Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 7-12.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2020-00011
Special Issue: 水稻
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chen Jingdu1(), Tang Jianpeng1, Zhang Mingwei1, Yao Yi1, Lu Peiling1, Hu Yajie2, Xie Chenglin1(
)
Received:
2020-04-09
Revised:
2020-11-21
Online:
2021-01-25
Published:
2021-01-26
Contact:
Xie Chenglin
E-mail:chenjingdu1985@163.com;yztgz@163.com
CLC Number:
Chen Jingdu, Tang Jianpeng, Zhang Mingwei, Yao Yi, Lu Peiling, Hu Yajie, Xie Chenglin. Differences in Yield and Quality of Different Japonica Rice with Good Taste[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 7-12.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2020-00011
品种 | 穗数/(万/hm2) | 每穗粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 理论产量/(kg/hm2) | 实际产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 357.56ABb | 125.40Bb | 91.59Aab | 26.43Bb | 10852.52Bb | 10472.32Bb |
南粳3908 | 346.12Bc | 136.75Aa | 92.35Aa | 27.65Aa | 12086.39Aa | 11417.66Aa |
南粳5055 | 366.90Aa | 126.15Bb | 91.13Ab | 26.09Bc | 11004.01Bb | 10682.87Bb |
品种 | 穗数/(万/hm2) | 每穗粒数/粒 | 结实率/% | 千粒重/g | 理论产量/(kg/hm2) | 实际产量/(kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 357.56ABb | 125.40Bb | 91.59Aab | 26.43Bb | 10852.52Bb | 10472.32Bb |
南粳3908 | 346.12Bc | 136.75Aa | 92.35Aa | 27.65Aa | 12086.39Aa | 11417.66Aa |
南粳5055 | 366.90Aa | 126.15Bb | 91.13Ab | 26.09Bc | 11004.01Bb | 10682.87Bb |
品种 | 分蘖中期/(万/hm2) | 拔节期/(万/hm2) | 抽穗期/(万/hm2) | 成熟期/(万/hm2) | 成穗率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 23.54Bb | 31.98Bb | 24.58Bc | 23.84ABb | 74.55Aa |
南粳3908 | 23.66Bb | 30.92Cc | 24.97Bb | 23.075Bc | 74.62Aa |
南粳5055 | 25.03Aa | 36.03Aa | 26.45Aa | 24.46Aa | 67.90Bb |
品种 | 分蘖中期/(万/hm2) | 拔节期/(万/hm2) | 抽穗期/(万/hm2) | 成熟期/(万/hm2) | 成穗率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 23.54Bb | 31.98Bb | 24.58Bc | 23.84ABb | 74.55Aa |
南粳3908 | 23.66Bb | 30.92Cc | 24.97Bb | 23.075Bc | 74.62Aa |
南粳5055 | 25.03Aa | 36.03Aa | 26.45Aa | 24.46Aa | 67.90Bb |
品种 | 分蘖期 | 拔节期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | 结实期叶面积衰减率/(LAI/d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 1.89Bb | 4.30Bb | 7.59Cc | 2.43Cc | 0.092Aa |
南粳3908 | 1.75Bc | 4.95Aa | 8.27Aa | 3.31Aa | 0.089Bb |
南粳5055 | 2.09Aa | 4.26Bb | 7.97Bb | 2.90Bb | 0.091AaB |
品种 | 分蘖期 | 拔节期 | 抽穗期 | 成熟期 | 结实期叶面积衰减率/(LAI/d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 1.89Bb | 4.30Bb | 7.59Cc | 2.43Cc | 0.092Aa |
南粳3908 | 1.75Bc | 4.95Aa | 8.27Aa | 3.31Aa | 0.089Bb |
南粳5055 | 2.09Aa | 4.26Bb | 7.97Bb | 2.90Bb | 0.091AaB |
品种 | 分蘖期/(kg/hm2) | 拔节期/(kg/hm2) | 抽穗期/(kg/hm2) | 成熟期/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 1933.8Bb | 4383.8Bb | 11722.4Bb | 19382.1Bb | 54.80Aa |
南粳3908 | 1688.8Cc | 4558.8AaBb | 12988.4Aa | 21660.6Aa | 53.52Aa |
南粳5055 | 2196.3Aa | 4742.5Aa | 13105.8Aa | 20278.1ABb | 53.65Aa |
品种 | 分蘖期/(kg/hm2) | 拔节期/(kg/hm2) | 抽穗期/(kg/hm2) | 成熟期/(kg/hm2) | 收获指数/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 1933.8Bb | 4383.8Bb | 11722.4Bb | 19382.1Bb | 54.80Aa |
南粳3908 | 1688.8Cc | 4558.8AaBb | 12988.4Aa | 21660.6Aa | 53.52Aa |
南粳5055 | 2196.3Aa | 4742.5Aa | 13105.8Aa | 20278.1ABb | 53.65Aa |
品种 | 移栽至分蘖中期 | 分蘖中期至拔节期 | 拔节至抽穗期 | 抽穗至成熟期 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | 积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | 积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | 积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | ||||
南粳9108 | 1933.75Bb | 9.97Bb | 2450.00Bb | 12.65Aa | 7338.63Bb | 37.86Bb | 7659.75Bb | 39.52Aa | |||
南粳3908 | 1688.75Cc | 7.80Cc | 2870.00Aa | 13.25Aa | 8429.67Aa | 38.91Bb | 8672.21Aa | 40.04Aa | |||
南粳5055 | 2196.25Aa | 10.84Aa | 2546.25Bb | 12.56Aa | 8363.25Aa | 41.24Aa | 7172.38Bb | 35.36Bb |
