Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (28): 118-123.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190900599
Previous Articles Next Articles
Lin Shaoxia1(), Zeng Xianping2, Lin Changhu3(), Xiao Zhiqiang1
Received:
2019-09-03
Revised:
2020-03-19
Online:
2020-10-05
Published:
2020-09-23
Contact:
Lin Changhu
E-mail:linsx112233@sina.com;linchanghu79@sina.com
CLC Number:
Lin Shaoxia, Zeng Xianping, Lin Changhu, Xiao Zhiqiang. Research on Yellow Soil Properties with Uncaria rhynchophylla-plant in Guizhou[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 118-123.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190900599
土壤性质 | 钩藤基地 | 林地 | 荒地 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | ||||
pH | 最小值 | 4.81 | 4.99 | 4.97 | 5.22 | 5.80 | 5.82 | ||
最大值 | 6.80 | 6.94 | 5.93 | 6.04 | 6.34 | 6.55 | |||
平均值 | 5.60aA | 5.95aA | 5.36abA | 5.72aA | 6.01bA | 6.17aA | |||
容重/(g/cm3) | 最小值 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.44 | ||
最大值 | 1.37 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.43 | 1.48 | 1.49 | |||
平均值 | 1.27cC | 1.35bB | 1.36bB | 1.40bB | 1.45aA | 1.46aA | |||
比重/(g/cm3) | 最小值 | 2.49 | 2.56 | 2.50 | 2.48 | 2.45 | 2.59 | ||
最大值 | 2.68 | 3.23 | 3.13 | 3.04 | 2.76 | 2.65 | |||
平均值 | 2.60aA | 2.68aA | 2.68aA | 2.66aA | 2.62aA | 2.62aA | |||
孔隙度/% | 最小值 | 46.51 | 46.1 | 45.40 | 43.17 | 39.73 | 42.49 | ||
最大值 | 54.61 | 55.47 | 56.41 | 53.45 | 47.04 | 45.20 | |||
平均值 | 51.05aA | 49.62aA | 48.71abAB | 47.30abAB | 44.48bB | 44.29bB | |||
毛管孔隙度/% | 最小值 | 40.05 | 27.92 | 24.88 | 20.05 | 17.67 | 19.25 | ||
最大值 | 50.25 | 47.95 | 36.49 | 32.81 | 30.03 | 28.52 | |||
平均值 | 45.04aA | 49.62aA | 31.36bB | 47.30aA | 22.51cC | 44.29aA | |||
非毛管孔隙度/% | 最小值 | 0.36 | 3.02 | 10.15 | 20.64 | 17.01 | 16.68 | ||
最大值 | 10.84 | 22.03 | 21.14 | 25.7 | 26.86 | 25.93 | |||
平均值 | 6.01cB | 12.71bB | 17.34bA | 22.95aA | 21.97aA | 21.03aAB | |||
含水率/% | 最小值 | 15.89 | 14.58 | 18.47 | 19.99 | 16.21 | 14.21 | ||
最大值 | 41.68 | 30.81 | 21.28 | 27.5 | 20.76 | 21.73 | |||
平均值 | 21.09aA | 21.08aA | 20.19aA | 22.99aA | 19.19aA | 18.68aA |
土壤性质 | 钩藤基地 | 林地 | 荒地 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | ||||
pH | 最小值 | 4.81 | 4.99 | 4.97 | 5.22 | 5.80 | 5.82 | ||
最大值 | 6.80 | 6.94 | 5.93 | 6.04 | 6.34 | 6.55 | |||
平均值 | 5.60aA | 5.95aA | 5.36abA | 5.72aA | 6.01bA | 6.17aA | |||
容重/(g/cm3) | 最小值 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.41 | 1.44 | ||
最大值 | 1.37 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.43 | 1.48 | 1.49 | |||
平均值 | 1.27cC | 1.35bB | 1.36bB | 1.40bB | 1.45aA | 1.46aA | |||
比重/(g/cm3) | 最小值 | 2.49 | 2.56 | 2.50 | 2.48 | 2.45 | 2.59 | ||
最大值 | 2.68 | 3.23 | 3.13 | 3.04 | 2.76 | 2.65 | |||
