | 19.2b | 8.25aA | |
新科稻31 | 0 N | 320.02a | 101.45b | 94.87a | 24.5a | 7.13bB |
中 N | 415.02a | 156a | 95.56a | 24.1a | 10.63aA | |
高N | 422.52a | 150.6a | 95.07a | 24a | 10.13aA |
品种 | 处理 | 上三叶叶面积指数 | 总叶面积指数 | 上三叶叶面积率 | 粒叶比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻567 | 0 | 3.44b | 6.51bB | 52.81a | 0.77aA |
中N | 5.24a | 10.02aA | 52.30a | 0.79aA | |
高N | 5.89a | 11.59aA | 50.83a | 0.65bB | |
新稻568 | 0 N | 3.58b | 6.54bB | 54.74bB | 0.79bB |
中N | 4.63b | 8.06aA | 57.49bB | 0.88aA | |
高N | 5.22a | 8.70aA | 60.03aA | 0.68cC | |
新科稻31 | 0 N | 3.76cC | 5.82cC | 64.63aA | 0.75aA |
中N | 5.96bB | 8.94bB | 66.72aA | 0.76aA | |
高N | 7.97aA | 15.17aA | 52.56bB | 0.43bB |
品种 | 处理 | 上三叶叶面积指数 | 总叶面积指数 | 上三叶叶面积率 | 粒叶比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻567 | 0 | 3.44b | 6.51bB | 52.81a | 0.77aA |
中N | 5.24a | 10.02aA | 52.30a | 0.79aA | |
高N | 5.89a | 11.59aA | 50.83a | 0.65bB | |
新稻568 | 0 N | 3.58b | 6.54bB | 54.74bB | 0.79bB |
中N | 4.63b | 8.06aA | 57.49bB | 0.88aA | |
高N | 5.22a | 8.70aA | 60.03aA | 0.68cC | |
新科稻31 | 0 N | 3.76cC | 5.82cC | 64.63aA | 0.75aA |
中N | 5.96bB | 8.94bB | 66.72aA | 0.76aA | |
高N | 7.97aA | 15.17aA | 52.56bB | 0.43bB |
品种 | 花后天数/d | 强势粒 | 弱势粒 | 品种 | 花后天数/d | 强势粒 | 弱势粒 | 品种 | 花后天数/d | 强势粒 | 弱势粒 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R | R | R | R | R | R | ||||||
新稻567 | 5 | -0.805 | -0.722 | 新稻568 | 5 | 0.724 | -0.851 | 新科稻31 | 5 | -0.014 | -0.709 |
10 | -0.324 | -0.054 | 10 | -0.187 | -0.889 | 10 | -0.161 | -0.803 | |||
15 | 0.784 | 0.867 | 15 | 0.998** | 0.252 | 15 | -0.344 | -0.981 | |||
20 | 0.266 | 0.431 | 20 | 0.624 | 0.652 | 20 | 0.555 | 0.564 | |||
25 | 0.219 | 0.695 | 25 | 0.441 | 0.887 | 25 | 0.794 | 0.799 | |||
30 | 0.201 | -0.008 | 30 | 0.415 | 0.889 | 30 | 0.854 | 0.996** | |||
35 | 0.187 | -0.181 | 35 | 0.404 | 0.266 | 35 | 0.898 | 0.637 | |||
40 | 0.180 | -0.353 | 40 | 0.404 | -0.048 | 40 | 0.922 | 0.350 |
品种 | 花后天数/d | 强势粒 | 弱势粒 | 品种 | 花后天数/d | 强势粒 | 弱势粒 | 品种 | 花后天数/d | 强势粒 | 弱势粒 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R | R | R | R | R | R | ||||||
新稻567 | 5 | -0.805 | -0.722 | 新稻568 | 5 | 0.724 | -0.851 | 新科稻31 | 5 | -0.014 | -0.709 |
10 | -0.324 | -0.054 | 10 | -0.187 | -0.889 | 10 | -0.161 | -0.803 | |||
15 | 0.784 | 0.867 | 15 | 0.998** | 0.252 | 15 | -0.344 | -0.981 | |||
20 | 0.266 | 0.431 | 20 | 0.624 | 0.652 | 20 | 0.555 | 0.564 | |||
25 | 0.219 | 0.695 | 25 | 0.441 | 0.887 | 25 | 0.794 | 0.799 | |||
30 | 0.201 | -0.008 | 30 | 0.415 | 0.889 | 30 | 0.854 | 0.996** | |||
35 | 0.187 | -0.181 | 35 | 0.404 | 0.266 | 35 | 0.898 | 0.637 | |||
40 | 0.180 | -0.353 | 40 | 0.404 | -0.048 | 40 | 0.922 | 0.350 |
[1] | 苏柏元, 陈惠哲, 朱德峰 . 水稻直播栽培技术发展现状及对策[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2014(1):7-11. |
