欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2010, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 5-9.

• 畜牧 动物医学 蚕 蜂 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用回归分析与最小二乘法对影响产奶量的因素进行校正的比较研究

白瑞景1,孙少华1,马亚宾2   

  • 收稿日期:2009-11-09 修回日期:2009-12-09 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2010-03-20

A comparision study on the adjusting coefficients estimated by regression analysis and the least square method for milk yield

  • Received:2009-11-09 Revised:2009-12-09 Online:2010-03-20 Published:2010-03-20

摘要:

摘 要:为了校正产犊月份和胎次对产奶量的影响,提高选种的准确性,本文以河北双娃奶牛场815头中国荷斯坦奶牛DHI测定结果为材料,利用回归分析和最小二乘法,制订了不同产犊月份和胎次对产奶量的校正系数。并且对两种研究方法的优劣进行了比较研究。结果表明:两种方法对305天产奶量估计值与实际测定值之间均无显著差异,但利用最小二乘法得出的第一胎305天产奶量估计值与利用回归分析法得出的估计值之间差异显著(P=0.04<0.05),且1至4胎的最小二乘法估计值与实际测定值更为接近。

关键词: 苎麻, 苎麻, 野生种质, 农艺性状, 形态结构, 理化性能

Abstract:

Abstract: To improve the accuracy of breeding , the effects of calving monthes and lactations must be considered. This study is based on the milk yield records of 815 Chinese Holstein Dairy cattle from HeBei ShuangWa dairy farm . The adjusting coefficients of milk yield with calving monthes and lactations were investigated with the simple statistical polynomial regression analysis methord and the least Square method . Besides,a comparision study on the two different methods was carried out. Results shows that there was no significant difference between the milk yield estimited by the adjusting coefficients and the actual calculated 305d milk yield value. But there was a significant difference between the two methods on milk yield estimited at parity Ⅰ((P=0.04<0.05),and milk yield estimited by the adjusting coefficients of the least square method were much closer to the actual values in all the parities fromⅠto Ⅳ .