Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (23): 70-76.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0879
Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Zhiqi1,2(), CHEN Yongxu2(
), WANG Yating2
Received:
2022-10-20
Revised:
2023-02-19
Online:
2023-08-15
Published:
2023-08-10
WU Zhiqi, CHEN Yongxu, WANG Yating. Analysis of Frost and Drought Resistance of 'Qingpotato No.9' under Different Planting Patterns[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(23): 70-76.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0879
编号 | 模式名称 | 说明 |
---|---|---|
① | 全膜双垄大垄面膜 侧种植 | 带宽1 m,小垄底宽40 cm,高15~20 cm,大垄底宽60 cm,高10~15 cm,两垄中间为集水沟,每个集水沟对应一大一小两个集水面,选用幅宽1.2 m,厚0.008 mm的地膜。 |
② | 起垄盖膜种植 | 带宽1 m,垄宽60 cm,高15~20 cm,沟宽40 cm,垄上选用幅宽1.2 m,厚0.008 mm的地膜。 |
③ | 平覆膜种植 | 带宽1 m,覆膜宽60 cm,膜间距40 cm,选用膜宽1.2 m,厚0.008 mm的地膜。 |
④ | 垄作不覆膜种植 | 带宽1 m,垄宽60 cm,高15~20 cm,垄沟40 cm。 |
⑤ | 双行靠种植 | 带宽1 m,宽行距60 cm,窄行距40 cm。 (平整好的土地上播种后打耱平地,现蕾开花初期取植株两侧的土壤堆土起垄)。 |
⑥ | 满天星种植 | 在平整好的土地上依据设计播种密度播种。 |
⑦ | 平作种植 | 种植方式同⑤,只中耕不培土。 |
⑧ | 垄沟种植 | 带宽1 m,垄面覆膜垄宽60 cm,沟宽40 cm,深15~20 cm,沟内种植两行马铃薯。 |
编号 | 模式名称 | 说明 |
---|---|---|
① | 全膜双垄大垄面膜 侧种植 | 带宽1 m,小垄底宽40 cm,高15~20 cm,大垄底宽60 cm,高10~15 cm,两垄中间为集水沟,每个集水沟对应一大一小两个集水面,选用幅宽1.2 m,厚0.008 mm的地膜。 |
② | 起垄盖膜种植 | 带宽1 m,垄宽60 cm,高15~20 cm,沟宽40 cm,垄上选用幅宽1.2 m,厚0.008 mm的地膜。 |
③ | 平覆膜种植 | 带宽1 m,覆膜宽60 cm,膜间距40 cm,选用膜宽1.2 m,厚0.008 mm的地膜。 |
④ | 垄作不覆膜种植 | 带宽1 m,垄宽60 cm,高15~20 cm,垄沟40 cm。 |
⑤ | 双行靠种植 | 带宽1 m,宽行距60 cm,窄行距40 cm。 (平整好的土地上播种后打耱平地,现蕾开花初期取植株两侧的土壤堆土起垄)。 |
⑥ | 满天星种植 | 在平整好的土地上依据设计播种密度播种。 |
⑦ | 平作种植 | 种植方式同⑤,只中耕不培土。 |
⑧ | 垄沟种植 | 带宽1 m,垄面覆膜垄宽60 cm,沟宽40 cm,深15~20 cm,沟内种植两行马铃薯。 |
序号 | 处理 | 播种期 | 出苗期 | 分枝期 | 花序形成期 | 盛花期 | 可收期 | 生育期 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ① | 12/4 | 5/5 | 3/6 | 23/6 | 22/8 | 11/9 | 152 |
2 | ② | 12/4 | 7/5 | 7/6 | 27/6 | 26/8 | 18/9 | 159 |
3 | ③ | 12/4 | 7/5 | 6/6 | 26/6 | 27/8 | 17/9 | 158 |
4 | ④ | 12/4 | 9/5 | 7/6 | 29/6 | 29/8 | 13/9 | 154 |
5 | ⑤ | 12/4 | 8/5 | 5/6 | 29/6 | 30/8 | 16/9 | 157 |
6 | ⑥ | 12/4 | 8/5 | 6/6 | 29/6 | 30/8 | 10/9 | 151 |
7 | ⑦ | 12/4 | 9/5 | 5/6 | 30/6 | 31/8 | 13/9 | 154 |
8 | ⑧ | 12/4 | 7/5 | 7/6 | 26/6 | 26/8 | 18/9 | 159 |
序号 | 处理 | 播种期 | 出苗期 | 分枝期 | 花序形成期 | 盛花期 | 可收期 | 生育期 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ① | 12/4 | 5/5 | 3/6 | 23/6 | 22/8 | 11/9 | 152 |
2 | ② | 12/4 | 7/5 | 7/6 | 27/6 | 26/8 | 18/9 | 159 |
3 | ③ | 12/4 | 7/5 | 6/6 | 26/6 | 27/8 | 17/9 | 158 |
4 | ④ | 12/4 | 9/5 | 7/6 | 29/6 | 29/8 | 13/9 | 154 |
5 | ⑤ | 12/4 | 8/5 | 5/6 | 29/6 | 30/8 | 16/9 | 157 |
6 | ⑥ | 12/4 | 8/5 | 6/6 | 29/6 | 30/8 | 10/9 | 151 |
7 | ⑦ | 12/4 | 9/5 | 5/6 | 30/6 | 31/8 | 13/9 | 154 |
8 | ⑧ | 12/4 | 7/5 | 7/6 | 26/6 | 26/8 | 18/9 | 159 |
处理 | 小区产量/(kg/m2) | 折合单产/(kg/hm2) | 位次 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | |||
① | 5.0 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 5.00 | 50002.50 | 1 |
② | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.00 | 40002.00 | 3 |
③ | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.13 | 41302.07 | 2 |
④ | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 2.93 | 29301.47 | 7 |
