Economic Characters of Introduced Sugar Beet Varieties: Relationship Analysis

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0021

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to explore the differences of the weight, size and length of root tubers of different sugar beet varieties, as well as the relationship between individual root tuber and sugar content, and the relationship between root tuber yield and sugar content of the same variety, five main sugar beet varieties (KWS1176, KWS9147, BETA379, BETA468, and BETA356) in Xinjiang were used as materials in this study. The economic characters such as root character, sugar content, root yield and sugar yield of the five varieties were measured by the investigation method in GB/T 10496-2018, and the correlations of the characters were analyzed. There is no significant difference of single root tuber weight among the five varieties. The sugar content of root tuber was as follows: KWS1176 (13.62%)> BETA379 (13.37%)> BETA468 (12.80%)> KWS9147 (12.56%)> BETA356 (9.04%). The root tuber yield was as follows: KWS9147 (100000.5 t/hm²)> BETA468 (95000.48 t/hm²)> BETA379 (93187.97 t/hm²)> BETA356 (89875.45 t/hm²)>KWS1176 (82000.41 t/hm²). The sugar content of KWS1176, KWS9147 and BETA356 were positively correlated with individual root weight, and the sugar content of BETA379 and BETA468 were negatively correlated with individual root weight. The sugar content of KWS1176 and KWS9147 did not change significantly with the increase of individual root weight. The sugar content of BETA379 decreased significantly with the increase of individual root weight. The sugar content of BETA468 decreased slowly with the increase of individual root weight. The sugar content of BETA356 did not increase significantly with the increase of individual root weight. The sugar content and sugar yield fluctuated greatly, and the stability was poor. The change rule of sugar content and individual root weight of different beet varieties are different, and the factors influencing the relationship between root tuber weight and sugar content of sugar beet need further research.

Key words: sugar beet, individual root, economic characters, correlation, sugar content

HUAN Ting, HU Huabing, HE Biwei, SUN Linlin, LIU Jianxiong, LIU Xun, YUAN Tuantuan, DING Zhaofei. Economic Characters of Introduced Sugar Beet Varieties: Relationship Analysis[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 11-19.

Figures/Tables 8

References 25

[8]	MARALIAN H, TOBEH A, SEIF AMIRI S, et al. Effects of sowing date and limited irrigation on root yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)[J]. Asian Journal of plant sciences, 2008, 7(3):298. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2008.298.303 URL
[9]	高妙真. 甜菜根重与含糖率相关关系的研究[J]. 中国甜菜, 1995(1):16-19.
[10]	王瑞刚. 生长条件与甜菜块根增长和舍糖率变化的关系[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 1998(5):26-29.
[11]	杨瑞红, 李占学. 甜菜含糖率与根重关系的研讨[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 1994(4):9-11,8.
[12]	张春来, 王华忠. 甜菜多胚四倍体品系制糖工艺品质性状的遗传潜势与选择[J]. 中国糖料, 2007(4):42-44,48.
[13]	GB/T 10496-2018, 糖料甜菜[S].
[14]	崔平. 甜菜种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[15]	牛庆林. 基于多源遥感的育种小区玉米表型信息定量反演[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2018.
[16]	黄敏. 旱稻及其突变体抗旱性与水稻杂种优势遗传聚合效应初析[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018.
[17]	王申莹, 胡志超, 张会娟, 等. 国内外甜菜生产与机械化收获分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2013, 34(3):20-25.
[18]	周海燕. 甜菜高产高糖源—库关系的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2008.
[19]	邵科. 甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)块根和含糖率增长与蔗糖代谢酶的关系及其营养调控的生理基础与实践[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2014.
[20]	邵金旺, 汪锦邦, 张家骅. 甜菜生育代谢的一般规律与其块根增长和糖分累积的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 1979(1):35-42.
[21]	夏红梅. 影响甜菜块根产量及含糖率的因素[J]. 中国甜菜糖业, 2001(3):39-41.
[22]	内蒙古农牧学院甜菜生理研究所. 甜菜生理育种一甜菜多倍体新品种协作2号的选育[J]. 中国甜菜, 1990(3):1-8.
[23]	胡华兵, 闫甜甜, 艾依肯. 甜菜品种BETA356产质量关系研究[J]. 中国糖料, 2015, 37(3):15-17.
[24]	罗春花. 甜菜品种比较试验分析[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019(4):127-129.
[1]	邹奕, 吴则东, 兴旺, 等. 甜菜种质资源遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 中国糖料, 2018, 40(5):73-76,80.
[2]	吴志毅. 甜菜夜蛾与藜科植物互作关系研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006.
[3]	李国龙. 甜菜苗期对干旱适应的生理生化及分子机制研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2011.
[4]	段娜, 刘雪, 于超, 等. 影响甜菜块根产量及含糖率因素的研究进展[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2014(5):49-50,71.
[5]	TSIALTAS J T, MASLARI N. Sugar beet root shape and its relation with yield and quality[J]. Sugar Tech, 2010, 12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s12355-010-0009-5 URL
[6]	张荣, 蔡葆. 中国甜菜概论[M]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古科学技术出版社, 2000.
[7]	DIANA B, BRITTA S, ROSLEFF S T, et al. Transcript profiles at different growth stages and tap-root zones identify correlated developmental and metabolic pathways of sugar beet[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2007, 58(3):699-715. pmid: 17307746
[25]	罗静静, 王贺亚, 王康, 等. 新疆塔额垦区优质抗病甜菜新品种适应性评价[J]. 北方农业学报, 2021, 49(1):17-22. doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.01.03

