Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (19): 76-85.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0598
Previous Articles Next Articles
DING Yuping1(), MA Tao1, YANG Yongsen1, LIU Jili2, ZHE Yongqing1, WU Na1(
)
Received:
2023-08-12
Revised:
2024-03-19
Online:
2024-07-05
Published:
2024-07-02
DING Yuping, MA Tao, YANG Yongsen, LIU Jili, ZHE Yongqing, WU Na. Effects of Manure Replacing Part of Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients and Potato Tuber Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 76-85.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0598
土层/cm | 有机质/(g/kg) | EC | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.52 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 42.54 | 22.88 | 357.78 | 8.62 |
20~40 | 8.35 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 41.33 | 20.08 | 340.77 | 8.76 |
土层/cm | 有机质/(g/kg) | EC | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.52 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 42.54 | 22.88 | 357.78 | 8.62 |
20~40 | 8.35 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 41.33 | 20.08 | 340.77 | 8.76 |
处理 | 有机肥 | 化肥 | 养分含量 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 硫酸钾 | N | P2O5 | K2O | 总养分 | |||
CK | 0 | 485 | 563 | 115 | 225 | 90 | 60 | 375 | |
T1 | 2451 | 388 | 450 | 92 | 220 | 94 | 61 | 375 | |
T2 | 4902 | 291 | 338 | 69 | 215 | 99 | 61 | 375 | |
T3 | 7353 | 194 | 225 | 46 | 210 | 103 | 62 | 375 | |
T4 | 12255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 111 | 64 | 375 |
处理 | 有机肥 | 化肥 | 养分含量 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
尿素 | 过磷酸钙 | 硫酸钾 | N | P2O5 | K2O | 总养分 | |||
CK | 0 | 485 | 563 | 115 | 225 | 90 | 60 | 375 | |
T1 | 2451 | 388 | 450 | 92 | 220 | 94 | 61 | 375 | |
T2 | 4902 | 291 | 338 | 69 | 215 | 99 | 61 | 375 | |
T3 | 7353 | 194 | 225 | 46 | 210 | 103 | 62 | 375 | |
T4 | 12255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 111 | 64 | 375 |
处理 | 维生素C/(mg/100 g) | 粗蛋白/% | 可溶性糖/% | 直链淀粉/% | 支链淀粉/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 12.70±0.18ab | 5.23±0.41c | 1.73±0.11a | 4.40±0.29c | 11.28±0.68c |
T1 | 13.33±1.21ab | 5.57±0.69bc | 1.97±0.28a | 4.79±0.10b | 12.62±1.17ab |
T2 | 14.21±0.05a | 6.67±0.21a | 1.91±0.07a | 5.17±0.04a | 13.29±0.41a |
T3 | 13.63±0.57ab | 6.24±0.23ab | 1.44±0.13a | 4.93±0.12ab | 12.29±1.50ab |
T4 | 12.36±1.45b | 5.16±0.13c | 1.75±0.08a | 4.12±0.23c | 11.30±0.55c |
处理 | 维生素C/(mg/100 g) | 粗蛋白/% | 可溶性糖/% | 直链淀粉/% | 支链淀粉/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 12.70±0.18ab | 5.23±0.41c | 1.73±0.11a | 4.40±0.29c | 11.28±0.68c |
T1 | 13.33±1.21ab | 5.57±0.69bc | 1.97±0.28a | 4.79±0.10b | 12.62±1.17ab |
T2 | 14.21±0.05a | 6.67±0.21a | 1.91±0.07a | 5.17±0.04a | 13.29±0.41a |
T3 | 13.63±0.57ab | 6.24±0.23ab | 1.44±0.13a | 4.93±0.12ab | 12.29±1.50ab |
T4 | 12.36±1.45b | 5.16±0.13c | 1.75±0.08a | 4.12±0.23c | 11.30±0.55c |
AE | APO | APM | SE1 | SE2 | UE1 | UE2 | CE1 | CE2 | APE1 | APE2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE | 1.00 | ||||||||||
APO | 0.68** | 1.00 | |||||||||
APM | 0.73** | 0.40** | 1.00 | ||||||||
SE1 | 0.50** | 0.40** | 0.57** | 1.00 | |||||||
SE2 | 0.22 | 0.33** | 0.37** | 0.66** | 1.00 | ||||||
UE1 | 0.24* | 0.41** | 0.12 | 0.67** | 0.62** | 1.00 | |||||
