Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (31): 66-76.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1043
Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Lixia(), YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui(
)
Received:
2021-11-03
Revised:
2022-02-23
Online:
2022-11-05
Published:
2022-10-27
Contact:
HE Yingdui
E-mail:wlxmm@163.com;heyingdui@163.com
CLC Number:
WANG Lixia, YIN Xiaomin, LIU Yongxia, LIAN Zihao, WANG Bizun, HE Yingdui. Change Characteristics of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Papaya Under Papaya-Leek Intercropping[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(31): 66-76.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1043
时间/d | OTU数量/个 | 覆盖率 | ACE指数 | Chao指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Simpson指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1600.00±20.00a | 0.9873±0.0017a | 1822.00±51.07a | 1812.67±63.37a | 5.6800±0.0360a | 0.0385±0.0019a |
30 | 1667.00±43.00b | 0.9884±0.0010a | 1848.33±44.41ab | 1857.67±60.47ab | 6.3700±0.0436c | 0.0039±0.0001b |
60 | 1610.00±6.00a | 0.9876±0.0014a | 1826.33±49.66a | 1823.65±65.05a | 6.2600±0.0265b | 0.0045±0.0002b |
90 | 1760.00±30.00c | 0.9883±0.0007a | 1930.00±41.90b | 1958.67±62.85b | 6.5200±0.0173d | 0.0032±0.0001b |
120 | 1718.00±10.00c | 0.9889±0.0010a | 1876.67±39.72ab | 1892.46±55.56ab | 6.4800±0.0200d | 0.0033±0.0002b |
时间/d | OTU数量/个 | 覆盖率 | ACE指数 | Chao指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Simpson指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1600.00±20.00a | 0.9873±0.0017a | 1822.00±51.07a | 1812.67±63.37a | 5.6800±0.0360a | 0.0385±0.0019a |
30 | 1667.00±43.00b | 0.9884±0.0010a | 1848.33±44.41ab | 1857.67±60.47ab | 6.3700±0.0436c | 0.0039±0.0001b |
60 | 1610.00±6.00a | 0.9876±0.0014a | 1826.33±49.66a | 1823.65±65.05a | 6.2600±0.0265b | 0.0045±0.0002b |
90 | 1760.00±30.00c | 0.9883±0.0007a | 1930.00±41.90b | 1958.67±62.85b | 6.5200±0.0173d | 0.0032±0.0001b |
120 | 1718.00±10.00c | 0.9889±0.0010a | 1876.67±39.72ab | 1892.46±55.56ab | 6.4800±0.0200d | 0.0033±0.0002b |
时间/d | OTU数量/个 | 覆盖率 | ACE指数 | Chao指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Simpson指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 239.00±9.54a | 0.9981±0.0003a | 290.00±21.00a | 284.00±12.12a | 1.8033±0.0379a | 0.4119±0.0063a |
30 | 348.00±10.00d | 0.9986±0.0005a | 373.00±6.56bc | 381.67±19.01bc | 3.4867±0.0217e | 0.0741±0.0014b |
60 | 321.00±11.00c | 0.9982±0.0004a | 361.33±12.50b | 362.33±10.60b | 3.2233±0.0153d | 0.0894±0.0015c |
90 | 320.00±5.00c | 0.9975±0.0016a | 392.00±16.00c | 403.00±14.11c | 2.8200±0.0265c | 0.1491±0.0026d |
120 | 300.00±12.00b | 0.9973±0.0010a | 381.00±13.53bc | 388.33±10.21c | 2.0367±0.0252b | 0.3799±0.0062e |
时间/d | OTU数量/个 | 覆盖率 | ACE指数 | Chao指数 | Shannon-Wiener指数 | Simpson指数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 239.00±9.54a | 0.9981±0.0003a | 290.00±21.00a | 284.00±12.12a | 1.8033±0.0379a | 0.4119±0.0063a |
30 | 348.00±10.00d | 0.9986±0.0005a | 373.00±6.56bc | 381.67±19.01bc | 3.4867±0.0217e | 0.0741±0.0014b |
60 | 321.00±11.00c | 0.9982±0.0004a | 361.33±12.50b | 362.33±10.60b | 3.2233±0.0153d | 0.0894±0.0015c |