[2] | 顾树平, 李刚, 易峰 , 等. 不同基蘖肥配比对秸秆全量还田条件下机直播水稻分蘖特性及产量的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2016,32(5):33-39. |
[3] | 辛明金, 任文涛, 宋玉秋 , 等. 旱直播对水稻生长及产量影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2014,45(2):175-179. |
[4] | 胡建利, 王德建, 王灿 , 等. 不同施肥方式对水稻产量构成及其稳定性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009,17(1):48-53. |
[5] | 王秀芹, 张洪程, 徐巡军 , 等. 施氮量对两优培九产量与品质的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2004,25(1):9-13. |
[6] | 柳金来, 宋继娟, 周柏明 , 等. 氮肥施用量与水稻品质的关系[J]. 土壤肥料, 2005(1):17-19. |
[7] | 周培南, 冯惟珠, 许乃霞 , 等. 施氮量和移栽密度对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业研究, 2001,22(1):27-31. |
[8] | 李红莉, 张卫峰, 张福锁 , 等. 中国主要粮食作物化肥施用量与效率变化分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(5):1136-1143. |
[9] | 朱兆良, 金继运 . 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(2):259-273. |
[10] | 王玉雯, 郭九信, 孔亚丽 , 等. 氮肥优化管理协同实现水稻高产和氮肥高效[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(5):1157-1166. |
[11] | 胡雅杰, 朱大伟, 邢志鹏 , 等. 改进施氮运筹对水稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(1):12-22. |
[12] | 刘立军, 徐伟, 吴长付 , 等. 实地氮肥管理下的水稻生长发育和养分吸收特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007,21(2):167-173. |
[13] | 郭晨, 徐正伟, 李小坤 , 等. 不同施氮处理对水稻产量、氮素吸收及利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2014,46(4):618-622. |
[14] | 周江明, 赵琳, 董越勇 , 等. 氮肥和栽植密度对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(2):274-281. |
[15] | 梁健, 赵晨, 韩超, 任红茹 , 等. 淮北地区氮高效高产型粳稻品种群体生长特征研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(4):400-408. |
[16] | 徐国伟, 谈桂露, 王志琴 , 等. 秸秆还田与实地氮肥管理对直播水稻产量、品质及氮肥利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(8):2736-2746. |
[17] | 田永超, 曹卫星, 王绍华 , 等. 不同水、氮条件下水稻不同叶位水、氮含量及光合速率的变化特征[J]. 作物学报, 2004,30(11):1129-1134. |
[18] | 朱庆森, 曹显祖, 骆亦琪 . 水稻籽粒灌浆的生长分析[J]. 作物学报, 1988,14(3):182-189. |
[19] | Richards F J . A flexible growth function for empirical use[J]. J Exp Bot, 1959,10:290-300. |
[20] | Venkateswarlu B, Visperas R M . Source-sink relationships in crop plant[J]. Rice, 1987,125:1-19. |
[21] | 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰 , 等. 水稻光合作用研究进展及其影响因素分析[J]. 北方水稻, 2014,44(5):66-71. |
[22] | 李敏, 张洪程, 杨雄 , 等. 高产氮高效型粳稻品种的叶片光合及衰老特性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013,27(2):168-176. |
[23] | 凌启鸿 . 作物群体质量[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2005: 77-85. |
[24] | 剧成欣, 陶进, 钱希旸 , 等. 不同年代中籼水稻品种的叶片光合性状[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(3):415-426. |
[25] | Minoru Yamauchi, Darryl V, Aragones Pablo R . Seedling establishment and grain yield of tropical rice sown in puddled soil[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000,92:275-282. |
[26] | Moody K . Weed control in wet-seeded rice[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental, 1993,29:393-403. |
[27] | 付景, 王生轩, 尹海庆 , 等. 施氮量对直播稻郑旱10号群体特征及产量的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017,46(1):30-35. |
