Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 87-91.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0304
Previous Articles Next Articles
XIE Kunhao1,2(), SHI Aokun1, DI Qinghua1, CHEN Ru1, LI Yansu1, YU Xianchang1, CHEN Shuangchen2, HE Chaoxing1(
)
Received:
2022-04-13
Revised:
2022-06-25
Online:
2023-02-15
Published:
2023-02-06
XIE Kunhao, SHI Aokun, DI Qinghua, CHEN Ru, LI Yansu, YU Xianchang, CHEN Shuangchen, HE Chaoxing. Effects of Vegetable Residue Compost on Ginger Yield and Soil Environment in Root Zone[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 87-91.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0304
处理 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数/个 |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 102.57±0.75 b | 13.12±0.12 a | 9.67±0.33 b |
T1 | 105.97±0.31 ab | 13.53±0.19 a | 11.33±0.33 ab |
T2 | 108.17±2.28 a | 13.91±0.39 a | 12.00±0.58 a |
处理 | 株高/cm | 茎粗/mm | 分枝数/个 |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 102.57±0.75 b | 13.12±0.12 a | 9.67±0.33 b |
T1 | 105.97±0.31 ab | 13.53±0.19 a | 11.33±0.33 ab |
T2 | 108.17±2.28 a | 13.91±0.39 a | 12.00±0.58 a |
处理 | 单株产量/kg | 折合总产/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | 经济系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.725±0.33 b | 48236.55±147.64 b | — | 0.572±0.01 c |
T1 | 0.739±0.69 b | 49212.45±304.26 b | 2.02 | 0.589±0.02 b |
T2 | 0.946±0.37 a | 62962.65±166.99 a | 30.53 | 0.601±0.04 a |
处理 | 单株产量/kg | 折合总产/(kg/hm2) | 增产率/% | 经济系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.725±0.33 b | 48236.55±147.64 b | — | 0.572±0.01 c |
T1 | 0.739±0.69 b | 49212.45±304.26 b | 2.02 | 0.589±0.02 b |
T2 | 0.946±0.37 a | 62962.65±166.99 a | 30.53 | 0.601±0.04 a |
处理 | 根系活力/[μg/(g·FW)] | 叶绿素/(mg/g) | 类胡萝卜素/(mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 24.34±1.57 b | 2.11±0.02 a | 0.47±0.00 b |
T1 | 32.51±1.89 a | 1.66±0.10 b | 0.37±0.02 c |
T2 | 30.50±0.64 a | 2.28±0.15 a | 0.53±0.01 a |
处理 | 根系活力/[μg/(g·FW)] | 叶绿素/(mg/g) | 类胡萝卜素/(mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 24.34±1.57 b | 2.11±0.02 a | 0.47±0.00 b |
T1 | 32.51±1.89 a | 1.66±0.10 b | 0.37±0.02 c |
T2 | 30.50±0.64 a | 2.28±0.15 a | 0.53±0.01 a |
处理 | 脲酶/[mg NH3-N/(g·24 h)] | 蔗糖酶[(mg Glucose/(g·24 h)) | 中性磷酸酶/[mg Phenol/(g·24 h)] |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.50±0.01 a | 0.98±0.02 b | 5.08±0.14 b |
T1 | 0.68±0.01 b | 1.19±0.07 b | 5.56±0.40 b |
T2 | 0.78±0.06 c | 1.55±0.07 a | 6.89±0.13 a |
处理 | 脲酶/[mg NH3-N/(g·24 h)] | 蔗糖酶[(mg Glucose/(g·24 h)) | 中性磷酸酶/[mg Phenol/(g·24 h)] |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 0.50±0.01 a | 0.98±0.02 b | 5.08±0.14 b |
T1 | 0.68±0.01 b | 1.19±0.07 b | 5.56±0.40 b |
T2 | 0.78±0.06 c | 1.55±0.07 a | 6.89±0.13 a |
处理 | 容重/(g/cm3) | 田间持水量/% | 孔隙度/% | pH | EC/(μs/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.39±0.03 b | 30.38±0.75 b | 52.58±0.85 b | 7.20±0.01 b | 120.00±0.01 ab |
T1 | 1.16±0.06 a | 36.10±0.52 a | 57.64±2.19 a | 7.33±0.03 a | 119.33±1.20 b |
T2 | 1.20±0.02 a | 34.71±1.85 a | 56.52±0.46 a | 7.20±0.01 b | 123.33±0.67 a |
处理 | 容重/(g/cm3) | 田间持水量/% | 孔隙度/% | pH | EC/(μs/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 1.39±0.03 b | 30.38±0.75 b | 52.58±0.85 b | 7.20±0.01 b | 120.00±0.01 ab |
T1 | 1.16±0.06 a | 36.10±0.52 a | 57.64±2.19 a | 7.33±0.03 a | 119.33±1.20 b |