品种名称	单个块根重量/kg	变异系数	块根直径/cm	变异系数	块根长度/cm	变异系数
KWS1176	1.17 a	0.56	10.82 b	0.21	17.61 b	0.14
KWS9147	1.35 a	0.50	11.79 a	0.17	14.09 d	0.25
BETA379	1.25 a	0.42	11.81 a	0.14	15.89 b	0.16
BETA468	1.19 a	0.51	10.89 ab	0.13	16.46 bc	0.14
BETA356 (CK)	1.29 a	0.50	11.33 ab	0.19	20.45 a	0.22

品种名称	单个块根重量/kg	变异系数	块根直径/cm	变异系数	块根长度/cm	变异系数
KWS1176	1.17 a	0.56	10.82 b	0.21	17.61 b	0.14
KWS9147	1.35 a	0.50	11.79 a	0.17	14.09 d	0.25
BETA379	1.25 a	0.42	11.81 a	0.14	15.89 b	0.16
BETA468	1.19 a	0.51	10.89 ab	0.13	16.46 bc	0.14
BETA356 (CK)	1.29 a	0.50	11.33 ab	0.19	20.45 a	0.22

品种名称	根重级别	个数		总重
品种名称	根重级别	个	占比/%	kg	占比/%
KWS1176	0~0.500	5	13	1.90	4
	0.501~0.800	12	30	7.93	17
	0.801~1.200	7	18	7.23	15
	1.201~1.500	6	15	8.45	18
	≥1.501	10	25	21.43	46
	合计	40		46.94
KWS9147	0~0.500	3	8	1.29	2
	0.501~0.800	7	18	4.61	9
	0.801~1.200	10	25	10.17	19
	1.201~1.500	3	8	3.89	7
	≥1.501	17	43	33.93	63
	合计	40		53.89
BETA379	0~0.500	3	8	1.08	2
	0.501~0.800	8	20	5.64	11
	0.801~1.200	9	23	9.90	20
	1.201~1.500	8	20	10.85	22
	≥1.501	12	30	22.36	45
	合计	40		49.83
BETA468	0~0.500	3	8	1.39	3
	0.501~0.800	11	28	7.66	16
	0.801~1.200	9	23	9.27	19
	1.201~1.500	9	23	12.33	26
	≥1.501	8	20	16.95	36
	合计	40		47.60
BETA356(CK)	0~0.500	4	10	1.69	3
	0.501~0.800	5	13	3.02	6
	0.801~1.200	11	28	11.15	22
	1.201~1.500	9	23	11.67	23
	≥1.501	11	28	23.96	47
	合计	40		51.49

品种名称	根重级别	个数		总重
品种名称	根重级别	个	占比/%	kg	占比/%
KWS1176	0~0.500	5	13	1.90	4
	0.501~0.800	12	30	7.93	17
	0.801~1.200	7	18	7.23	15
	1.201~1.500	6	15	8.45	18
	≥1.501	10	25	21.43	46
	合计	40		46.94
KWS9147	0~0.500	3	8	1.29	2
	0.501~0.800	7	18	4.61	9
	0.801~1.200	10	25	10.17	19
	1.201~1.500	3	8	3.89	7
	≥1.501	17	43	33.93	63
	合计	40		53.89
BETA379	0~0.500	3	8	1.08	2
	0.501~0.800	8	20	5.64	11
	0.801~1.200	9	23	9.90	20
	1.201~1.500	8	20	10.85	22
	≥1.501	12	30	22.36	45
	合计	40		49.83
BETA468	0~0.500	3	8	1.39	3
	0.501~0.800	11	28	7.66	16
	0.801~1.200	9	23	9.27	19
	1.201~1.500	9	23	12.33	26
	≥1.501	8	20	16.95	36
	合计	40		47.60
BETA356(CK)	0~0.500	4	10	1.69	3
	0.501~0.800	5	13	3.02	6
	0.801~1.200	11	28	11.15	22
	1.201~1.500	9	23	11.67	23
	≥1.501	11	28	23.96	47
	合计	40		51.49

品种名称	锤度		含糖率			根产量			产糖量
品种名称	锤度/%	变异系数	含糖率/%	较CK	排名	根产量/ (t/hm²)	较CK/±%	排名	产糖量/ (t/hm²)	较CK/±%	排名
KWS1176	16.41 d	0.11	13.62 a	4.58	1	82000.41	-8.8	5	11170.4	37.54	4
KWS9147	15.14 b	0.11	12.56 b	3.52	4	100000.5	11.27	1	12562.11	54.67	1
BETA379	16.11 cd	0.06	13.37 ab	4.33	2	93187.97	3.69	3	12462.38	53.45	2
BETA468	15.42 c	0.09	12.80 bc	3.76	3	95000.48	5.7	2	12158.73	49.71	3
BETA356(CK)	10.89 a	0.19	9.04 d	0	5	89875.45	0	4	8121.71	0	5