⑤ | 2.0 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 24001.20 | 8 |
⑥ | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.13 | 31301.57 | 6 |
⑦ | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 32001.6 | 5 |
⑧ | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.87 | 38701.94 | 4 |
处理 | 小区产量/(kg/m2) | 折合单产/(kg/hm2) | 位次 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | |||
① | 5.0 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 5.00 | 50002.50 | 1 |
② | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.00 | 40002.00 | 3 |
③ | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.13 | 41302.07 | 2 |
④ | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 2.93 | 29301.47 | 7 |
⑤ | 2.0 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 24001.20 | 8 |
⑥ | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.13 | 31301.57 | 6 |
⑦ | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 32001.6 | 5 |
⑧ | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.87 | 38701.94 | 4 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 13.73 | 20.02 | 20.02 | 34.03 | 34.03 | 34.03 | 34.03 | 20.02 |
2012 | 113.72 | 231.49 | 231 | 308.66 | 308.66 | 308.66 | 308.66 | 231.49 |
2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2014 | 1.33 | 2.71 | 2.71 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 2.71 |
2015 | 50.54 | 102.89 | 102.89 | 137.18 | 137.18 | 137.18 | 137.18 | 102.89 |
2016 | 63.61 | 92.77 | 92.77 | 157.7 | 157.7 | 157.7 | 157.7 | 92.77 |
2017 | 7.98 | 11.64 | 11.64 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 11.64 |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 13.73 | 20.02 | 20.02 | 34.03 | 34.03 | 34.03 | 34.03 | 20.02 |
2012 | 113.72 | 231.49 | 231 | 308.66 | 308.66 | 308.66 | 308.66 | 231.49 |
2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2014 | 1.33 | 2.71 | 2.71 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 2.71 |
2015 | 50.54 | 102.89 | 102.89 | 137.18 | 137.18 | 137.18 | 137.18 | 102.89 |
2016 | 63.61 | 92.77 | 92.77 | 157.7 | 157.7 | 157.7 | 157.7 | 92.77 |
2017 | 7.98 | 11.64 | 11.64 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 19.78 | 11.64 |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 401.18 | 560.38 | 560.38 | 1220.00 | 1220.00 | 1220.00 | 1220.00 | 560.38 |
2012 | 138.07 | 189.36 | 189.36 | 552.29 | 552.29 | 552.29 | 552.29 | 189.36 |
2013 | 194.16 | 254.84 | 254.84 | 667.43 | 667.43 | 667.43 | 667.43 | 254.84 |
2014 | 110.00 | 164.00 | 164.00 | 330.00 | 330.00 | 330.00 | 330.00 | 164.00 |
2015 | 316.78 | 482.72 | 482.72 | 965.43 | 965.43 | 965.43 | 965.43 | 482.72 |
2016 | 466.65 | 799.97 | 799.97 | 1870.00 | 1870.00 | 1870.00 | 1870.00 | 799.97 |
2017 | 429.63 | 605.59 | 605.59 | 1540.00 | 1540.00 | 1540.00 | 1540.00 | 605.59 |
2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 401.18 | 560.38 | 560.38 | 1220.00 | 1220.00 | 1220.00 | 1220.00 | 560.38 |
2012 | 138.07 | 189.36 | 189.36 | 552.29 | 552.29 | 552.29 | 552.29 | 189.36 |
2013 | 194.16 | 254.84 | 254.84 | 667.43 | 667.43 | 667.43 | 667.43 | 254.84 |
