Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (33): 30-35.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0469
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Xiaohan1(), Wang Ronghua2, Wang Weicheng2, Liu Dali1, Wu Zedong1, Wang Maoqian1()
Received:
2021-05-06
Revised:
2021-06-25
Online:
2021-11-25
Published:
2022-01-06
Contact:
Wang Maoqian
E-mail:1020216446@qq.com;haixiang80@126.com
CLC Number:
Liu Xiaohan, Wang Ronghua, Wang Weicheng, Liu Dali, Wu Zedong, Wang Maoqian. Four Initiators: Effects on the Initiation of Different Sugar Beet Seeds[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 30-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0469
处理编号 | 种子名称 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 处理编号 | 种子名称 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | TD701 | 60%PEG | 24 | 处理9 | TD801 | 60%PEG | 24 |
处理2 | TD701 | 40%PEG | 24 | 处理10 | TD801 | 40%PEG | 24 |
处理3 | TD701 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 处理11 | TD801 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 |
处理4 | TD701 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 处理12 | TD801 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 |
处理5 | TD703 | 60%PEG | 24 | 处理13 | TD805 | 60%PEG | 24 |
处理6 | TD703 | 40%PEG | 24 | 处理14 | TD805 | 40%PEG | 24 |
处理7 | TD703 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 处理15 | TD805 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 |
处理8 | TD703 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 处理16 | TD805 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 |
处理编号 | 种子名称 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 处理编号 | 种子名称 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | TD701 | 60%PEG | 24 | 处理9 | TD801 | 60%PEG | 24 |
处理2 | TD701 | 40%PEG | 24 | 处理10 | TD801 | 40%PEG | 24 |
处理3 | TD701 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 处理11 | TD801 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 |
处理4 | TD701 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 处理12 | TD801 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 |
处理5 | TD703 | 60%PEG | 24 | 处理13 | TD805 | 60%PEG | 24 |
处理6 | TD703 | 40%PEG | 24 | 处理14 | TD805 | 40%PEG | 24 |
处理7 | TD703 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 处理15 | TD805 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 |
处理8 | TD703 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 处理16 | TD805 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 36.00±3.61 | 74.67±4.51 | 35.56±2.12 | 255.89±25.32 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 41.67±2.52 | 62.67±12.22 | 31.59±4.06 | 311.38±28.32 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 40.67±4.16 | 68.67±4.16 | 38.30±2.28 | 333.36±34.49 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 38.67±4.51 | 71.33±3.06 | 33.98±3.62 | 301.82±36.41 |
CK | TD701 | 0 | 24.00±4.58 | 65.00±0.00 | 25.03±1.55 | 160.44±17.83 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 36.00±3.61 | 74.67±4.51 | 35.56±2.12 | 255.89±25.32 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 41.67±2.52 | 62.67±12.22 | 31.59±4.06 | 311.38±28.32 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 40.67±4.16 | 68.67±4.16 | 38.30±2.28 | 333.36±34.49 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 38.67±4.51 | 71.33±3.06 | 33.98±3.62 | 301.82±36.41 |
CK | TD701 | 0 | 24.00±4.58 | 65.00±0.00 | 25.03±1.55 | 160.44±17.83 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 32.67±2.52 | 66.67±3.06 | 29.81±2.86 | 238.24±25.81 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 35.33±4.16 | 66.33±7.23 | 31.96±2.56 | 274.95±33.52 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 55.67±2.08 | 71.00±10.82 | 50.39±6.75 | 458.63±63.75 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 38.33±3.21 | 65.67±1.15 | 32.60±0.76 | 259.77±38.68 |
CK | TD703 | 0 | 32.67±1.53 | 70.67±2.52 | 32.13±1.87 | 235.41±53.45 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 32.67±2.52 | 66.67±3.06 | 29.81±2.86 | 238.24±25.81 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 35.33±4.16 | 66.33±7.23 | 31.96±2.56 | 274.95±33.52 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 55.67±2.08 | 71.00±10.82 | 50.39±6.75 | 458.63±63.75 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 38.33±3.21 | 65.67±1.15 | 32.60±0.76 | 259.77±38.68 |
