Four Initiators: Effects on the Initiation of Different Sugar Beet Seeds

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0469

Abstract

Abstract:

To determine the effect of different initiators on the initiation of different sugar beet seeds, and to provide a basis for screening sugar beet seed coating materials, in this study, four kinds of beet seeds were used as experimental materials, and four kinds of reagents were used to treat the seeds, and the germination energy, germination percentage, germination index and vigor index of beet seeds were determined. The results showed that compared with the control group, after the treatment, the germination energy of the four kinds of beet seeds after treatments were increased by 12%–17.67%, 0%–23%, 7.34%–22.34%, and 4.34%–10.00%, respectively; the germination percentage of the four kinds of sugar beet seeds were increased by -2.33%–9.67%, -5.00%–0.33%, -4.00%–-0.33%, -11.66%–4.00%, respectively, the germination index of the four kinds of beet seeds were increased by 6.56–13.27, -2.32–18.26, 9.12–23.72, 4.16–12.37, respectively, and the vigor index of the four kinds of beet seeds were increased by 95.45–172.92, 2.83–223.22, 106.93–324.93, 53.99–254.08, respectively. In conclusion, the four treatments have promoting effects on seed vigor index, but the same treatment has different triggering effects on different kinds of seeds.

Key words: sugar beet, seed, PEG, initiation combination, hydrogen peroxide, boric acid

CLC Number:

S566.3

Liu Xiaohan, Wang Ronghua, Wang Weicheng, Liu Dali, Wu Zedong, Wang Maoqian. Four Initiators: Effects on the Initiation of Different Sugar Beet Seeds[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 30-35.

Figures/Tables 5

References 27

[1]	王茂芊, 王维成, 吴则东, 等. 我国甜菜种子引发研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(5):70-72.
[2]	Heydecker W, Coolbear P. Seed treatments for improved performance survey and attempted prognosis[J]. Nursing Times, 1977, 104(35):20-21.
[3]	Bradford K J. Manipulation of seed water relations via osmotic priming to improve germination under stress conditions[J]. Hort Science: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1986, 21(5):1105-1112.
[4]	张卫华, 郝丽珍, 胡宁宝, 张进文. 种子引发及其效应[J]. 种子, 2004(6):49-51.
[5]	富波年, 马乐元, 马慧霞, 等. PEG引发对小冠花种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2021, 41(1):126-131.
[6]	董雯, 姜慧芳, 龚秀秀, 等. 过氧化氢对狗尾草种子萌发的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012(20):161.
[7]	郑蔚虹, 冷建梅. 青霉素、过氧化氢和高锰酸钾浸种对沙棘种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子, 2003(6):22-23,30.
[8]	由晓晴, 任嫒, 赵婷婷, 等. 聚乙二醇提高老化白菜种子活力的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(2):39-45.
[9]	张燕, 方力, 吴业池, 等. PEG浸种处理提高烟草种子活力的效应[J]. 种子, 2003(6):27-30.
[10]	张丽, 祝利海. PEG引发对农大108玉米种子萌发及活力的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2011, 29(7):24-26.
[11]	王炜, 史雨刚, 王曙光. PEG引发对老化大豆种子发芽及活力的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(7):650-654.
[12]	马文广, 利站, 郑昀晔, 等. 过氧化氢增氧引发对烟草种子活力的影响[A]. 中国烟草学会, 2016: 6.
[13]	Liu Y, Ye N, Liu R, et al. H₂O₂ mediates the regulation of ABA catabolism and GA biosynjournal in Arabidopsis seed dormancy and germination[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010: 125.
[14]	韩燕雨, 鲁凤年, 宋佳, 等. 两种引发剂对黄芩种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(2):59-63.
[15]	刘婷, 史宝胜. 硼酸、吲哚乙酸、硫酸铜溶液对天仙子和龙胆种子萌发的影响[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2018, 32(2):44-50.
[16]	王少平, 林紫玉, 刘改芬. 不同浓度硼酸对蜀葵种子发芽的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2007(10):128-130.
[17]	Cavusoglu K, Kaya F, Kilic S. Effects of salicylic acid pretreatment on the seed germination, seedling growth and leaf anatomy of barley under saline conditions[J]. 2013, 42(2).
[18]	徐丽媛, 范家萌, 徐四静, 等. 农作物种子活力检测与引发技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018, 24(20):37-40.
[19]	刘慧霞. 紫花苜蓿种子水引发研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2007.
[20]	张利霞, 常青山, 侯小改, 等. 不同钠盐胁迫对夏枯草种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3):177-186.
[21]	冯岳, 魏永胜, 冯浩. 低渗溶液促进小麦种子萌发的生理机制[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(3):428-435.
[22]	Giaveno C D, Ribeiro R V, Soua G M, et al. Screening of tropical maire for salt sress tolerance[J]. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 2007, 7(3):304-313.
[23]	闫月, 卢艳, 崔程程, 等. 聚乙二醇引发处理对水曲柳种子在高温下萌发的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(06):13-16.
[24]	Ghader Habibi. Physiological, photochemical and ionic responses of sunflower seedlings to exogenous selenium supply under salt stress[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2017, 39(10).
[25]	张高原, 刘永娟, 张建农. 不同药剂处理对籽瓜种子活力和生理生化特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2013, 48(5):61-68.
[26]	马向丽, 何超, 罗富成, 等. 水引发对不同贮藏年限纳罗克非洲狗尾草种子活力的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(5):16-23.
[27]	骆岩, 张泽旭, 王维成, 等. 相同浓度PEG对不同甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(21):24-29.