2014 | 110.00 | 164.00 | 164.00 | 330.00 | 330.00 | 330.00 | 330.00 | 164.00 |
2015 | 316.78 | 482.72 | 482.72 | 965.43 | 965.43 | 965.43 | 965.43 | 482.72 |
2016 | 466.65 | 799.97 | 799.97 | 1870.00 | 1870.00 | 1870.00 | 1870.00 | 799.97 |
2017 | 429.63 | 605.59 | 605.59 | 1540.00 | 1540.00 | 1540.00 | 1540.00 | 605.59 |
2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 110.46 | 151.49 | 151.49 | 441.83 | 441.83 | 441.83 | 441.83 | 151.49 |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2021 | 120.84 | 203.01 | 203.01 | 512.36 | 512.36 | 512.36 | 512.36 | 203.01 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 110.46 | 151.49 | 151.49 | 441.83 | 441.83 | 441.83 | 441.83 | 151.49 |
2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2021 | 120.84 | 203.01 | 203.01 | 512.36 | 512.36 | 512.36 | 512.36 | 203.01 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 33.12 | 48.30 | 48.30 | 82.11 | 82.11 | 82.11 | 82.11 | 48.30 |
2020 | 106.26 | 216.32 | 216.32 | 288.42 | 364.32 | 364.32 | 364.32 | 216.32 |
2021 | 28.84 | 58.71 | 58.71 | 78.28 | 98.88 | 98.88 | 98.88 | 58.71 |
年份 | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 33.12 | 48.30 | 48.30 | 82.11 | 82.11 | 82.11 | 82.11 | 48.30 |
2020 | 106.26 | 216.32 | 216.32 | 288.42 | 364.32 | 364.32 | 364.32 | 216.32 |
2021 | 28.84 | 58.71 | 58.71 | 78.28 | 98.88 | 98.88 | 98.88 | 58.71 |
[1] |
杨建玲, 冯建民, 郑广芬, 等. 宁夏中南部地区干旱变化趋势分析[J]. 中国沙漠, 2012, 32(3):842-851.
|
[2] |
doi: 10.3354/cr00771 URL |
[3] |
武艳娟, 李玉娥, 刘运通, 等. 宁夏气象灾害变化及其对粮食产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2008, 29(4):491-495.
|
[4] |
刘浩, 张宗山. 宁夏南部山区马铃薯主栽品种耐霜冻性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(33):14485-14486,14551.
|
[5] |
丁红映, 熊兴耀, 王万兴, 等. 103份马铃薯种质资源的耐寒性评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2019(12):46-55.
|
[6] |
胡晓黎, 袁媛, 雷蕾, 等. 马铃薯优质高产气候指标及灾害防御方法[J]. 陕西气象, 2019(4):43-45.
|
[7] |
张上宁, 徐利岗, 汤英, 等. 不同补灌水量对膜下滴灌马铃薯产量及水分利用的影响研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2020(7):149-153.
|
[8] |
余帮强, 张国辉, 吴林科, 等. 不同覆膜集雨方式对马铃薯生长发育的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(11):136-138.
|
[9] |
侯贤清, 牛有文, 吴文利, 等. 不同降雨年型下种植密度对旱作马铃薯生长、水分利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10):1560-1569.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01560 |
[10] |
穆长青, 董凤林. 覆膜方式对半干旱地区马铃薯经济性状及产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2014(3):47-48.
|
[11] |
刘颖秋, 宋建军, 张庆杰. 干旱灾害对我国社会经济影响研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005:70-71.
|
[12] |
中国气象局. QX/T 300—2015,农业气象观测规范[S]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2018:13.
|
[13] |
中国气象局. GB/T 35221—2017,地面气象观测规范[S]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003:85.
|
[14] |
陈红. 黑龙江省农业干旱灾害风险评价与区划研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(3):245-248.
|
[15] |
陈豫英, 陈楠, 张晓煜. 宁夏农业区霜冻出现规律分析[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2001(3):34-37.
|
[16] |
王连喜, 朱贇贇, 李剑萍, 等. 宁夏马铃薯种植的气候分区和风险评估[J]. 中国农业气象, 2011, 32(1):100-105.
|
[17] |
陈红. 黑龙江省农业干旱灾害风险评价与区划研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(3):245-248.