品种 | 移栽至分蘖中期 | 分蘖中期至拔节期 | 拔节至抽穗期 | 抽穗至成熟期 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | 积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | 积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | 积累量/(kg/hm2) | 比例/% | ||||
南粳9108 | 1933.75Bb | 9.97Bb | 2450.00Bb | 12.65Aa | 7338.63Bb | 37.86Bb | 7659.75Bb | 39.52Aa | |||
南粳3908 | 1688.75Cc | 7.80Cc | 2870.00Aa | 13.25Aa | 8429.67Aa | 38.91Bb | 8672.21Aa | 40.04Aa | |||
南粳5055 | 2196.25Aa | 10.84Aa | 2546.25Bb | 12.56Aa | 8363.25Aa | 41.24Aa | 7172.38Bb | 35.36Bb |
品种 | 糙米率 | 精米率 | 整精米率 | 垩白粒率 | 垩白度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 82.95Aa | 74.70Aa | 71.81Aa | 34.71Aa | 22.51Aa |
南粳3908 | 85.04Aa | 76.48Aa | 75.37Aa | 21.07Bb | 5.87Bb |
南粳5055 | 84.48Aa | 76.57Aa | 74.98Aa | 16.86Bb | 4.13Bb |
品种 | 糙米率 | 精米率 | 整精米率 | 垩白粒率 | 垩白度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 82.95Aa | 74.70Aa | 71.81Aa | 34.71Aa | 22.51Aa |
南粳3908 | 85.04Aa | 76.48Aa | 75.37Aa | 21.07Bb | 5.87Bb |
南粳5055 | 84.48Aa | 76.57Aa | 74.98Aa | 16.86Bb | 4.13Bb |
品种 | 峰值黏度/cP | 热浆黏度/cP | 最终黏度/cP | 崩解值/cP | 回复值/cP | 消减值/cP | 峰值时间/min | 糊化温度/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 2054.5Aa | 1242.0Aab | 1820.0Aa | 812.5Aa | 578.0Aa | -234.5Bc | 6.14Aa | 73.25Aa |
南粳3908 | 1994.0Bb | 1261.5Aa | 1778.5Ab | 732.5Ab | 517.0Ab | -215.5Ab | 6.30Aa | 73.65Aa |
南粳5055 | 1960.5Bc | 1218.5Ab | 1760.0Ab | 742.0Ab | 541.5Aab | -200.5Aa | 6.24Aa | 72.83Aa |
品种 | 峰值黏度/cP | 热浆黏度/cP | 最终黏度/cP | 崩解值/cP | 回复值/cP | 消减值/cP | 峰值时间/min | 糊化温度/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
南粳9108 | 2054.5Aa | 1242.0Aab | 1820.0Aa | 812.5Aa | 578.0Aa | -234.5Bc | 6.14Aa | 73.25Aa |
南粳3908 | 1994.0Bb | 1261.5Aa | 1778.5Ab | 732.5Ab | 517.0Ab | -215.5Ab | 6.30Aa | 73.65Aa |
南粳5055 | 1960.5Bc | 1218.5Ab | 1760.0Ab | 742.0Ab | 541.5Aab | -200.5Aa | 6.24Aa | 72.83Aa |
[1] | 章秀福, 王丹英, 方福平, 等. 中国粮食安全和水稻生产[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2005,26(2):85-88. |
[2] | 程方民, 刘正辉, 张嵩午. 稻米品质形成的气候生态条件评价及我国地域分布规律[J]. 生态学报, 2002,22:636-642. |
[3] |
Hayashi S, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J, et al. Genotypic differences in grain yield of transplanted and direct-seeded rain fed lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in northeastern Thailand[J]. Field Crops Res, 2007,102:9-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.01.001 URL |
[4] |
Lanning S B, Siebenmorgen T J, Counce P A, et al. Extreme nighttime air temperatures in 2010 impact rice chalkiness and milling quality[J]. Field Crops Res, 2011,124:132-136
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.012 URL |
[5] | 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 张亚东, 等. 不同地点南粳9108稻米直链淀粉含量及RVA谱特征值分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019,47(24):213-216. |
[6] |
韩超, 许方甫, 卞金龙, 等. 淮北地区机械化种植方式对不同生育类型优质食味粳稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018,44(11):1681-1693.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01681 URL |
[7] | 王淑彬, 林青, 黄国勤, 等. 轮作对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(33):137-141. |
[8] | 薛亚光, 魏亚凤, 李波, 等. 麦秸还田和耕作方式对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(22):10-14. |
[9] |
许阳东, 朱宽宇, 章星传, 等. 绿色超级稻品种的农艺与生理性状分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019,45(1):70-80.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.82036 URL |
[10] | 吴培, 陈天晔, 袁嘉琦, 等. 施氮量和直播密度互作对水稻产量形成特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019,33(3):269-281. |
[11] |
张洪程, 张军, 龚金龙, 等. “籼改粳”的生产优势及其形成机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(4):686-704.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.04.004 URL |
[12] | 卫平洋, 裘实, 唐健, 等. 安徽沿淮地区优质高产常规粳稻品种筛选及特征特性[J]. 作物学报, 2020,46(4):571-585. |
[13] | 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 等. 不同水稻氮利用效率基因型的物质生产与积累特性[J]. 作物学报, 2007,33(11):1802-1809. |
[14] | 梁健, 赵晨, 韩超, 等. 淮北地区氮高效高产型粳稻品种群体生长特征研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(4):400-408. |