平均值 | 2.60aA | 2.68aA | 2.68aA | 2.66aA | 2.62aA | 2.62aA | |||
孔隙度/% | 最小值 | 46.51 | 46.1 | 45.40 | 43.17 | 39.73 | 42.49 | ||
最大值 | 54.61 | 55.47 | 56.41 | 53.45 | 47.04 | 45.20 | |||
平均值 | 51.05aA | 49.62aA | 48.71abAB | 47.30abAB | 44.48bB | 44.29bB | |||
毛管孔隙度/% | 最小值 | 40.05 | 27.92 | 24.88 | 20.05 | 17.67 | 19.25 | ||
最大值 | 50.25 | 47.95 | 36.49 | 32.81 | 30.03 | 28.52 | |||
平均值 | 45.04aA | 49.62aA | 31.36bB | 47.30aA | 22.51cC | 44.29aA | |||
非毛管孔隙度/% | 最小值 | 0.36 | 3.02 | 10.15 | 20.64 | 17.01 | 16.68 | ||
最大值 | 10.84 | 22.03 | 21.14 | 25.7 | 26.86 | 25.93 | |||
平均值 | 6.01cB | 12.71bB | 17.34bA | 22.95aA | 21.97aA | 21.03aAB | |||
含水率/% | 最小值 | 15.89 | 14.58 | 18.47 | 19.99 | 16.21 | 14.21 | ||
最大值 | 41.68 | 30.81 | 21.28 | 27.5 | 20.76 | 21.73 | |||
平均值 | 21.09aA | 21.08aA | 20.19aA | 22.99aA | 19.19aA | 18.68aA |
土壤性质 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 缓效钾/(g/kg) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钩藤基地 | 根际 | 范围 | 13.23~44.31 | 1.06~2.58 | 89.08~177.46 | 4.39~10.86 | 48.72~308.72 | 36.48~664.57 |
平均值 | 29.44aA | 1.84aA | 130.32aA | 5.91aA | 107.65aA | 261.17aA | ||
变异系数 | 30.71 | 27.42 | 19.7 | 36.83 | 69.66 | 91.34 | ||
非根际 | 范围 | 10.01~36.91 | 0.91~2.52 | 76.36~142.11 | 4.34~10.23 | 30.72~148.72 | 70.40~631.72 | |
平均值 | 23.58aA | 1.57aA | 103.36aA | 5.62aA | 79.39aA | 268.73aA | ||
变异系数 | 36.73 | 34.25 | 20.45 | 31.71 | 35.29 | 84.41 | ||
林地 | 根际 | 范围 | 21.82~26.88 | 1.37~1.61 | 101.10~113.83 | 4.39~5.81 | 83.72~148.72 | 95.01~142.05 |
平均值 | 24.31abA | 1.48abA | 109.02aA | 4.98aA | 121.72aA | 114.40aA | ||
变异系数 | 8.4 | 6.08 | 5.09 | 10.97 | 21.27 | 16.53 | ||
非根际 | 范围 | 20.57~26.17 | 1.27~1.58 | 97.57~113.12 | 4.70~12.54 | 70.72~143.72 | 63.49~120.21 | |
平均值 | 22.03aA | 1.42aA | 105.34aA | 8.09aA | 107.12aA | 100.34aA | ||
变异系数 | 10.6 | 8.16 | 6.66 | 42.9 | 30.9 | 22.46 | ||
荒地 | 根际 | 范围 | 15.90~17.15 | 0.92~1.14 | 74.94~94.74 | 5.12~6.65 | 78.72~158.72 | 94.92~151.86 |
平均值 | 16.62bA | 1.02bB | 82.72aA | 6.00aA | 117.05aA | 114.03aA | ||
变异系数 | 3.88 | 10.79 | 12.76 | 13.13 | 34.26 | 28.74 | ||
非根际 | 范围 | 10.79~17.18 | 0.86~1.91 | 71.41~94.03 | 5.70~8.07 | 48.72~123.72 | 95.40~149.82 | |
平均值 | 14.26aA | 1.25aA | 80.36aA | 5.62aA | 77.05aA | 116.87aA | ||
变异系数 | 22.67 | 45.81 | 14.96 | 18.29 | 52.85 | 24.79 |
土壤性质 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/(g/kg) | 碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) | 缓效钾/(g/kg) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
钩藤基地 | 根际 | 范围 | 13.23~44.31 | 1.06~2.58 | 89.08~177.46 | 4.39~10.86 | 48.72~308.72 | 36.48~664.57 |
平均值 | 29.44aA | 1.84aA | 130.32aA | 5.91aA | 107.65aA | 261.17aA | ||
变异系数 | 30.71 | 27.42 | 19.7 | 36.83 | 69.66 | 91.34 | ||
