Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 95-99.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0043
Special Issue: 玉米
Previous Articles Next Articles
Hao Baoqiang1(), Ren Lirui1, Cheng Hongyan1, Cao Aocheng1, Wang Qiuxia1, Li Yuan1, Yan Dongdong1, Ouyang Canbin1(
), Zhu Wenda2(
)
Received:
2020-04-26
Revised:
2020-11-26
Online:
2021-03-05
Published:
2021-03-17
Contact:
Ouyang Canbin,Zhu Wenda
E-mail:hbq0222@163.com;oycb@iccas.ac.cn;zhwda@163.com
CLC Number:
Hao Baoqiang, Ren Lirui, Cheng Hongyan, Cao Aocheng, Wang Qiuxia, Li Yuan, Yan Dongdong, Ouyang Canbin, Zhu Wenda. Effect of 20% Nicosulfuron OD on Annual Weeds in Corn Field[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(7): 95-99.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0043
处理号 | 处理药剂 | 施药剂量/(g/hm2) | 有效成分量/(g(a.i)/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
A | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 225 | 45 |
B | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 262.5 | 52.5 |
C | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 300 | 60 |
D | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 525 | 105 |
E | 40 g/L烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 262.5 | 52.5 |
F | 人工除草 | 0 | 0 |
G | 空白对照 | 0 | 0 |
处理号 | 处理药剂 | 施药剂量/(g/hm2) | 有效成分量/(g(a.i)/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
A | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 225 | 45 |
B | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 262.5 | 52.5 |
C | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 300 | 60 |
D | 20%烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 525 | 105 |
E | 40 g/L烟嘧磺隆可分散油悬浮剂 | 262.5 | 52.5 |
F | 人工除草 | 0 | 0 |
G | 空白对照 | 0 | 0 |
时间 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 总草 | 时间 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 总草 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
药后20 d | A | 78.96bc | 75.88ab | 81.85a | 76.85ab | 79.22c | 药后40 d | A | 79.35b | 76.64b | 79.62ab | 75.89ab | 78.85d |
B | 85.16ab | 82.44a | 84.97a | 83.10ab | 84.85bc | B | 86.07ab | 81.35ab | 81.61ab | 83.16a | 84.09bc | ||
C | 89.48ab | 86.19a | 88.54a | 87.26a | 88.26ab | C | 88.77ab | 85.80ab | 87.40a | 86.27a | 87.27b | ||
D | 94.21a | 90.35a | 92.26a | 91.43a | 93.25a | D | 93.89a | 89.63a | 91.43a | 91.88a | 91.78a | ||
E | 83.09abc | 81.10a | 85.57a | 80.77ab | 83.05bc | E | 84.08ab | 80.05b | 83.19ab | 81.29a | 82.34cd | ||
F | 70.90c | 62.82b | 74.11a | 65.36b | 69.34d | F | 67.15c | 59.89c | 70.26b | 62.35b | 64.61e | ||
G | 0d | 0c | 0b | 0c | 0e | G | 0d | 0d | 0c | 0c | 0f |
时间 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 总草 | 时间 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 总草 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
药后20 d | A | 78.96bc | 75.88ab | 81.85a | 76.85ab | 79.22c | 药后40 d | A | 79.35b | 76.64b | 79.62ab | 75.89ab | 78.85d |
B | 85.16ab | 82.44a | 84.97a | 83.10ab | 84.85bc | B | 86.07ab | 81.35ab | 81.61ab | 83.16a | 84.09bc | ||
C | 89.48ab | 86.19a | 88.54a | 87.26a | 88.26ab | C | 88.77ab | 85.80ab | 87.40a | 86.27a | 87.27b | ||
D | 94.21a | 90.35a | 92.26a | 91.43a | 93.25a | D | 93.89a | 89.63a | 91.43a | 91.88a | 91.78a | ||
E | 83.09abc | 81.10a | 85.57a | 80.77ab | 83.05bc | E | 84.08ab | 80.05b | 83.19ab | 81.29a | 82.34cd | ||
F | 70.90c | 62.82b | 74.11a | 65.36b | 69.34d | F | 67.15c | 59.89c | 70.26b | 62.35b | 64.61e | ||
G | 0d | 0c | 0b | 0c | 0e | G | 0d | 0d | 0c | 0c | 0f |
项目 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 小计 | 项目 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 小计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株防效 | A | 78.90b | 75.14ab | 77.08ab | 74.80ab | 77.66b | 鲜重防效 | A | 81.13b | 77.36a | 80.34ab | 75.77bc | 79.70a |
B | 84.36ab | 81.69a | 80.21ab | 82.34a | 84.48ab | B | 87.45ab | 83.43a | 83.60ab | 84.28ab | 85.95a | ||
