Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (33): 88-97.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0015
Special Issue: 园艺
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wan Renyuan1(), Ma Huijie2, Jiang Bin3, Yang Liran3, Zhou Dapeng1, He Mingzhu1, Yang Guangrong1(
)
Received:
2021-01-07
Revised:
2021-04-03
Online:
2021-11-25
Published:
2022-01-06
Contact:
Yang Guangrong
E-mail:984642624@qq.com;2452739538@qq.com
CLC Number:
Wan Renyuan, Ma Huijie, Jiang Bin, Yang Liran, Zhou Dapeng, He Mingzhu, Yang Guangrong. The Fungi Community Structure and Influencing Factors in Tea Gardens Soil[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 88-97.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0015
土样 | S1 | S2 | S3 | X1 | X2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤类型 | 景迈山森林 | 布朗山森林 | 南糯山森林 | 景迈山现代茶园 | 布朗山现代茶园 |
经纬度 | 100°02′ E,22°12′ N | 100°09′ E,21°48′ N | 100°36′ E,21°56′ N | 100°00′ E,22°12′ N | 100°29′ E,21°48′ N |
海拔/m | 1422 | 1670 | 1582 | 1603 | 1597 |
坡度/° | 18~32 | 20~22 | 35~38 | 19~24 | 14~24 |
含水量/% | 19.20 | 17.30 | 25.40 | 22.10 | 24.20 |
pH | 4.43±0.01 C | 4.86±0.01 A | 4.55±0.03 B | 4.64±0.02 B | 4.65±0.01 B |
CEC/(cmol/kg) | 9.28±0.02 C | 18.41±0.06 B | 20.37±0.01 A | 8.43±0.06 B | 6.54±0.04 C |
SOM/(g/kg) | 70.13±0.42 C | 96.99±2.72 A | 85.19±1.16 B | 58.39±0.27 B | 55.40±2.04 B |
TN/(g/kg) | 1.36±0.01 C | 1.76±0.02 B | 2.07±0.01 A | 1.15±0.02 B | 0.84±0.01 C |
C:N | 29.86±0.16 B | 31.99±0.65 A | 23.82±0.43 C | 29.39±0.52 B | 38.06±1.14 A |
TP/(g/kg) | 0.19±0.01 B | 0.86±0.06 A | 0.92±0.01 A | 0.34±0.01 B | 0.29±0.06 B |
TK/(g/kg) | 1.62±0.35 B | 12.61±0.36 A | 3.04±0.35 B | 6.30±0.00 B | 7.73±0.35 A |
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 112.07±2.23 C | 122.35±1.89 B | 150.69±0.81 A | 116.08±1.39 B | 87.14±1.64 C |
Olsen-P/(mg/kg) | 7.05±0.41 C | 45.68±0.58 B | 48.65±0.49 A | 10.86±0.49 B | 7.63±0.23 C |
有效钾/(mg/kg) | 104.12±2.33 C | 359.36±0.24 A | 114.87±4.03 B | 145.77±2.33 C | 151.14±4.03 B |
土样 | X3 | G1 | G2 | G3 | |
土壤类型 | 南糯山现代茶园 | 景迈山古茶园 | 布朗山古茶园 | 南糯山古茶园 | |
经纬度 | 100°36′ E,21°56′ N | 100°00′ E,22°11′ N | 100°29′ E,21°47′ N | 100°36′ E,21°56′ N | |
海拔/m | 1579 | 1600 | 1753 | 1559 | |
坡度/° | 5~10 | 12~14 | 18~30 | 35~40 | |
含水量/% | 21.00 | 19.00 | 21.40 | 22.70 | |
pH | 4.75±0.03 A | 4.30±0.06 C | 4.75±0.03 A | 4.64±0.01 B | |
CEC/(cmol/kg) | 14.61±0.29 A | 10.46±0.03 C | 12.81±0.28 B | 16.65±0.29 A | |
SOM/(g/kg) | 100.28±0.42 A | 87.34±0.75 B | 101.18±1.05 A | 104.06±0.96 A | |
TN/(g/kg) | 1.88±0.02 A | 1.55±0.03 C | 1.96±0.01 B | 2.44±0.01 A | |
C:N | 30.94±0.39 B | 32.61±0.59 A | 29.88±0.09 B | 26.89±0.16 C | |
TP/(g/kg) | 0.46±0.00 A | 0.54±0.01 B | 0.63±0.06 AB | 0.71±0.01 A | |
TK/(g/kg) | 8.13±0.00 A | 2.43±0.35 C | 9.15±0.35 A | 4.67±0.35 B | |
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 134.26±2.41 A | 110.03±2.05 C | 144.97±0.77 B | 172.03±1.45 A | |
Olsen-P/(mg/kg) | 16.03±0.19 A | 19.19±0.62 | 20.81±0.11 | 20.42±1.18 | |
有效钾/(mg/kg) | 210.25±2.33 A | 106.81±4.03 C | 227.71±4.03 A | 137.71±2.33 B |
土样 | S1 | S2 | S3 | X1 | X2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
