Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 33-40.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0581
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Xiaoyue(), XING Wang, LIU Dali, WU Zedong, WANG Maoqian(
)
Received:
2021-06-03
Revised:
2021-09-13
Online:
2022-04-25
Published:
2022-05-18
Contact:
WANG Maoqian
E-mail:970766396@qq.com;haixiang80@126.com
CLC Number:
LIU Xiaoyue, XING Wang, LIU Dali, WU Zedong, WANG Maoqian. Malic Acid: Effect on the Vigour of Sugar Beet Seed[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 33-40.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0581
处理编号 | 种子分类 | 处理浓度/ (mmol/L) | 处理编号 | 种子分类 | 处理浓度/(mmol/L) | 处理编号 | 种子分类 | 处理浓度/(mmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | TD701 | 1 | 处理6 | TD801 | 2 | 处理11 | TD703 | 10 |
处理2 | TD703 | 1 | 处理7 | TD701 | 5 | 处理12 | TD801 | 10 |
处理3 | TD801 | 1 | 处理8 | TD703 | 5 | 处理13 | TD701 | 15 |
处理4 | TD701 | 2 | 处理9 | TD801 | 5 | 处理14 | TD703 | 15 |
处理5 | TD703 | 2 | 处理10 | TD701 | 10 | 处理15 | TD801 | 15 |
处理编号 | 种子分类 | 处理浓度/ (mmol/L) | 处理编号 | 种子分类 | 处理浓度/(mmol/L) | 处理编号 | 种子分类 | 处理浓度/(mmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理1 | TD701 | 1 | 处理6 | TD801 | 2 | 处理11 | TD703 | 10 |
处理2 | TD703 | 1 | 处理7 | TD701 | 5 | 处理12 | TD801 | 10 |
处理3 | TD801 | 1 | 处理8 | TD703 | 5 | 处理13 | TD701 | 15 |
处理4 | TD701 | 2 | 处理9 | TD801 | 5 | 处理14 | TD703 | 15 |
处理5 | TD703 | 2 | 处理10 | TD701 | 10 | 处理15 | TD801 | 15 |
CK | 1 mmol/L | 2 mmol/L | 5 mmol/L | 10 mmol/L | 15 mmol/L | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TD701 | 141.36±11.67 | 23.17±5.45 a | 23.23±2.71 a | 19.87±1.42 a | 23.93±1.61 a | 25.53±4.61 a |
TD703 | 72.67±16.96 | 19.17±1.66 b | 11.27±1.60 c | 23.0±2.35 a | 11.97±1.94 c | 22.57±1.50 a |
TD801 | 179.9±3.54 | 24.43±1.94 b | 32.77±10.82 ab | 28.57±1.33 ab | 24.63±1.16 b | 28.8±2.39 ab |
CK | 1 mmol/L | 2 mmol/L | 5 mmol/L | 10 mmol/L | 15 mmol/L | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TD701 | 141.36±11.67 | 23.17±5.45 a | 23.23±2.71 a | 19.87±1.42 a | 23.93±1.61 a | 25.53±4.61 a |
TD703 | 72.67±16.96 | 19.17±1.66 b | 11.27±1.60 c | 23.0±2.35 a | 11.97±1.94 c | 22.57±1.50 a |
TD801 | 179.9±3.54 | 24.43±1.94 b | 32.77±10.82 ab | 28.57±1.33 ab | 24.63±1.16 b | 28.8±2.39 ab |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK701 | 65.67±5.51 a | 68.67±5.77 a | 18.99±1.08 c | 126.67±37.47 b |
CK703 | 69±5.00 a | 72.33±2.52 a | 22.19±2.04 a | 144.05±6.40 bc |
CK801 | 91±1.00 ab | 94±0.00 ab | 33.24±2.67 c | 237.15±47.6 ab |
1 mmol/L 701 | 65±4.58 a | 67.67±5.03 a | 24.27±2.73 ab | 199.84±35.14 a |
1 mmol/L 703 | 65±9.64 a | 66±7.94 a | 24.16±3.08 a | 140.12±29.34 c |
1 mmol/L 801 | 93.67±0.58 a | 95.33±0.58 a | 39.53±2.31 a | 316.88±56.46 a |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK701 | 65.67±5.51 a | 68.67±5.77 a | 18.99±1.08 c | 126.67±37.47 b |
CK703 | 69±5.00 a | 72.33±2.52 a | 22.19±2.04 a | 144.05±6.40 bc |
CK801 | 91±1.00 ab | 94±0.00 ab | 33.24±2.67 c | 237.15±47.6 ab |
1 mmol/L 701 | 65±4.58 a | 67.67±5.03 a | 24.27±2.73 ab | 199.84±35.14 a |
1 mmol/L 703 | 65±9.64 a | 66±7.94 a | 24.16±3.08 a | 140.12±29.34 c |
1 mmol/L 801 | 93.67±0.58 a | 95.33±0.58 a | 39.53±2.31 a | 316.88±56.46 a |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 mmol/L 701 | 61.67±3.79 a | 65±4.58 a | 25.51±2.80 a | 185.33±26.97 ab |
2 mmol/L 703 | 58.33±8.02 a | 62.67±8.08 a | 23.07±1.54 a | 183.6±30.51 a |