[15] | 凌启鸿. 作物群体质量[M]. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 2000: 1-210. |
[16] | 陈爱忠, 潘晓华, 吴建富, 等. 施氮量对双季超级稻产量、干物质生产及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2011,26(2):58-63. |
[17] | 吴殿星, 夏英武, 李旭晨. 水稻胚乳外观云雾性状形成基础及其快速识别条件分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001,15(3):192-196. |
[18] | Chen T, Zhang Y D, Zhao L, et al. A cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence marker to detect variation in Wx locusconditioning translucent endosperm in rice[J]. Chin J Rice Sci, 2009,16:106-110. |
[19] | 莫惠栋. 我国稻米品质的改良[J]. 中国农业科学, 1993,26(4):8-14. |
[20] | Gomez K A. Effect of environment on protein and amylose content of rice[A]. In: Chemical Aspects of Rice Grain Quality[M]. Manila, Philippines: IRRI, 1979: 59-68. |
[21] | 李坤. 低直链淀粉含量、低蛋白质含量粳稻资源品质性状研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2016. |
[22] | 张晓. 杂交水稻种子淀粉、蛋白质、脂肪含量对其活力影响的初步研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2014. |
[23] |
张启莉, 谢黎虹, 李仕贵, 等. 稻米蛋白质与蒸煮食味品质的关系硏究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2012,18(4):1-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2012.04.001 URL |
[24] | 舒庆尧, 吴殿星, 夏英武, 等. 稻米淀粉RVA谱特征与食用品质的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 1998,31(3):1-4. |
[25] | 何秀英, 程永盛, 刘志霞, 等. 国标优质籼稻的稻米品质与淀粉RVA谱特征研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015,36(3):37-44. |
[1] | WANG Fang, QIAO Shuai, YANG Songtao, SONG Wei, LIAO Anzhong, TAN Wenfang. Starch Type Sweet Potato Cultivar ‘Chuanshu231’: Breeding and Superior Characteristics [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 16-21. |
[2] | DUAN Qingqing, HAN Meimei, TAN Yueqiang, ZHANG Zikun. Effects of Supplemental Light Quality and Duration on the Growth and Carbon Metabolism of Leaves of Greenhouse-grown Sweet Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 37-44. |
[3] | GAO Wenrui, SUN Yanjun, HAN Bing, FEI Cong, WANG Xiansheng, XU Gang. Effects of Low Light on Quality and Sucrose Metabolism of Watermelon Fruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 56-61. |
[4] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[5] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[6] | MA Meng, WANG Kehua, QU Liang, DOU Taocun, GUO Jun, WANG Xingguo, HU Yuping, LU Jian. Determination and Analysis of Slaughter Performance, Chest Muscle Quality and Composition of Different Chicken Breeds [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 137-142. |
[7] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[8] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[9] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[10] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
[11] | JI Hongting, ZHAO Hanwei, WANG Yong, ZENG Yannan, CHENG Rundong, WANG Qingnan, ZHAO Hejuan. Effects of Two Plant Growth Retardants on Plug Seedling Quality of Sunflower [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 1-8. |
[12] | ZHOU Xiaohong. The Crop Yield Estimation Model Based on Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 152-156. |
[13] | QIN Naiqun, MA Qiaoyun, GAO Jingwei, YANG Pu, CAI Jinlan, HAO Yingchun, LI Yanmei, JI Hongce, LIAO Xiangzheng. Effects of Biogas Residue Application on Nutrient and Heavy Metal Content in Soil and Yield of Crops Under Peanut-wheat Rotation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 58-63. |
[14] | WU Zhibin, HUANG Chao, LEI Yuan, JING Feng, LIU Zhandong. Water and Fertilizer Utilization Characteristics of Winter Wheat Under Different Yield Levels [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 64-71. |
[15] | LU Lilan, WANG Yuping, YIN Xinxing, HUANG Yingkai, FAN Haikuo. Investigation and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Fruit Coconut Orchards in Hainan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(8): 72-80. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||