T2 | 1.20±0.02 a | 34.71±1.85 a | 56.52±0.46 a | 7.20±0.01 b | 123.33±0.67 a |
处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/% | 全磷/% | 全钾/% | 水解性氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 33.43±0.77 b | 0.157±0.00 b | 0.172±0.01 a | 1.863±0.04 a | 137.00±1.15 c | 158.67±3.84 b | 381.67±3.76 c |
T1 | 39.50±1.10 a | 0.179±0.00 a | 0.169±0.01 a | 1.947±0.18 a | 149.33±1.86 b | 171.67±13.78 ab | 472.00±10.69 b |
T2 | 39.23±1.77 a | 0.188±0.01 a | 0.181±0.01 a | 1.797±0.13 a | 166.67±3.76 a | 189.67±2.67 a | 523.67±10.49 a |
处理 | 有机质/(g/kg) | 全氮/% | 全磷/% | 全钾/% | 水解性氮/(mg/kg) | 有效磷/(mg/kg) | 速效钾/(mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 33.43±0.77 b | 0.157±0.00 b | 0.172±0.01 a | 1.863±0.04 a | 137.00±1.15 c | 158.67±3.84 b | 381.67±3.76 c |
T1 | 39.50±1.10 a | 0.179±0.00 a | 0.169±0.01 a | 1.947±0.18 a | 149.33±1.86 b | 171.67±13.78 ab | 472.00±10.69 b |
T2 | 39.23±1.77 a | 0.188±0.01 a | 0.181±0.01 a | 1.797±0.13 a | 166.67±3.76 a | 189.67±2.67 a | 523.67±10.49 a |
[1] |
韩伶, 李衍素, 于贤昌, 等. 日光温室蔬菜残株堆腐后还田对根区土壤环境及蔬菜产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5):1553-1559.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.037 |
[2] |
doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091828 URL |
[3] |
徐坤, 康立美, 赵德婉. 生姜对氮磷钾吸收分配规律的研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 1992(3):14-16.
|
[4] |
董灿兴, 徐坤, 谷顼, 等. 有机土配方与生姜产量品质的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(4):871-876.
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.057 pmid: 33911965 |
[6] |
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00027.x URL |
[7] |
孔涛, 李勃, 柯杨, 等. 蔬菜废弃物堆肥对设施蔬菜产量和土壤生物特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5):157-160.
|
[8] |
吴文辉. 蔬菜废弃物不同还田方式对番茄生长及土壤环境的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2021.
|
[9] |
刘本生, 杨岩, 孙钦平, 等. 京郊露地蔬菜废弃物原位还田的农学效应研究[J]. 蔬菜, 2018(1):16-21.
|
[10] |
孙俊宝, 王建新. 樱桃叶绿素含量测定方法研究[J]. 太原:山西农业科学, 2010, 38(3):18-19.
|
[11] |
孔祥波. 生物有机肥对生姜生长及产量品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2007.
|
[12] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[13] |
关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社,1986.
|
[14] |
宋小艺, 徐坤, 王忠宾, 等. 有机土基质栽培对生姜产量及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012(14):59-64.
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.11.038 URL |
[16] |
|
[17] |
黄继川, 彭智平, 于俊红, 等. 玉米秸秆堆肥处理对芥菜品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2009(12):88-91.
|
[18] |
魏晓璇. 日光温室黄瓜/番茄残株原位还田技术的科学性评估[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
|
[19] |
程学超, 李衍素, 闫妍, 等. 番茄和黄瓜茎秆堆肥还田对生姜生长及根区环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(10):1921-1928.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.10.018 |
[20] |
杨冬艳, 冯海萍, 桑婷, 等. 番茄秸秆不同还田方式对番茄生长及土壤碳氮含量和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(10):55-59.
|
[21] |
宋时丽, 吴昊, 黄鹏伟, 等. 秸秆还田土壤改良培肥基质和复合菌剂配施对土壤生态的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(11):4562-4576.
|
[22] |
牟子平, 周志红, 骆世明. 番茄(Lycopersicon)的化感作用研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1997(4):445-449.
|
[23] |
杨滨娟, 黄国勤, 钱海燕. 秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤温度、根际微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(1):150-157.
|
[24] |
林天, 何园球, 李成亮, 等. 红壤旱地中土壤酶对长期施肥的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2005(4):682-686.