非根际 | 范围 | 10.01~36.91 | 0.91~2.52 | 76.36~142.11 | 4.34~10.23 | 30.72~148.72 | 70.40~631.72 | |
平均值 | 23.58aA | 1.57aA | 103.36aA | 5.62aA | 79.39aA | 268.73aA | ||
变异系数 | 36.73 | 34.25 | 20.45 | 31.71 | 35.29 | 84.41 | ||
林地 | 根际 | 范围 | 21.82~26.88 | 1.37~1.61 | 101.10~113.83 | 4.39~5.81 | 83.72~148.72 | 95.01~142.05 |
平均值 | 24.31abA | 1.48abA | 109.02aA | 4.98aA | 121.72aA | 114.40aA | ||
变异系数 | 8.4 | 6.08 | 5.09 | 10.97 | 21.27 | 16.53 | ||
非根际 | 范围 | 20.57~26.17 | 1.27~1.58 | 97.57~113.12 | 4.70~12.54 | 70.72~143.72 | 63.49~120.21 | |
平均值 | 22.03aA | 1.42aA | 105.34aA | 8.09aA | 107.12aA | 100.34aA | ||
变异系数 | 10.6 | 8.16 | 6.66 | 42.9 | 30.9 | 22.46 | ||
荒地 | 根际 | 范围 | 15.90~17.15 | 0.92~1.14 | 74.94~94.74 | 5.12~6.65 | 78.72~158.72 | 94.92~151.86 |
平均值 | 16.62bA | 1.02bB | 82.72aA | 6.00aA | 117.05aA | 114.03aA | ||
变异系数 | 3.88 | 10.79 | 12.76 | 13.13 | 34.26 | 28.74 | ||
非根际 | 范围 | 10.79~17.18 | 0.86~1.91 | 71.41~94.03 | 5.70~8.07 | 48.72~123.72 | 95.40~149.82 | |
平均值 | 14.26aA | 1.25aA | 80.36aA | 5.62aA | 77.05aA | 116.87aA | ||
变异系数 | 22.67 | 45.81 | 14.96 | 18.29 | 52.85 | 24.79 |
土壤性质 | 钩藤基地 | 林地 | 荒地 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | ||||
过氧化氢酶/ [0.1 mol/L KMnO4 mL/(g·20 min)] | 最小值 | 1.33 | 1.02 | 2.36 | 2.27 | 0.97 | 0.92 | ||
最大值 | 3.09 | 2.92 | 3.26 | 3.11 | 1.75 | 1.71 | |||
平均值 | 2.42aA | 1.98bB | 2.84aA | 2.75aA | 1.38bB | 1.35bB | |||
磷酸酶/ [酚mg/(g·d)] | 最小值 | 5.26 | 2.74 | 13.46 | 11.16 | 12.55 | 11.25 | ||
最大值 | 23.34 | 15.68 | 16.18 | 15.4 | 15.51 | 13.83 | |||
平均值 | 11.91aA | 8.94aA | 15.06aA | 13.00aA | 14.03aA | 12.54aA | |||
脲酶/ [NH3-N mg/(g·d)] | 最小值 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.52 | ||
最大值 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 1.02 | 0.7 | 0.85 | 0.56 | |||
平均值 | 0.48bA | 0.37aA | 0.77aA | 0.61aAB | 0.69abA | 0.54bB |
土壤性质 | 钩藤基地 | 林地 | 荒地 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | 根际 | 非根际 | ||||
过氧化氢酶/ [0.1 mol/L KMnO4 mL/(g·20 min)] | 最小值 | 1.33 | 1.02 | 2.36 | 2.27 | 0.97 | 0.92 | ||
最大值 | 3.09 | 2.92 | 3.26 | 3.11 | 1.75 | 1.71 | |||
平均值 | 2.42aA | 1.98bB | 2.84aA | 2.75aA | 1.38bB | 1.35bB | |||
磷酸酶/ [酚mg/(g·d)] | 最小值 | 5.26 | 2.74 | 13.46 | 11.16 | 12.55 | 11.25 | ||
最大值 | 23.34 | 15.68 | 16.18 | 15.4 | 15.51 | 13.83 | |||
平均值 | 11.91aA | 8.94aA | 15.06aA | 13.00aA | 14.03aA | 12.54aA | |||
脲酶/ [NH3-N mg/(g·d)] | 最小值 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.52 | ||
最大值 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 1.02 | 0.7 | 0.85 | 0.56 | |||
平均值 | 0.48bA | 0.37aA | 0.77aA | 0.61aAB | 0.69abA | 0.54bB |
[1] | 何顺志, 徐文芬, 黄敏, 等. 贵州中药资源种类、地理分布及开发利用现状[J]. 贵州科学, 2004,22(4):45-52 |
[2] | 杨继祥. 药用植物栽培学[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1991. |
