Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (15): 78-86.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0441
Previous Articles Next Articles
Liu Hong1,2(), Dong Yuanhua1, Sui Yueyu3, Li Jiangang1(
)
Received:
2020-09-08
Revised:
2020-10-09
Online:
2021-05-25
Published:
2021-05-18
Contact:
Li Jiangang
E-mail:liuhong@issas.ac.cn;jgli@issas.ac.cn
CLC Number:
Liu Hong, Dong Yuanhua, Sui Yueyu, Li Jiangang. Soil Microbial Mechanism of Disease Resistant Sugar Beet Variety[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(15): 78-86.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0441
统计指标 | 抗病品种(PT) | 感病品种(ST) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发病轻(PTL) | 发病重(PTH) | 发病轻(STL) | 发病重(STH) | ||
pH | 6.55±0.02d | 6.91±0.04b | 6.69±0.04c | 7.03±0.02a | |
有机碳/% | 1.56±0.05a | 1.52±0.02ab | 1.51±0.03ab | 1.43±0.01c | |
全氮/% | 0.149±0.001b | 0.160±0.001a | 0.146±0.002bc | 0.143±0.002c | |
全磷/% | 0.973±0.053a | 0.800±0.003b | 0.794±0.043b | 0.800±0.032b | |
全钾/% | 0.947±0.027b | 0.905±0.006b | 0.893±0.002b | 1.063±0.051a | |
硝态氮/(mg/kg) | 4.08±0.02c | 6.18±0.02b | 3.93±0.01d | 7.36±0.04a | |
铵态氮/(mg/kg) | 0.52±0.08a | 0.38±0.02b | 0.27±0.04b | 0.36±0.04b | |
有效磷/(mg/kg) | 21.77±0.08a | 8.37±0.08c | 12.10±0.08b | 8.99±0.97c | |
有效钾/(mg/kg) | 27.63±0.68c | 47.30±0.52a | 26.73±1.08c | 39.53±0.58b |
统计指标 | 抗病品种(PT) | 感病品种(ST) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发病轻(PTL) | 发病重(PTH) | 发病轻(STL) | 发病重(STH) | ||
pH | 6.55±0.02d | 6.91±0.04b | 6.69±0.04c | 7.03±0.02a | |
有机碳/% | 1.56±0.05a | 1.52±0.02ab | 1.51±0.03ab | 1.43±0.01c | |
全氮/% | 0.149±0.001b | 0.160±0.001a | 0.146±0.002bc | 0.143±0.002c | |
全磷/% | 0.973±0.053a | 0.800±0.003b | 0.794±0.043b | 0.800±0.032b | |
全钾/% | 0.947±0.027b | 0.905±0.006b | 0.893±0.002b | 1.063±0.051a | |
硝态氮/(mg/kg) | 4.08±0.02c | 6.18±0.02b | 3.93±0.01d | 7.36±0.04a | |
铵态氮/(mg/kg) | 0.52±0.08a | 0.38±0.02b | 0.27±0.04b | 0.36±0.04b | |
有效磷/(mg/kg) | 21.77±0.08a | 8.37±0.08c | 12.10±0.08b | 8.99±0.97c | |
有效钾/(mg/kg) | 27.63±0.68c | 47.30±0.52a | 26.73±1.08c | 39.53±0.58b |
微生物 | 品种 | 病情 | Richness | Shannon | Chao 1 | Faith_pd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
细菌 | 抗病品种(PT) | 发病轻(PTL) | 930±12a | 8.35±0.05a | 974±14a | 44.41±1.21a |
发病重(PTH) | 906±12a | 8.06±0.11a | 989±18a | 44.18±1.20a | ||
感病品种(ST) | 发病轻(STL) | 892±7a | 8.09±0.16a | 947±10a | 44.67±0.39a | |
发病重(STH) | 924±5a | 8.22±0.03a | 970±4a | 42.60±0.33a | ||
真菌 | 抗病品种(PT) | 发病轻(PTL) | 723±16a | 6.27±0.32a | 898±3.52a | 124.27±2.92a |
发病重(PTH) | 580±44b | 5.58±0.34a | 725±39b | 107.70±8.71a | ||
感病品种(ST) | 发病轻(STL) | 653±44ab | 6.17±0.51a | 780±34ab | 116.53±6.39a | |
发病重(STH) | 564±24b | 4.95±0.49a | 740±29b | 105.37±3.27a |
微生物 | 品种 | 病情 | Richness | Shannon | Chao 1 | Faith_pd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
细菌 | 抗病品种(PT) | 发病轻(PTL) | 930±12a | 8.35±0.05a | 974±14a | 44.41±1.21a |
发病重(PTH) | 906±12a | 8.06±0.11a | 989±18a | 44.18±1.20a | ||
感病品种(ST) | 发病轻(STL) | 892±7a | 8.09±0.16a | 947±10a | 44.67±0.39a | |