处理编号	种子名称	引发组合	处理时间/h	处理编号	种子名称	引发组合	处理时间/h
处理1	TD701	60%PEG	24	处理9	TD801	60%PEG	24
处理2	TD701	40%PEG	24	处理10	TD801	40%PEG	24
处理3	TD701	5%过氧化氢	0.5	处理11	TD801	5%过氧化氢	0.5
处理4	TD701	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	处理12	TD801	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6
处理5	TD703	60%PEG	24	处理13	TD805	60%PEG	24
处理6	TD703	40%PEG	24	处理14	TD805	40%PEG	24
处理7	TD703	5%过氧化氢	0.5	处理15	TD805	5%过氧化氢	0.5
处理8	TD703	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	处理16	TD805	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6

处理编号	种子名称	引发组合	处理时间/h	处理编号	种子名称	引发组合	处理时间/h
处理1	TD701	60%PEG	24	处理9	TD801	60%PEG	24
处理2	TD701	40%PEG	24	处理10	TD801	40%PEG	24
处理3	TD701	5%过氧化氢	0.5	处理11	TD801	5%过氧化氢	0.5
处理4	TD701	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	处理12	TD801	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6
处理5	TD703	60%PEG	24	处理13	TD805	60%PEG	24
处理6	TD703	40%PEG	24	处理14	TD805	40%PEG	24
处理7	TD703	5%过氧化氢	0.5	处理15	TD805	5%过氧化氢	0.5
处理8	TD703	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	处理16	TD805	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数
处理1	60%PEG	24	36.00±3.61	74.67±4.51	35.56±2.12	255.89±25.32
处理2	40%PEG	24	41.67±2.52	62.67±12.22	31.59±4.06	311.38±28.32
处理3	5%过氧化氢	0.5	40.67±4.16	68.67±4.16	38.30±2.28	333.36±34.49
处理4	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	38.67±4.51	71.33±3.06	33.98±3.62	301.82±36.41
CK	TD701	0	24.00±4.58	65.00±0.00	25.03±1.55	160.44±17.83

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数
处理1	60%PEG	24	36.00±3.61	74.67±4.51	35.56±2.12	255.89±25.32
处理2	40%PEG	24	41.67±2.52	62.67±12.22	31.59±4.06	311.38±28.32
处理3	5%过氧化氢	0.5	40.67±4.16	68.67±4.16	38.30±2.28	333.36±34.49
处理4	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	38.67±4.51	71.33±3.06	33.98±3.62	301.82±36.41
CK	TD701	0	24.00±4.58	65.00±0.00	25.03±1.55	160.44±17.83

处理编号	引发组合	处理时间/h	5 d发芽势/%	7 d发芽率/%	发芽指数	活力指数
处理1	60%PEG	24	32.67±2.52	66.67±3.06	29.81±2.86	238.24±25.81
处理2	40%PEG	24	35.33±4.16	66.33±7.23	31.96±2.56	274.95±33.52
处理3	5%过氧化氢	0.5	55.67±2.08	71.00±10.82	50.39±6.75	458.63±63.75
处理4	3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸	0.5+6	38.33±3.21	65.67±1.15	32.60±0.76	259.77±38.68
CK	TD703	0	32.67±1.53	70.67±2.52	32.13±1.87	235.41±53.45