[3] | 郭丽丽. 中药材种植地土壤肥力衰退原因及恢复对策[J]. 北京农业, 2014,30:137. |
[4] | 刘德辉, 郭巧生, 孙玉华, 等. 苏北中药材种植地土壤肥力衰退原因及恢复对策[J]. 土壤通报, 2000,31(2):76-78. |
[5] | 孟令军, 耿增超, 殷金岩, 等. 秦岭太白山区6中中药材根际与非根际土壤化学性质及酶活性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(10):2685-2692. |
[6] | 梁平, 龙先菊, 韦波. 剑河县关口农场钩藤种植气候条件分析[A]. 贵州省气象学会2008年学术年会论文集[C]. 2008. |
[7] | 李金玲, 赵致, 龙安林, 等. 贵州野生钩藤生长环境调查研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2013,32(4):58-60. |
[8] | 王克英, 郭思妤, 祝晶, 等. 黔产钩藤药材不同采收期及不同加工方法有效成分含量对比研究[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2012,21(13):27-28. |
[9] | 陶刚, 刘涛, 朱英, 等. 贵州中药材钩藤属植物的分子鉴定[J]. 中草药, 2008,31(6):82. |
[10] | 杨鑫, 谭霖, 王廷龙, 等. 黔产钩藤中钩藤碱的测定及限量研究[J]. 贵州科学, 2014,32(4):67-70. |
[11] | 屈小媛, 林昌虎, 秦华军, 等. 钩藤不同部位、不同时期药用成分分布规律分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2016,55(3):658-659. |
[12] | 王浴生, 邓文龙, 薛春生. 中药药理与应用(第二版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1998, 836-841. |
[13] | 杨武亮, 林谋信. 钩藤的驯化栽培[J]. 中药材, 1992,15(1):9-10. |
[14] | 赵欢, 何腾兵, 林昌虎, 等. 贵州不同生境下种植钩藤土壤养分与酶活性研究[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2014,33(2):23-26. |
[15] | 曾宪平, 林绍霞, 何腾兵, 等. 贵州钩藤产地土壤养分含量特征[J]. 广东农业科学, 2014(6):89-92. |
[16] | 鲍士旦, 土壤农化分析(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[17] | 丰骁, 段建平, 蒲小鹏, 等. 土壤脲酶活性两种测定方法的比较[J]. 草原与草坪, 2008(2):70-72. |
[18] | 关松荫, 张德生, 张志明. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986: 41-44. |
[19] | Garcia-Ruizr, Ochoa V, Hinojosa M B, et al. Suitability of enzyme activities for the monitoring of soil quality improvement in organic agricultural systems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008,40:2137-2145. |
[20] | 董艳, 董坤, 郑毅, 等. 种植年限和种植模式对设施土壤微生物区系和酶活性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(3):527-532. |
[21] | 和文祥, 朱铭莪. 陕西土壤脲酶活性与土壤肥力关系分析[J]. 土壤学报, 1997,34(4):392-398. |
[22] | 曾宪军, 刘登魁, 朱世民. 不同浓度阿特拉津对三种肥力条件土壤过氧化氢酶的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2005(6):33-35. |
[23] | 郭兰萍, 黄璐琦, 邵爱娟, 等. 苍术根际区土壤养分变化规律[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2005,30(19):1504-1507. |
[1] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[2] | CHEN Hui, ZHOU Xiaoyue, TAN Cheng, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo. Effects of Milk Vetch Returning to Field on the Content of Soil Nutrient and Heavy Metal [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(7): 80-85. |
[3] | XIAO Yang, LI Qingrong, XING Dongxu, YANG Qiong. Effects of High Temperature Stress on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Gene Expression in Larvae of Silkworm Varieties with Different Tolerance [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 111-118. |