土壤类型 | 景迈山森林 | 布朗山森林 | 南糯山森林 | 景迈山现代茶园 | 布朗山现代茶园 |
经纬度 | 100°02′ E,22°12′ N | 100°09′ E,21°48′ N | 100°36′ E,21°56′ N | 100°00′ E,22°12′ N | 100°29′ E,21°48′ N |
海拔/m | 1422 | 1670 | 1582 | 1603 | 1597 |
坡度/° | 18~32 | 20~22 | 35~38 | 19~24 | 14~24 |
含水量/% | 19.20 | 17.30 | 25.40 | 22.10 | 24.20 |
pH | 4.43±0.01 C | 4.86±0.01 A | 4.55±0.03 B | 4.64±0.02 B | 4.65±0.01 B |
CEC/(cmol/kg) | 9.28±0.02 C | 18.41±0.06 B | 20.37±0.01 A | 8.43±0.06 B | 6.54±0.04 C |
SOM/(g/kg) | 70.13±0.42 C | 96.99±2.72 A | 85.19±1.16 B | 58.39±0.27 B | 55.40±2.04 B |
TN/(g/kg) | 1.36±0.01 C | 1.76±0.02 B | 2.07±0.01 A | 1.15±0.02 B | 0.84±0.01 C |
C:N | 29.86±0.16 B | 31.99±0.65 A | 23.82±0.43 C | 29.39±0.52 B | 38.06±1.14 A |
TP/(g/kg) | 0.19±0.01 B | 0.86±0.06 A | 0.92±0.01 A | 0.34±0.01 B | 0.29±0.06 B |
TK/(g/kg) | 1.62±0.35 B | 12.61±0.36 A | 3.04±0.35 B | 6.30±0.00 B | 7.73±0.35 A |
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 112.07±2.23 C | 122.35±1.89 B | 150.69±0.81 A | 116.08±1.39 B | 87.14±1.64 C |
Olsen-P/(mg/kg) | 7.05±0.41 C | 45.68±0.58 B | 48.65±0.49 A | 10.86±0.49 B | 7.63±0.23 C |
有效钾/(mg/kg) | 104.12±2.33 C | 359.36±0.24 A | 114.87±4.03 B | 145.77±2.33 C | 151.14±4.03 B |
土样 | X3 | G1 | G2 | G3 | |
土壤类型 | 南糯山现代茶园 | 景迈山古茶园 | 布朗山古茶园 | 南糯山古茶园 | |
经纬度 | 100°36′ E,21°56′ N | 100°00′ E,22°11′ N | 100°29′ E,21°47′ N | 100°36′ E,21°56′ N | |
海拔/m | 1579 | 1600 | 1753 | 1559 | |
坡度/° | 5~10 | 12~14 | 18~30 | 35~40 | |
含水量/% | 21.00 | 19.00 | 21.40 | 22.70 | |
pH | 4.75±0.03 A | 4.30±0.06 C | 4.75±0.03 A | 4.64±0.01 B | |
CEC/(cmol/kg) | 14.61±0.29 A | 10.46±0.03 C | 12.81±0.28 B | 16.65±0.29 A | |
SOM/(g/kg) | 100.28±0.42 A | 87.34±0.75 B | 101.18±1.05 A | 104.06±0.96 A | |
TN/(g/kg) | 1.88±0.02 A | 1.55±0.03 C | 1.96±0.01 B | 2.44±0.01 A | |
C:N | 30.94±0.39 B | 32.61±0.59 A | 29.88±0.09 B | 26.89±0.16 C | |
TP/(g/kg) | 0.46±0.00 A | 0.54±0.01 B | 0.63±0.06 AB | 0.71±0.01 A | |
TK/(g/kg) | 8.13±0.00 A | 2.43±0.35 C | 9.15±0.35 A | 4.67±0.35 B | |
碱解氮/(mg/kg) | 134.26±2.41 A | 110.03±2.05 C | 144.97±0.77 B | 172.03±1.45 A | |
Olsen-P/(mg/kg) | 16.03±0.19 A | 19.19±0.62 | 20.81±0.11 | 20.42±1.18 | |
有效钾/(mg/kg) | 210.25±2.33 A | 106.81±4.03 C | 227.71±4.03 A | 137.71±2.33 B |
土样 | 土壤类型 | 操作分类单元s | 覆盖率/% | chao1指数 | ACE指数 | Shannon指数 | Simpson指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 景迈山森林 | 2175 | 98.73 | 4799.94 | 6942.16 | 3.92 | 0.076 |
S2 | 布朗山森林 | 1225 | 98.74 | 2790.80 | 4138.38 | 3.99 | 0.055 |
S3 | 南糯山森林 | 538 | 95.39 | 1097.03 | 1624.78 | 4.07 | 0.052 |
X1 | 景迈山现代茶园 | 1276 | 99.07 | 2656.21 | 3662.60 | 3.20 | 0.113 |
X2 | 布朗山现代茶园 | 2266 | 97.80 | 5130.91 | 7440.02 | 4.70 | 0.073 |
X3 | 南糯山现代茶园 | 1545 | 98.82 | 3295.11 | 4847.04 | 3.65 | 0.110 |
G1 | 景迈山古茶园 | 1063 | 99.19 | 2092.16 | 2930.48 | 2.35 | 0.244 |
G2 | 布朗山古茶园 | 1742 | 98.47 | 3784.45 | 5405.79 | 3.90 | 0.048 |
G3 | 南糯山古茶园 | 2157 | 98.26 | 4492.16 | 6682.78 | 4.11 | 0.099 |
土样 | 土壤类型 | 操作分类单元s | 覆盖率/% | chao1指数 | ACE指数 | Shannon指数 | Simpson指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 景迈山森林 | 2175 | 98.73 | 4799.94 | 6942.16 | 3.92 | 0.076 |