发病重(STH) | 924±5a | 8.22±0.03a | 970±4a | 42.60±0.33a | ||
真菌 | 抗病品种(PT) | 发病轻(PTL) | 723±16a | 6.27±0.32a | 898±3.52a | 124.27±2.92a |
发病重(PTH) | 580±44b | 5.58±0.34a | 725±39b | 107.70±8.71a | ||
感病品种(ST) | 发病轻(STL) | 653±44ab | 6.17±0.51a | 780±34ab | 116.53±6.39a | |
发病重(STH) | 564±24b | 4.95±0.49a | 740±29b | 105.37±3.27a |
微生物 | 处理 | PERMANOVA | MRPP | ANOSIM | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | R2 | P | δ | P | R | P | ||||
细菌 | 所有样品 | 4.1178 | 0.6069 | 0.001 | 0.2837 | 0.001 | 0.5957 | 0.001 | ||
品种 | 1.3314 | 0.1175 | 0.238 | 0.3829 | 0.135 | 0.06481 | 0.176 | |||
致病状态 | 6.4952 | 0.39376 | 0.007 | 0.3184 | 0.005 | 0.6204 | 0.004 | |||
真菌 | 所有样品 | 2.5362 | 0.4875 | 0.002 | 0.4951 | 0.001 | 0.6296 | 0.001 | ||
品种 | 1.3677 | 0.1203 | 0.181 | 0.5751 | 0.117 | 0.1296 | 0.119 | |||
致病状态 | 3.5073 | 0.2597 | 0.006 | 0.5321 | 0.003 | 0.5333 | 0.002 |
微生物 | 处理 | PERMANOVA | MRPP | ANOSIM | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | R2 | P | δ | P | R | P | ||||
细菌 | 所有样品 | 4.1178 | 0.6069 | 0.001 | 0.2837 | 0.001 | 0.5957 | 0.001 | ||
品种 | 1.3314 | 0.1175 | 0.238 | 0.3829 | 0.135 | 0.06481 | 0.176 | |||
致病状态 | 6.4952 | 0.39376 | 0.007 | 0.3184 | 0.005 | 0.6204 | 0.004 | |||
真菌 | 所有样品 | 2.5362 | 0.4875 | 0.002 | 0.4951 | 0.001 | 0.6296 | 0.001 | ||
品种 | 1.3677 | 0.1203 | 0.181 | 0.5751 | 0.117 | 0.1296 | 0.119 | |||
致病状态 | 3.5073 | 0.2597 | 0.006 | 0.5321 | 0.003 | 0.5333 | 0.002 |
[1] | 韩秉进, 朱向明. 我国甜菜生产发展历程及现状分析[J]. 土壤与作物, 2016,5(02):91-95. |
[2] | 张建平. 额敏糖区甜菜主要病害发生特点及防控措施[J]. 农村科技, 2020(01):24-26. |
[3] | 王文君, 赵灿, 刘梅, 等. 我国甜菜根腐病病原镰刀菌的初步研究[A]. 中国植物病理学会.中国植物病理学会2011年学术年会论文集[C].中国植物病理学会:中国植物病理学会, 2011:1. |
[4] |
Pérez-Jaramillo J E, Mendes R, Raaijmakers J M. Impact of plant domestication on rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2016,90:635-644.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0337-7 URL |
[5] |
Smith K P, Handelsman J. Genetic basis in plants for interactions with disease-suppressive bacteria[J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999,96:4786-4790.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.4786 URL |
[6] |
Smith K P, Goodman R M. Host variation for interactions with beneficial plant-associated microbes[J]. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol, 1999,37:473-491.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.473 URL |
[7] |
Wissuwa M, Mazzola M, Picard C. Novel approaches in plant breeding for rhizosphere-related traits[J]. Plant Soil, 2009,321(1-2):409-430.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9693-2 URL |
[8] |
Xiong W, Li R, Ren Y, et al. Distinct roles for soil fungal and bacterial communities associated with the suppression of vanilla Fusarium wilt disease[J]. Soil Biol. Biochem, 2017,107:198-207.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.010 URL |
[9] |
Mendes R, Kruijt M, Bruijn I D, et al. Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria[J]. Science, 2011,332(6033):1097-100.