90 | 320.00±5.00c | 0.9975±0.0016a | 392.00±16.00c | 403.00±14.11c | 2.8200±0.0265c | 0.1491±0.0026d |
120 | 300.00±12.00b | 0.9973±0.0010a | 381.00±13.53bc | 388.33±10.21c | 2.0367±0.0252b | 0.3799±0.0062e |
采样时间 | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL-0 | 23.93±0.06b | 6.09±0.08ab | 0.97±0.06a | 14.80±0.20a | 820.00±43.59a |
PL-30 | 22.97±0.06a | 5.92±0.18a | 0.95±0.01a | 22.33±0.25b | 1340.00±20.00d |
PL-60 | 23.00±0.00a | 6.13±0.06b | 0.92±0.06b | 35.07±0.25d | 1233.33±11.55c |
PL-90 | 23.93±0.06b | 6.63±0.06c | 1.04±0.02c | 29.70±0.00c | 1016.67±5.77b |
PL-120 | 25.87±0.06c | 6.93±0.06d | 1.03±0.01c | 45.70±0.36e | 826.67±5.77a |
采样时间 | 有机质/(g/kg) | pH | 全氮/(g/kg) | 速效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL-0 | 23.93±0.06b | 6.09±0.08ab | 0.97±0.06a | 14.80±0.20a | 820.00±43.59a |
PL-30 | 22.97±0.06a | 5.92±0.18a | 0.95±0.01a | 22.33±0.25b | 1340.00±20.00d |
PL-60 | 23.00±0.00a | 6.13±0.06b | 0.92±0.06b | 35.07±0.25d | 1233.33±11.55c |
PL-90 | 23.93±0.06b | 6.63±0.06c | 1.04±0.02c | 29.70±0.00c | 1016.67±5.77b |
PL-120 | 25.87±0.06c | 6.93±0.06d | 1.03±0.01c | 45.70±0.36e | 826.67±5.77a |
[1] | 韦俊, 杨焕文, 徐照丽, 等. 不同烤烟套作模式对烤烟根际土壤细菌群落特征及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(4):601-608. |
[2] |
HEIJDEN M, WAGG C. Soil microbial diversity and agro-ecosystem functioning[J]. Plant and soil, 2013, 363(1-2):1-5.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1545-4 URL |
[3] | 王慧颖, 徐明岗, 马想, 等. 长期施肥下我国农田土壤微生物及氨氧化菌研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(2):1-12. |
[4] |
罗蓉, 杨苗, 余旋, 等. 沙棘人工林土壤微生物群落结构及酶活性的季节变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4):1163-1169.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201804.035 |
[5] | 刘丽, 杨静, 李成云. 玉米-大豆间作对玉米根际氨氧化微生物的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(6):1278-1287. |
[6] | 孟自力, 叶美金, 闫延梅, 等. 间作大蒜对小麦根际土壤微生物数量及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(5):430-438. |
[7] | 刘岚君, 何季, 文雪峰. 间作不同农作物对刺梨园土壤微生物类群及酶活性的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2019, 38(6):8-13,42. |
[8] | 柳影, 丁文娟, 曹群, 等. 套种韭菜配施生物有机肥对香蕉枯萎病及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(2):303-309. |
[9] | 许振羽, 李学鹏, 杜宇, 等. 桑树根际土壤微生物对间作和施氮的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(6):1983-1992. |
[10] | 覃潇敏, 郑毅, 汤利, 等. 玉米与马铃薯间作对根际微生物群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(6):919-928. |
[11] | 常静, 魏群勇. 猕猴桃与韭菜高效套种栽培技术[J]. 现代农业科, 2015(22):90,96. |
[12] | 蒙国洲, 吴峰, 粟少芬, 等. 春花生套种番木瓜栽培技术示范及效益分析[J]. 广西农学报, 2019, 34(2):17-19,41. |
[13] |
MATTHIAS H, ALEXANDER S, ROB E, et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen[J]. Science, 2011, 331:463-467.
doi: 10.1126/science.1200387 pmid: 21273488 |
[14] | 代真林, 汪娅婷, 姚秀英, 等. 玉米大豆间作模式对玉米根际土壤微生物群落特征、玉米产量及病害的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(5):1-9. |
[15] |
MORI H, MARUYAMA F, KATO H, et al. Design and experimental application of a novel non-degenerate universal primer set that amplifies prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes with a low possibility to amplify eukaryotic rRNA genes[J]. DNA research, 2014, 21(2):217-227.