S2 | 布朗山森林 | 1225 | 98.74 | 2790.80 | 4138.38 | 3.99 | 0.055 |
S3 | 南糯山森林 | 538 | 95.39 | 1097.03 | 1624.78 | 4.07 | 0.052 |
X1 | 景迈山现代茶园 | 1276 | 99.07 | 2656.21 | 3662.60 | 3.20 | 0.113 |
X2 | 布朗山现代茶园 | 2266 | 97.80 | 5130.91 | 7440.02 | 4.70 | 0.073 |
X3 | 南糯山现代茶园 | 1545 | 98.82 | 3295.11 | 4847.04 | 3.65 | 0.110 |
G1 | 景迈山古茶园 | 1063 | 99.19 | 2092.16 | 2930.48 | 2.35 | 0.244 |
G2 | 布朗山古茶园 | 1742 | 98.47 | 3784.45 | 5405.79 | 3.90 | 0.048 |
G3 | 南糯山古茶园 | 2157 | 98.26 | 4492.16 | 6682.78 | 4.11 | 0.099 |
样本 | 子囊菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 担子菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 接合菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 壶菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 球囊菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 总比例/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 39732 | 42.60 | 41331 | 44.40 | 11297 | 12.14 | 7 | 0.01 | 85 | 0.09 | 99.24 |
S2 | 26180 | 51.20 | 23770 | 46.54 | 801 | 1.57 | 44 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.00 | 99.40 |
S3 | 2752 | 43.40 | 3113 | 49.15 | 302 | 4.77 | 115 | 1.82 | 2 | 0.03 | 99.17 |
X1 | 52839 | 74.10 | 14665 | 20.58 | 3448 | 4.84 | 1 | 0.00 | 6 | 0.01 | 99.53 |
X2 | 35547 | 62.90 | 16686 | 29.55 | 2558 | 4.53 | 35 | 0.06 | 357 | 0.63 | 97.67 |
X3 | 41033 | 59.20 | 23774 | 34.30 | 4235 | 6.11 | 17 | 0.02 | 54 | 0.08 | 99.71 |
G1 | 37157 | 54.10 | 30046 | 43.82 | 1188 | 1.73 | 1 | 0.00 | 7 | 0.01 | 99.66 |
G2 | 34479 | 55.80 | 25067 | 40.62 | 1826 | 2.96 | 112 | 0.18 | 7 | 0.01 | 99.57 |
G3 | 31244 | 47.60 | 23391 | 35.70 | 9774 | 14.92 | 52 | 0.08 | 82 | 0.13 | 98.43 |
样本 | 子囊菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 担子菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 接合菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 壶菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 球囊菌 门/个 | 比例/% | 总比例/ % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 39732 | 42.60 | 41331 | 44.40 | 11297 | 12.14 | 7 | 0.01 | 85 | 0.09 | 99.24 |
S2 | 26180 | 51.20 | 23770 | 46.54 | 801 | 1.57 | 44 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.00 | 99.40 |
S3 | 2752 | 43.40 | 3113 | 49.15 | 302 | 4.77 | 115 | 1.82 | 2 | 0.03 | 99.17 |
X1 | 52839 | 74.10 | 14665 | 20.58 | 3448 | 4.84 | 1 | 0.00 | 6 | 0.01 | 99.53 |
X2 | 35547 | 62.90 | 16686 | 29.55 | 2558 | 4.53 | 35 | 0.06 | 357 | 0.63 | 97.67 |
X3 | 41033 | 59.20 | 23774 | 34.30 | 4235 | 6.11 | 17 | 0.02 | 54 | 0.08 | 99.71 |
G1 | 37157 | 54.10 | 30046 | 43.82 | 1188 | 1.73 | 1 | 0.00 | 7 | 0.01 | 99.66 |
G2 | 34479 | 55.80 | 25067 | 40.62 | 1826 | 2.96 | 112 | 0.18 | 7 | 0.01 | 99.57 |
G3 | 31244 | 47.60 | 23391 | 35.70 | 9774 | 14.92 | 52 | 0.08 | 82 | 0.13 | 98.43 |
[1] | 杨广容, 王秀青, 李永梅, 等. 景迈山古茶园与现代台地茶园土壤养分与茶叶品质分析研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 31(3):519-527. |
[2] | 邓西海, 蒋其鳌, 周凌云. 世界主要优质红茶化学成分与产地环境研究[J]. 土壤, 2008, 40(4):672-675. |
[3] | 韩文炎, 王皖蒙, 郭赟, 等. 茶园土壤细菌丰度及其影响因子研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2013, 33(2):147-154. |
[4] | 杨广容, 王秀青, 谢瑾, 等. 云南古茶园和现代茶园土壤养分与茶叶品质的研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2015, 35(6):574-582. |