2 mmol/L 801 | 88±2.65 b | 91.33±3.06 ab | 38.17±2.02 ab | 292.1±18.81 ab |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 mmol/L 701 | 61.67±3.79 a | 65±4.58 a | 25.51±2.80 a | 185.33±26.97 ab |
2 mmol/L 703 | 58.33±8.02 a | 62.67±8.08 a | 23.07±1.54 a | 183.6±30.51 a |
2 mmol/L 801 | 88±2.65 b | 91.33±3.06 ab | 38.17±2.02 ab | 292.1±18.81 ab |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 mmol/L 701 | 58.67±0.58 ab | 62±8.66 a | 21.12±1.90 c | 149.66±15.38 a |
5 mmol/L 703 | 65.33±1.53 a | 72.33±4.16 a | 26.12±1.65 a | 176.79±12.31 abc |
5 mmol/L 801 | 87±5.20 b | 89.33±5.69 b | 35.13±2.21 bc | 279.17±32.12 ab |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 mmol/L 701 | 58.67±0.58 ab | 62±8.66 a | 21.12±1.90 c | 149.66±15.38 a |
5 mmol/L 703 | 65.33±1.53 a | 72.33±4.16 a | 26.12±1.65 a | 176.79±12.31 abc |
5 mmol/L 801 | 87±5.20 b | 89.33±5.69 b | 35.13±2.21 bc | 279.17±32.12 ab |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 mmol/L 701 | 65.33±4.04 a | 71.67±1.15 a | 24.11±0.62 ab | 195.94±9.61 ab |
10 mmol/L 703 | 62.33±2.08 a | 65±2.65 a | 22.15±0.45 a | 189.19±8.77 a |
10 mmol/L 801 | 87±2.00 b | 92.33±2.08 ab | 35.38±0.74 bc | 310.07±17.84 a |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 mmol/L 701 | 65.33±4.04 a | 71.67±1.15 a | 24.11±0.62 ab | 195.94±9.61 ab |
10 mmol/L 703 | 62.33±2.08 a | 65±2.65 a | 22.15±0.45 a | 189.19±8.77 a |
10 mmol/L 801 | 87±2.00 b | 92.33±2.08 ab | 35.38±0.74 bc | 310.07±17.84 a |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 mmol/L 701 | 52.33±7.77 ab | 57.33±12.74 a | 21.37±2.99 c | 173.88±24.19 ab |
15 mmol/L 703 | 59.33±8.33 a | 67.67±12.86 a | 23.88±3.33 a | 166.84±28.61 abc |
15 mmol/L 801 | 89.33±0.58 ab | 92±2.00 ab | 34.67±0.10 bc | 289.18±12.58 ab |
处理 | 5 d发芽势/% | 7 d发芽率/% | 发芽指数 | 活力指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
15 mmol/L 701 | 52.33±7.77 ab | 57.33±12.74 a | 21.37±2.99 c | 173.88±24.19 ab |
15 mmol/L 703 | 59.33±8.33 a | 67.67±12.86 a | 23.88±3.33 a | 166.84±28.61 abc |
15 mmol/L 801 | 89.33±0.58 ab | 92±2.00 ab | 34.67±0.10 bc | 289.18±12.58 ab |
处理 | 显著性 | 处理 | 显著性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 mmol/L | 0.006 | 5 mmol/L | CK | 0.313 |
2 mmol/L | 0.02 | 1 mmol/L | 0.04 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.313 | 5 mmol/L | 0.128 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.008 | 10 mmol/L | 0.055 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.051 | 15 mmol/L | 0.289 | ||
1 mmol/L | CK | 0.006 | 10 mmol/L | CK | 0.008 |
2 mmol/L | 0.518 | 1 mmol/L | 0.861 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.04 | 2 mmol/L | 0.635 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.861 | 5 mmol/L | 0.055 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.257 | 15 mmol/L | 0.332 | ||
2 mmol/L | CK | 0.02 | 15 mmol/L | CK | 0.051 |
1 mmol/L | 0.518 | 1 mmol/L | 0.257 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.128 | 2 mmol/L | 0.609 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.635 | 5 mmol/L | 0.289 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.609 | 10 mmol/L | 0.332 |
处理 | 显著性 | 处理 | 显著性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 mmol/L | 0.006 | 5 mmol/L | CK | 0.313 |
2 mmol/L | 0.02 | 1 mmol/L | 0.04 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.313 | 5 mmol/L | 0.128 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.008 | 10 mmol/L | 0.055 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.051 | 15 mmol/L | 0.289 | ||