CK | TD703 | 0 | 32.67±1.53 | 70.67±2.52 | 32.13±1.87 | 235.41±53.45 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 67.00±3.61 | 91.33±2.08 | 53.25±1.05 | 419.37±22.59 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 71.67±3.51 | 91.67±1.15 | 67.70±1.54 | 637.37±18.33 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 64.00±2.65 | 89.33±2.52 | 56.95±1.51 | 518.93±26.34 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 56.67±2.52 | 88.00±3.00 | 53.10±1.08 | 496.80±38.46 |
CK | TD801 | 0 | 49.33±3.21 | 92.00±1.73 | 43.98±0.44 | 312.44±14.19 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 67.00±3.61 | 91.33±2.08 | 53.25±1.05 | 419.37±22.59 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 71.67±3.51 | 91.67±1.15 | 67.70±1.54 | 637.37±18.33 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 64.00±2.65 | 89.33±2.52 | 56.95±1.51 | 518.93±26.34 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 56.67±2.52 | 88.00±3.00 | 53.10±1.08 | 496.80±38.46 |
CK | TD801 | 0 | 49.33±3.21 | 92.00±1.73 | 43.98±0.44 | 312.44±14.19 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 42.00±4.58 | 84.33±9.24 | 36.79±3.85 | 280.22±24.84 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 41.33±2.08 | 79.00±2.65 | 45.00±0.56 | 480.31±39.43 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 40.67±4.16 | 68.67±4.16 | 42.89±3.65 | 451.92±30.03 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 46.33±2.08 | 78.00±6.56 | 40.88±2.45 | 341.19±26.70 |
CK | TD805 | 0 | 36.33±2.52 | 80.33±3.21 | 32.63±2.10 | 226.23±21.90 |
处理编号 | 引发组合 | 处理时间/h | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | 60%PEG | 24 | 42.00±4.58 | 84.33±9.24 | 36.79±3.85 | 280.22±24.84 |
处理2 | 40%PEG | 24 | 41.33±2.08 | 79.00±2.65 | 45.00±0.56 | 480.31±39.43 |
处理3 | 5%过氧化氢 | 0.5 | 40.67±4.16 | 68.67±4.16 | 42.89±3.65 | 451.92±30.03 |
处理4 | 3%过氧化氢+0.01%硼酸 | 0.5+6 | 46.33±2.08 | 78.00±6.56 | 40.88±2.45 | 341.19±26.70 |
CK | TD805 | 0 | 36.33±2.52 | 80.33±3.21 | 32.63±2.10 | 226.23±21.90 |
[1] | 王茂芊, 王维成, 吴则东, 等. 我国甜菜种子引发研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(5):70-72. |
[2] | Heydecker W, Coolbear P. Seed treatments for improved performance survey and attempted prognosis[J]. Nursing Times, 1977, 104(35):20-21. |
[3] | Bradford K J. Manipulation of seed water relations via osmotic priming to improve germination under stress conditions[J]. Hort Science: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1986, 21(5):1105-1112. |
[4] | 张卫华, 郝丽珍, 胡宁宝, 张进文. 种子引发及其效应[J]. 种子, 2004(6):49-51. |
[5] | 富波年, 马乐元, 马慧霞, 等. PEG引发对小冠花种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2021, 41(1):126-131. |
[6] | 董雯, 姜慧芳, 龚秀秀, 等. 过氧化氢对狗尾草种子萌发的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012(20):161. |
[7] | 郑蔚虹, 冷建梅. 青霉素、过氧化氢和高锰酸钾浸种对沙棘种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 种子, 2003(6):22-23,30. |
[8] | 由晓晴, 任嫒, 赵婷婷, 等. 聚乙二醇提高老化白菜种子活力的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(2):39-45. |
[9] | 张燕, 方力, 吴业池, 等. PEG浸种处理提高烟草种子活力的效应[J]. 种子, 2003(6):27-30. |
[10] | 张丽, 祝利海. PEG引发对农大108玉米种子萌发及活力的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2011, 29(7):24-26. |
[11] | 王炜, 史雨刚, 王曙光. PEG引发对老化大豆种子发芽及活力的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(7):650-654. |
[12] | 马文广, 利站, 郑昀晔, 等. 过氧化氢增氧引发对烟草种子活力的影响[A]. 中国烟草学会, 2016: 6. |
[13] | Liu Y, Ye N, Liu R, et al. H2O2 mediates the regulation of ABA catabolism and GA biosynjournal in Arabidopsis seed dormancy and germination[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010: 125. |
[14] | 韩燕雨, 鲁凤年, 宋佳, 等. 两种引发剂对黄芩种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(2):59-63. |
[15] | 刘婷, 史宝胜. 硼酸、吲哚乙酸、硫酸铜溶液对天仙子和龙胆种子萌发的影响[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2018, 32(2):44-50. |
[16] | 王少平, 林紫玉, 刘改芬. 不同浓度硼酸对蜀葵种子发芽的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2007(10):128-130. |
[17] | Cavusoglu K, Kaya F, Kilic S. Effects of salicylic acid pretreatment on the seed germination, seedling growth and leaf anatomy of barley under saline conditions[J]. 2013, 42(2). |