doi: 10.1126/science.1203980 URL |
[10] | Chapelle E, Mendes R, Bakker P, et al. Fungal invasion of the rhizosphere microbiome[J]. ISME J. 2015,10. |
[11] |
Raaijmakers J M, Mazzola M. Soil immune responses[J]. Science, 2016,352(6292):1392-1393.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3252 URL |
[12] |
Mendes R, Garbeva P, Raaijmakers J M. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms[J]. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2013,37(5):634-663.
doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12028 URL |
[13] |
Philippot L, Raaijmakers J M, Lemanceau P, et al. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2013,11(11):789-799.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109 URL |
[14] | Berg G, Grube M, Schloter M, et al. Unraveling the plant microbiome: looking back and future perspectives[J]. Front Microbiol, 2014,5(148):148. |
[15] |
Yao H, Wu F. Soil microbial community structure in cucumber rhizosphere of different resistance cultivars to fusarium wilt[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2010,72(3):456-463.
doi: 10.1111/fem.2010.72.issue-3 URL |
[16] | Lu R. Analytical methods of soil agrochemistry[J]. China Agricultural Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing, China, 1999:18-99. |
[17] | Caporaso J G, Kuczynski J, Knight R, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data[J]. Nat Methods, 2010,7(5):335-336. |
[18] |
Clarke K R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure[J]. Aust J Ecol, 1993,18(1):117-143.
doi: 10.1111/aec.1993.18.issue-1 URL |
[19] | Parks D H, Tyson G W, Philip H, et al. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014(21):21. |
[20] |
Trivedi P, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Trivedi C, et al. Keystone microbial taxa regulate the invasion of a fungal pathogen in agro-ecosystems[J]. Soil Biol. Biochem, 2017,111:10-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.013 URL |
[21] |
Wang R, Zhang H, Sun L, et al. Microbial community composition is related to soil biological and chemical properties and bacterial wilt outbreak[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7(1):343.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00472-6 URL |
[22] |
Shen Z, Xue C, Penton C R, et al. Suppression of banana Panama disease induced by soil microbiome reconstruction through an integrated agricultural strategy[J]. Soil Biol. Biochem, 2019,128:164-174.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.10.016 URL |
[23] |
Knotek-Smith H M, Crawford D L, Moller G, et al. Microbial studies of a selenium-contaminated mine site and potential for on-site remediation[J]. J Ind. Microbiol. Biot, 2006,33(11):897-913.
pmid: 16804682 |
[24] |
Hu Q, Tan L, Deng Y, et al. Network analysis infers the wilt pathogen invasion associated with non-detrimental bacteria[J]. npj Biofilms and Microbiomes, 2020,6(1):8.
doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-0117-2 URL |
[25] |
Mendes L, Raaijmakers J, Hollander M, et al. Influence of resistance breeding in common bean on rhizosphere microbiome composition and function[J]. ISME J, 2017,12:212-224.
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.158 URL |
[26] | Wei Z, Gu Y, Shen Q, et al. Initial soil microbiome composition and functioning predetermine future plant health[J]. Sci. Adv, 2019,5(9):eaaw0759-eaaw0759. |
[27] |
Wei Z, Hu J, Shen Q, et al. Ralstonia solanacearum pathogen disrupts bacterial rhizosphere microbiome during an invasion[J]. Soil Biol. Biochem, 2017,118:8-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.012 URL |
[28] |
Wang R, Xiao Y, Lv F, et al. Bacterial community structure and functional potential of rhizosphere soils as influenced by nitrogen addition and bacterial wilt disease under continuous sesame cropping[J]. Appl. Soil Ecol, 2017,125:117-127.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.12.014 URL |
[29] |
Siegel-Hertz K, Edel-Hermann V, Chapelle E, et al. Comparative Microbiome Analysis of a Fusarium Wilt Suppressive Soil and a Fusarium Wilt Conducive Soil From the Châteaurenard Region[J]. Front Microbiol, 2018,9:568.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00568 pmid: 29670584 |
[30] |
Rouphael Y, Franken P, Schneider C, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi act as biostimulants in horticultural crops[J]. Sci. Hortic, 2015,196:91-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.002 URL |
[31] |
Schisler D A, Slininger P, Behle R, et al. Formulation of Bacillus spp. for Biological Control of Plant Diseases[J]. Phytopathology, 2004,94:1267-1271.