UE2 | 0.60** | 0.77** | 0.35** | 0.59** | 0.49** | 0.75** | 1.00 | ||||
CE1 | 0.51** | 0.52** | 0.59** | 0.31** | 0.42** | 0.001 | 0.38** | 1.00 | |||
CE2 | 0.56** | 0.69** | 0.57** | 0.38** | 0.42** | 0.09 | 0.45** | 0.78** | 1.00 | ||
APE1 | 0.24* | 0.44** | 0.11 | 0.68** | 0.64** | 0.94** | 0.74** | 0.04 | 0.17 | 1.00 | |
APE2 | 0.58** | 0.74** | 0.43** | 0.65** | 0.59** | 0.75** | 0.87** | 0.45** | 0.50** | 0.73** | 1.00 |
AE | APO | APM | SE1 | SE2 | UE1 | UE2 | CE1 | CE2 | APE1 | APE2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE | 1.00 | ||||||||||
APO | 0.68** | 1.00 | |||||||||
APM | 0.73** | 0.40** | 1.00 | ||||||||
SE1 | 0.50** | 0.40** | 0.57** | 1.00 | |||||||
SE2 | 0.22 | 0.33** | 0.37** | 0.66** | 1.00 | ||||||
UE1 | 0.24* | 0.41** | 0.12 | 0.67** | 0.62** | 1.00 | |||||
UE2 | 0.60** | 0.77** | 0.35** | 0.59** | 0.49** | 0.75** | 1.00 | ||||
CE1 | 0.51** | 0.52** | 0.59** | 0.31** | 0.42** | 0.001 | 0.38** | 1.00 | |||
CE2 | 0.56** | 0.69** | 0.57** | 0.38** | 0.42** | 0.09 | 0.45** | 0.78** | 1.00 | ||
APE1 | 0.24* | 0.44** | 0.11 | 0.68** | 0.64** | 0.94** | 0.74** | 0.04 | 0.17 | 1.00 | |
APE2 | 0.58** | 0.74** | 0.43** | 0.65** | 0.59** | 0.75** | 0.87** | 0.45** | 0.50** | 0.73** | 1.00 |
品质指标 | R | R2 | e | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单独引入各自变量所得 线性回归方程中最优的相关系数 | 引入全部自变量所得 线性回归方程的相关系数 | 单独引入各自变量所得 线性回归方程中最优的相关系数 | 引入全部自变量所得 线性回归方程的相关系数 | |||
维生素C | 0.56 | 0.31 | 0.83 | |||
粗蛋白 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.51 | |
可溶性糖 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.59 | |
支链淀粉 | 0.52 | 0.27 | 0.85 | |||
直链淀粉 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.36 |
品质指标 | R | R2 | e | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单独引入各自变量所得 线性回归方程中最优的相关系数 | 引入全部自变量所得 线性回归方程的相关系数 | 单独引入各自变量所得 线性回归方程中最优的相关系数 | 引入全部自变量所得 线性回归方程的相关系数 | |||
维生素C | 0.56 | 0.31 | 0.83 | |||
粗蛋白 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.51 | |
可溶性糖 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 0.59 | |
支链淀粉 | 0.52 | 0.27 | 0.85 | |||
直链淀粉 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.36 |
品质指标 | 自变量 | 相关系数 | 直接通径系数 | 间接通径系数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A4 | A2 | A3 | A5 | ||||
维生素C | A1 | 0.56 | 0.56 | / | / | / | / |
粗蛋白 | A2 | 0.79 | 1.19 | / | / | -0.40 | / |
A3 | 0.38 | -0.52 | / | 0.90 | / | / | |
可溶性糖 | A4 | -0.17 | 0.65 | / | / | -0.34 | / |
A3 | -0.67 | -1.14 | 0.77 | / | / | / | |
直链淀粉 | A5 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.31 | / | -0.48 | / |
A4 | 0.70 | 0.40 | / | / | -0.48 | 0.77 | |
A3 | 0.36 | -0.66 | 0.29 | / | / | 0.73 | |
支链淀粉 | A6 | 0.20 | 0.52 | / | / | / | / |
品质指标 | 自变量 | 相关系数 | 直接通径系数 | 间接通径系数 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A4 | A2 | A3 | A5 | ||||
维生素C | A1 | 0.56 | 0.56 | / | / | / | / |
粗蛋白 | A2 | 0.79 | 1.19 | / | / | -0.40 | / |
A3 | 0.38 | -0.52 | / | 0.90 | / | / | |
可溶性糖 | A4 | -0.17 | 0.65 | / | / | -0.34 | / |
A3 | -0.67 | -1.14 | 0.77 | / | / | / | |
直链淀粉 | A5 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.31 | / | -0.48 | / |
A4 | 0.70 | 0.40 | / | / | -0.48 | 0.77 | |
A3 | 0.36 | -0.66 | 0.29 | / | / | 0.73 | |
支链淀粉 | A6 | 0.20 | 0.52 | / | / | / | / |
[1] |
|
[2] |
胡月华. 化肥减量与生物有机肥配施对土壤质量变化及马铃薯产量与品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(19):204-210.