[5] |
Uffe N N, Diana H W, Johan S. Soil biodiversity and the environment[J]. Annual Review Environment Resources, 2015, 40:63-90.
doi: 10.1146/energy.2015.40.issue-1 URL |
[6] | Gabriel C, Paulo J P L T, Sur H P, et al. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity[J]. Nature, 2017, 543:512-533. |
[7] | 李会琳, 张静, 王岚, 等. 土地利用方式改变对两种酸性土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 西华师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 38(4):373-381. |
[8] | 高秀兵, 陈娟, 郭灿, 等. 茶树丛枝菌根真菌的研究进展[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2011, 39(9):122-126. |
[9] | 季凌飞, 倪康, 马立锋, 等. 不同施肥方式对酸性茶园土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(22):8158-8166. |
[10] | 袁赛艳, 陈暄, 房婉萍, 等. 茶树修剪物对茶园土壤真菌群落多样性影响研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2015, 35(3):255-262. |
[11] | 胡雲飞, 张玥, 张彩丽, 等. 茶树根系内生真菌与根际土壤真菌的季节多样性分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2013, 36(3):41-46. |
[12] | Bardgett R D, Leemmans D K, Cook R, et al. Seasonality of the soil biota of grazed and ungrazed hill grasslands[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1997, 8:1285-1294. |
[13] | 陈名君, 林俨, 江涛, 等. 茶园昆虫病原真菌群落组成及生态位[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2017, 33(1):79-84. |
[14] | 王品, 黄翠, 黎健龙, 等. 德市茶园土壤昆虫病原真菌群落结构与多样性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2013, 33(6):562-569. |
[15] |
Bordoloi A, Nath P C, Shukla A K. Distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with different land use systems of Arunachal Pradesh of Eastern Himalayan region[J]. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2015, 31(10):1587-1593.
doi: 10.1007/s11274-015-1909-z URL |
[16] |
Subhoshmita M, Sibashish B. Strain-specific identification of Beauveria bassiana isolated from a novel habitat, using rDNA-based sequence analogy[J]. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 2018. 28(29):27-35.
doi: 10.1186/s41938-017-0025-9 URL |
[17] |
Xie S W, Feng H X, Yang F, et al. Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26:2464-2476.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3732-1 URL |
[18] |
Huang Y, Xiao X, Long X E. Fungal denitrification contributes significantly to N2O production in a highly acidic tea soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 17(6):1599-1606.
doi: 10.1007/s11368-017-1655-y URL |
[19] | 杨广容, 马燕, 蒋宾, 等. 基于16S rDNA测序对茶园土壤细菌群落多样性的研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(22):8452-8461. |
[20] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. |
[21] | Schloss P D, Westcott S L, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities[J]. Application Environment Microbiology, 2009, 75(23):7537-7541. |
[22] | http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/classifier/classifier.jsp . |
[23] | 张玥, 胡雲飞, 高水练, 等. 茶树修剪物还田方式对茶园土壤性质及细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(8):1596-1602. |
[24] |
Himadri K, Pranab D. Establishment of Metarhizium anisopliae, an entomopathogen as endophyte for biological control in tea[J]. Research on Crops, 2016, 17(2):375-387.