1 mmol/L | CK | 0.006 | 10 mmol/L | CK | 0.008 |
2 mmol/L | 0.518 | 1 mmol/L | 0.861 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.04 | 2 mmol/L | 0.635 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.861 | 5 mmol/L | 0.055 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.257 | 15 mmol/L | 0.332 | ||
2 mmol/L | CK | 0.02 | 15 mmol/L | CK | 0.051 |
1 mmol/L | 0.518 | 1 mmol/L | 0.257 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.128 | 2 mmol/L | 0.609 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.635 | 5 mmol/L | 0.289 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.609 | 10 mmol/L | 0.332 |
处理 | 显著性 | 处理 | 显著性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 mmol/L | 0.83 | 5 mmol/L | CK | 0.092 |
2 mmol/L | 0.047 | 1 mmol/L | 0.063 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.092 | 5 mmol/L | 0.71 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.027 | 10 mmol/L | 0.502 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.227 | 15 mmol/L | 0.588 | ||
1 mmol/L | CK | 0.83 | 10 mmol/L | CK | 0.027 |
2 mmol/L | 0.032 | 1 mmol/L | 0.018 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.063 | 2 mmol/L | 0.76 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.018 | 5 mmol/L | 0.502 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.161 | 15 mmol/L | 0.235 | ||
2 mmol/L | CK | 0.047 | 15 mmol/L | CK | 0.227 |
1 mmol/L | 0.032 | 1 mmol/L | 0.161 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.71 | 2 mmol/L | 0.367 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.76 | 5 mmol/L | 0.588 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.367 | 10 mmol/L | 0.235 |
处理 | 显著性 | 处理 | 显著性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 mmol/L | 0.83 | 5 mmol/L | CK | 0.092 |
2 mmol/L | 0.047 | 1 mmol/L | 0.063 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.092 | 5 mmol/L | 0.71 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.027 | 10 mmol/L | 0.502 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.227 | 15 mmol/L | 0.588 | ||
1 mmol/L | CK | 0.83 | 10 mmol/L | CK | 0.027 |
2 mmol/L | 0.032 | 1 mmol/L | 0.018 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.063 | 2 mmol/L | 0.76 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.018 | 5 mmol/L | 0.502 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.161 | 15 mmol/L | 0.235 | ||
2 mmol/L | CK | 0.047 | 15 mmol/L | CK | 0.227 |
1 mmol/L | 0.032 | 1 mmol/L | 0.161 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.71 | 2 mmol/L | 0.367 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.76 | 5 mmol/L | 0.588 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.367 | 10 mmol/L | 0.235 |
处理 | 显著性 | 处理 | 显著性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 mmol/L | 0.016 | 5 mmol/L | CK | 0.166 |
2 mmol/L | 0.078 | 1 mmol/L | 0.211 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.166 | 5 mmol/L | 0.658 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.025 | 10 mmol/L | 0.3 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.093 | 15 mmol/L | 0.732 | ||
1 mmol/L | CK | 0.016 | 10 mmol/L | CK | 0.025 |
2 mmol/L | 0.402 | 1 mmol/L | 0.815 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.211 | 2 mmol/L | 0.54 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.815 | 5 mmol/L | 0.3 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.35 | 15 mmol/L | 0.478 | ||
2 mmol/L | CK | 0.078 | 15 mmol/L | CK | 0.093 |