[4] | GESANG Dunzhun. Soil Nutrient Status Analysis and Soil Fertility Comprehensive Evaluation in Luolong County of Changdu City in Tibet [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 30-34. |
[5] | WANG Lixia, YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui. Change Characteristics of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Papaya Under Papaya-Leek Intercropping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 66-76. |
[6] | PAN Xue, CAI Liqun, DONG Bo, NIE Guangyun. The Quality Grade and Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Pingchuan District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 118-128. |
[7] | HU Yi, WANG Jing, LI Gang. Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Fertility Grade Evaluation of Newly-increased Farmland in Weibei Dryland: A Case Study of Heyang County [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(27): 94-100. |
[8] | YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55. |
[9] | GUO Shuya, SHANG Shang, WANG Kun, TANG Qining, ZHANG Yan, FU Guozhan, LU Guangyuan. Effects of Straw Mulching and Subsoiling on Soil Enzyme Activities in Summer Maize Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 96-101. |
[10] | LI Zongtai, ZHAN Lijie, LIANG Yan, GE Zhongqiang, CAO Zhenfei, DU Zhenyu, DUN Xingjian. Leaf Stoichiometric Characteristics of Japanese Red Pine Forest in Shandong Province and Their Correlation with Stand Characteristics and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 20-30. |
[11] | WANG Qixu, LI Jianyong. Analysis and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Vegetable Fields in Shanghai Suburbs [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 84-88. |
[12] | LI Xingyue, YI Jun, FU Huijuan, LI Qiyong, LU Wenyi, LUO Congcong, ZHANG Hong. Effects of Photosynthetic Bacteria and Biological Coating on Soil Enzyme Activities and Yield of Rape [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 87-91. |
[13] | YIN Shanshan, ZHOU Guoyan, GU Bowen, WU Chuncheng, YAN Liying, XIE Yang. Effects of Melatonin Priming on Physiological Characteristics of Cucumber Seedlings Under Drought Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 30-36. |
[14] | CAO Caihong, CAO Lingling, ZHU Ning, CHEN Jiahe, ZHAO Liqun, TIAN Yanan, ZHANG Baojie, HE Bingqing. Effects of Different Agronomic Measures on Strawberry Continuous Cropping Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 107-112. |
[15] | MA Yue, ZHANG Kexin, WANG Fawu, ZHANG Qiangyan, ZHANG Yanlei, TAO Yan, LIU Huiping, LIU Changzhong. Effect of Tetranychus truncatus Feeding on Enzyme Activities of Solanum tuberosum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 125-131. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||