Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1-5.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0076
Special Issue: 水稻
Received:
2020-05-08
Revised:
2021-02-25
Online:
2021-04-05
Published:
2021-04-12
处理 | 有效穗数/(万/hm2) | 每穗总粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 315.00 | 132.51 | 86.71 | 22.41 | 9383.03 | -0.20 |
A1B2 | 331.50 | 119.16 | 92.05 | 24.23 | 9893.58 | 4.73 |
A1B3 | 255.60 | 133.73 | 93.71 | 25.14 | 9728.18 | 10.26 |
A2B1 | 256.50 | 141.89 | 92.17 | 25.46 | 9714.88 | 1.46 |
A2B2 | 258.00 | 117.59 | 94.39 | 25.35 | 9938.21 | 8.91 |
A2B3 | 217.80 | 174.79 | 94.45 | 26.45 | 9919.20 | 19.87 |
A3B1 | 265.50 | 146.90 | 94.05 | 25.95 | 9451.58 | — |
A3B2 | 262.50 | 143.79 | 95.53 | 26.60 | 8333.97 | — |
A3B3 | 190.80 | 167.06 | 95.96 | 26.39 | 6342.97 | — |
A | 19.64** | 2.25 | 36.31** | 74.55** | 153.79** | 73.69* |
B | 20.49** | 4.20 | 29.57** | 23.32** | 32.71** | 194.04** |
A×B | 0.75 | 0.81 | 5.34* | 7.81** | 49.66** | 15.22 |
处理 | 有效穗数/(万/hm2) | 每穗总粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 315.00 | 132.51 | 86.71 | 22.41 | 9383.03 | -0.20 |
A1B2 | 331.50 | 119.16 | 92.05 | 24.23 | 9893.58 | 4.73 |
A1B3 | 255.60 | 133.73 | 93.71 | 25.14 | 9728.18 | 10.26 |
A2B1 | 256.50 | 141.89 | 92.17 | 25.46 | 9714.88 | 1.46 |
A2B2 | 258.00 | 117.59 | 94.39 | 25.35 | 9938.21 | 8.91 |
A2B3 | 217.80 | 174.79 | 94.45 | 26.45 | 9919.20 | 19.87 |
A3B1 | 265.50 | 146.90 | 94.05 | 25.95 | 9451.58 | — |
A3B2 | 262.50 | 143.79 | 95.53 | 26.60 | 8333.97 | — |
A3B3 | 190.80 | 167.06 | 95.96 | 26.39 | 6342.97 | — |
A | 19.64** | 2.25 | 36.31** | 74.55** | 153.79** | 73.69* |
B | 20.49** | 4.20 | 29.57** | 23.32** | 32.71** | 194.04** |
A×B | 0.75 | 0.81 | 5.34* | 7.81** | 49.66** | 15.22 |
处理 | 有效穗数/(万/hm2) | 每穗总粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 300.70 | 128.46 | 90.82 | 23.93 | 9668.26 | 4.93 |
A2 | 244.10 | 144.76 | 93.67 | 25.79 | 9857.43 | 10.08 |
A3 | 240.27 | 152.58 | 95.18 | 26.31 | 8042.84 | — |
B1 | 279.00 | 140.43 | 90.98 | 24.61 | 9516.49 | 1.88 |
B2 | 284.00 | 126.85 | 93.99 | 25.39 | 9388.59 | 6.82 |
B3 | 221.40 | 158.53 | 94.71 | 25.99 | 8663.45 | 15.07 |
处理 | 有效穗数/(万/hm2) | 每穗总粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 籽粒产量/(kg/hm2) | 氮肥农学利用率/(kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | 300.70 | 128.46 | 90.82 | 23.93 | 9668.26 | 4.93 |
A2 | 244.10 | 144.76 | 93.67 | 25.79 | 9857.43 | 10.08 |
A3 | 240.27 | 152.58 | 95.18 | 26.31 | 8042.84 | — |
B1 | 279.00 | 140.43 | 90.98 | 24.61 | 9516.49 | 1.88 |
B2 | 284.00 | 126.85 | 93.99 | 25.39 | 9388.59 | 6.82 |
B3 | 221.40 | 158.53 | 94.71 | 25.99 | 8663.45 | 15.07 |
处理 | 收益 | 成本 | 净收益 |
---|---|---|---|
A1 | 31905.3 | 21296.4 | 10608.9 |
A2 | 32529.5 | 20521.2 | 12008.3 |
A3 | 26541.4 | 19590.0 | 6951.4 |
B1 | 31404.4 | 20799.2 | 10605.2 |
B2 | 30982.3 | 20469.2 | 10513.1 |
B3 | 28589.4 | 20139.2 | 8450.2 |
处理 | 收益 | 成本 | 净收益 |
---|---|---|---|
A1 | 31905.3 | 21296.4 | 10608.9 |
A2 | 32529.5 | 20521.2 | 12008.3 |
A3 | 26541.4 | 19590.0 | 6951.4 |
B1 | 31404.4 | 20799.2 | 10605.2 |
B2 | 30982.3 | 20469.2 | 10513.1 |
B3 | 28589.4 | 20139.2 | 8450.2 |
处理 | 收益 | 成本 | 净收益 |
---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 30964.0 | 21626.4 | 9337.6 |
A1B2 | 32648.8 | 21296.4 | 11352.4 |
A1B3 | 32103.0 | 20966.4 | 11136.6 |
A2B1 | 32059.1 | 20851.2 | 11207.9 |
A2B2 | 32796.1 | 20521.2 | 12274.9 |