|
[25] |
高梦瑶, 靳玉婷, 缪杰杰, 等. 秸秆还田对土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 红河学院学报, 2021, 19(2):138-141.
|
[26] |
张志刚, 董春娟, 高苹, 等. 蔬菜残株堆肥及微生物菌剂对设施辣椒栽培土壤的改良作用[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(6):1243-1249.
|
[1] | MENG Zhanying, CAI Haixia, YANG Haozhe, WANG Yueqing, GUO Dang, LI Lifeng. Variety Adaptability of Silage Maize in Terms of Photosynthesis and Yield in Western Henan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 28-32. |
[2] | KAN Jianluan, WANG Xiaoyun, SU Jianping, ZHANG Yongchun, WANG Jidong, MA Hongbo, CAI Yuntong. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Inhibitors on Wheat Yield, Soil Fertility and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(5): 69-74. |
[3] | LIU Jinna, ZHANG Di, YE Jiayi, ZHOU Meng, ZHANG Cunli. Effects of 6-Carbonyl Spirostane Compounds on Fruit Quality and Yield of Kiwifruit [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 37-43. |
[4] | GUI Tengfei, LI Weibiao, PU Fengya, YANG Zhiqing. Effects of Phosphorus Application Levels on Agronomic Characters and Yield of Coix lacryma-jobi [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(4): 7-13. |
[5] | CHEN Zhenlu, PAN Xiaoying, LU Yusheng, HUANG Zhenrui, GU Wenjie, GUO Junjie, WEI Bin, ZENG Yuling, LIU Yixuan, HE Jingwei, LI Jiqin. Effects of Organic-inorganic Compound Conditioner on Acidified Soil Properties and Tobacco Yield and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(3): 28-34. |
[6] | ZHANG Yanjun, LIU Jia, ZHANG Zhong, ZHANG Cuiping, LI Jianzeng, HU Xuanjiang, SHI Li’an, GAO Yuxi, LUO Lei, CAI Shujiang, LI Huaihong, RAO Min. Effects of Varieties, Planting Densities, Nitrogen Application Rates and Sowing Modes on Biological Characters and Yield of Waxy Sorghum [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 1-7. |
[7] | LIU Min, ZHAO Cai, FAN Hong, YIN Wen, FAN Zhilong, HU Falong, SUN Yabin. Effects of Long-term Intercropping and No-tillage on Soil Physical Properties and Crop Yield [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 28-35. |
[8] | LIU Kexin, WANG Kexiu, TANG Mingxia, HE Wei, YANG Wenting, LI Ping, HU Jianjun. Effect of Potassium Application Rates on Potato Growth and NPK Accumulation and Distribution [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 51-56. |
[9] | ZHANG Wu, HUANG Wenyan, LIU Yueyan, WANG Jianjian. Effects of Potassium Fertilizer Types on the Growth and Yield of Pepper [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(2): 57-62. |
[10] | JIN Meijuan, SHE Xudong, SHEN Mingxing, LU Changying, TAO Yueyue, WANG Haihou. Production Effect of Strawberry Cultured by Constructing Ridge-type Soil Groove Coupling Substrate in Paddy Field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 71-76. |
[11] | ZHOU Dongdong, ZHANG Jun, GE Mengjie, LIU Zhonghong, ZHU Xiaohuan, LI Chunyan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Treatments on Grain Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and Quality of Late-sowing Wheat ‘Huaimai 36’ Following Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 1-7. |
[12] | WANG Fuyu, CHEN Guiju, SUN Leiming, HUANG Ling, SHAO Minmin, ZHAO Kai, YANG Benzhou, ZHANG Yudan, YAN Lu, WANG Lin. Interaction Between Tillage Modes and Nitrogen Application Rates: Effects on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 20-26. |
[13] | CHEN Yinghua, BAI Ruxiao, WANG Juan, ZHANG Xinjiang, LIU Linghui, LIU Xiaolong, FENG Guorui, WEI Changzhou. Foliar Spraying Uniconazole and Boron: Effects on Yield and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet in Taer Basin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 41-48. |
[14] | LI Xinghua, WANG Huan, ZHANG Sheng, CAI Xingxing, ZHOU Qiang, ZHOU Nan. Nitrogen Application Rate and Mode: Effects on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation and Transport After Flowering of Late Indica Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 6-13. |
[15] | WANG Qiangqiang, YANG Zihui, GUO Shujiang, ZHANG Jianhui, WANG Duoze. Effect of Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Jujube in Arid Desert Area of Minqin [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 71-74. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||