1 mmol/L | 0.402 | 1 mmol/L | 0.35 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.658 | 2 mmol/L | 0.92 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.54 | 5 mmol/L | 0.732 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.92 | 10 mmol/L | 0.478 |
处理 | 显著性 | 处理 | 显著性 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1 mmol/L | 0.016 | 5 mmol/L | CK | 0.166 |
2 mmol/L | 0.078 | 1 mmol/L | 0.211 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.166 | 5 mmol/L | 0.658 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.025 | 10 mmol/L | 0.3 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.093 | 15 mmol/L | 0.732 | ||
1 mmol/L | CK | 0.016 | 10 mmol/L | CK | 0.025 |
2 mmol/L | 0.402 | 1 mmol/L | 0.815 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.211 | 2 mmol/L | 0.54 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.815 | 5 mmol/L | 0.3 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.35 | 15 mmol/L | 0.478 | ||
2 mmol/L | CK | 0.078 | 15 mmol/L | CK | 0.093 |
1 mmol/L | 0.402 | 1 mmol/L | 0.35 | ||
5 mmol/L | 0.658 | 2 mmol/L | 0.92 | ||
10 mmol/L | 0.54 | 5 mmol/L | 0.732 | ||
15 mmol/L | 0.92 | 10 mmol/L | 0.478 |
[1] | 姚东伟, 吴凌云, 沈海斌, 等. 种子引发技术研究与应用进展[J]. 上海农业学报, 2020,36(5):153-160. |
[2] |
TAYLOR A G, ALLEN P S, BENNETT M A. Seed enhancement[J]. Seed science research, 1998,8:245-256.
doi: 10.1017/S0960258500004141 URL |
[3] | 胡晋. 种子引发及其效应[J]. 种子, 1998,17(2):33-35. |
[4] | 耿贵, 吕春华, 於丽华, 等. 甜菜组学技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(12):124-129. |
[5] | 马春泉, 陶鑫, 关萍, 等. 甜菜保卫细胞应答 NaCI 胁道气孔变化及富集优化[J]. 黑龙江大学工程学报, 2019,10(1):84-90. |
[6] | 李任任, 耿贵, 吕春华, 等. 低温对甜菜种子发芽及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 黑龙江大学自然科学学报, 2020,37(6):718-725. |
[7] | 张泽旭, 骆岩, 王维成, 等. 不同浓度PEG对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(13):48-52. |
[8] | 沙红, 高燕, 高卫时, 等. 聚乙二醇对甜菜种子低温萌发的影响[J]. 中国糖料, 2013(3):40-41,43. |
[9] | 刘军. 微量元素浸种对甜菜种子活力、发芽和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2000(5):228-230. |
[10] | ZITA BRAZIENE, VIRGILIJUS PALTANAVICIUS, DOVILE AVIZIENYT E. The influence of fulvic acid on spring cereals and sugar beets seed germination and plant productivity[J]. Environmental research, 2021(195):110824. |
[11] | 刘朝阳, 王荣华, 王维成, 等. 硝酸钙和硫酸镁组合对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021,37(14):21-26. |
[12] | 周春菊, 王林权, 李生秀. 有机酸和维生素对玉米幼苗生长的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1999,17(2):1-6. |
[13] | 莫淑勋. 土壤中有机酸的产生、转化对土壤肥力的某些影响[J]. 土壤学进展, 1986(4):1-10. |
[14] | 梅惠生. 腐殖酸钠对植物生长发育的刺激作用[J]. 植物生理学报, 1980(2):133-134. |
[15] | 张瑞亭. 农药的混用与混剂[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 1987:299. |
[16] | 王向阳, 彭文博, 崔金梅, 等. 有机酸、锌对小麦旗叶活性氧代谢及粒重的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 1995(1):69-74. |
[17] | 王茂芊, 王维成, 吴则东, 等. 中国甜菜种子引发研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018,40(5):70-72. |
[18] | 祁瑞林, 张红瑞, 彭涛, 等. 不同引发剂对贮藏夏枯草种子引发效果的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018,59(2):283-286. |
[19] | 马悦, 王荣华, 朱腾翔, 等. 过氧化氢、硼酸、PEG对甜菜种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(6):19-23. |
[20] | 程大友, 张义, 陈丽. 氯化钠胁迫下甜菜种子的萌发[J]. 中国糖料, 1996,18(2):21-23. |
[21] | 郭俊强, 王琦俐, 王祎玮, 等. 花穗整形及植物生长调节剂处理对‘阳光玫瑰'葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2021(4):27-34. |
BHAT Z A, REDDY Y N, SRIHARI D, et al. New generation growth regulators-brassinosteroids and CPPU improve bunch and berry characteristics in ‘Tas-A-Ganesh' grape[J]. International journal of fruit science, 2011,4:309-315. | |