A2B3 | 32733.4 | 20191.2 | 12542.2 |
A3B1 | 31190.2 | 19920.0 | 11270.2 |
A3B2 | 27502.1 | 19590.0 | 7912.1 |
A3B3 | 20931.8 | 19260.0 | 1671.8 |
A | 32.3** | ||
B | 7.0 | ||
A×B | 16.6 |
处理 | 收益 | 成本 | 净收益 |
---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 30964.0 | 21626.4 | 9337.6 |
A1B2 | 32648.8 | 21296.4 | 11352.4 |
A1B3 | 32103.0 | 20966.4 | 11136.6 |
A2B1 | 32059.1 | 20851.2 | 11207.9 |
A2B2 | 32796.1 | 20521.2 | 12274.9 |
A2B3 | 32733.4 | 20191.2 | 12542.2 |
A3B1 | 31190.2 | 19920.0 | 11270.2 |
A3B2 | 27502.1 | 19590.0 | 7912.1 |
A3B3 | 20931.8 | 19260.0 | 1671.8 |
A | 32.3** | ||
B | 7.0 | ||
A×B | 16.6 |
[1] | 张江林, 侯文峰, 鲁剑巍, 等. 不同施氮量和移栽密度对水稻产量及灌浆特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017,19(2):75-85. |
[2] | De Datta S K. Principles and Praetiees of Rice Production[M]. Newyork: John Wiley, 1981:68. |
[3] | 徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 等. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(3):763-772. |
[4] | 袁隆平. 杂交水稻超高产育种[J]. 杂交水稻, 1997,12(6):1-6. |
[5] | 郭光荣. 以生物产量和收获指数作为水稻育种指标的初步研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 1990(5):20-22. |
[6] | 袁平荣, 杨从党, 周能. 高产水稻品种的物质生长特性[J]. 西南农业学报, 1996(11):89-94. |
[7] | 邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 等. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015,47(1):20-25. |
[8] | 杨益花. 不同施氮量对水稻品种产量形成和N素吸收利用的影响[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2003:2-40. |
[9] | 殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 等. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010(1):39-50. |
[10] | 韦叶娜, 张杰, 杨国涛, 等. 不同氮素水平对杂交水稻产量性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016.32(24):6-10. |
[11] | 陈荣江, 赵磊, 张祎芳, 等. 粳稻新品种产量与产量性状的逐步回归及通径分析[J]. 河南科技学院学报, 2014,42(6):490-496. |
[12] | 刘义玲, 范守君, 周鸿飞. 水稻分蘖成穗特点及产量性状与产量回归模型分析[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2005(3):12-14. |
[13] | 刘伟明. 籼粳亚种间杂交水稻产量性状与产量的相关、回归及通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(1):70-72. |
[14] | 张锦文, 李小林, 邓伟, 等. 施用氮肥对杂交水稻产量及产量性状的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2015,30(6):30-34. |
[15] | 董桂春. 不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种的基本特点[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2007:8-162. |
[16] | 马汉云. 水稻氮素利用基因型鉴定筛选及其响应研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2009:1-45. |
[17] | 王麟, 王术. 秸秆还田当年氮肥用量对寒地粳稻产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2014,45(2):78-82. |
[18] | 颜贞龙. 播种量与施肥量对杂交稻浙优21产量的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018(7):1095-1097. |
[19] | 郎有忠, 王美娥, 吕川根, 等. 水稻叶片形态、群体结构和产量对种植密度的响应[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2012,28(1):7-11. |
[20] | 李静. 生态条件和栽培密度对水稻群体特征、产量和品质的影响[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2013:2-108. |
[21] | 朱兆良. 稻田土壤中氮素的转化与氮肥的合理施用[J]. 化学通报, 1994(9):15-17. |
[22] | 范大泳, 莫绍芬, 蒋满英, 等. 氮肥运筹对晚稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 广西农业生物科学, 2007(4):312-316. |
[23] | 万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 等. 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响[J]. [J].作物学报, 2007(2):175-182. |
[24] | 邹应斌, 敖和军, 夏冰, 等. 不同氮肥施用对杂交稻产量及其氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2008(4):214-219. |
[25] | 潘团胜. 测土配方施肥技术在水稻上的应用效果试验[J]. 广西农学报, 2006,21(5):17-18. |
[26] | 魏海燕. 水稻氮素利用的基因型差异与生理机理研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2008:1-120. |