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dst052 pmid: 24277737 |
[16] |
XU N, TAN G, WANG H. Effect of biochar additions to soil on nitrogen leaching, microbial biomass and bacterial community structure[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2016, 74:1-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.02.004 URL |
[17] | 胡亚林, 汪思龙, 颜绍馗. 影响土壤微生物活性与群落结构因素研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2006(1):170-176. |
[18] | 彭柯, 董志, 邸琰茗, 等. 基于16S rRNA高通量测序的北运河水体及沉积物微生物群落组成对比分析[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(11). |
[19] | 章家恩, 高爱霞, 徐华勤, 等. 玉米/花生间作对土壤微生物和土壤养分状况的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(7):1597-1602. |
[20] |
LUDUENA L M, ANZUAY M S, ANGELINI J G, et al. Genome sequence of the endophytic strain Enterobacter sp. J49, a potential biofertilizer for peanut and maize[J]. Genomics, 2019, 111(4):913-920.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.05.021 URL |
[21] |
罗蓉, 杨苗, 余旋, 等. 沙棘人工林土壤微生物群落结构及酶活性的季节变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4):1163-1169.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201804.035 |
[22] |
ZIEGLER M, ENGEL M, WELZL G, et al. Development of a simple root model to study the effects of single exudates on the development of bacterial community structure[J]. Journal of microbiological methods, 2013, 94(1):30-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.04.003 pmid: 23611840 |
[23] | 江冰冰, 张彧, 郭存武, 等. 韭菜和辣椒间作对辣椒疫病的防治效果及其化感机理[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(1):145-151. |
[24] | 李鑫. 苏打盐碱地桑树/大豆间作的土壤微生物多样性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012. |
[25] |
LANSSEN P H. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2006, 72(3):1719-1728.
pmid: 16517615 |
[26] | FRANKE-WHITTLE, L H, MANICI L M, et al. Rhizosphere bacteria and fungi associated with plant growth in soils of three replanted apple orchards[J]. Plant & soil, 2015, 395:317-333. |
[27] | HARGREAVES S K, WILLIAMS R J, HOFMOCKEL K S. Environmental filtering of microbial communities in agricultural soil shifts with crop growth[J]. Plant and soil, 2015, 10(7):e0134345. |
[28] |
WANG J J, SHEN J, WU Y C, et al. Phylogenetic beta diversity in bacterial assemblages across ecosystems: deterministic versus stochastic processes[J]. The ISME Journal, 2013, 7:1310-1321.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.30 URL |
[29] | 王宇蕴, 任家兵, 郑毅, 等. 间作小麦根际和土体磷养分的动态变化[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2011, 26(6):850-854. |
[30] | 王宇蕴, 郑毅, 汤利. 不同抗性小麦品种与蚕豆间作对小麦根际速效养分含量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(2):466-471. |
[31] | 魏常慧, 刘亚军, 冶秀香, 等. 马铃薯/玉米间作栽培对土壤和作物的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(1):54-64. |
[32] |
MAU J L, CHEN C P, HSIEH P C. Antimicrobial effect of extracts from Chinese chive, cinnamon, and cornifructus[J]. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2001, 49(1):183-188.
doi: 10.1021/jf000263c URL |
[33] | SEO K I, MOON Y H, CHOI S U, et al. Antibacterial activity of S-methyl methanethiosulfinate and S-methyl 2-propene-1-thiosulfinate from Chinese chive toward Escherichia coli O157:H7[J]. Journal of the agricultural chemical society of Japan, 2001, 65(4): 966-968. |
[34] |
RATTAN Ac HAIKUNSOPON P, PHUMKHACHORN P. Potential of Chinese chive oil as a natural antimicrobial for controlling Flavobacterium columnare in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus[J]. Fisheries science, 2009, 75(6):1431-1437.
doi: 10.1007/s12562-009-0171-4 URL |
[35] |
LI Z F, WANG T, HE C, et al. Control of Panama disease of banana by intercropping with Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum Rottler): cultivar differences[J]. BMC plant biology, 2020, 20(1):432.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02640-9 URL |
[36] |
ZHANG H, MALLIK A, ZENG R S. Control of panama disease of banana by rotating and intercropping with Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum Rottler): Role of plant volatiles[J]. Journal of chemical ecology, 2013, 39(2):243-52.
doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0243-x URL |
[37] |
HUANG Y H, WANG R C, LI C H, et al. Control of Fusarium wilt in banana with Chinese leek[J]. European journal of plant pathology, 2012, 134(1):87-95.
pmid: 23144534 |
[38] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
[39] |
SCHLOSS P D, GEVERS D, WESTCOTT S L. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA- based studies[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 6(12):e27310.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 URL |
[40] | SCHLOSS P D, WESTCOTT S L, RYABIN T, et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities[J]. Applied & environmental microbiology, 2009, 75:7537-7541. |
[1] | XU Lingqing, LI Jiajia, CHANG Xiao, ZHANG Yunlong, LIU Dali. The Mechanism of Soil Nitrogen Mineralization: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 97-101. |
[2] | CHAO Ying, FU Gangfeng, YAN Xianghui, HANG Zhongqiao, YANG Quangang, WANG Hui, PAN Hong, LOU Yanhong, ZHUGE Yuping. Effects of Organic Fertilizer on Crop Quality, Soil Fertility and Environment: Research Progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 103-107. |
[3] | PAN Xue, CAI Liqun, DONG Bo, NIE Guangyun. The Quality Grade and Nutrient Characteristics of Cultivated Land in Pingchuan District [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(29): 118-128. |
[4] | YANG Min, CHEN Xiuhu, PI Xiaojuan, GUO Feng, CHEN Xinmiao, HU Jiewen. Migration and Distribution Characteristics of Available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Rice Terrace Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(26): 50-55. |
[5] | FAN Yaqi, WANG Yanan, HUO Ruixuan, YAO Tao, YANG Zhenping, QIAO Yuejing, GUO Laichun. Research Status of Interaction Between Soil Microorganisms and Nematode Communities Under Rotation Mode [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(25): 108-113. |
[6] | HONG Ciqing, SUN Yuyao, MO Wenjing, FANG Yun, CHEN Fangrong, GUI Fangze, GUAN Xiong, PAN Xiaohong. Effects of Nano-silver Prepared from Tea Extract on Soil Microorganisms [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(23): 56-63. |
[7] | WANG Qixu, LI Jianyong. Analysis and Evaluation of Soil Nutrients in Vegetable Fields in Shanghai Suburbs [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(22): 84-88. |
[8] | DU Qian, LI Lin, LIU Tienan, LIANG Suyu. Effects of Compound Microbial Fertilizer on Soil Microbial Diversity in Saline Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 38-43. |
[9] | WEI Jiadi, WANG Yongfen, HE Xiang, YANG Peiwen, YU Yanchun, ZHENG Sijun, XU Shengtao. Effect of Plant Covering on Soil Microbial Community Functional Diversity Under Banana Cropping System [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(17): 90-97. |
[10] | ZHAO Xiudong, CHEN Xiaofang, YUAN Ziran, YE Yin. Organic Fertilizer Substitution: Effects on Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 74-80. |
[11] | CAO Yongqing, YAO Xiaohua, REN Huadong, WANG Kailiang, LI Jianxin, ZHOU Qing. Correlations Between Soil Nutrient Characteristics and Kernel Quality Traits in Camellia oleifera Cultivation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(16): 81-85. |
[12] | LUO Dan, MAO Zhongan, ZHANG Tingyu, CHANG Qingrui. Spatial Variation of Topsoil Nutrients and Its Correlation with Topographic Factors in Yanhe River Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(12): 79-87. |
[13] | Wan Renyuan, Ma Huijie, Jiang Bin, Yang Liran, Zhou Dapeng, He Mingzhu, Yang Guangrong. The Fungi Community Structure and Influencing Factors in Tea Gardens Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 88-97. |
[14] | Zhang Jinbin, Wang Xiaoyun, Meng Yuan, Sun Yuxiang, Ma Hongbo. Effects of Different Amounts of Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Fertilizer Utilization and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(32): 96-101. |
[15] | Xie Yun, Guo Fangyun, Cao Bing. Elevated CO2 Concentrations: Effects on Soil Microbial Quantity and Enzyme Activity in Root Zone of Lycium barbarum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(3): 90-97. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||