[23] | 张万毅. 赤霉酸(GA3)对无核白葡萄果穗及果实生长的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2018. |
[24] | 陈锦永, 方金豹, 顾红, 等. 环剥和 GA处理对红地球葡萄果实性状的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2005,22(6):14-18. |
[25] | 王惠君, 薛卫杰, 张昕, 等. 叶面喷施苹果酸对水稻Cd积累特性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021,40(2):269-278. |
[1] | JIA Yechun, CHEN Runyi, HE Zelin, NI Hongtao. Abiotic Stress on Sugar Beet: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 33-40. |
[2] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[3] | GONG Yongyong, DUANMU Huizi. TIFY Gene Family in Sugar Beet: Whole Genome Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 17-24. |
[4] | WANG Linyu, JIANG Yichen, YU Qingyang, WU Zedong, PI Zhi. Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) Gene Family in Sugar Beet: Identification and Functional Prediction [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 9-16. |
[5] | DENG Yushuai, WANG Yuguang, YU Lihua, GENG Gui. Effects of Waterlogging Stress on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Sugar Beet Seedlings Under Different Soil Salinity and Alkalinity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 18-23. |
[6] | LIU Na, HU Huabing, WANG Ronghua, LIU Xiaoyue, LIU Zhaoyang, LIU Xiaohan, WANG Maoqian. Methanol Aging Treatment: Effect on Germination of Sugar Beet Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 28-33. |
[7] | ZHAO Yaru, PI Zhi, LIU Rui, MA Yuyan, WU Zedong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Monogerm Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Lines and Maintainer Lines of Sugar Beet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 35-40. |
[8] | DONG Yinzhuang, WANG Gang, YU Lihua, GENG Gui. Effects of Ferrous Stress on Accumulation of Mineral Elements in Sugar Beet Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 11-16. |
[9] | SHI Yang, YIN Xilong, LI Wangsheng, XING Wang. PEG Simulated Drought Stress: Effects on Morphological Indices of Drought-tolerant and Drought-sensitive Sugar Beet Germplasms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 45-51. |
[10] | ZHOU Yanli, LIU Na, YU Lihua, LU Bingfu, ZHANG Wenbin, LIU Xiaoxue. Soil Mechanical Compaction and Its Effect on Crop Growth [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 83-88. |
[11] | YANG Ran, XING Wang, LIU Dali, WU Zedong, WANG Maoqian. Initiation Effects of Different Concentrations of Melatonin on Sugar Beet Seeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 19-25. |
[12] | LIU Danyang, CUI Rufei, GENG Gui, WANG Yuguang. Pathogenic Bacteria of Sugar Beet Blight: Isolation and Identification [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(24): 113-117. |
[13] | ZHANG Ziruo, MA Jiajie, GAO Qiuyu, WU Zedong. Molecular Identity for Sugar Beet Varieties: Establishment Based on DAMD Molecular Marker [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 21-26. |
[14] | LI Wangsheng, WANG Xueqian, YIN Xilong, SHI Yang, XING Wang. Drought Resistance of Sugar Beet Seedling: Identification and Index Screening [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 17-23. |
[15] | CONG Junchao, HU Huabing, WANG Ronghua, LIU Dali, WU Zedong, WANG Maoqian. Different Concentrations of Citric Acid: Effects on Sugar Beet Seed Priming [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 13-19. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||