[1] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[2] | Pema Rigzin, Dhonyo Dorji, Delek Kunkyi, Dekyi Yangzom, Yeshe Dorji, Penpa Tsring. Constructing the Monitoring Model of High Temperature Damage on Rice by Combining Data from Satellites and Ground Automatic Weather Stations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 133-141. |
[3] | LUO Xianfu, LIU Wenqiang, PAN Xiaowu, DONG Zheng, LIU Sanxiong, LIU Licheng, YANG Biaoren, SHENG Xinnian, LI Xiaoxiang. Mapping of Plant Height QTL Using NILs Derived from Residual Heterozygous Lines in Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 1-5. |
[4] | ZHANG Shuangyan, REN Hao, DING Wenqing, WU Yutao. Research Progress on Material Utilization of Agricultural Waste Rice Husk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 101-108. |
[5] | HUANG Yu, CHEN Bin, XIAO Guanli. The Physiological Response of the Local Rice Variety of ‘Acuce’ of Hani Nationality in Yunnan Against the Feeding of Nilaparvata lugens Stål [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 123-129. |
[6] | SHI Yonghai, CAO Xiangde, XU Jiabo. Effect of COVID-19 Epidemic on Alosa sapidissima Production in China and the Countermeasures [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 151-156. |
[7] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[8] | YE Pei, LIU Kequn, SHEN Shuanghe, LIU Kaiwen, LIU Zhixiong, DENG Yanjun. Risk Analysis and Regionalization of Heat Damage During Heading and Flowering Stage of Mid-season Rice in Hubei Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 110-117. |
[9] | WANG Yifan, LAO Xiaocan, YU Liping, YE Hailong. Rice Variety ‘Yongyou 15’: The Suitability of Meteorological Conditions for Sowing by Stages [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 106-109. |
[10] | LIU Xiaohang, MA Shuqing, ZHAO Jing, QUAN Hujie, DENG Kuicai, CHAI Qingrong. Yield Response of Japonica Rice of Northeast China to Low Temperature in Different Time Periods of Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 91-98. |
[11] | LI Xuefeng, WANG Jian, YE Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Xiuting, WANG Lixue. Plant Aqueous Extract of Momordica charantia: Effects on Rice Seed Germination and Seedling Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 1-7. |
[12] | YAN Yuntao, HE Xi, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. Advances in Research on the Storability of Rice Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 1-8. |
[13] | ZHAI Caijiao, ZHANG Jiao, CUI Shiyou, CHEN Pengjun. Effects of Salt Stress on the Panicle Traits and Yield Components of Rice Cultivars [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 1-9. |
[14] | LIU Yuting, HUANG Shiyu, LI Liujia, ZHAO Tianzhang, LI Huiying, SU Zifeng, LONG Xiaowen. Comparative Study on Biological Indexes and Meat Nutritional Value of Cyprinus carpio Under Earth Pond Reared Mode and Rice Field Reared Mode [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 159-164. |
[15] | LIU Haiying, WANG Zeng, XU Yaowen, GE Xiaogai, ZHOU Benzhi, JIANG Zhonglong. Characteristics of Carbon Storage in Phyllostulis pubescens Ecosystem with Different Stand Densities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 17-21. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 95
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 488
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||