[28] | 蔡永萍, 杨其光, 黄义德 . 水稻水作与旱作对抽穗后剑叶光合特性、衰老及根系活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2000,14(4):219-224. |
[29] | 蒋彭炎 . 直播稻的生育特点和增产对策[J]. 中国稻米, 1996(4):30-33. |
[30] | 胡国强, 陈正龙, 周铭成 . 麦茬少免耕直播稻生育特性及栽培策略研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2004,( I):19-21. |
[31] | Chau N M, Yamanchi M . Performance of an aerobically direct seeded rice plant sin the Mekong Delt, Vietnam[J]. In Rice Research Notes, 1994,19:6-7. |
[32] | 凌启鸿, 张洪程 . 水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 1993,26(6):1-11. |
[33] | 王成瑷, 赵磊, 赵秀哲 , 等. 氮肥用量对水稻不同穗位与粒位籽粒灌浆速率的影响[J]. 农学学报2016, 6(2):8-21. |
[34] | 殷春渊, 王书玉, 刘贺梅 , 等. 氮肥施用量对超级粳稻新稻18号强、弱势籽粒灌浆和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013,27(5):503-510. |
[35] | 魏颖娟, 赵杨, 邹应斌 . 不同穗型超级稻品种籽粒灌浆特性[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(10):1516-1529. |
[1] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[2] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[3] | Pema Rigzin, Dhonyo Dorji, Delek Kunkyi, Dekyi Yangzom, Yeshe Dorji, Penpa Tsring. Constructing the Monitoring Model of High Temperature Damage on Rice by Combining Data from Satellites and Ground Automatic Weather Stations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 133-141. |
[4] | LUO Xianfu, LIU Wenqiang, PAN Xiaowu, DONG Zheng, LIU Sanxiong, LIU Licheng, YANG Biaoren, SHENG Xinnian, LI Xiaoxiang. Mapping of Plant Height QTL Using NILs Derived from Residual Heterozygous Lines in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 1-5. |
[5] | ZHANG Shuangyan, REN Hao, DING Wenqing, WU Yutao. Research Progress on Material Utilization of Agricultural Waste Rice Husk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 101-108. |
[6] | HUANG Yu, CHEN Bin, XIAO Guanli. The Physiological Response of the Local Rice Variety of ‘Acuce’ of Hani Nationality in Yunnan Against the Feeding of Nilaparvata lugens Stål [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 123-129. |
[7] | SHI Yonghai, CAO Xiangde, XU Jiabo. Effect of COVID-19 Epidemic on Alosa sapidissima Production in China and the Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 151-156. |
[8] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[9] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[10] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[11] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[12] | YE Pei, LIU Kequn, SHEN Shuanghe, LIU Kaiwen, LIU Zhixiong, DENG Yanjun. Risk Analysis and Regionalization of Heat Damage During Heading and Flowering Stage of Mid-season Rice in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 110-117. |
[13] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[14] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[15] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||