|
[18] |
胡晓黎, 袁媛, 雷蕾, 等. 马铃薯优质高产气候指标及灾害防御方法[J]. 陕西气象, 2019(4):43-45.
|
[19] |
陈义明. 马铃薯产量与气候条件的灰色动态预测模型[J]. 青海气象, 2005(3):31-33.
|
[20] |
陈娟, 贺锦红, 刘吉利, 等. 半干旱区不同种植模式对马铃薯淀粉形成及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(3):169-176.
|
[21] |
孙芳, 林而达, 武艳娟. 宁夏气候变化及其对马铃薯生产的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(4):465-471.
|
[22] |
黄嘉佑. 气象数据统计分析方法[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2015:52-53.
|
[23] |
李剑萍, 杨侃, 曹宁, 等. 气候变化情景下宁夏马铃薯单产变化模拟[J]. 中国农业气象, 2009, 30(3):407-412.
|
[24] |
苏建云, 金飞鹏, 杨立军. 宁夏中部干旱带旱地马铃薯覆膜种植技术研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2015, 56(12):9-12.
|
[25] |
马金虎, 杜守宇, 杨发, 等. 宁夏不同旱作区全膜双垄沟播技术的增产效果研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2011, 52(2):1,45.
|
[26] |
永坤, 何春蒙, 曹怀亮, 等. 播期对早熟马铃薯产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2009(6):44-45.
|
[1] | FAN Xian, QUAN Yiji, YANG Shaolin, LI Rudan, DENG Jun, ZHANG Yuebin. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance in Sugarcane Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 17-24. |
[2] | WANG Shuo, JIA Xiaoqian, HE Lu, LI Haoran, WANG Hongguang, HE Jianning, LI Dongxiao, FANG Qin, LI Ruiqi. Response Mechanism of Crops to Drought Stress and Measures for Improving Drought Resistance of Crops: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 31-44. |
[3] | LI Wangsheng, WANG Xueqian, YIN Xilong, SHI Yang, XING Wang. Drought Resistance of Sugar Beet Seedling: Identification and Index Screening [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(21): 17-23. |
[4] | ZHANG Mengfei, LI Shuang, LI Yunsheng, MA Haixia, LIU Yueqiu. Evaluation on the Drought Resistance of Seedlings of Nine Greening Tree Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 38-46. |
[5] | ZHANG Ruijiu, MA Hui, JI Lijie, REN Dezhi, LI Shuangdong, ZHANG Yaohui, WANG Lihong. Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Potato Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(15): 34-39. |
[6] | Liu Bokuan, Zhao Nannan, Cui Shunli, Li Xiukun, Liu Yingru, He Meijing, Hou Mingyu, Yang Xinlei, Mu Guojun, Liu Lifeng. Peanut Varieties: Drought Resistance Identification and Drought Resistance Indices’ Evaluation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(19): 27-35. |
[7] | Junxiu Yao, Xueliang Liu, Shanwen Li, Fei Ren, Qinghua Li, Haitao Wu, Honglian Zhai, Dejun Wu. Sambucus williamsii Clones at Seedling Stage: Response to Drought Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 75-81. |
[8] | Jinsheng Guo, Liru Cao, Xin Zhang, Qianjin Zhang, Xin Wei, Zhenhua Wang, Xiaomin Lu. Drought Stress at Jointing Stage: Effects on Physiological Characteristics and Drought Resistance of Maize Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(9): 14-18. |
[9] | Zhang Fuguo, Wang Huaiping. Drought Stress and Drought-resistant Maize Inbred Lines: Effects on Growth at Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(7): 6-10. |
[10] | Liu Huatao, Huang Xuefang, Huang Mingjing, Zhang Dongmei, Zhang Wei, Zhao Cong. Maize Varieties with Different Genotypes: Study on Yield, Drought Resistance and Water Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(33): 12-18. |
[11] | Wang Jingdong, Ma Sishuang, Bai Haibo, Hui Jian. Genetic Ability of Drought Resistance Indexes of Spring Wheat at Germination Stage Under PEG Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 6-12. |
[12] | . Agricultural Drought Resistance in Shandong: Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Combination Optimization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(35): 134-140. |
[13] | . Physiological Indexes of Maize Inbred Lines: The Relationship with Drought Resistance and Recovery Capacity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(29): 32-40. |
[14] | 郭丽芬 and . Safflower Seed at Germination Stage: Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(20): 44-49. |
[15] | . Effects on Photosynthetic Capacity and Stomatal Opening of Maize Leaves: Exogenous ABA Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(13): 31-35. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||