C | 88.32ab | 84.28a | 88.54ab | 86.71a | 86.59ab | C | 91.41ab | 86.36a | 90.94a | 87.93ab | 88.58a | ||
D | 94.14a | 88.31a | 90.63a | 89.48a | 91.04a | D | 96.11a | 91.14a | 93.55a | 92.00a | 93.23a | ||
E | 82.81ab | 79.64a | 83.33ab | 80.46a | 82.45ab | E | 85.67ab | 81.89a | 86.67ab | 82.15ab | 84.19a | ||
F | 64.77c | 54.47b | 69.79b | 61.61b | 62.25c | F | 65.27c | 57.02b | 72.53b | 63.07c | 62.46b | ||
G | 0d | 0c | 0c | 0c | 0d | G | 0d | 0c | 0c | 0d | 0c |
项目 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 小计 | 项目 | 编号 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 马齿苋 | 小计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株防效 | A | 78.90b | 75.14ab | 77.08ab | 74.80ab | 77.66b | 鲜重防效 | A | 81.13b | 77.36a | 80.34ab | 75.77bc | 79.70a |
B | 84.36ab | 81.69a | 80.21ab | 82.34a | 84.48ab | B | 87.45ab | 83.43a | 83.60ab | 84.28ab | 85.95a | ||
C | 88.32ab | 84.28a | 88.54ab | 86.71a | 86.59ab | C | 91.41ab | 86.36a | 90.94a | 87.93ab | 88.58a | ||
D | 94.14a | 88.31a | 90.63a | 89.48a | 91.04a | D | 96.11a | 91.14a | 93.55a | 92.00a | 93.23a | ||
E | 82.81ab | 79.64a | 83.33ab | 80.46a | 82.45ab | E | 85.67ab | 81.89a | 86.67ab | 82.15ab | 84.19a | ||
F | 64.77c | 54.47b | 69.79b | 61.61b | 62.25c | F | 65.27c | 57.02b | 72.53b | 63.07c | 62.46b | ||
G | 0d | 0c | 0c | 0c | 0d | G | 0d | 0c | 0c | 0d | 0c |
编号 | 全氮消耗量 | 全磷消耗量 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | ||
A | 1.29 | 2.03 | 0.34 | 3.67c | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.49c | |
B | 0.83 | 1.57 | 0.22 | 2.62c | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.34c | |
C | 0.65 | 1.47 | 0.16 | 2.27c | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.28c | |
D | 0.35 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 1.26c | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.15c | |
E | 1.10 | 1.69 | 0.21 | 3.00c | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.41c | |
F | 2.57 | 4.04 | 0.49 | 7.10b | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.96b | |
G | 7.79 | 10.69 | 1.74 | 20.22a | 1.87 | 0.83 | 0.13 | 2.82a | |
编号 | 全钾消耗量 | 水分消耗量 | |||||||
稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | ||
A | 2.85 | 4.32 | 0.37 | 7.54c | 301.44 | 617.23 | 86.54 | 1005.20c | |
B | 1.83 | 3.34 | 0.24 | 5.41c | 193.66 | 477.40 | 55.07 | 726.13c | |
C | 1.44 | 3.12 | 0.17 | 4.72c | 151.56 | 445.44 | 39.34 | 636.34c | |
D | 0.78 | 1.71 | 0.11 | 2.60c | 82.52 | 243.70 | 25.57 | 351.78c | |
E | 2.42 | 3.59 | 0.23 | 6.24c | 255.97 | 513.36 | 53.10 | 822.43c | |
F | 5.68 | 8.60 | 0.52 | 14.80b | 599.50 | 1228.46 | 121.94 | 1949.91b | |
G | 17.20 | 22.73 | 1.87 | 41.81a | 1817.04 | 3247.94 | 436.62 | 5501.59a |
编号 | 全氮消耗量 | 全磷消耗量 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | ||
A | 1.29 | 2.03 | 0.34 | 3.67c | 0.31 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.49c | |
B | 0.83 | 1.57 | 0.22 | 2.62c | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.34c | |
C | 0.65 | 1.47 | 0.16 | 2.27c | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.28c | |
D | 0.35 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 1.26c | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.15c | |
E | 1.10 | 1.69 | 0.21 | 3.00c | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.41c | |
F | 2.57 | 4.04 | 0.49 | 7.10b | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.96b | |
G | 7.79 | 10.69 | 1.74 | 20.22a | 1.87 | 0.83 | 0.13 | 2.82a | |
编号 | 全钾消耗量 | 水分消耗量 | |||||||
稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | 稗草 | 马唐 | 旱莲草 | 小计 | ||
A | 2.85 | 4.32 | 0.37 | 7.54c | 301.44 | 617.23 | 86.54 | 1005.20c | |
B | 1.83 | 3.34 | 0.24 | 5.41c | 193.66 | 477.40 | 55.07 | 726.13c | |
C | 1.44 | 3.12 | 0.17 | 4.72c | 151.56 | 445.44 | 39.34 | 636.34c | |
D | 0.78 | 1.71 | 0.11 | 2.60c | 82.52 | 243.70 | 25.57 | 351.78c | |