doi: 10.5958/2348-7542.2016.00063.2 URL |
[25] |
Morang P, Devi S P, Jha D K, et al. Tea root brown-rot fungus disease reduction and yield recovery with rhizobacteria inoculation in both nursery and field trials[J]. Rhizosphere, 2018, 6:89-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.06.001 URL |
[26] | Pramanik P, Safique S, Jahan A. Humic substrates extracted by recycling factory tea waste improved soil properties and tea productivity: an innovative approach[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2018(6):1-10. |
[27] | Qin X M, Wei C Z, Li J T, et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure and functional diversity in the rhizosphere surrounding tea and soybean[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences(Sri Lanka), 2017, 12(1):1-13. |
[28] | 李艳春, 李兆伟, 林伟伟, 等. 施用生物质炭和羊粪对宿根连作茶园根际土壤微生物的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4):1273-1282. |
[29] | 蒋宇航, 林生, 林伟伟, 等. 不同肥料对退化茶园根际土壤微生物代谢活性和群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(10):2894-2902. |
[30] | Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B N, Chakraborty A P, et al. Resistance in tea plants against root rot pathogens induced by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoters[J]. Journal of Mycopathological Research, 2016, 54(2):211-224. |
[1] | CHEN Dao, WANG Xin, JIANG Shan, ZHANG Jie, WU Zujian, DING Xinlun. Strawberry Mottle Virus Isolated in Fujian: Complete Genome Sequence and Molecular Variation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 94-101. |
[2] | WANG Yan, WANG Liwei, ZHAO Hongyan, ZHAO Min, YANG Hongyan. Characteristics of Nutrients and Microbial Community Composition of Different Panax ginseng Cultivation Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 60-68. |
[3] | WANG Lixia, YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui. Change Characteristics of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Papaya Under Papaya-Leek Intercropping [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 66-76. |
[4] | CHEN Liuhong, ZHAO Chunlei, WANG Xi, LI Yanli, DING Guangzhou, CHEN Li. Single-cell Transcriptome Sequencing Technology and Its Application in Plant Research [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 87-93. |
[5] | PAN Xue, CAI Liqun, DONG Bo, NIE Guangyun. The Quality Grade and Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Pingchuan District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 118-128. |
[6] | PAN Yuhan, ZHAO Wenjuan, HE Kejian, HUANG Xiaoxia, SHI Yaqiu. Impact of Livelihood Capital on the Livelihood Activities of Ethnic Minority Farmers and the Regional Differences: Case Study in Xinping County in Yuanjiang Dry-hot Valley [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(28): 156-164. |
[7] | YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55. |
[8] | LU Feng, LIAO Chaolin, XIAO Zhipeng, SHI Gang, XIANG Penghua, YU Baocheng, SHAN Xuehua, XIA Fan. Effects of Tobacco-Rice Continuous Cropping on Distribution and Stability of Soil Aggregates in Red Paddy Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 56-61. |
[9] | WANG Qixu, LI Jianyong. Analysis and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Vegetable Fields in Shanghai Suburbs [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 84-88. |
[10] | ZHANG Heqing, WU Jie, HAN Shuai, XI Yadong, LI Yuejian, LIANG Genyun. Effects of Four Annual Rotation Patterns on Soil Microbial Community [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 73-80. |
[11] | ZHAO Xiudong, CHEN Xiaofang, YUAN Ziran, YE Yin. Organic Fertilizer Substitution: Effects on Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 74-80. |
[12] | CAO Yongqing, YAO Xiaohua, REN Huadong, WANG Kailiang, LI Jianxin, ZHOU Qing. Correlations Between Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Kernel Quality Traits in Camellia oleifera Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 81-85. |
[13] | ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Guowei, SHANG Kankan. Effects of Intensified Measures on Microbial Diversity in Copper Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 96-103. |
[14] | LUO Dan, MAO Zhongan, ZHANG Tingyu, CHANG Qingrui. Spatial Variation of Topsoil Nutrients and Its Correlation with Topographic Factors in Yanhe River Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 79-87. |
[15] | JIANG Lili, GUO Tengda, GONG Qingtao, WU Haibin, SUN Ruihong. Microbial Community Structure Analysis on Different Phenophases of Late-maturing Peach ‘Snow Giant’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(1): 44-52. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||