[18] | 徐丽媛, 范家萌, 徐四静, 等. 农作物种子活力检测与引发技术研究进展[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2018, 24(20):37-40. |
[19] | 刘慧霞. 紫花苜蓿种子水引发研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2007. |
[20] | 张利霞, 常青山, 侯小改, 等. 不同钠盐胁迫对夏枯草种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3):177-186. |
[21] | 冯岳, 魏永胜, 冯浩. 低渗溶液促进小麦种子萌发的生理机制[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(3):428-435. |
[22] | Giaveno C D, Ribeiro R V, Soua G M, et al. Screening of tropical maire for salt sress tolerance[J]. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 2007, 7(3):304-313. |
[23] | 闫月, 卢艳, 崔程程, 等. 聚乙二醇引发处理对水曲柳种子在高温下萌发的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(06):13-16. |
[24] | Ghader Habibi. Physiological, photochemical and ionic responses of sunflower seedlings to exogenous selenium supply under salt stress[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2017, 39(10). |
[25] | 张高原, 刘永娟, 张建农. 不同药剂处理对籽瓜种子活力和生理生化特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2013, 48(5):61-68. |
[26] | 马向丽, 何超, 罗富成, 等. 水引发对不同贮藏年限纳罗克非洲狗尾草种子活力的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(5):16-23. |
[27] | 骆岩, 张泽旭, 王维成, 等. 相同浓度PEG对不同甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(21):24-29. |
[1] | KANG Yunqiang, LI Lingling, XIE Junhong, ZHANG Jian, DU Changliang, ZECHARIAH Effah. Adaptability and Wind Erosion Resistance of Winter Rapeseed in Semi-arid Area of Central Gansu [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 31-36. |
[2] | WANG Sizhi, GUAN Wenling, HAO Xiaohan, SONG Jie. Study on Germination Characteristics of Gaultheria procumbens Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 77-84. |
[3] | JIA Yechun, CHEN Runyi, HE Zelin, NI Hongtao. Abiotic Stress on Sugar Beet: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 33-40. |
[4] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[5] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[6] | GONG Yongyong, DUANMU Huizi. TIFY Gene Family in Sugar Beet: Whole Genome Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 17-24. |
[7] | WANG Linyu, JIANG Yichen, YU Qingyang, WU Zedong, PI Zhi. Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) Gene Family in Sugar Beet: Identification and Functional Prediction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 9-16. |
[8] | LI Ruizhen, YAN Dingchun. Study on the Value of Honeybees as Pollinators of Oilseed Rape [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 129-134. |
[9] | DENG Yushuai, WANG Yuguang, YU Lihua, GENG Gui. Effects of Waterlogging Stress on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sugar Beet Seedlings Under Different Soil Salinity and Alkalinity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 18-23. |
[10] | XU Xinyang, ZHANG Yuejian, SHEN Jia, SHOU Weisong. Methods for Breaking Seed Dormancy of Thick-skinned Muskmelon ‘Cuixue 5’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 41-44. |
[11] | LI Xuefeng, WANG Jian, YE Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Xiuting, WANG Lixue. Plant Aqueous Extract of Momordica charantia: Effects on Rice Seed Germination and Seedling Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 1-7. |
[12] | MA Ruili, ZHAO Xiaoying. Climatic Suitability of Cauliflowers and Disaster Prevention in Duolun County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 80-86. |
[13] | YAN Yuntao, HE Xi, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. Advances in Research on the Storability of Rice Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 1-8. |
[14] | ZHAO Liqun, TIAN wen, TIAN Yanan, CAO Lingling, XU Xiulan. The Disinfection Effect of Allyl Isothiocyanate Applied in Nursery Greenhouse [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 37-42. |
[15] | LI Sen, FENG Di, ZHANG Jingmin, ZHU Haiyan, PENG Dianliang, WANG Zhihe, WANG Qinqin. Effects of Fulvic Acid Potassium on Germination and Seedling Growth of Cherry Radish Under NaCl Solution Hydroponics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 48-53. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||