|
[3] |
许景钢, 孙涛, 李嵩. 我国微生物肥料的研发及其在农业生产中的应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2016(1):1-6.
|
[4] |
赵健宇, 王凤新, 孟潮彪, 等. 生物有机肥对马铃薯产量与土壤氮循环作用机制研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(4):343-351.
|
[5] |
胡岗, 赵欢, 秦松, 等. 有机钾与化学钾肥配施对黔中马铃薯产量、品质及钾素平衡的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(3):55-62.
|
[6] |
钱彩霞, 陈吉昆, 余丽燕, 等. 有机肥替代化肥对低纬高原大春马铃薯产量与品质的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2021, 41(8):17-18.
|
[7] |
蓝贤瑾, 刘益仁, 侯红乾, 等. 长期有机无机肥配施对红壤性水稻土微生物生物量和有机质结构的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(5):810-819.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
季佳鹏, 赵欣宇, 吴景贵, 等. 有机肥替代20%化肥提高黑钙土养分有效性及玉米产量[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(3):491-499.
|
[10] |
郭振威, 李永山, 王慧, 等. 长期棉花秸秆还田和施用有机肥对棉田土壤养分含量和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(6):877-884.
|
[11] |
尹献远, 徐霄, 余丽丽. 全自动凯氏定氮仪测定土壤碱解氮的探讨[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2012(8):1185-1187.
|
[12] |
张萍. 土壤中速效磷含量测定(钼锑批色法)[J]. 现代经济信息, 2005(6):1.
|
[13] |
孙兰香. 乙酸铵浸提——火焰光度计法测定土壤速效钾[J]. 现代农业科技, 2008(17):199.
|
[14] |
隋跃宇, 陈一民, 焦晓光. 土壤蔗糖酶的测定方法[P]. 中国专利, CN106248664A,2016-12-21.
|
[15] |
石春芳, 王志勇, 冷小云, 等. 土壤磷酸酶活性测定方法的改进[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2016, 33(7):48-49.
|
[16] |
丰骁, 段建平, 蒲小鹏. 土壤脲酶活性两种测定方法的比较[J]. 草原与草坪, 2008(2):70-72.
|
[17] |
曾凡逵, 赵鑫, 周添红, 等. 双波长比色法测定马铃薯直链/支链淀粉含量[J]. 现代食品科技, 2012, 28(1):119-122.
|
[18] |
杨鹭生, 李国平. 几个油莎豆品种块茎中蛋白质含量的比较分析[J]. 武夷学院学报, 2018, 37(6):40-43.
|
[19] |
刘海英, 王华华, 崔长海. 可溶性糖含量测定(蒽酮法)实验的改进[J]. 实验室科学, 2013, 16(2):19-20.
|
[20] |
梁云贞, 董佩佩, 黄秋婵. 测定果蔬中维生素C含量的实验教学改革——2,6-二氯酚靛酚法[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2019(2):279-280.
|
[21] |
刘亚军, 李越, 马琨, 等. 马铃薯与蚕豆、荞麦间作对土壤的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(21):79-83.
