Effect of Mushroom Residue on Cucumber and Melon Yield and Quality and Soil Fertility in Greenhouse

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0571

Abstract

Abstract:

A field experiment with 7 treatments was conducted, including one application of chicken manure (CON) and six application rates of mushroom residue [0 (MR0), 15 (MR1), 30 (MR2), 45 (MR3), 60 (MR4) and 75 (MR5) t/hm²], to examine the effects mushroom residue on cucumber and melon yield and quality and soil fertility in greenhouse at Shenxian County of Shandong Province. The results showed that application of mushroom residue treatments increased cucumber and melon yield by 28.1%-45.3% and 0.5%-10.4%, respectively, compared with CON, and the effect of MR4 was the best. The yield of cucumber and melon showed a trend of first increase and then decrease with the increase of the application rate of mushroom residue. Compared with CON, application of mushroom residue treatments increased cucumber and melon quality, and the effects of MR3 and MR4 were the best. The application of mushroom residue decreased soil pH by 2.1%-2.4% and soil EC value by 29.8%-48.1%, increased organic matter by 11.2%-33.1%, it also increased the soil N, P, K content and activation coefficient. In conclusion, the appropriate application of mushroom residue is the optimum choice to improve cucumber and melon yield and quality, elevate soil fertility and soil quality, and reduce soil pH and EC value, and the effect of MR4 (60 t/hm²) is the best.

Key words: mushroom residue, cucumber, melon, yield, quality, soil fertility

CLC Number:

S165

Zhao Zichao, Zhao Shifeng, Zhang Hongqi, Zhang Hailan, Guo Bing, Yao Li. Effect of Mushroom Residue on Cucumber and Melon Yield and Quality and Soil Fertility in Greenhouse[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(19): 112-118.

Figures/Tables 5

References 30

[1]	苗晓颖, 苗纪忠, 侯秋菊, 等. 山东莘县蔬菜规模化生产经营模式浅析[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018(7):19-24.
[2]	李少龙, 王泽奇. 山东莘县农业转型升级发展现状——以蔬菜产业为例[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2019, 569(5):10-12.
[3]	周新伟, 王海候, 陆长婴, 等. 秸秆堆腐物的基质化改良及育苗效应研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(2):182-190.
[4]	何梓林, 杨鲜, 孟晓霞, 等. 菌渣生物炭对镉污染土壤性质及小白菜吸收镉的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(1):342-346,354.
[5]	Meng X Y, Dai J L, Zhang Y, et al. Composted biogas residue and spent mushroom substrate as a growth medium for tomato and pepper seedlings[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 216:62-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.056 URL
[6]	Rao A C S, Smith J L, Parr J F, et al. Considerations in estimating Nitrogen Recovery Efficiency by the difference and isotopic dilution methods[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1992, 33(3):209-217.
[7]	黄武强, 周红. 提高环境效益的食用菌菌渣循环再利用方式[J]. 中国食用菌, 2019, 38(1):104-106.
[8]	聂胜委, 张巧萍, 李向东, 等. 施用不同菌渣肥对小麦玉米轮作系统土壤养分的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(4):588-594.
[9]	马征, 崔荣宗, 宫志远, 等. 葱麦轮作模式下菌渣有机肥与氮肥配施对作物产量、品质的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(9):102-107.
[10]	田平平, 何铭烽, 李碧瑶, 等. 施用不同草菇菌渣对生菜产量、品质及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2015, 49(2):203-207.
[11]	胡留杰, 李燕, 田时炳, 等. 菌渣还田对菜地土壤理化性状、微生物及酶活性的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(1):98-104.
[12]	齐广耀, 李增安, 左杰, 等. 大球盖菇菌渣改良滨海盐碱土试验[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(4):126-130.
[13]	Du Y D, Cao H X, Liu S Q, et al. Response of yield, quality, water and nitrogen use efficiency of tomato to different levels of water and nitrogen under drip irrigation in Northwestern China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(5):1153-1161. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61371-0 URL
[14]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[15]	姚佳璇, 俄胜哲, 袁金华, 等. 施肥对灌漠土作物产量、土壤肥力与重金属含量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报:中英文, 2020, 28(6):813-825.
[16]	滕青, 曾梦凤, 林慧凡, 等. 菌渣还田对生菜生长、土壤养分及酶活性的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(6):30-36.
[17]	石思博, 王旭东, 叶正钱, 等. 菌渣化肥配施对稻田土壤微生物量碳氮和可溶性碳氮的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23):8612-8620.
[18]	温广蝉, 叶正钱, 王旭东, 等. 菌渣还田对稻田土壤养分动态变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012(3):82-86.
[19]	Postemsky P D, Marinangeli P A, Curvetto N R. Recycling of residual substrate from Ganoderma lucidum mushroom cultivation as biodegradable containers for horticultural seedlings[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 201:329-337. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.02.021 URL
[20]	陈雯雯, 申卫收, 韩成, 等. 施用不同配比菇渣、熟牛粪对酸性土壤质量和花生产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2014(1):69-74.
[21]	刘中良, 焦娟, 谷端银, 等. 菌渣基质栽培对日光温室番茄品质和产量的影响[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2018, 25(2):13-16.
[22]	Song B, Ye J Q, Sossah F L, et al. Assessing the effects of different agro-residue as substrates on growth cycle and yield of Grifola frondosa and statistical optimization of substrate components using simplex-lattice design[J]. Amb Express, 2018, 8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0565-8 URL
[23]	Hou Y X, Yang J, Hu X J, et al. Effect of organic fertilizers used in sandy soil on the growth of tomatoes[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 726-731:90-93.
[24]	吴韶辉, 温明霞, 王鹏, 等. 菌渣还田对本地早光合作用和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江柑橘, 2019, 36(1):15-20.
[25]	刘鸣达, 王秋凝, 魏佳伦, 等. 羊粪-菇渣蚓粪与化肥配施对油麦菜产量及品质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(6):1760-1766.
[26]	张颖, 牟森, 张金梅, 等. 不同配比菇渣基质对黄瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019, 11:1-5.
[27]	刘中良, 郑建利, 孙哲, 等. 麦秸、稻壳及菌渣还田对设施菜地的青椒品质及产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017, 1:98-102.
[28]	Zhang J, Wang P C, Fang L, et al. Isolation and characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from mushroom residues and their effect on tomato plant growth promotion[J]. Polish Journal of Microbiology, 2017, 66(1):57-65. doi: 10.5604/17331331.1234993 pmid: 29359698
[29]	Phan C W, Sabaratnam V. Potential uses of spent mushroom substrate and its associated lignocellulosic enzymes[J]. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 2012, 96(4):863-873. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4446-9 URL
[30]	胡杨勇, 马嘉伟, 叶正钱, 等. 稻耳轮作制度下连续菌渣还田对土壤肥力性状的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(6):172-176.