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1267 pmid: 18944465 |
[32] |
Al-Mughrabi K. Biological control of Fusarium dry rot and other potato tuber diseases using Pseudomonas fluorescens and Enterobacter cloacae[J]. Biol. Control, 2010,53:280-284.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.01.010 URL |
[33] |
Rosier A, Bishnoi U, Lakshmanan V, et al. A perspective on inter-kingdom signaling in plant-beneficial microbe interactions[J]. Plant Mol Biol, 2016,90:537-54.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0433-3 URL |
[34] | Nguyen N H, Song Z, Bates S T, et al. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild[J]. Fungal Ecol, 2016,20:241-248. |
[1] | SUN Shuqing, DING Wei, SUN Rui, ZHANG Xicai, LAN Guoyu, CHEN Wei, YANG Chuan, WU Zhixiang. Soil Bacterial Community of Rubber Plantations of Different Ages of Stand: Composition and Diversity Study [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(9): 93-100. |
[2] | CHEN Dao, WANG Xin, JIANG Shan, ZHANG Jie, WU Zujian, DING Xinlun. Strawberry Mottle Virus Isolated in Fujian: Complete Genome Sequence and Molecular Variation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(6): 94-101. |
[3] | WANG Yan, WANG Liwei, ZHAO Hongyan, ZHAO Min, YANG Hongyan. Characteristics of Nutrients and Microbial Community Composition of Different Panax ginseng Cultivation Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(5): 60-68. |
[4] | LIU Qi, GAO Zhiqiang, YANG Zhenping, QIAO Yuejing. Rational Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rates Improving the Bacterial Community Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Winter Wheat Tillage Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(30): 77-84. |
[5] | CHEN Liuhong, ZHAO Chunlei, WANG Xi, LI Yanli, DING Guangzhou, CHEN Li. Single-cell Transcriptome Sequencing Technology and Its Application in Plant Research [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 87-93. |
[6] | SUI Zhenquan, FAN Jinshi, YIN Chongshan, MAO Jinchao. Chitosan: The Action Mechanism on Plant Pathogens and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(3): 121-126. |
[7] | ZHANG Heqing, WU Jie, HAN Shuai, XI Yadong, LI Yuejian, LIANG Genyun. Effects of Four Annual Rotation Patterns on Soil Microbial Community [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(20): 73-80. |
[8] | ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Guowei, SHANG Kankan. Effects of Intensified Measures on Microbial Diversity in Copper Contaminated Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 96-103. |
[9] | JIANG Lili, GUO Tengda, GONG Qingtao, WU Haibin, SUN Ruihong. Microbial Community Structure Analysis on Different Phenophases of Late-maturing Peach ‘Snow Giant’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(1): 44-52. |
[10] | Wan Renyuan, Ma Huijie, Jiang Bin, Yang Liran, Zhou Dapeng, He Mingzhu, Yang Guangrong. The Fungi Community Structure and Influencing Factors in Tea Gardens Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33): 88-97. |
[11] | Nie Zhijuan, Shao Nailin, Zhang Zhiwei, Hu Jiawen, Xu Pao, Xu Gangchun. Intestine of Acanthopagrus schlegelii and Microbial Communities in the Aquatic Water: Study in Two Culture Modes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(27): 155-164. |
[12] | Gao Xiaoning, Wu Zilin, Huang Yonghong, Liu Rui, Qi Yongwen. Response of Sugarcane Leaves to the Infection of Puccinia melanocephala: Transcriptomic Analysis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(24): 102-109. |
[13] | Fan Na, Peng Zhidong, Bai Wenbin. Analysis of Soil Bacterial Composition, Abundance and Diversity Based on High-throughput Sequencing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(20): 66-70. |
[14] | Cheng Zhichao, Wu Wenyan, Song Yonghui, Sui Xin, Li Mengsha, Yang Libin. Influence of Municipal Solid Waste Stacking on Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Function [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(17): 72-79. |
[15] | Chen Gang, Yu Shihe, Jiang Yiren, Bu Pengtu, Zheng Ying, Feng Jian. Development of SSR Markers for Quercus mongolica Based on High-throughput Sequencing [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(16): 13-17. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||