|
[22] |
刘雷, 王梦亮, 王俊红, 等. 不同施肥方式对玉米生育期内根际土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(6):199-204.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2018.06.027 |
[23] |
|
[24] |
孙得翔, 石铭福, 王勇. 有机肥部分替代化肥对马铃薯农艺性状、产量和品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(6):43-51.
|
[1] | ZHAN Wenjie, ZHOU Ben, ZHU Linxing, WANG Min, ZHU Changtai, SHEN Qirong, GUO Shiwei. Effects of Trichoderma Bio-organic Fertilizer on Salinized Soil Fertility and Yield and Quality of Hang Cabbage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 108-117. |
[2] | CHEN Jingwei, MA Jukui, GAO Fangyuan, ZHANG Chengling, YANG Dongjing, TANG Wei, XIE Yiping, SUN Houjun. Effects of Combinations of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato at Seedling Stage [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(7): 8-13. |
[3] | ZHANG Xinxin, HUANG Yong, CHEN Jingyi, ZOU Hongda, LUO Zhongxia, WANG Zhangying, HUANG Lifei. Elsinoe batatas Causing Sweetpotato Scab: Biological Characteristics and Conidia Production [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(3): 112-119. |
[4] | GUO Xinsong, WEI Juhua, SHA Chunyan, GAO Han, SONG Zhi, FAN Zhongqing, YIN Jing, DING Fangjun. Effect of Optimizing Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Potato and Soil Nutrient Supply [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(2): 84-90. |
[5] | WU Penghui, KONG Lingjie, LANG Yishan, ZHAO Haimeng, ZHOU Haonan, JIANG Haonan, WU Xia. Effects of Potato Onion Accompaniment on Fruit Quality and Rhizosphere Soil Nutrients of Tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(19): 33-39. |
[6] | CHEN Youming, GUO Yanru, MA Xingkong, TIAN Jian, DONG Yuanhua. Effects of Rice-crab Coculture on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Soil Enzyme Activities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 58-65. |
[7] | HUANG Xun, FENG Jiawen, HE Wenrui, XU Yajin, DENG Linmei, ZHOU Kunyan, ZHANG Xiaofang, YANG Yanli, LIU Xia. Streptomyces acidiscabies: Identification and Screening of Antibacterial Organic Acids [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 125-134. |
[8] | CHEN Yihang, TANG Chaochen, ZHANG Rong, YAO Zhufang, JIN Jingwei, WANG Zhangying. 132 Sweetpotato Landraces: Genetic Diversity and Population Structure [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(18): 22-30. |
[9] | LIN Haizhong, ZHANG Minrong, LIN Feirong, YU Jihua. Experimental Study on Prevention and Treatment of Stem Base Rot of Ipomoea batatas During Cutting Period [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 114-119. |
[10] | GUO Xinsong, HUANG Jian, LIU Xiaochen, HONG Pizheng, FAN Zhongqing, HE Lining, LIU Tongxin, ZHAO Hua, DING Fangjun, WANG Haiwei, WANG Kun. Physiological Response of Potato Seedling Leaves to Low Temperature Stress by Spraying Different Concentrations of Humic Acid [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(17): 28-35. |
[11] | SHI Guizhi, FENG Jiawen, XU Yajin, LIN Zhixu, LIU Xia. Analysis of Resistance of Potato Varieties (lines) to Potato Common Scab in Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(15): 137-142. |
[12] | YUAN Hui, HUI Lingling, XIE Junhong, ZHOU Yongjie, XIE Lihua. Effects on Yield and Quality of Potato and Soil Nutrients: Iron and Zinc Fertilizers [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(12): 15-21. |
[13] | TIAN Changgeng, LIU Shanggang, CHEN Lulu, SUN Zhe, QIN Huawei. Effect of Planting Methods on Stem and Leaf Growth, Yield and Marketability of Storage Roots of Two Types of Sweetpotato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(11): 9-13. |
[14] | LIU Kexing, YAN Shiwen, CUI Dong, ZHOU Longhao, XU Bingjie, SHI Chunyu, KONG Xiangyu, LI Cong, LIU Hongjuan. Effects of Hormone Proportions on Tissue Culture of Sweet Potato and Tube Seedlings Growth After Transplantation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(10): 12-16. |
[15] | ZHANG Xiaohong. Research Progress of Sweet Potato with High Light Efficiency and Weak Light Tolerance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(8): 1-6. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||