作物	处理	Vc含量/(mg/kg)	硝酸盐含量/(mg/kg)	可溶性糖含量/%	酸度/%
黄瓜	CON	8.18±0.54c	71.6±1.34a	0.84±0.03b	1.27±0.03a
	MR0	5.59±0.01d	35.1±2.7d	0.69±0.01c	1.47±0.26a
	MR1	8.45±0.24bc	50.9±1.38c	0.79±0.01b	1.31±0.03a
	MR2	8.58±0.19bc	53.5±1.06bc	0.92±0.03a	1.33±0.03a
	MR3	9.3±1.05ab	55.5±5.21bc	0.93±0.02a	1.33±0.12a
	MR4	10.4±1.54a	64.3±8.25ab	0.90±0.04a	1.35±0.05a
	MR5	10.7±1.23a	65.3±21.17ab	0.94±0.01a	1.32±0.09a
甜瓜	CON	60.0±9.6bc	82.5±5.3a	7.45±0.30a	0.17±0.02a
	MR0	50.2±10.7c	44.1±18.7b	6.86±0.54a	0.20±0.03a
	MR1	76.5±0.3abc	70.2±7.5ab	7.05±1.00a	0.21±0.04a
	MR2	94.3±5.7ab	76.1±9.8ab	7.02±0.16a	0.17±0.02a
	MR3	100.2±24.7a	83.5±3.5a	7.77±0.80a	0.20±0.02a
	MR4	93.4±7.4ab	86.0±56.4a	8.00±0.71a	0.19±0.03a
	MR5	81.7±26.5abc	82.7±16.9a	7.87±0.21a	0.20±0.06a