E | 2.42 | 3.59 | 0.23 | 6.24c | 255.97 | 513.36 | 53.10 | 822.43c | |
F | 5.68 | 8.60 | 0.52 | 14.80b | 599.50 | 1228.46 | 121.94 | 1949.91b | |
G | 17.20 | 22.73 | 1.87 | 41.81a | 1817.04 | 3247.94 | 436.62 | 5501.59a |
编号 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% |
---|---|---|---|
A | 7436.29a | 1277.51a | 20.89ab |
B | 7611.29a | 1452.51a | 23.61a |
C | 7676.29a | 1517.51a | 24.73a |
D | 7791.29a | 1632.51a | 26.66a |
E | 7536.29a | 1377.51a | 22.51a |
F | 6995.03b | 836.25b | 13.65b |
G | 6158.78c | 0c | 0c |
编号 | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产量/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% |
---|---|---|---|
A | 7436.29a | 1277.51a | 20.89ab |
B | 7611.29a | 1452.51a | 23.61a |
C | 7676.29a | 1517.51a | 24.73a |
D | 7791.29a | 1632.51a | 26.66a |
E | 7536.29a | 1377.51a | 22.51a |
F | 6995.03b | 836.25b | 13.65b |
G | 6158.78c | 0c | 0c |
[1] | Ali M, Alireza K, Mehdi N M. Analysis of the variations in dry matter yield and resource use efficiency of maize under different rates of nitrogen, phosphorous and water supply[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2020,43(9):1306-1319. |
[2] |
Bouwman A F, Beusen A H, Lassaletta L, et al. Lessons from temporal and spatial patterns in global use of N and P fertilizer on cropland[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7:40366.
doi: 10.1038/srep40366 URL pmid: 28084415 |
[3] | Bai H, Tao F. Sustainable intensification options to improve yield potential and eco-efficiency for rice-wheat rotation system in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017,211:89-105. |
[4] |
Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L, et al. Can improvement in photosynjournal increase crop yields?[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment, 2006,29(3):315-330.
URL pmid: 17080588 |
[5] | 夏文, 袁善奎, 聂东兴, 等. 玉米田除草剂登记情况及趋势分析[J]. 农药市场信息, 2016(25):36-37. |
[6] | 朱海霞, 马永强, 程亮, 等. 极细链格孢菌HZ-1对阔叶杂草的致病性及对作物的安全性评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016,28(6):1037-1040. |
[7] | 杨梅, 陈新, 袁星星, 等. 不同除草剂对蚕豆田间杂草及蚕豆生长和根瘤的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(25):106-114. |
[8] | 杨益军. 中国除草剂产业的现状及主流产品市场分析[J]. 今日农药, 2017(12):36-41. |
[9] | Sabadie J. Nicosulfuron: alcoholysis, chemical hydrolysis, and degradation on various minerals[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2002,50(3):526-531. |
[10] | Cholette, Taïga B, Soltani N, et al. Suppression of Annual Ryegrass in Corn with Nicosulfuron[J]. Weed Technology, 2019,33(1):173-177. |
[11] | Wang J, Zhong H M, Lv X L, et al. Photosynjournal and physiology responses of paired near-isogenic lines in waxy maize (Zea mays L.) to nicosulfuron[J]. Photosynthetica, 2018,56:1059-1068. |
[12] | Lum A F, Chikoye D, Adesiyan S O. Evaluation of nicosulfuron for control of speargrass [Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel] in Nigeria[J]. International Journal of Pest Management, 2004,50(4):327-330. |
[13] | 赵雨朦, 魏海峰, 马晴晴, 等. 烟嘧磺隆对翅碱蓬生理代谢的影响研究[J]. 环境生态学, 2019,1(6):8-12. |
[14] | Chen J, Meng X, Wei W, et al. Research on Controllable Degradation of Novel Sulfonylurea Herbicides in Acidic and Alkaline Soils[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017,65(35):7661-7668. |
[15] | 王佳颖, 何枞, 杨冬臣, 等. 生物炭固定化YB1菌剂对烟嘧磺隆降解效果的研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2019,42(6):91-96. |
[16] | Délye C, Duhoux A, Gardin J A C, et al. High conservation of the transcriptional response to acetolactate- synthase- inhibiting herbicides across plant species[J]. Weed Research, 2018,58(1):2-7. |
[17] | 徐加利, 王金信, 高兴文. 烟嘧磺隆的研究与开发进展[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2007(1):151-154. |
[18] | 贾鑫, 王建军, 杨俊伟, 等. 75%烟嘧磺隆水分散粒剂防除玉米田杂草药效试验报告[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2020(1):41-42. |
[19] | 宋春林, 吴秋平, 韩成卫. 4%烟嘧磺隆减量对玉米田杂草防效及玉米产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016,44(4):157-158. |
[20] | 甘林, 卢学松, 兰成忠, 等. 9种除草剂对玉米田杂草的防除效果及其安全性评价[J]. 农药学学报, 2020(3):468-476. |
[21] | 康东辉, 沙吾列·金斯汗.玉米田杂草化除技术要点[J]. 现代农村科技, 2019(11):31. |
[22] | 朱文达. 湖北省油菜田灾害性杂草高效防控技术研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010,32(1):156-162. |
[23] | 黄义召, 谢娜, 赵孔平, 等. 氯吡嘧磺隆与烟嘧磺隆混用对玉米田杂草防除效果及安全性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(35):93-97. |
[24] | Zhang Z, Yang D, Wang J, et al. Studies on the interactions between nicosulfuron and degradation enzymes[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2020,91:99-103. |
[25] | 张哲, 杨树森, 杨冬臣, 等. 烟嘧磺隆降解菌枯草芽孢杆菌YB1颗粒剂的加工及应用[J]. 农药学学报, 2018,20(2):254-258. |
[26] | Sarmah A K, Sabadie J. Hydrolysis of sulfonylurea herbicides in soils and aqueous solutions: a review[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2002,50(22):6253-6265. |
[1] | LI Xiaoyu. Cultivation and Product Analysis of Pleurotus eryngii on Phragmites australis Substrates [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 51-55. |
[2] | CUI Yingying, ZHOU Bo, CHEN Yiyong, LIU Jiayu, LI Jianlong, TANG Hao, TANG Jinchi. Spatial-temporal Variation Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility in Guangdong Major Tea Areas [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 85-95. |
[3] | DONG Wencai, LIU Xianbin, LI Hongmei, ZHAO Shuangmei, BAO Jinmei, SHEN Jianping, LIANG Fang, LU Mei. Effects of Calcium Supply with Varying Levels on the Growth and Development of Woody Ornamental Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 42-50. |
[4] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[5] | WANG Lina, YANG Ying, Du Su. Effects of Biochar Application on Saline-alkali Soil: Research Status [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 81-87. |
[6] | CAO Qiumei, WANG Luyi, LI Xiaoman, LI Junda, LIU Mengtian, ZHENG Yao, WANG Lihua. Effects of Effective Microorganisms on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Fecal Ammonia Emission of BALB/C Mice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 124-128. |
[7] | LI Dongxue, WANG Yiliu, HUAN Weiwei, BU Lingduo, WANG Ruizhi, LIU Hao, LU Dianjun, WANG Huoyan, CHEN Xiaoqin. Nutrient Content of Tobacco Leaves and Root Zone Soil Affected by Citrate Soluble Potassium Fertilizer in Yuxi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 67-73. |
[8] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
[9] | ZHAO Yue, ZHANG Xiaoyan, CAO Kun, HAN Chengwei, JIANG Ying, BIAN Jing, WANG Xiaonan, SUN Yufeng. Physiology and Molecular Mechanism of Stress Resistance in Hemp: A Review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 102-106. |
[10] | CHEN Zhi, CHEN Duhuang, QIN Zhiqing, XU Shan, ZHOU Minglong. Comparative Analysis of Nutrient Compositions in Different Tissues of Female Tri-Spine Horseshoe Crab Tachypleus tridentatus [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(4): 153-156. |
[11] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[12] | YANG Kexin, ZHAO Xin, GE Hong, YANG Shuhua, JIA Ruidong, KOU Yaping. Nutrition and Fertilizer Efficient Utilization Technology of Cut Chrysanthemum: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 52-58. |
[13] | ZHOU Tingyu, XIAO Yang, HUANG Qingyang, XIE Chen, LUO You. Forest Litter Decomposition: Research Progress and Prospect [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(33): 44-51. |
[14] | WANG Yongjiang, WANG Shuang, QIAO Qi, TIAN Yuting. Screening Nutrient Solution Formulas for Static Hydroponics of Sweet Potato ‘Shangshu 19’ Plantlet and Analysis of Endogenous Hormone Concentrations [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(32): 99-105. |
[15] | MA Yanzhi, QI Kejia, WANG Xiangdong. Effects of Drying Methods on the Quality of Rose ‘Crimson Glory’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 142-146. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||