作物	处理	Vc含量/(mg/kg)	硝酸盐含量/(mg/kg)	可溶性糖含量/%	酸度/%
黄瓜	CON	8.18±0.54c	71.6±1.34a	0.84±0.03b	1.27±0.03a
	MR0	5.59±0.01d	35.1±2.7d	0.69±0.01c	1.47±0.26a
	MR1	8.45±0.24bc	50.9±1.38c	0.79±0.01b	1.31±0.03a
	MR2	8.58±0.19bc	53.5±1.06bc	0.92±0.03a	1.33±0.03a
	MR3	9.3±1.05ab	55.5±5.21bc	0.93±0.02a	1.33±0.12a
	MR4	10.4±1.54a	64.3±8.25ab	0.90±0.04a	1.35±0.05a
	MR5	10.7±1.23a	65.3±21.17ab	0.94±0.01a	1.32±0.09a
甜瓜	CON	60.0±9.6bc	82.5±5.3a	7.45±0.30a	0.17±0.02a
	MR0	50.2±10.7c	44.1±18.7b	6.86±0.54a	0.20±0.03a
	MR1	76.5±0.3abc	70.2±7.5ab	7.05±1.00a	0.21±0.04a
	MR2	94.3±5.7ab	76.1±9.8ab	7.02±0.16a	0.17±0.02a
	MR3	100.2±24.7a	83.5±3.5a	7.77±0.80a	0.20±0.02a
	MR4	93.4±7.4ab	86.0±56.4a	8.00±0.71a	0.19±0.03a
	MR5	81.7±26.5abc	82.7±16.9a	7.87±0.21a	0.20±0.06a

处理	pH	EC/ (μS/cm)	有机质/ (g/kg)	全氮/ (g/kg)	全磷/ (g/kg)	全钾/ (g/kg)	速效氮/ (mg/kg)	速效磷/ (mg/kg)	速效钾/ (mg/kg)
CON	8.05±0.04a	586.5±30.6a	17.0±0.59d	1.16±0.02e	1.25±0.05c	38.2±1.53ab	78.3±2.4d	54.7±1.88c	428±11.1c
MR0	7.88±0.03b	281.8±16.8c	14.2±0.47e	0.76±0.01g	0.98±0.01e	35.9±0.48c	46.6±1.52e	33.9±1.64e	339±1.2e
MR1	7.86±0.06b	304.4±10.2c	19.0±0.47c	1.19±0.02d	1.27±0.03bc	39.2±1.62b	88.0±5.2c	41.4±2.79d	459±6.4b
MR2	7.85±0.06b	381.6±20.1b	18.9±0.03c	1.09±0.01f	1.12±0.04d	38.0±1.06bc	108.0±3.18b	44.5±0.98d	416±20.9c
MR3	7.86±0.09b	390.3±22.6b	20.6±1.1b	1.39±0.02c	1.31±0.08ab	38.4±1.91bc	130.3±2.41a	56.3±2.60c	415±16.2c
MR4	7.85±0.06b	403.1±30.6b	22.6±0.27a	1.50±0.01a	1.35±0.04ab	38.3±0.58bc	132.1±6.43a	70.6±0.51b	391±4.2d
MR5	7.88±0.08b	411.6±25.8b	22.4±0.22a	1.46±0.01b	1.39±0.05a	41.8±1.76a	134.9±7.32a	80.5±7.32a	492±8.7a

处理	pH	EC/ (μS/cm)	有机质/ (g/kg)	全氮/ (g/kg)	全磷/ (g/kg)	全钾/ (g/kg)	速效氮/ (mg/kg)	速效磷/ (mg/kg)	速效钾/ (mg/kg)
CON	8.05±0.04a	586.5±30.6a	17.0±0.59d	1.16±0.02e	1.25±0.05c	38.2±1.53ab	78.3±2.4d	54.7±1.88c	428±11.1c
MR0	7.88±0.03b	281.8±16.8c	14.2±0.47e	0.76±0.01g	0.98±0.01e	35.9±0.48c	46.6±1.52e	33.9±1.64e	339±1.2e
MR1	7.86±0.06b	304.4±10.2c	19.0±0.47c	1.19±0.02d	1.27±0.03bc	39.2±1.62b	88.0±5.2c	41.4±2.79d	459±6.4b
MR2	7.85±0.06b	381.6±20.1b	18.9±0.03c	1.09±0.01f	1.12±0.04d	38.0±1.06bc	108.0±3.18b	44.5±0.98d	416±20.9c
MR3	7.86±0.09b	390.3±22.6b	20.6±1.1b	1.39±0.02c	1.31±0.08ab	38.4±1.91bc	130.3±2.41a	56.3±2.60c	415±16.2c
MR4	7.85±0.06b	403.1±30.6b	22.6±0.27a	1.50±0.01a	1.35±0.04ab	38.3±0.58bc	132.1±6.43a	70.6±0.51b	391±4.2d
MR5	7.88±0.08b	411.6±25.8b	22.4±0.22a	1.46±0.01b	1.39±0.05a	41.8±1.76a	134.9±7.32a	80.5±7.32a	492±8.7a